Cyberspace Sexual Predators Exposed - Page 11
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
| ||
|
baal
10708 Posts
On October 30 2006 08:52 Hot_Bid wrote: baal stop skewing the discussion, this thread is discussing the morality issues of luring pedophiles, not about whether you or whoever else think its morally "OK" to be attracted to underage girls. he's completely right in that there's a huge difference with being attracted to someone physically and actually acting on it. please stop making assumptions about people and acting like you're some badass and everyone else is an insecure nerd or something, because all i hear from you on MSN is a selfish pussy constantly whining about poker to the point where i have to stop talking to you. "buy you some whores you sexually scared mouse" haha wow baal you're so cool! lol so what i whine about poker bad beats? does that makes me a geek like urself, nope it doesnt, but thats not the point anyway. true about skewing the discussion, anyway is there really a way to have an exchange of ideas to someone who calls me a "sick fuck" because even if i think that guy is sick i also believe this entrapment is wrong? | ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On October 30 2006 09:12 baal wrote: lol so what i whine about poker bad beats? does that makes me a geek like urself, nope it doesnt, but thats not the point anyway. right, it doesn't, so don't go calling everyone sexually insecure virgins just because they don't believe its entrapment, you fucking hypocrit. thats not the point, indeed. | ||
|
perLi is 2down
United States533 Posts
![]() VS ![]() | ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
On October 27 2006 17:32 ))(())(( wrote: from wiki: "However, when a person is predisposed to commit a crime, offering opportunities to commit the crime is not entrapment, a widely held misconception similar to the idea that police officers must answer questions truthfully if they are asked the same question three times, or that they must say "yes" if asked if they are a police officer." these guys werent pick up randomly, they hung around channels where they talked about this shit. read what i posted before baal, you fucking idiot. if it was entrapment, it would have been dealt with already. this is no different then going to a known drug dealing spot and offering to sell drugs and busted the dumbass. unfortunately, you cant understand this concept. seems that the rest of tl.net and THE FUCKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM seems to get it. | ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On October 30 2006 09:37 ))(())(( wrote: fucking idiot. if it was entrapment, it would have been dealt with already. this is no different then going to a known drug dealing spot and offering to sell drugs and busted the dumbass. unfortunately, you cant understand this concept. seems that the rest of tl.net and THE FUCKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM seems to get it. did you just flame yourself | ||
|
perLi is 2down
United States533 Posts
| ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
edit: fixed it now ;p | ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On October 30 2006 09:18 Hot_Bid wrote: right, it doesn't, so don't go calling everyone sexually insecure virgins just because they don't believe its entrapment, you fucking hypocrit. thats not the point, indeed. fuck you dumbass | ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
![]() | ||
|
baal
10708 Posts
On October 30 2006 09:37 ))(())(( wrote: fucking idiot. if it was entrapment, it would have been dealt with already. this is no different then going to a known drug dealing spot and offering to sell drugs and busted the dumbass. unfortunately, you cant understand this concept. seems that the rest of tl.net and THE FUCKING JUDICIAL SYSTEM seems to get it. fucking cunt, it IS fucking different. (im talking about the paritcular case) It is like an undercop offering someone (who has a drug problem) in a common dealing spot drugs, the guy clearly says "No, i have a drug problem, so i dont want any drugs thank you", the cop keeps pushing it and pushing it and pushing it until the drugaddicts breaks, then jailtime. in that particular case the guy clearly stated that he could only hurt him so he should keep away and they shouldnt meet, the fake kid kept pushing it. Good god, i just realized what u just did, i thik its time for you to leave this thread -.- | ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
a cops in a known drug spot, the narc offers drugs. they are both predisposed. you clearly would not go to a known drug spot unless that what you wanted and you clearly would not go into a male for kiddie porn channel without wanting it. | ||
|
baal
10708 Posts
| ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On October 30 2006 09:54 baal wrote: fucking cunt, it IS fucking different. (im talking about the paritcular case) It is like an undercop offering someone (who has a drug problem) in a common dealing spot drugs, the guy clearly says "No, i have a drug problem, so i dont want any drugs thank you", the cop keeps pushing it and pushing it and pushing it until the drugaddicts breaks, then jailtime. in that particular case the guy clearly stated that he could only hurt him so he should keep away and they shouldnt meet, the fake kid kept pushing it. Good god, i just realized what u just did, i thik its time for you to leave this thread -.- baal did you even read the site, thats totally not what they do there. please don't argue when you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. the pedos message the fake kids FIRST in a regional channel, there's no way for the website agents to know which people are actual pedos. it's not like theres a channel "pedophilia" full of pedos waiting for kids to show up, which real kid would actually go in there? and the chat logs are not the way you stated, that particular one i think you exaggerate just how much pushing the "kid" did, i mean the pedo messaged him first, why would he do that just to chat? every PJ agent always makes sure they know that they are underage kids. in the vast majority of the cases and in ALL the actual convictions the actual pedos are the ones who are initiating the contact and setting up the meets. otherwise it would be entrapment and the courts/police wouldn't follow through, duh. | ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
baal
10708 Posts
| ||
|
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
On October 30 2006 10:58 baal wrote: http://www.corrupted-justice.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=447&sid=8c938bfad6e59b872a51f33da21c0a73 baal, you realize you just posted a source that is known for being pro-pedophile and for distributing lies and false rumors to slander sites that are anti-pedophiles right? heres a site that specifically says corrupted-justice.com is corrupt: http://www.corrupted-justice.net and here's an article that is specifically about how CJ.com's criticism of Perverted-Justice is blatantly false: http://www.corrupted-justice.net/?archive=42 in fact, CJ.net claims that CJ.com's website and forums are just a bunch of lies backed by pro-pedophilia people. you really should read up on the sources you post before treating them like gospel, i mean i can post a link to the Danish Pedophile Association's charter, it probably denounces Perverted-Justice too. i mean dude, if you just read the stupid FAQ section of the website you posted, you'd quickly realize that its a big crock of bullshit? | ||
|
gameguard
Korea (South)2132 Posts
| ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
| ||
|
medawg14
Poland4 Posts
On October 30 2006 07:31 ))(())(( wrote: you really are a sorry little man. youre trying to tie two things together that have abso-fucking-lutely nothing to do with one another. 14 with a 16 year old? no one said once theres a problem with that, you can have a healthy relationship like that. im sure most people on here had something similar. 21 with 15? yes, you dense fuck, statatory. theres a major difference in being the hs senior at 17 or 18 whos hitting up all the underclassmen legally in consent age and then having enough common sense to stop when your our of hs and approaching the legal fucking drinking age and going after girls that arent even fully developed. seriously, are you fucking stupid? we are a majority of males on this site here, think back to your own experiences. who here, when you were a senior, went after younger girls because you thought they would be a nice girlfriend? get real, it was for ass because they are young and dumb and think youre in love with them. thats why theres statutory, theres a world of difference in the maturity levels of a 15 year old girl and a 21 year old guy. the reality is, as a whole, guys are horny jerkoffs and take advantage of younger girls or in some instances, young guys. now think of a 55 with a 15? yes, that one giant step beyond statutory, its fucking pedo. a grown man should not be going after a guy or girl who isnt fully developed phsyically or emotionally. YOU CAN NOT HAVE A HEALTHY RELATIONSHIP LIEK THAT, NO MATTER HOW BAD YOU WANT TO JUSTIFY YOUR ATTRACTION TO UNDERAGE PEOPLE. youve got some real issue if you think that a rational person would have a relationship with that type of age gap. next youre gonna fucking tell me anna nicole smith was in love with her 90 year old billionare ex husband? fucking idiots. Think back your own teenage years. When you were 15 would you have been interested in have a sexual relationship with a 20 or 30 year old remale actress/model? Do think this would have been wrong? I'm guessing no. Many people are mature enought to have a relationship at 15. Stop resorting to insults and try to see teh issue from another perspective. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://teamliquid.net/userfiles/2764.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://poplicks.com/images/asian-cowboy.jpg)
