|
Please attempt to distinguish between extremists and non extremists to avoid starting the inevitable waste of time that is "can Islam be judged by its believers?" - KwarK |
On May 23 2013 03:41 TheFish7 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 03:37 farvacola wrote: For better or for worse, you can bet the public response would have been different here in the US. Not that I am by any means suggesting that our public view of justice is in any way superior, but I could easily see these men being taken down by random passerby almost immediately. From what I understand random passerby in England aren't as well armed as the random passerby in the States. Passerbys in the States aren't well-armed at all...
|
|
His walk in the video doesn't look human...
|
On May 23 2013 05:25 darthfoley wrote: Can anyone tell me how NSFW the video is? I can deal with bloody hands but if it's the actual attack or anything...
just bloody hands and knife and an idiot.
|
On May 23 2013 05:40 edlover420 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:24 ImperialFist wrote: Can Islam be judged by its believers?
Absolutely not, this is utter nonsense.
These killers can easily find verses in the Qoran which would support actions like this. People are not inherently evil but Islam is.
User was temp banned for this post. Actually by the most accepted interpretation of Qur'an it is actually stated that Allah will never forgive you if you kill another man and jihad is interpreted as a battle with yourself and your bad side to become better as a person. Yet some demagogues explain the words in Qur'an differently to naive uneducated people of the 3rd world countries, mainly not because they would believe so but because of their own economical interests and they train young man to become extremists and do crazy shit like this. What happened was indeed extremely shameful and all extremists are a disgrace for our religion.
Hadith is a bitch. Though the religion is still partly to blame, when you have claims of it being the literal word of God.
And many of the extremists are not 3rd world people but young muslims who grow up in Western nations and radicalize.
|
On May 23 2013 05:40 edlover420 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:24 ImperialFist wrote: Can Islam be judged by its believers?
Absolutely not, this is utter nonsense.
These killers can easily find verses in the Qoran which would support actions like this. People are not inherently evil but Islam is.
User was temp banned for this post. Actually by the most accepted interpretation of Qur'an it is actually stated that Allah will never forgive you if you kill another man and jihad is interpreted as a battle with yourself and your bad side to become better as a person. Yet some demagogues explain the words in Qur'an differently to naive uneducated people of the 3rd world countries, mainly not because they would believe so but because of their own economical interests and they train young man to become extremists and do crazy shit like this. What happened was indeed extremely shameful and all extremists are a disgrace for our religion.
What about Muhammed? He killed a lot of people right?
|
On May 23 2013 05:40 Corvi wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:36 jinorazi wrote: random question...
is allahu akbar only used in part of jihad and some people here say or is it more akin to "oh my god" that people use often?
when watching liveleak videos, if anything crazy happens people seem to howl "allahu akbar" nah, muslim people use that all the time, mostly as a positive reaction. for example when i was in a rollercoaster a little while ago some muslims yelled it out of joy. oO
It really is comparable to "Oh my god". It literally means "God is great" but the usage is pretty similar, although it's more commonly used with positive things. It's really common.
I like "Insh allah" better tho, it means something like "if good wills it" and it's really common too. Most arab people are really laid back and also generally pretty happy. Makes for great patients, much happier and accepting than your typical Swede.
|
On May 23 2013 05:40 Antylamon wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 03:41 TheFish7 wrote:On May 23 2013 03:37 farvacola wrote: For better or for worse, you can bet the public response would have been different here in the US. Not that I am by any means suggesting that our public view of justice is in any way superior, but I could easily see these men being taken down by random passerby almost immediately. From what I understand random passerby in England aren't as well armed as the random passerby in the States. Passerbys in the States aren't well-armed at all...
Well, the actual course of events isn't clear as of yet. I would wager the perpetrators did their job quickly, without there necessary being people around to stop them.
I think passersby in Finland would definitely interfere decisively. I have no real reason to believe a stranger of suitable physical size and strength would not interfere in England.
What I gather from the news reports is that there were passersby, but they were women.
|
On May 23 2013 05:48 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:40 Corvi wrote:On May 23 2013 05:36 jinorazi wrote: random question...
is allahu akbar only used in part of jihad and some people here say or is it more akin to "oh my god" that people use often?
when watching liveleak videos, if anything crazy happens people seem to howl "allahu akbar" nah, muslim people use that all the time, mostly as a positive reaction. for example when i was in a rollercoaster a little while ago some muslims yelled it out of joy. oO It really is comparable to "Oh my god". It literally means "God is great" but the usage is pretty similar, although it's more commonly used with positive things. It's really common. I like "Insh allah" better tho, it means something like "if good wills it" and it's really common too. Most arab people are really laid back and also generally pretty happy. Makes for great patients, much happier and accepting than your typical Swede.
I'm not sure if it's really fair to say that about Arabs; do you really know most Arabs that are alive? Do you really know most Swedish people? And is it fair to say well about one and not the other? As if the different cultures were reason to say the people are less happy and more extreme? What if the two were switched and you said that Swedes were much more accepting than your typical Arab, and much more laid back? Sounds like double standards playing in the background.
|
On May 23 2013 05:45 Sverigevader wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:40 edlover420 wrote:On May 23 2013 05:24 ImperialFist wrote: Can Islam be judged by its believers?
Absolutely not, this is utter nonsense.
These killers can easily find verses in the Qoran which would support actions like this. People are not inherently evil but Islam is.
User was temp banned for this post. Actually by the most accepted interpretation of Qur'an it is actually stated that Allah will never forgive you if you kill another man and jihad is interpreted as a battle with yourself and your bad side to become better as a person. Yet some demagogues explain the words in Qur'an differently to naive uneducated people of the 3rd world countries, mainly not because they would believe so but because of their own economical interests and they train young man to become extremists and do crazy shit like this. What happened was indeed extremely shameful and all extremists are a disgrace for our religion. What about Muhammed? He killed a lot of people right? He was a full-time warlord i would assume so.
|
On May 23 2013 05:48 Kontys wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:40 Antylamon wrote:On May 23 2013 03:41 TheFish7 wrote:On May 23 2013 03:37 farvacola wrote: For better or for worse, you can bet the public response would have been different here in the US. Not that I am by any means suggesting that our public view of justice is in any way superior, but I could easily see these men being taken down by random passerby almost immediately. From what I understand random passerby in England aren't as well armed as the random passerby in the States. Passerbys in the States aren't well-armed at all... Well, the actual course of events isn't clear as of yet. I would wager the perpetrators did their job quickly, without there necessary being people around to stop them. I think passersby in Finland would definitely interfere decisively. I have no real reason to believe a stranger of suitable physical size and strength would not interfere in England. What I gather from the news reports is that there were passersby, but they were women.
This attack was frenzied so happened very quickly, he was hit by a car then they set on him with knives very quickly. No passer boy would be able to gauge what was happening, and then they threatneded males who tried to approach with a gun, and knives... hence why noone could approach them. They let a few women go to the body, more out of the fact that "their" women have to see it in their own countries... yeh he was british with a cockeny accent... so he was home born.
im guessing some people did try, but if your threatened with a gun you soon back off or the would be a lot more dead.
|
On May 23 2013 05:51 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:48 CuddlyCuteKitten wrote:On May 23 2013 05:40 Corvi wrote:On May 23 2013 05:36 jinorazi wrote: random question...
is allahu akbar only used in part of jihad and some people here say or is it more akin to "oh my god" that people use often?
when watching liveleak videos, if anything crazy happens people seem to howl "allahu akbar" nah, muslim people use that all the time, mostly as a positive reaction. for example when i was in a rollercoaster a little while ago some muslims yelled it out of joy. oO It really is comparable to "Oh my god". It literally means "God is great" but the usage is pretty similar, although it's more commonly used with positive things. It's really common. I like "Insh allah" better tho, it means something like "if good wills it" and it's really common too. Most arab people are really laid back and also generally pretty happy. Makes for great patients, much happier and accepting than your typical Swede. I'm not sure if it's really fair to say that about Arabs; do you really know most Arabs that are alive? Do you really know most Swedish people? And is it fair to say well about one and not the other? As if the different cultures were reason to say the people are less happy and more extreme? What if the two were switched and you said that Swedes were much more accepting than your typical Arab, and much more laid back? Sounds like double standards playing in the background.
I meet about 20 ppl a day for perhaps 320 days a year. Decide for yourself how valid my observations are. And of course this is only in one specific circumstance as well. Also note that the vast majority of ppl are nice regardless of where they are from, its mostly a matter of degress.
|
On May 23 2013 05:35 dUTtrOACh wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:26 knOxStarcraft wrote:On May 23 2013 05:09 farvacola wrote:On May 23 2013 05:05 soon.Cloak wrote:On May 23 2013 04:53 farvacola wrote:On May 23 2013 04:40 DeepElemBlues wrote:You're not being prudent and intelligent in your judgment Deb, you're pushing a certain storyline first to prove your intellectual superiority and second because of your irrational fear of Islam. Just what about saying that saying "Allahu Ackbar" does not necessitate Islamic adherence is anti-Islamaphobia, by the way? Did I say Islamaphobia is a joke faith based on moon worship or something? Just where is this irrational fear of Islam? I'm one of the least Islam-scared people around. What exactly is scary about Muslims farv? Put me on the chair Dr. Farv, let's find this non-existent fear of Muslims I have. I just want to know how, exactly, pointing out jihadis are jihadis is "anti-Islam." Are not jihadis a stain on Islam? Isn't pointing out they're jihadis separating them from the rest of the Muslims who aren't jihadis? At the end of the day Deb, we both know that waiting more than 12 hours before proclaiming that these men are jihadis is not a PC nor illogical decision, you're just politically posturing because of your intense need to feel intellectually superior through knee jerk, prescriptive thinking. I'm making the obvious conclusion based on the obvious facts, and everyone knows that those of us saying they're jihadis are right. You're the one making it political by bringing in Islamophobia as part of your knee-jerk, prescriptive thinking farv. What is our crime farv, that we were right too soon? Or that you're just afraid that since we're right, Islamophobia will rise? So we must deny reality to avoid an unpleasant outcome? That may or may not happen anyway? It's not set in stone, this "they are jihadis so Islamophobia will rise" concern. I made no political implications about them being jihadis. I just said they were jihadis. Which is obvious no matter how much smoke you blow with non-sequitirs about "anti-Islam." Go read that post implying Muhammad was a child raper, now that's "anti-Islam." You created the political football of "Islamophobia" out of thin air and proceeded to run with it. Not me. The media consuming public is, by and large, stupid and quick to make associations that are immediately spurious in the eyes of those with the proper background knowledge/education. You yourself said that there is a distinct possibility that previous psychological issues led these men to co-opt Islam in their search for some sort of outlet (I'd add socioeconomic factors in myself). In this sense, while it is technically correct to label these men jihadis, it is damaging to the notion of correctly identifying the factors that give these actions rise to immediately and loudly associate Islam with the aforementioned violent acts, particularly when the perpetrators have made it so clear that this is exactly what they want. It is a media simplification of a phenomena that is far more complex than "radical Islam=bad", and it is along these lines that a public encouragement of tempered judgment and a comfort with complexity ought to take center stage. I need not point to evidence that anti-Islamic sentiments run strong, both in Europe and the United States, for you've provided such things in previous threads. All in all, I'm not arguing that calling these men Jihadi's is wrong, I'm arguing that it is irresponsible given what we know about how the public consumes media and forms ideas relative to the contours and shape of the media's information. So...you're saying that what he said wasn't wrong, but was irresponsible, because people would misinterpret it... Or am I misinterpreting you? I'm saying that oversimplifying these things in favor of getting out a clean, neat, consumable message encourages poor thinking on the part of the public. The public can think whatever they please, and if they're jihadis then that's what should be reported. Are you suggesting it should be hidden that they're jihadis or that contributing factors should also be discussed and shown clearly? If so, I agree completely. Not to mention the difference between us and them (extremists) being that we won't take the information and use it as an excuse to commit atrocities. I agree. How the fuck can we ignore the fact that they're screaming "God is great" while hacking a human being to pieces? It's obviously a heavy influence to them and is likely their primary source of moral accountability. Oversimplifying things is exactly what the media has to do, because over-complicating simple things leads to more confusion. Listening to the attacker in the video's accent, he was obviously in the UK for a fairly long time, meaning associates of his and members of his community in the UK contributed to his beliefs and those of his accomplice. Pretending this isn't a Muslim problem won't help moderate Muslims in dealing with it. We won't take this information and use it to commit atrocities? Have you not been awake the last 10 years when various western powers have started assasinating 'targets' at will despite about every moral code prohibiting that? Or the widespread use of torture? Oversimplified reporting like this is exactly what allows the 'global war on terror' to exist, and creates such widespread support for it.
|
On May 23 2013 05:45 Doctorbeat wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:40 edlover420 wrote:On May 23 2013 05:24 ImperialFist wrote: Can Islam be judged by its believers?
Absolutely not, this is utter nonsense.
These killers can easily find verses in the Qoran which would support actions like this. People are not inherently evil but Islam is.
User was temp banned for this post. Actually by the most accepted interpretation of Qur'an it is actually stated that Allah will never forgive you if you kill another man and jihad is interpreted as a battle with yourself and your bad side to become better as a person. Yet some demagogues explain the words in Qur'an differently to naive uneducated people of the 3rd world countries, mainly not because they would believe so but because of their own economical interests and they train young man to become extremists and do crazy shit like this. What happened was indeed extremely shameful and all extremists are a disgrace for our religion. Hadith is a bitch. Though the religion is still partly to blame, when you have claims of it being the literal word of God. And many of the extremists are not 3rd world people but young muslims who grow up in Western nations and radicalize.
Religion is never to blame, you are always accountable for your own actions and even in religious texts I have at least personally never heard of someone saying: "Do whatever you want, God doesnt care". If you, as an individual, are to put the blame on God for your actions you would actually have to know that its what God wants. With religion being a matter of belief this is in itself a contradiction.
People who assume they know what God wants are to blame. People who use religion as a tool to get others to do their bidding are to blame. People who use religion as an excuse to harm others are to blame. Religion is a belief and even God, should there be one, would hold you responsible for your own actions. You can only try to do what you think is right in the name of God and you alone are to blame for your actions.
|
On May 23 2013 05:43 Thrill wrote: His walk in the video doesn't look human... chav walk
|
Horrible to hear, but at least they attacked a soldier instead of a civilian.
|
On May 23 2013 05:52 ShadeR wrote:Show nested quote +On May 23 2013 05:45 Sverigevader wrote:On May 23 2013 05:40 edlover420 wrote:On May 23 2013 05:24 ImperialFist wrote: Can Islam be judged by its believers?
Absolutely not, this is utter nonsense.
These killers can easily find verses in the Qoran which would support actions like this. People are not inherently evil but Islam is.
User was temp banned for this post. Actually by the most accepted interpretation of Qur'an it is actually stated that Allah will never forgive you if you kill another man and jihad is interpreted as a battle with yourself and your bad side to become better as a person. Yet some demagogues explain the words in Qur'an differently to naive uneducated people of the 3rd world countries, mainly not because they would believe so but because of their own economical interests and they train young man to become extremists and do crazy shit like this. What happened was indeed extremely shameful and all extremists are a disgrace for our religion. What about Muhammed? He killed a lot of people right? He was a full-time warlord i would assume so.
Muslims view that the Muhammad fought only when attacked, or in the context of a wider war of self-defense. They argue that Muhammad was the first among the major military figures of history to lay down rules for humane warfare, and that he was scrupulous in limiting the loss of life as much as possible.
|
On May 23 2013 06:02 Yuljan wrote: Horrible to hear, but at least they attacked a soldier instead of a civilian.
rofl, you can't be... well ze internetz
|
haters' gonna hate
User was temp banned for this post.
|
On May 23 2013 06:02 Yuljan wrote: Horrible to hear, but at least they attacked a soldier instead of a civilian.
Sorry to hear your dad was murdered, what was he, a printer? Good thing they killed a printer rather than a baker.
Lolz @ internet...sad lolz :/
|
|
|
|