EPTCyberspace Sexual Predators Exposed - Page 12
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On October 30 2006 14:07 medawg14 wrote: Think back your own teenage years. When you were 15 would you have been interested in have a sexual relationship with a 20 or 30 year old remale actress/model? Do think this would have been wrong? I'm guessing no. Many people are mature enought to have a relationship at 15. Stop resorting to insults and try to see teh issue from another perspective. You do realize that what the kid wants is irrelevant? And that stated age of the 18 year old was 13, not 15? And no, I've never found remales very attractive. | ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
On October 30 2006 14:20 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT look. seriously. ive repeated myself so many fucking times. and everyone with a brain agrees with me. im not talking about luring. if you dont think ' hi ... i miss you ... ive been thinking about how itd be if we were together ' isnt feigning maturity or willingness or whatever etc then you're a fucking DOUCHEBAG. but thats NOT the issue, because anyone who accepts such lures or suggestions is still breaking the law. the issue is that the law ITSELF is incorrect. whether you are 12 and 40 or 15 and 19, the law persists and does not have leniences. whether they be leniences or considerations of age, or of the nature of the relationship, or the willingness (or mutual love, etc etc) of either party. the 40 yo and the 19 yo are both going to jail and will be sex offenders for the next 10 years. we agree that this is silly, and that an adult and minor CAN have a relationship without it being child abuse, and without it warranting the current penalties and disgust and hate. hence we agree that pursuing the law (especially in a manner that actively feigns maturity or consent or willingness) is also silly. and by silly i mean totally fucked up beyond all recognition. urgh. if you have a specific thing you want to argue then go ahead. otherwise im pretty sure vagina boy is either trolling or simply not worth reading another post of again. and that clitoris website in quote? well that was a specific response to a specific statement by the PJ website: that 15 year old girls are non-sexual. ps please ban vagina boy edit: btw, who exactly is we? you and baal? edit2: they certainly treat 19 year old with 15 yer old and 12 and 40 different. what the hell are you talking about. yes chibi, you win. youre right, its ok to ravage 15 year old kiddies if youre a grown adult. a 13 year old can have a fully healthy, sexual relationship with a 66 grandpa. i tell you what, lets have a little bet ok? you go down to your favorite middle school and pick up on some kids and when you and you new friend hit it off, you go and introduce yourself to their parents. if the kids father doesnt take the nearest blunt object to your face right there, go down to the police station and ask what they think. if youre still alive and not in jail yet, ill swim across the atlantic to shake your hand, admit im wrong and then give you any money i have. i mean, you are right, arent you? | ||
|
MyLostTemple
United States2921 Posts
| ||
Hot_Bid
Braavos36402 Posts
edit: and chibi nobody agrees with you. | ||
|
Detonate
Iceland578 Posts
| ||
|
gameguard
Korea (South)2132 Posts
On October 30 2006 14:20 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT look. seriously. ive repeated myself so many fucking times. and everyone with a brain agrees with me. im not talking about luring. if you dont think ' hi ... i miss you ... ive been thinking about how itd be if we were together ' isnt feigning maturity or willingness or whatever etc then you're a fucking DOUCHEBAG. but thats NOT the issue, because anyone who accepts such lures or suggestions is still breaking the law. the issue is that the law ITSELF is incorrect. whether you are 12 and 40 or 15 and 19, the law persists and does not have leniences. whether they be leniences or considerations of age, or of the nature of the relationship, or the willingness (or mutual love, etc etc) of either party. the 40 yo and the 19 yo are both going to jail and will be sex offenders for the next 10 years. we agree that this is silly, and that an adult and minor CAN have a relationship without it being child abuse, and without it warranting the current penalties and disgust and hate. hence we agree that pursuing the law (especially in a manner that actively feigns maturity or consent or willingness) is also silly. and by silly i mean totally fucked up beyond all recognition. urgh. if you have a specific thing you want to argue then go ahead. otherwise im pretty sure vagina boy is either trolling or simply not worth reading another post of again. and that clitoris website in quote? well that was a specific response to a specific statement by the PJ website: that 15 year old girls are non-sexual. ps please ban vagina boy At least this time you stated your opinions without sounding like a schizophreniac monkey. Good job. When you say everyone with a brain agrees with you, who exactly are you pointing out. You and baal? And what exactly are you pointing out by posting logs of PJ's convo with the pedophile. You post the logs and say they are mature? They are fucking PJ agents you nutsack. And you post a fucking random ass site of how girls masterbate and say they are mature and sexual. Thats the most ridiculous shit ever. Honestly... try harder. Obviously some girls get curious at that age and shit, but does that jusify older men exploiting them? How about young boys. You want to argue that 13 year old boys can have a meaningful relationships with old men? If you look at the pics, most of them are in their 40s. If I get what you're saying, you agree that middle aged men approaching pre pubescent children is wrong. What you want to argue is that somehow they might convict a some inoocent 19 year old going out with a 16 year old. ARE YOU FUCKING RETARDED. If they are a legitimate couple with a resonable age gap and have known each other for a while (no, not through AIM you dumb shit) I doubt anyone would have a problem with consentual sex. But if the girl turns out to be some hobag and reports your ass, tough shit. You should have known her better before engaging in illegal sex. If she was really mature like you say they can be, there would be no problems. The problem arises when these douchebags go into chatrooms to try to score some underaged pussy. You dont fucking message 15 year old girls in chatrooms for a healthy relationship (losers like you might though). And if its actually a healthy relationship you want, you're not going to be proposing sex meets the first day. I didnt spend much time on the site, but I believe all of them got convicted when they showed up for the meet. I dont see much room for error when they only convict after the person states their INTENT for sex AND they show up. So basically, you are a complete moron. Good day. Edit: and where the fuck do you get vagina boy you fucking degenerate trash. I hope you get lured by PJ when you are a middle aged sack of dirty shit (theres a good chance of this actually). | ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On October 30 2006 14:20 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT look. seriously. ive repeated myself so many fucking times. and everyone with a brain agrees with me. im not talking about luring. if you dont think ' hi ... i miss you ... ive been thinking about how itd be if we were together ' isnt feigning maturity or willingness or whatever etc then you're a fucking DOUCHEBAG. but thats NOT the issue, because anyone who accepts such lures or suggestions is still breaking the law. the issue is that the law ITSELF is incorrect. whether you are 12 and 40 or 15 and 19, the law persists and does not have leniences. whether they be leniences or considerations of age, or of the nature of the relationship, or the willingness (or mutual love, etc etc) of either party. the 40 yo and the 19 yo are both going to jail and will be sex offenders for the next 10 years. we agree that this is silly, and that an adult and minor CAN have a relationship without it being child abuse, and without it warranting the current penalties and disgust and hate. hence we agree that pursuing the law (especially in a manner that actively feigns maturity or consent or willingness) is also silly. and by silly i mean totally fucked up beyond all recognition. urgh. if you have a specific thing you want to argue then go ahead. otherwise im pretty sure vagina boy is either trolling or simply not worth reading another post of again. and that clitoris website in quote? well that was a specific response to a specific statement by the PJ website: that 15 year old girls are non-sexual. ps please ban vagina boy You know nothing about the law, Chibi. Nothing. And nearly everything you said is wrong. Of course the law is "lenient." Even if you watch Law and Order you should know that. For example, if a girlfriend brings me to a party and dumps me to there just to humiliate me, and I lose it and kill her, I'm not going to get the death penalty. There are distinctions. Murder 1 is different Murder 2, and Manslaughter, and so on and so forth. In fact, directly contrary to what you say, the age difference between the two people IS taken into account (in nearly all states). And OF COURSE the willingness is taken into account. That's THE FUCKING DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RAPE AND STATUTORY RAPE WITH A 15 YEAR OLD. God, how can you be so stupid? And the age of the victim is also taken into account. (if the kid's 11, you're getting full-statutory rape, if the kid's 15, something like criminal sexualy activity with a minor). In fact, if a 19 year old guy has sex with a 15 year old, 90% of the time he's going to off scott fucking free (though a few states will fuck him over--unless the cops realizing this take it easy and make things right, which they will). Like maybe the guy was held back a year and they're both in high school. One of the reasons statutory rape exists is because the adult is more advantaged that the kid. That is, the adult exerts undue influence. Like when a nurse gets a old guy to willingly write a will giving them everything. The old dude depends on the nurse, and even if the nurse never threatened him, the balance of power is 100% the nurses way. But if they're both high school kids who live with their parents, no undue influence. Fact is, if you're trying to fuck kids, you're going to get fucked yourself. But if you're in a serious relationship with someone about your age, you're either going to get off because of laws, or because of good lawyer and helpful cops (girl lies to cops and refuses rape kit and what the fuck evidence do they have to even bring up a charge?). | ||
|
NewbSaibot
3849 Posts
Chibi: Do you believe it is possible for a 13 year old girl and a 40 year old man to have a healthy, sexual, intimate and emotionally stable relationship? | ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On October 30 2006 16:12 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: so we have inargueable intrinsic differences in opinion about adult minor relations. the difference between cultures. i know about the frikin laws. they make it impossible for an older guy to date a young girl. impossible. and i think this is wrong, and can and should be improved upon. but you dont, so meh. Now, chibi i can see the argument youve made throughout the thread and although i dont agree with it, i understand it. Here is what i mainly contribute. Yes there are some 13 year olds who could have a solid mature relationship with someone, they are few and far between but yes they do exist. But we have laws set in place to protect the majority who cant from the people who would rape them, kill them etc.... To protect the majority, you have to have laws in place, and those laws due to the nature of the legal system must effect everyone, not just specific people. As such the ability to change the laws to allow a bit more leniency on the young child + adult relationships cant be put into effect since most adults in that situation are preying on the child. To make the laws more lenient puts the majority of children at risk. | ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
On October 30 2006 16:12 Chibi[OWNS] wrote: so we have inargueable intrinsic differences in opinion about adult minor relations. the difference between cultures. i know about the frikin laws. they make it impossible for an older guy to date a young girl. impossible. and i think this is wrong, and can and should be improved upon. but you dont, so meh. No you don't. And the retarded rant you posted above proved that. | ||
|
-_-
United States7081 Posts
This specifically is completely wrong. You know nothing, and you shouldn't talk about what you don't know about. | ||
|
Detonate
Iceland578 Posts
STOP INSERTING RANDOM CAPS IN YOUR ESSAYS btw | ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
j0ehoe
United States2705 Posts
On October 30 2006 15:10 gameguard wrote: Edit: and where the fuck do you get vagina boy you fucking degenerate trash. I hope you get lured by PJ when you are a middle aged sack of dirty shit (theres a good chance of this actually). vagina boy would be my name o.o so chibi, which middle school do you hang out at so i can alert the police? | ||
|
Chibi[OWNS]
United Kingdom10597 Posts
| ||
|
PaSsiOnPinK
China125 Posts
| ||
| ||
