• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:02
CET 07:02
KST 15:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [G] How to playtest arcade maps [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
Sagi.gg Launcher Released List of top players active on ShieldBattery Rollback Netcode in Brood War BW General Discussion [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [$1250] International ShieldBattery League Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Stratus: Battle for the sky now on steam Early acc
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Playlenda
Playlendapro
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9146 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1443

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 6071 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:28:14
May 09 2019 21:23 GMT
#28841
I'm genuinely curious as to how many of the posters around here truly believe that Trump's comment at the rally is a big deal. I'd really like to know who each of these posters is for future reference.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
May 09 2019 21:27 GMT
#28842
Well, I'm taking xdaunt's name down as a poster who truly believe that discussing whether or not Trump's comment at the rally is important enough to talk about, whilst simultaneously beleiving that Trump's comment at the rally is not important enough to talk about.

Just for future reference.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24505 Posts
May 09 2019 21:28 GMT
#28843
On May 10 2019 06:23 xDaunt wrote:
I'm genuinely curious as to how many of the posters around here truly believe that Trump's comment at the rally is important enough to talk about. I'd really like to know who each of these posters is for future reference.


I think there's two distinct things you're getting at.

1. The political effectiveness of this as a talking point

2. The troubling nature of the comments amidst an already toxic social atmosphere.


1. You're right, it's largely useless as a political talking point

2. You're wrong about this comment in the greater context of rhetoric and actions reflective of fascist tendencies and "cultural" ethnostates.

At least that's my position.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:34:42
May 09 2019 21:32 GMT
#28844
I don't know, I have a hard time beleiving that all of Trumps fanbase are ok with what he said in the rally. Perhaps that is why xdaunt is trying so hard to shut discussion down. If they all truly are, you better get out of USA as fast as possible GH, it's going to get real ugly for you.
Saryph
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1955 Posts
May 09 2019 21:36 GMT
#28845
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?



Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18876 Posts
May 09 2019 21:40 GMT
#28846
Frankly, the shit goes on in many state legislatures is just as bad, if not worse, than what is happening at the federal level. For one thing, special interest capture becomes easier to accomplish as the scale goes down, and many states have passed term limits that have basically made sure that the only permanent fixtures at the table of state government are the lobbyists.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
May 09 2019 21:44 GMT
#28847
Every state handles introducing amendments and voting on them differently. This is Georgia. Maybe three raised hands is sufficient for some proceedings. Clip doesn’t have context of a motion and vote on a motion before the theatrics or wild protest starts. Roll call vote might’ve been requested. Maybe the only motion was motion to table.

The chair recognized the point of order, which is generally shared in assemblies/legislatures of the states.
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:48:53
May 09 2019 21:46 GMT
#28848
I've seen auctions pass slower than that. The guy talking just ignores the other guy shouting whoa whoa whoa. He speaks so fast that I swear he just says shambles right after the guys says "I will". .

Danglars showing that he does not care for democracy. As long as his side wins.
IyMoon
Profile Joined April 2016
United States1249 Posts
May 09 2019 21:48 GMT
#28849
On May 10 2019 06:46 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I've seen auctions pass slower than that. The guy talking just ignores the other guy shouting whoa whoa whoa.

Danglars showing that he does not care for democracy. As long as his side wins.


Danglars didnt endorse anything... he just said this could be what happened and guess with lack of context.
there is nothing wrong with what he said or anyway you could get that from this one post
Something witty
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:11:22
May 09 2019 21:48 GMT
#28850
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.

I asked because I was curious how you saw the issue. You've made that abundantly clear.

What the people at the rally said wasn't funny to me. What Trump said wasn't funny to me. That doesn't register as a joke to me. You can spin it however you like. The immigrants they threaten to shoot wouldn't find that funny. You have Trump supporters collecting thousands of guns, waiting for the chance to use them. They hear Trump and his supporters say these things at a rally, and they listen in earnest. This is not a joke to them. It's a White Supremacist rallying cry, by a bunch of White Supremacists. So I'm really happy for you that, in your privilege, you can sit there in all your smugness and say that the power Trump has is beneath you. But this is not funny to me, it's goddamn terrifying. It should be the same for you.

I've laid my cards out, now that you've pressed me. You've made it clear just how funny you think this whole issue is. But I can guarantee you that the thousands of people that listen and cheer for Trump, and bring up the idea of shooting immigrants in a very public venue, they don't think it's funny. They think it's serious. So really, I don't care how funny you think it is. Good for you that you can be so detached about it. I'm glad I could insult you so with my stupid question.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 21:54:08
May 09 2019 21:49 GMT
#28851
On May 10 2019 06:48 IyMoon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:46 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I've seen auctions pass slower than that. The guy talking just ignores the other guy shouting whoa whoa whoa.

Danglars showing that he does not care for democracy. As long as his side wins.


Danglars didnt endorse anything... he just said this could be what happened and guess with lack of context.
there is nothing wrong with what he said or anyway you could get that from this one post

Did he watch the same video? The context is the video. When the man at the bottom right raised he had and said I will. The guy in the upper chair just ignores him. Words were spoken like "All those in favour say aye. Any oppose? Motion is passed" All in quick succession.

Just wow. This cannot be how any motion is supposed to be passed and we have some crackpot ceremonies in the UK.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
May 09 2019 21:53 GMT
#28852
On May 10 2019 06:36 Saryph wrote:
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?

https://twitter.com/arlenparsa/status/1126525787451154432

Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.

It has become more normal, if that makes sense. We are seeing a lot of aggressive bills like this being passed in states held by Republicans. The new conservative Supreme Court hasn't been tested on abortion and they are desperate to see how much they can get away with.

But the answer is that a bunch Republicans would support jailing women for getting abortions, if they could. And the rest just don't think it is a very important issue.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany12081 Posts
May 09 2019 22:02 GMT
#28853
On May 10 2019 06:53 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:36 Saryph wrote:
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?

https://twitter.com/arlenparsa/status/1126525787451154432

Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.

It has become more normal, if that makes sense. We are seeing a lot of aggressive bills like this being passed in states held by Republicans. The new conservative Supreme Court hasn't been tested on abortion and they are desperate to see how much they can get away with.

But the answer is that a bunch Republicans would support jailing women for getting abortions, if they could. And the rest just don't think it is a very important issue.


Yeah, but this is more about the process than the result.

Sure, we can talk forever about abortion and how much republicans suck. (Also a valid topic, but a different one)

But what i find most weird here (And what i think was why that video was posted) is that there does not seem to actually be any vote or anything, the chairman just waves the whole thing through. There does not seem to be even a short pause in between "Any opposed" and "Motion passed"

Which does not sound like that is how it is supposed to be from my laymans perspective. If you ask for a reaction, you should give enough time for that reaction to happen before moving on. Especially since there were clearly some people opposed.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:11:15
May 09 2019 22:07 GMT
#28854
On May 10 2019 07:02 Simberto wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:53 Plansix wrote:
On May 10 2019 06:36 Saryph wrote:
Since a lot of you guys probably watch this stuff more than me, could you tell me if this is normal? Apparently they were trying to vote on an amendment to the Georgia abortion bill concerning giving life imprisonment for having an abortion? The speed at which that vote passes, and the attitude in general just doesn't make sense to me. If you know you've already won, why have a vote that lasts less than a couple of seconds?

https://twitter.com/arlenparsa/status/1126525787451154432

Sorry in advance if I am wrong on the particular of the amendment they're voting on.

It has become more normal, if that makes sense. We are seeing a lot of aggressive bills like this being passed in states held by Republicans. The new conservative Supreme Court hasn't been tested on abortion and they are desperate to see how much they can get away with.

But the answer is that a bunch Republicans would support jailing women for getting abortions, if they could. And the rest just don't think it is a very important issue.


Yeah, but this is more about the process than the result.

Sure, we can talk forever about abortion and how much republicans suck. (Also a valid topic, but a different one)

But what i find most weird here (And what i think was why that video was posted) is that there does not seem to actually be any vote or anything, the chairman just waves the whole thing through. There does not seem to be even a short pause in between "Any opposed" and "Motion passed"

Which does not sound like that is how it is supposed to be from my laymans perspective. If you ask for a reaction, you should give enough time for that reaction to happen before moving on. Especially since there were clearly some people opposed.

It is an amendment to a proposed bill, so what happened there is not the final vote. People can add things onto a bill, but that doesn't mean it becomes law.

The US systems are not like parliamentary systems. We have two separate parts of our legislature that both draft bills and consolidate them to become one, final bill that then goes to the executive(governor or president) to be signed or vetoed. And I just give you the super condensed version. So what you saw there was a tiny part of a much larger process. Amendments can be added and killed at any point long that long path.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:10:39
May 09 2019 22:09 GMT
#28855
On May 10 2019 06:17 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 05:53 brian wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.


i get the sentiment and if you’ll let me i’ll put some words in your mouth in the sense that in parading around similar failures, at the very least, we would all then agree they’re faux pas. or some people
may choose to try to defend the democrats respective faux pas(though i would like to think i would not be one of them.)

if i’m off base, i’m sorry.

also i just realized i have no idea how to pluralize faux pas. google says it’s already plural, like moose. in case anyone else needed to learn that too.

My point is the following: regardless of whether what Trump said is actually a faux pas, who really gives a fuck? It's not informative. It's not interesting. It's not going to change anyone's mind about Trump. This is why I don't bother bringing up similar shit that Democrats say/do.

As I have pointed out many times in this thread over the past few years, Democrats and liberals have demonstrated a real problem with being able to discern between important grounds to attack Trump on and trivial grounds to attack Trump on. Most people simply tune it all out now.


Idk did you think Obama’s association with Rev. Wright and his Chicago church community was a big deal? I’m not saying you did but plenty of people who watched Fox News did.

What is so offensive is not the joke itself (which is actually kind of funny) but that Trump always seems to find himself associating with these types of ignorant people, and, even worse, has to pander to them to get/stay elected. Just file it under “another reminder that Trump’s base is comprised of a lot of racist people.”
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
May 09 2019 22:11 GMT
#28856
On May 10 2019 06:48 NewSunshine wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.

I asked because I was curious how you saw the issue. You've made that abundantly clear.

What the people at the rally said wasn't funny to me. What Trump said wasn't funny to me. That doesn't register as a joke to me. You can spin it however you like. The immigrants they threaten to shoot wouldn't find that funny. You have Trump supporters collecting thousands of guns, waiting for the chance to use them. They hear Trump and his supporters say these things at a rally, and they listen in earnest. This is not a joke to them. It's a White Supremacist rallying cry, by a bunch of White Supremacists. So I'm really happy for you that, in your privilege, you can sit there in all your smugness and say that the power Trump has is beneath you. But this is not funny to me, it's goddamn terrifying. It should be the same for you.

I've laid my cards out, now that you've pressed me. You've made it clear just how funny you think this whole issue is. But I can guarantee you that the thousands of people that listen and cheer for Trump, and bring up the idea of shooting immigrants in a very public venue, they don't think it's funny. They think it's serious. So really, I don't care how funny you think it is. Good for you that you can be so detached about it.


Pretty much nothing that you have written here is accurate about what I have said, so apparently nothing that I have said is "abundantly clear" to you. Your post is a giant straw man. So, no I'm not interested in your cards. You can play with yourself.

User was temp banned for this post.
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
May 09 2019 22:13 GMT
#28857
On May 10 2019 07:11 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:48 NewSunshine wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.

I asked because I was curious how you saw the issue. You've made that abundantly clear.

What the people at the rally said wasn't funny to me. What Trump said wasn't funny to me. That doesn't register as a joke to me. You can spin it however you like. The immigrants they threaten to shoot wouldn't find that funny. You have Trump supporters collecting thousands of guns, waiting for the chance to use them. They hear Trump and his supporters say these things at a rally, and they listen in earnest. This is not a joke to them. It's a White Supremacist rallying cry, by a bunch of White Supremacists. So I'm really happy for you that, in your privilege, you can sit there in all your smugness and say that the power Trump has is beneath you. But this is not funny to me, it's goddamn terrifying. It should be the same for you.

I've laid my cards out, now that you've pressed me. You've made it clear just how funny you think this whole issue is. But I can guarantee you that the thousands of people that listen and cheer for Trump, and bring up the idea of shooting immigrants in a very public venue, they don't think it's funny. They think it's serious. So really, I don't care how funny you think it is. Good for you that you can be so detached about it.


Pretty much nothing that you have written here is accurate about what I have said, so apparently nothing that I have said is "abundantly clear" to you. Your post is a giant straw man. So, no I'm not interested in your cards. You can play with yourself.

I'm not talking about what you've said. I don't really care. Your assessment of the rally is one perspective, and it's one I don't imagine that many people share in that crowd. I really don't care when you go to such lengths to convince me that you don't take "jokes" like that seriously. Because that crowd is filled with tons and tons of not-you people. They don't all have the same strength of virtue you clearly have.

Your input is not necessary. I just wanted to give you an opportunity to see if you could recognize that.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:21:18
May 09 2019 22:16 GMT
#28858
On May 10 2019 07:09 IgnE wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 06:17 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:53 brian wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.


i get the sentiment and if you’ll let me i’ll put some words in your mouth in the sense that in parading around similar failures, at the very least, we would all then agree they’re faux pas. or some people
may choose to try to defend the democrats respective faux pas(though i would like to think i would not be one of them.)

if i’m off base, i’m sorry.

also i just realized i have no idea how to pluralize faux pas. google says it’s already plural, like moose. in case anyone else needed to learn that too.

My point is the following: regardless of whether what Trump said is actually a faux pas, who really gives a fuck? It's not informative. It's not interesting. It's not going to change anyone's mind about Trump. This is why I don't bother bringing up similar shit that Democrats say/do.

As I have pointed out many times in this thread over the past few years, Democrats and liberals have demonstrated a real problem with being able to discern between important grounds to attack Trump on and trivial grounds to attack Trump on. Most people simply tune it all out now.


Idk did you think Obama’s association with Rev. Wright and his Chicago church community was a big deal? I’m not saying you did but plenty of people who watched Fox News did.


I thought that Obama's association with Rev. Wright and other radicals was a big deal worth discussing as it pertained to his world view and how he was likely to act as president. There's a big difference between the significance of the comments of the pastor at the church that you have been attending for 20+ years and and the significance of the comment of some random guy at your campaign rally.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-05-09 22:23:41
May 09 2019 22:22 GMT
#28859
As someone who attended church for 20 years, the pastor of the church had zero impact on my world views. Now the people at the church, like my grandparents, they mattered. And were also smarter and better read than both of the pastors. And we spent a good chunk of time complaining about those pastors, because that is what you do at church. Given my experience, I find it doubtful that the pastor at the church has negligible impact on Obama's world views, especially given Obama's impressive education and accomplishments.

But man, it does make for an impressive line of attack, to think that Obama was taking this guys counsel for all this time. I can see why Fox News latched on. Not really seeing how anyone of substance believed it, however.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
IgnE
Profile Joined November 2010
United States7684 Posts
May 09 2019 22:23 GMT
#28860
On May 10 2019 07:16 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 10 2019 07:09 IgnE wrote:
On May 10 2019 06:17 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:53 brian wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:49 xDaunt wrote:
On May 10 2019 05:43 NewSunshine wrote:
I mean, I'm honestly curious. How would Danglars and xDaunt feel if Obama went to a rally, filled with people who clearly support him, and someone joked about shooting Christians, and his response was to mildly joke about what that person said? Would you honestly feel he went far enough to ridicule the idea? You would want someone in such a clear position of authority to send a clear message that he wouldn't tolerate such heinous ideas, would you not?

I'm serious here. Take a minute and do some reflection. Within minutes you'd have people all over the internet saying that's unacceptable. You guys know that. But do you care?

See, I find this to be a particularly stupid and insulting question. It should be obvious from my posting history that I don't bother bitching about trivial shit like this. It's generally beneath me. And believe me, there is no shortage of stupid jokes and other public faux pas that democrats have made that I could bring up around here. Long story short, don't project your love affair of the trivial upon others, and especially not me.


i get the sentiment and if you’ll let me i’ll put some words in your mouth in the sense that in parading around similar failures, at the very least, we would all then agree they’re faux pas. or some people
may choose to try to defend the democrats respective faux pas(though i would like to think i would not be one of them.)

if i’m off base, i’m sorry.

also i just realized i have no idea how to pluralize faux pas. google says it’s already plural, like moose. in case anyone else needed to learn that too.

My point is the following: regardless of whether what Trump said is actually a faux pas, who really gives a fuck? It's not informative. It's not interesting. It's not going to change anyone's mind about Trump. This is why I don't bother bringing up similar shit that Democrats say/do.

As I have pointed out many times in this thread over the past few years, Democrats and liberals have demonstrated a real problem with being able to discern between important grounds to attack Trump on and trivial grounds to attack Trump on. Most people simply tune it all out now.


Idk did you think Obama’s association with Rev. Wright and his Chicago church community was a big deal? I’m not saying you did but plenty of people who watched Fox News did.


I thought that Obama's association with Rev. Wright and other radicals was a big deal worth discussing as it pertained to his world view and how he was likely to act as president. There's a big difference between the significance of the comments of the pastor at the church that you have been attending for 20+ years and and the significance of the comment of some random guy at your campaign rally.


yeah maybe except in this case many people justifiably believe that a large number of people in Trump’s audiences believe such comments
It is terrible to die of thirst at sea. Must you so salt your truth that it will no longer even slake thirst?
Prev 1 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 6071 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
08:00
ISSL: Premier - Quarterfinals
LiquipediaDiscussion
The PiG Daily
06:20
Best Games of SC
MaxPax vs Clem
SHIN vs TBD
herO vs TBD
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech31
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 3438
GuemChi 1752
Horang2 569
ZergMaN 72
Noble 26
Aegong 14
Icarus 9
yabsab 7
Force[name] 6
LuMiX 6
League of Legends
JimRising 691
Counter-Strike
taco 370
Other Games
summit1g11629
XaKoH 460
NeuroSwarm85
ViBE75
RuFF_SC240
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick493
BasetradeTV129
Counter-Strike
PGL88
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 27
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2303
League of Legends
• Rush1145
• Lourlo716
• Stunt357
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
16h 58m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 3h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 5h
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
OSC
1d 16h
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
PiGosaur Cup
1d 18h
The PondCast
3 days
KCM Race Survival
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
IPSL
5 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
IPSL
6 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-06
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

Sector 951
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.