• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:20
CET 14:20
KST 22:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced! What's the best tug of war? The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion How soO Began His ProGaming Dreams Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA)
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB SemiFinals - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB & LB Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread 12 Days of Starcraft The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1478 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1443

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 5396 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:28:14
May 09 2019 21:23 GMT
#28841
I'm genuinely curious as to how many of the posters around here truly believe that Trump's comment at the rally is a big deal. I'd really like to know who each of these posters is for future reference.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
May 09 2019 21:27 GMT
#28842
Well, I'm taking xdaunt's name down as a poster who truly believe that discussing whether or not Trump's comment at the rally is important enough to talk about, whilst simultaneously beleiving that Trump's comment at the rally is not important enough to talk about.

Just for future reference.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23515 Posts
May 09 2019 21:28 GMT
#28843
On May 10 2019 06:23 xDaunt wrote:
I'm genuinely curious as to how many of the posters around here truly believe that Trump's comment at the rally is important enough to talk about. I'd really like to know who each of these posters is for future reference.


I think there's two distinct things you're getting at.

1. The political effectiveness of this as a talking point

2. The troubling nature of the comments amidst an already toxic social atmosphere.


1. You're right, it's largely useless as a political talking point

2. You're wrong about this comment in the greater context of rhetoric and actions reflective of fascist tendencies and "cultural" ethnostates.

At least that's my position.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:34:42
May 09 2019 21:32 GMT
#28844
I don't know, I have a hard time beleiving that all of Trumps fanbase are ok with what he said in the rally. Perhaps that is why xdaunt is trying so hard to shut discussion down. If they all truly are, you better get out of USA as fast as possible GH, it's going to get real ugly for you.
Saryph
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1955 Posts
May 09 2019 21:36 GMT
#28845
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?



Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18843 Posts
May 09 2019 21:40 GMT
#28846
Frankly, the shit goes on in many state legislatures is just as bad, if not worse, than what is happening at the federal level. For one thing, special interest capture becomes easier to accomplish as the scale goes down, and many states have passed term limits that have basically made sure that the only permanent fixtures at the table of state government are the lobbyists.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
May 09 2019 21:44 GMT
#28847
Every state handles introducing amendments and voting on them differently. This is Georgia. Maybe three raised hands is sufficient for some proceedings. Clip doesn’t have context of a motion and vote on a motion before the theatrics or wild protest starts. Roll call vote might’ve been requested. Maybe the only motion was motion to table.

The chair recognized the point of order, which is generally shared in assemblies/legislatures of the states.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:48:53
May 09 2019 21:46 GMT
#28848
I've seen auctions pass slower than that. The guy talking just ignores the other guy shouting whoa whoa whoa. He speaks so fast that I swear he just says shambles right after the guys says "I will". .

Danglars showing that he does not care for democracy. As long as his side wins.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
May 09 2019 21:48 GMT
#28849
On May 10 2019 06:46 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I've seen auctions pass slower than that. The guy talking just ignores the other guy shouting whoa whoa whoa.

Danglars showing that he does not care for democracy. As long as his side wins.


Danglars didnt endorse anything... he just said this could be what happened and guess with lack of context.
there is nothing wrong with what he said or anyway you could get that from this one post
Something witty
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:11:22
May 09 2019 21:48 GMT
#28850
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.

I asked because I was curious how you saw the issue. You've made that abundantly clear.

What the people at the rally said wasn't funny to me. What Trump said wasn't funny to me. That doesn't register as a joke to me. You can spin it however you like. The immigrants they threaten to shoot wouldn't find that funny. You have Trump supporters collecting thousands of guns, waiting for the chance to use them. They hear Trump and his supporters say these things at a rally, and they listen in earnest. This is not a joke to them. It's a White Supremacist rallying cry, by a bunch of White Supremacists. So I'm really happy for you that, in your privilege, you can sit there in all your smugness and say that the power Trump has is beneath you. But this is not funny to me, it's goddamn terrifying. It should be the same for you.

I've laid my cards out, now that you've pressed me. You've made it clear just how funny you think this whole issue is. But I can guarantee you that the thousands of people that listen and cheer for Trump, and bring up the idea of shooting immigrants in a very public venue, they don't think it's funny. They think it's serious. So really, I don't care how funny you think it is. Good for you that you can be so detached about it. I'm glad I could insult you so with my stupid question.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:54:08
May 09 2019 21:49 GMT
#28851
On May 10 2019 06:48 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:46 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I've seen auctions pass slower than that. The guy talking just ignores the other guy shouting whoa whoa whoa.

Danglars showing that he does not care for democracy. As long as his side wins.


Danglars didnt endorse anything... he just said this could be what happened and guess with lack of context.
there is nothing wrong with what he said or anyway you could get that from this one post

Did he watch the same video? The context is the video. When the man at the bottom right raised he had and said I will. The guy in the upper chair just ignores him. Words were spoken like "All those in favour say aye. Any oppose? Motion is passed" All in quick succession.

Just wow. This cannot be how any motion is supposed to be passed and we have some crackpot ceremonies in the UK.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 09 2019 21:53 GMT
#28852
On May 10 2019 06:36 Saryph wrote:
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?

https://twitter.com/arlenparsa/status/1126525787451154432

Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.

It has become more normal, if that makes sense. We are seeing a lot of aggressive bills like this being passed in states held by Republicans. The new conservative Supreme Court hasn't been tested on abortion and they are desperate to see how much they can get away with.

But the answer is that a bunch Republicans would support jailing women for getting abortions, if they could. And the rest just don't think it is a very important issue.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11686 Posts
May 09 2019 22:02 GMT
#28853
On May 10 2019 06:53 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:36 Saryph wrote:
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?

https://twitter.com/arlenparsa/status/1126525787451154432

Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.

It has become more normal, if that makes sense. We are seeing a lot of aggressive bills like this being passed in states held by Republicans. The new conservative Supreme Court hasn't been tested on abortion and they are desperate to see how much they can get away with.

But the answer is that a bunch Republicans would support jailing women for getting abortions, if they could. And the rest just don't think it is a very important issue.


Yeah, but this is more about the process than the result.

Sure, we can talk forever about abortion and how much republicans suck. (Also a valid topic, but a different one)

But what i find most weird here (And what i think was why that video was posted) is that there does not seem to actually be any vote or anything, the chairman just waves the whole thing through. There does not seem to be even a short pause in between "Any opposed" and "Motion passed"

Which does not sound like that is how it is supposed to be from my laymans perspective. If you ask for a reaction, you should give enough time for that reaction to happen before moving on. Especially since there were clearly some people opposed.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:11:15
May 09 2019 22:07 GMT
#28854
On May 10 2019 07:02 Simberto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:53 Plansix wrote:
On May 10 2019 06:36 Saryph wrote:
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?

https://twitter.com/arlenparsa/status/1126525787451154432

Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.

It has become more normal, if that makes sense. We are seeing a lot of aggressive bills like this being passed in states held by Republicans. The new conservative Supreme Court hasn't been tested on abortion and they are desperate to see how much they can get away with.

But the answer is that a bunch Republicans would support jailing women for getting abortions, if they could. And the rest just don't think it is a very important issue.


Yeah, but this is more about the process than the result.

Sure, we can talk forever about abortion and how much republicans suck. (Also a valid topic, but a different one)

But what i find most weird here (And what i think was why that video was posted) is that there does not seem to actually be any vote or anything, the chairman just waves the whole thing through. There does not seem to be even a short pause in between "Any opposed" and "Motion passed"

Which does not sound like that is how it is supposed to be from my laymans perspective. If you ask for a reaction, you should give enough time for that reaction to happen before moving on. Especially since there were clearly some people opposed.

It is an amendment to a proposed bill, so what happened there is not the final vote. People can add things onto a bill, but that doesn't mean it becomes law.

The US systems are not like parliamentary systems. We have two separate parts of our legislature that both draft bills and consolidate them to become one, final bill that then goes to the executive(governor or president) to be signed or vetoed. And I just give you the super condensed version. So what you saw there was a tiny part of a much larger process. Amendments can be added and killed at any point long that long path.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:10:39
May 09 2019 22:09 GMT
#28855
On May 10 2019 06:17 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 05:53 brian wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.


i get the sentiment and if you’ll let me i’ll put some words in your mouth in the sense that in parading around similar failures, at the very least, we would all then agree they’re faux pas. or some people
may choose to try to defend the democrats respective faux pas(though i would like to think i would not be one of them.)

if i’m off base, i’m sorry.

also i just realized i have no idea how to pluralize faux pas. google says it’s already plural, like moose. in case anyone else needed to learn that too.

My point is the following: regardless of whether what Trump said is actually a faux pas, who really gives a fuck? It's not informative. It's not interesting. It's not going to change anyone's mind about Trump. This is why I don't bother bringing up similar shit that Democrats say/do.

As I have pointed out many times in this thread over the past few years, Democrats and liberals have demonstrated a real problem with being able to discern between important grounds to attack Trump on and trivial grounds to attack Trump on. Most people simply tune it all out now.


Idk did you think Obama’s association with Rev. Wright and his Chicago church community was a big deal? I’m not saying you did but plenty of people who watched Fox News did.

What is so offensive is not the joke itself (which is actually kind of funny) but that Trump always seems to find himself associating with these types of ignorant people, and, even worse, has to pander to them to get/stay elected. Just file it under “another reminder that Trump’s base is comprised of a lot of racist people.”
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
May 09 2019 22:11 GMT
#28856
On May 10 2019 06:48 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.

I asked because I was curious how you saw the issue. You've made that abundantly clear.

What the people at the rally said wasn't funny to me. What Trump said wasn't funny to me. That doesn't register as a joke to me. You can spin it however you like. The immigrants they threaten to shoot wouldn't find that funny. You have Trump supporters collecting thousands of guns, waiting for the chance to use them. They hear Trump and his supporters say these things at a rally, and they listen in earnest. This is not a joke to them. It's a White Supremacist rallying cry, by a bunch of White Supremacists. So I'm really happy for you that, in your privilege, you can sit there in all your smugness and say that the power Trump has is beneath you. But this is not funny to me, it's goddamn terrifying. It should be the same for you.

I've laid my cards out, now that you've pressed me. You've made it clear just how funny you think this whole issue is. But I can guarantee you that the thousands of people that listen and cheer for Trump, and bring up the idea of shooting immigrants in a very public venue, they don't think it's funny. They think it's serious. So really, I don't care how funny you think it is. Good for you that you can be so detached about it.


Pretty much nothing that you have written here is accurate about what I have said, so apparently nothing that I have said is "abundantly clear" to you. Your post is a giant straw man. So, no I'm not interested in your cards. You can play with yourself.

User was temp banned for this post.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
May 09 2019 22:13 GMT
#28857
On May 10 2019 07:11 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:48 NewSunshine wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.

I asked because I was curious how you saw the issue. You've made that abundantly clear.

What the people at the rally said wasn't funny to me. What Trump said wasn't funny to me. That doesn't register as a joke to me. You can spin it however you like. The immigrants they threaten to shoot wouldn't find that funny. You have Trump supporters collecting thousands of guns, waiting for the chance to use them. They hear Trump and his supporters say these things at a rally, and they listen in earnest. This is not a joke to them. It's a White Supremacist rallying cry, by a bunch of White Supremacists. So I'm really happy for you that, in your privilege, you can sit there in all your smugness and say that the power Trump has is beneath you. But this is not funny to me, it's goddamn terrifying. It should be the same for you.

I've laid my cards out, now that you've pressed me. You've made it clear just how funny you think this whole issue is. But I can guarantee you that the thousands of people that listen and cheer for Trump, and bring up the idea of shooting immigrants in a very public venue, they don't think it's funny. They think it's serious. So really, I don't care how funny you think it is. Good for you that you can be so detached about it.


Pretty much nothing that you have written here is accurate about what I have said, so apparently nothing that I have said is "abundantly clear" to you. Your post is a giant straw man. So, no I'm not interested in your cards. You can play with yourself.

I'm not talking about what you've said. I don't really care. Your assessment of the rally is one perspective, and it's one I don't imagine that many people share in that crowd. I really don't care when you go to such lengths to convince me that you don't take "jokes" like that seriously. Because that crowd is filled with tons and tons of not-you people. They don't all have the same strength of virtue you clearly have.

Your input is not necessary. I just wanted to give you an opportunity to see if you could recognize that.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:21:18
May 09 2019 22:16 GMT
#28858
On May 10 2019 07:09 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:17 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:53 brian wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.


i get the sentiment and if you’ll let me i’ll put some words in your mouth in the sense that in parading around similar failures, at the very least, we would all then agree they’re faux pas. or some people
may choose to try to defend the democrats respective faux pas(though i would like to think i would not be one of them.)

if i’m off base, i’m sorry.

also i just realized i have no idea how to pluralize faux pas. google says it’s already plural, like moose. in case anyone else needed to learn that too.

My point is the following: regardless of whether what Trump said is actually a faux pas, who really gives a fuck? It's not informative. It's not interesting. It's not going to change anyone's mind about Trump. This is why I don't bother bringing up similar shit that Democrats say/do.

As I have pointed out many times in this thread over the past few years, Democrats and liberals have demonstrated a real problem with being able to discern between important grounds to attack Trump on and trivial grounds to attack Trump on. Most people simply tune it all out now.


Idk did you think Obama’s association with Rev. Wright and his Chicago church community was a big deal? I’m not saying you did but plenty of people who watched Fox News did.


I thought that Obama's association with Rev. Wright and other radicals was a big deal worth discussing as it pertained to his world view and how he was likely to act as president. There's a big difference between the significance of the comments of the pastor at the church that you have been attending for 20+ years and and the significance of the comment of some random guy at your campaign rally.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:23:41
May 09 2019 22:22 GMT
#28859
As someone who attended church for 20 years, the pastor of the church had zero impact on my world views. Now the people at the church, like my grandparents, they mattered. And were also smarter and better read than both of the pastors. And we spent a good chunk of time complaining about those pastors, because that is what you do at church. Given my experience, I find it doubtful that the pastor at the church has negligible impact on Obama's world views, especially given Obama's impressive education and accomplishments.

But man, it does make for an impressive line of attack, to think that Obama was taking this guys counsel for all this time. I can see why Fox News latched on. Not really seeing how anyone of substance believed it, however.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7681 Posts
May 09 2019 22:23 GMT
#28860
On May 10 2019 07:16 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 07:09 IgnE wrote:
On May 10 2019 06:17 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:53 brian wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.


i get the sentiment and if you’ll let me i’ll put some words in your mouth in the sense that in parading around similar failures, at the very least, we would all then agree they’re faux pas. or some people
may choose to try to defend the democrats respective faux pas(though i would like to think i would not be one of them.)

if i’m off base, i’m sorry.

also i just realized i have no idea how to pluralize faux pas. google says it’s already plural, like moose. in case anyone else needed to learn that too.

My point is the following: regardless of whether what Trump said is actually a faux pas, who really gives a fuck? It's not informative. It's not interesting. It's not going to change anyone's mind about Trump. This is why I don't bother bringing up similar shit that Democrats say/do.

As I have pointed out many times in this thread over the past few years, Democrats and liberals have demonstrated a real problem with being able to discern between important grounds to attack Trump on and trivial grounds to attack Trump on. Most people simply tune it all out now.


Idk did you think Obama’s association with Rev. Wright and his Chicago church community was a big deal? I’m not saying you did but plenty of people who watched Fox News did.


I thought that Obama's association with Rev. Wright and other radicals was a big deal worth discussing as it pertained to his world view and how he was likely to act as president. There's a big difference between the significance of the comments of the pastor at the church that you have been attending for 20+ years and and the significance of the comment of some random guy at your campaign rally.


yeah maybe except in this case many people justifiably believe that a large number of people in Trump’s audiences believe such comments
The unrealistic sound of these propositions is indicative, not of their utopian character, but of the strength of the forces which prevent their realization.
Prev 1 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 5396 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
2025 December Finals
Classic vs PercivalLIVE!
CranKy Ducklings587
IndyStarCraft 270
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 270
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 35625
Rain 8787
Sea 5364
Jaedong 1709
GuemChi 993
EffOrt 814
Stork 724
Light 460
Mini 413
Soma 344
[ Show more ]
Hyuk 283
PianO 277
hero 256
firebathero 240
Mong 222
Rush 214
ggaemo 198
Last 163
Mind 130
Hyun 92
sorry 84
Barracks 81
Shuttle 77
Pusan 71
ToSsGirL 57
Sea.KH 52
soO 43
Yoon 37
Terrorterran 33
yabsab 30
zelot 21
Sexy 21
Shine 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 14
SilentControl 11
JulyZerg 9
Icarus 6
eros_byul 0
Dota 2
XcaliburYe1237
League of Legends
C9.Mang0416
Counter-Strike
x6flipin1045
Other Games
B2W.Neo2046
Pyrionflax524
Mew2King56
MindelVK18
Hui .0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick707
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 89
• LUISG 23
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler79
League of Legends
• Jankos2217
Upcoming Events
OSC
4h 40m
BSL 21
6h 40m
Cross vs Dewalt
Replay Cast
19h 40m
Wardi Open
22h 40m
OSC
1d 22h
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
OSC
5 days
OSC
6 days
OSC
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1: W2
Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.