EPTthis is so crazy
they set up christmas lights like a show on their hosue matching the music
the very end is insane..
i wonder how long it took them = _=;;;
The Craziest Christmas lights.. holy sh**!!
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
BlueRoyaL
United States2493 Posts
this is so crazy they set up christmas lights like a show on their hosue matching the music the very end is insane.. i wonder how long it took them = _=;;; | ||
|
Romance_us
Seychelles1806 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32278 Posts
Almost 1 year aniversary! | ||
|
nitram
Canada5412 Posts
| ||
|
pyrogenetix
China5098 Posts
| ||
|
Ceril
Sweden1343 Posts
| ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
On November 02 2006 07:29 Romance_us wrote: thats uh, a song by Trans Siberian Orchestra if im correct..... can't remember the song title though. The lighting was VERY cool. i havent watched it but i'm goign to guess it's "christmas eve" by trans siberian orchestra. That's th emost common tune of theirs that's played, so O_O edit: damn i was so wrong. | ||
|
nonpuz
United States176 Posts
| ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On November 02 2006 19:19 nonpuz wrote: This is actually cut together with editting, the took pictures of each lights on and off etc..its all just editting nothing to do with choreagraphy etc....still pretty impressive. NO IT FUCKING ISNT | ||
|
NonYold
United States2814 Posts
On November 02 2006 19:19 nonpuz wrote: This is actually cut together with editting, the took pictures of each lights on and off etc..its all just editting nothing to do with choreagraphy etc....still pretty impressive. you're either a liar or an idiot. in any case you're useless | ||
|
nonpuz
United States176 Posts
There see I can make statements too, they dont FUCKING MEAN ANYTHIGN THOUGH UNLESS you back them up with an explanation, your fucking POSTS are useless. See below. Hahahahaha, what did they use to time the lights then, tell me that? It would have been EASY as fuck to simply turn each light on/off take a picture, next frame take a picture, etc...similair to stop-motion animation. Not to mention the fact that the NEIGHBORS would kill them if they had that thing going all the time. Use some common sense dipshit, plus you can tell the music was added later anyways. | ||
|
Tsagacity
United States2124 Posts
On November 02 2006 19:43 nonpuz wrote: Hahahahaha, what did they use to time the lights then, tell me that? It would have been EASY as fuck to simply turn each light on/off take a picture, next frame take a picture, etc...similair to stop-motion animation. Your frame by frame idea sounds a lot harder and more time consuming than programming the lights :/ Not to mention the fact that the NEIGHBORS would kill them if they had that thing going all the time. Use some common sense dipshit. You should have read your second sentence about common sense before writing that first one -_-. You don't have to have lights on all the time, they can most likely be unplugged or turned off. go figure. | ||
|
tec27
United States3702 Posts
On November 02 2006 19:43 nonpuz wrote: You're wrong. There see I can make statements too, they dont FUCKING MEAN ANYTHIGN THOUGH UNLESS you back them up with an explanation, your fucking POSTS are useless. See below. Hahahahaha, what did they use to time the lights then, tell me that? It would have been EASY as fuck to simply turn each light on/off take a picture, next frame take a picture, etc...similair to stop-motion animation. Not to mention the fact that the NEIGHBORS would kill them if they had that thing going all the time. Use some common sense dipshit, plus you can tell the music was added later anyways. #1 - nobody every said they had this running all the time, it was probably a one-time thing for the video. #2 - Any person who has access to light equipment for concerts and such probably has the required equipment to pull something like this off. #3 - Just because something is *easy* to do doesn't mean thats the way it was done. Thats a pretty huge logical fallacy, way to go. | ||
|
fusionsdf
Canada15390 Posts
On November 02 2006 19:43 nonpuz wrote: You're wrong. There see I can make statements too, they dont FUCKING MEAN ANYTHIGN THOUGH UNLESS you back them up with an explanation, your fucking POSTS are useless. See below. Hahahahaha, what did they use to time the lights then, tell me that? It would have been EASY as fuck to simply turn each light on/off take a picture, next frame take a picture, etc...similair to stop-motion animation. Not to mention the fact that the NEIGHBORS would kill them if they had that thing going all the time. Use some common sense dipshit, plus you can tell the music was added later anyways. Ever hear of timers? Was was the quote about idiots being the most arrogant? | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
anyone with the knowhow can do it with a fucking computer | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
nonpuz
United States176 Posts
First of all, read the previous thread that this was posted in (link near the top of this). Second of all, explain to me why the ENTIRE picture is moving around the whole time? grass etc.. watch the lines on the cement and what not. This was PROVEN a long time ago (on another forum I frequent, this is all over the internet) to be a fake, so please shut the fuck up you have no idea what you're talking about. | ||
Chill
Calgary25996 Posts
Did he splice that story together too? | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On November 02 2006 20:08 nonpuz wrote: God i cant believe im still wasting my time but here you go: First of all, read the previous thread that this was posted in (link near the top of this). Second of all, explain to me why the ENTIRE picture is moving around the whole time? grass etc.. watch the lines on the cement and what not. This was PROVEN a long time ago (on another forum I frequent, this is all over the internet) to be a fake, so please shut the fuck up you have no idea what you're talking about. this just gets more and more ironic | ||
|
Yogurt
United States4258 Posts
.... just wanted to use ironic in a sentence. I can be cool too! | ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
| ||
|
BlackJack
United States10574 Posts
On November 02 2006 19:19 nonpuz wrote: This is actually cut together with editting, the took pictures of each lights on and off etc..its all just editting nothing to do with choreagraphy etc....still pretty impressive. You shouldn't say things so matter of factly when you have no idea what you are talking about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carson_Williams | ||
|
Bruceling
United States392 Posts
| ||
|
Chill
Calgary25996 Posts
On November 02 2006 20:49 BlackJack wrote: You shouldn't say things so matter of factly when you have no idea what you are talking about. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carson_Williams Omggles, motherfucking owned | ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36390 Posts
| ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On November 02 2006 20:08 nonpuz wrote: God i cant believe im still wasting my time but here you go: First of all, read the previous thread that this was posted in (link near the top of this). Second of all, explain to me why the ENTIRE picture is moving around the whole time? grass etc.. watch the lines on the cement and what not. This was PROVEN a long time ago (on another forum I frequent, this is all over the internet) to be a fake, so please shut the fuck up you have no idea what you're talking about. Shut the fuck up. | ||
|
ieatkids5
United States4628 Posts
| ||
|
dronebabo
10866 Posts
| ||
|
Wangsta
United States776 Posts
the photography idea would've been MUCH easier because you can reuse frames. many sequences in the show were repeated so until I read the wikipedia article I thought this was editted too | ||
|
Alborz
Canada1551 Posts
| ||
|
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On November 02 2006 21:48 Wangsta wrote: not to jump on the wrong boat but let's be fair, his argument did make more sense to me (before seeing those wiki/etc. links) from the viewpoint of a guy who hasn't heard about this before the photography idea would've been MUCH easier because you can reuse frames. many sequences in the show were repeated so until I read the wikipedia article I thought this was editted too LIGHTS FADE WATCH->COMPREHEND | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
FireBatLover
United States203 Posts
| ||
|
BlaCha
Poland743 Posts
On November 02 2006 21:04 Hot_Bid wrote: yah but that wikipedia entry is not real, it was actually put together with editing, creator took pictures of each letter and spliced it together, nothing to do with typing etc... still pretty impressive hahahahah gold ;] | ||
|
DarK]N[exuS
China1441 Posts
Moronland/Moronia/Moron ahaha | ||
|
EmilyJieunChoi
China246 Posts
On November 02 2006 21:04 Hot_Bid wrote: yah but that wikipedia entry is not real, it was actually put together with editing, creator took pictures of each letter and spliced it together, nothing to do with typing etc... still pretty impressive GG -> NO RE | ||
|
zulu_nation8
China26351 Posts
| ||
|
nitram
Canada5412 Posts
On November 02 2006 21:48 Wangsta wrote: not to jump on the wrong boat but let's be fair, his argument did make more sense to me (before seeing those wiki/etc. links) from the viewpoint of a guy who hasn't heard about this before the photography idea would've been MUCH easier because you can reuse frames. many sequences in the show were repeated so until I read the wikipedia article I thought this was editted too F his argument, he was really BM! | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22259 Posts
On November 02 2006 21:48 Wangsta wrote: not to jump on the wrong boat but let's be fair, his argument did make more sense to me (before seeing those wiki/etc. links) from the viewpoint of a guy who hasn't heard about this before the photography idea would've been MUCH easier because you can reuse frames. many sequences in the show were repeated so until I read the wikipedia article I thought this was editted too It has to do with his attitude, not his argument. If he presented himself a little differently, maybe that wouldn't have happened. | ||
| ||
