• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:59
CEST 10:59
KST 17:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles4[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Summer Games Done Quick 2024!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 648 users

Use of DU (Depleted Uranium) Weapons in Iraq - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Abraxas514
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada475 Posts
March 18 2013 19:31 GMT
#21
On March 19 2013 04:24 Demonhunter04 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 02:50 Irratonalys wrote:
OPs post is großly exaggerated,natural Uranium has a decay time of 4,5 billion years, which means its radioactivity is incredibly low over a short period of time. depleted Uranium is even less radioactive.

The main health concerns are heavy metal poisoning , which you also have in any other usable metal for armor penetrating rounds.


I think you might have meant something different than what you wrote. Uranium's half-life of 4.5 billion years means it remains highly radioactive for an extremely long period of time. The DoD has said that DU has about 60% of the radioactivity of natural uranium, but the sun will die before DU becomes insignificantly radioactive.

However, I agree that DU is not uniquely dangerous or anything. It's not very radioactive. The effects of radiation from DU have not been substantiated, but direct exposure is, of course, toxic, but less so than heavy metals.


Man, please don't post about physics. A long half-life means less radioactivity. Even U-235 is pretty low on the decay scale with a half life of about 100 thousand years. It's generally the by-products of fission which are super-radioactive.
Fear is the mind killer
Deleted User 183001
Profile Joined May 2011
2939 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-18 19:42:09
March 18 2013 19:32 GMT
#22
On March 19 2013 03:46 heliusx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 03:33 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
On March 19 2013 03:21 Ettick wrote:
Is there another material that is as effective for piercing armor and as cost efficient?



Tungsten, usually alloyed with nickel and iron or cobalt to form heavy alloys, is used in kinetic energy penetrators as an alternative to depleted uranium, in applications where uranium's radioactivity is problematic, or where uranium's additional pyrophoric properties are not required (for example, in ordinary small arms bullets designed to penetrate body armor).


Other than that, I don't know that there are alternatives. Bear in mind I'm not an expert on munitions, but from my limited knowledge Uranium and Tungsten are the highest-end there is for the time being.

I was reading the wiki article on DU and came across this claim, although the source link is dead. If it's true the tungsten might be worse.
Show nested quote +
According to 2005 research,[32] at least some of the most promising tungsten alloys that have been considered as replacement for depleted uranium in penetrator ammunitions, such as tungsten-cobalt or tungsten-nickel-cobalt alloys, also possess extreme carcinogenic properties, which by far exceed those (confirmed or suspected) of depleted uranium itself: 100% of rats implanted with a pellet of such alloys developed lethal rhabdomyosarcoma within a few weeks.


The Russians use lots of Tungsten-based munitions. It actually works more effectively. The problem is, it's more expensive, since DU is dirt cheap. It's literally the spent waste from nuclear power generation and other uranium usage.

On March 19 2013 03:38 patronage wrote:
My dad lives in Iraq, and he says there are often dust storms and the city officials have warned about radiation during the dust storms.

Well, that's shitty. Really shitty. Not trying to sound insensitive, but I think that's still one of the least of Iraq's worries . To put it briefly, it has a long way to go to get to 1990 status.
MasterOfPuppets
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Romania6942 Posts
March 18 2013 19:33 GMT
#23
On March 19 2013 04:18 aksfjh wrote:
I'm not sure what the gripe is here. It's war, people are going to die, and poisonous substances are likely to enter the environment.


Thankfully military powers today do not share this sentiment quite to the same extent, otherwise I'm sure they'd be topping Tsar Bomba instead of striving to produce increasingly precise weapons designed specifically to reduce casualties and collateral damage.
"my shaft scares me too" - strenx 2014
nucLeaRTV
Profile Joined May 2011
Romania822 Posts
March 18 2013 19:37 GMT
#24
On March 19 2013 03:22 D4V3Z02 wrote:
The half life of this stuff is pretty outrageous. Looks like world police is pretty corrupted.

Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 02:31 GrandInquisitor wrote:
This is all Terran's fault. Did they never stop to think about the environmental impact of their U-238 upgrades?

User was warned for this post


This is actually a good one.


Yeah, but irrelevant to the thread.

Aren't these kind of weapons considered chemical weapons? Aren't those world wide banned?
"Having your own haters means you are famous"
emythrel
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United Kingdom2599 Posts
March 18 2013 19:39 GMT
#25
On March 19 2013 04:30 Dfgj wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 04:24 Demonhunter04 wrote:
On March 19 2013 02:50 Irratonalys wrote:
OPs post is großly exaggerated,natural Uranium has a decay time of 4,5 billion years, which means its radioactivity is incredibly low over a short period of time. depleted Uranium is even less radioactive.

The main health concerns are heavy metal poisoning , which you also have in any other usable metal for armor penetrating rounds.


I think you might have meant something different than what you wrote. Uranium's half-life of 4.5 billion years means it remains highly radioactive for an extremely long period of time. The DoD has said that DU has about 60% of the radioactivity of natural uranium, but the sun will die before DU becomes insignificantly radioactive.

However, I agree that DU is not uniquely dangerous or anything. It's not very radioactive. The effects of radiation from DU have not been substantiated, but direct exposure is, of course, toxic, but less so than heavy metals.

What he's getting at is if it takes 4.5 billion years for half of an amount of Uranium to decay, the amount that decays over a given short period of time is relatively minor.

Whether 'relatively minor' for Uranium is still a hazard is an entirely different matter.


60% of the original radioactive energy is pretty close to the natural uranium's half life but the fact that the uranium hasn't yet decayed in to other elements is the important part, if its still uranium, its still dangerous... just ask Marie Curie! (ok that was radium but same principle!)
When there is nothing left to lose but your dignity, it is already gone.
emythrel
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United Kingdom2599 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-18 19:45:02
March 18 2013 19:42 GMT
#26
On March 19 2013 04:37 nucLeaRTV wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 03:22 D4V3Z02 wrote:
The half life of this stuff is pretty outrageous. Looks like world police is pretty corrupted.

On March 19 2013 02:31 GrandInquisitor wrote:
This is all Terran's fault. Did they never stop to think about the environmental impact of their U-238 upgrades?

User was warned for this post


This is actually a good one.


Yeah, but irrelevant to the thread.

Aren't these kind of weapons considered chemical weapons? Aren't those world wide banned?


by that standard everything is a chemical weapon, except nuclear ones. Gunpower releases its chemical energy to create an explosion and propel a bullet. All explosions are chemical energy.

A chemical weapon is something that kills people directly using a chemical agent like mustard gas. This is just a by-product of the material used in armor piercing rounds. If anything it would be considered a nuclear weapon, which are also banned (unless ur the UK,USA,China,Isreal,India,pakistan etc) because their lasting effects are too harsh.

More people die from the aftermath of a nuclear strike than by the explosion itself, that is the hallmark of a nuclear weapon and if DU does have the effect described in the OP, it should be considered a nuclear weapon.
When there is nothing left to lose but your dignity, it is already gone.
Chemist391
Profile Joined October 2010
United States366 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-18 19:49:45
March 18 2013 19:45 GMT
#27
On March 19 2013 04:39 emythrel wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 04:30 Dfgj wrote:
On March 19 2013 04:24 Demonhunter04 wrote:
On March 19 2013 02:50 Irratonalys wrote:
OPs post is großly exaggerated,natural Uranium has a decay time of 4,5 billion years, which means its radioactivity is incredibly low over a short period of time. depleted Uranium is even less radioactive.

The main health concerns are heavy metal poisoning , which you also have in any other usable metal for armor penetrating rounds.


I think you might have meant something different than what you wrote. Uranium's half-life of 4.5 billion years means it remains highly radioactive for an extremely long period of time. The DoD has said that DU has about 60% of the radioactivity of natural uranium, but the sun will die before DU becomes insignificantly radioactive.

However, I agree that DU is not uniquely dangerous or anything. It's not very radioactive. The effects of radiation from DU have not been substantiated, but direct exposure is, of course, toxic, but less so than heavy metals.

What he's getting at is if it takes 4.5 billion years for half of an amount of Uranium to decay, the amount that decays over a given short period of time is relatively minor.

Whether 'relatively minor' for Uranium is still a hazard is an entirely different matter.


60% of the original radioactive energy is pretty close to the natural uranium's half life but the fact that the uranium hasn't yet decayed in to other elements is the important part, if its still uranium, its still dangerous... just ask Marie Curie! (ok that was radium but same principle!)


All radiation is not created equal. The decay pathway determines what particle or wavelength is emitted from the parent nucleus, and that's what you care about. High energy Beta decay is more dangerous than alpha decay...unless an alpha emitter is ingested somehow.
Natural Uranium has a higher percentage of U235 than does DU (which is nearly all U238). U235, like U238 is an alpha emitter, but it also emits gamma rays, which are FAR more dangerous to the human body. The half-life is also significantly shorter, so the CPS (counts per second) is much higher. So an increase in %U235 is what leads to that 60% number from the DoD, and that 60% figure is comparing the relative Total Ionizing Doses.

Comparing relative doses of radiation is actually pretty complex, hence the large number of units used to describe it: Curies, Roentgens, Rads, Grays, Sieverts, Becquerels, etc .
Glull
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Germany404 Posts
March 18 2013 19:48 GMT
#28
although i can see a reasonable discussion arise from whether or not causing radioactive pollution is acceptable under the geneva conventions (or a similar rationale), this op is so factually incorrect and incendiary (pun!) it makes me want to puke.

if the op gets updated some time soon i can see this being a great topic to talk about, but right now i can only regard it as flamebaiting or making people do "research" for the thread starter.
Mjolnir
Profile Joined January 2009
912 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-18 20:01:22
March 18 2013 19:57 GMT
#29

I own a depleted uranium shell (casing) from the vulcan cannon of an A-10. It's a shell that was fired on Iraqi targets, interestingly enough. Here's hoping it hasn't been poisoning my house for the last decade or so.

Chilling5pr33
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Germany518 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-18 20:27:31
March 18 2013 19:59 GMT
#30
On March 19 2013 04:48 Glull wrote:
although i can see a reasonable discussion arise from whether or not causing radioactive pollution is acceptable under the geneva conventions (or a similar rationale), this op is so factually incorrect and incendiary (pun!) it makes me want to puke.

if the op gets updated some time soon i can see this being a great topic to talk about, but right now i can only regard it as flamebaiting or making people do "research" for the thread starter.



Im not a specialist on the topic nor do i have advanced knowlege of physics/chemicals so please everyone who has some interesting information should send me those, that i can include them!

If someone feels offended by my Post please point out the major flaws and points where i might have been wrong or biased.

Thanks in advance.
F-
Invol2ver
Profile Joined September 2010
United States330 Posts
March 18 2013 20:05 GMT
#31
On March 19 2013 04:24 Demonhunter04 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 02:50 Irratonalys wrote:
OPs post is großly exaggerated,natural Uranium has a decay time of 4,5 billion years, which means its radioactivity is incredibly low over a short period of time. depleted Uranium is even less radioactive.

The main health concerns are heavy metal poisoning , which you also have in any other usable metal for armor penetrating rounds.


I think you might have meant something different than what you wrote. Uranium's half-life of 4.5 billion years means it remains highly radioactive for an extremely long period of time. The DoD has said that DU has about 60% of the radioactivity of natural uranium, but the sun will die before DU becomes insignificantly radioactive.


You are incorrect. Radioactivity is caused by the decay of the particles in the substance. Radioactive materials with a long half-life release less radiation per unit of time. Not that it is insignificant, but the most immediately dangerous radioactive materials are the ones with the shortest half lives, such as iodine and others.
Losing money is less good than making it, confirm?
ScoSteSal
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States54 Posts
March 18 2013 20:07 GMT
#32
Man, actually read through these first two pages of this thread. They've listed a ton of critical failures in your presentation of the issue in the OP.
Iustum Agere Arduum Est...Sed Modo Sine Day9o
Chilling5pr33
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Germany518 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-18 20:22:33
March 18 2013 20:22 GMT
#33
On March 19 2013 03:06 Silvanel wrote:
OP made several mistakes.(to not call it blantant lies)
Uranium is both radiocative and toxic. Its toxicity is much bigger issue than radioactivity.
There are studies claiming that using that kind of amunition can be hamrfull, but there are also studies claiming it has negligable effects.
The sentence about million deaths is taken out of nowhere. Nothing suggests that. As far as i am awere of there is no single proven case of death as result of use of DU (not counting those killed by bullets of course), not to mention millions.


Isnt the Toxic level caused mainly by his radioactive propertys?
F-
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-18 20:29:53
March 18 2013 20:27 GMT
#34
On March 19 2013 04:57 Mjolnir wrote:

I own a depleted uranium shell (casing) from the vulcan cannon of an A-10. It's a shell that was fired on Iraqi targets, interestingly enough. Here's hoping it hasn't been poisoning my house for the last decade or so.


It hasn't been. Even if you accept that DU is bad (I don't), the casing is just brass, or something else equally harmless. It's the projectile that's DU.

On March 19 2013 05:22 Chilling5pr33 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 03:06 Silvanel wrote:
OP made several mistakes.(to not call it blantant lies)
Uranium is both radiocative and toxic. Its toxicity is much bigger issue than radioactivity.
There are studies claiming that using that kind of amunition can be hamrfull, but there are also studies claiming it has negligable effects.
The sentence about million deaths is taken out of nowhere. Nothing suggests that. As far as i am awere of there is no single proven case of death as result of use of DU (not counting those killed by bullets of course), not to mention millions.


Isnt the Toxic level caused mainly by his radioactive propertys?

No. Toxicity is due to the fact that it's a heavy metal.

Speaking of which, why are people complaining about DU when traditional lead can be just as toxic, and is used far more often?
Who called in the fleet?
naastyOne
Profile Joined April 2012
491 Posts
March 18 2013 20:38 GMT
#35
People still have no idea that sun radiates raiation,
That every time you get X-rays you do get a substantial dose of radiation,
and that small quantities additional to the natural level of radiation are not harmfull,
right?
Chilling5pr33
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Germany518 Posts
March 18 2013 20:42 GMT
#36
On March 19 2013 05:38 naastyOne wrote:
People still have no idea that sun radiates raiation,
That every time you get X-rays you do get a substantial dose of radiation,
and that small quantities additional to the natural level of radiation are not harmfull,
right?


Well our body has some great mechanism to deal with those doses but too much of it is always bad (like of everything) and if you inhale something wich has (even very little) radioactive propertys it poisons you over a long period of time.
Its basic knowlege that radiation cause damage in our DNA wich can lead to cancer.
F-
Skullflower
Profile Joined July 2010
United States3779 Posts
March 18 2013 21:53 GMT
#37
On March 19 2013 04:37 nucLeaRTV wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 03:22 D4V3Z02 wrote:
The half life of this stuff is pretty outrageous. Looks like world police is pretty corrupted.

On March 19 2013 02:31 GrandInquisitor wrote:
This is all Terran's fault. Did they never stop to think about the environmental impact of their U-238 upgrades?

User was warned for this post


This is actually a good one.


Yeah, but irrelevant to the thread.

Aren't these kind of weapons considered chemical weapons? Aren't those world wide banned?


I'm fairly certain they are not considered chemical weapons and even if they were in all likelihood superpowers like the US and Russia wouldn't even be signatories to such a thing
The ruminations are mine, let the world be yours.
Daumen
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany1073 Posts
March 18 2013 21:56 GMT
#38
I remember hearing about the German Guy (Journalist or Doctor, not sure anymore) trying to find a University here in Germany to test a sample that he found, he got arrested. 1 University tested it(2 others rejected the request) and thats how the Public got to know about this, before it was all just a rumor and/or a very well hidden crime. It is a crime, isnt it?

Didnt the Nato ban the Weapons that could have unforeseeable damages? (Mines, radiation etc)
President of the ReaL Fan Club.
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 18 2013 22:17 GMT
#39
On March 19 2013 04:33 MasterOfPuppets wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 19 2013 04:18 aksfjh wrote:
I'm not sure what the gripe is here. It's war, people are going to die, and poisonous substances are likely to enter the environment.


Thankfully military powers today do not share this sentiment quite to the same extent, otherwise I'm sure they'd be topping Tsar Bomba instead of striving to produce increasingly precise weapons designed specifically to reduce casualties and collateral damage.

Merely a line has to be drawn. It's one thing to consider collateral damage from a bomb and take steps to refine them to minimize collateral damage and civilian casualties. It's another issue to ask that those involved don't kick up a lot of dust, literally. Are you going to ask next to limit our use of lead in bullets to prevent fringe cases of lead poisoning?
Greggle
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1131 Posts
March 18 2013 22:19 GMT
#40
I thought it just did +1 range.
Life is too short to take it seriously.
Prev 1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 1m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 201
StarCraft: Brood War
actioN 1476
GuemChi 1239
Hyuk 402
EffOrt 308
Soma 290
Leta 226
ToSsGirL 213
PianO 180
Rush 110
sSak 57
[ Show more ]
JulyZerg 47
Barracks 40
Sacsri 35
yabsab 32
Free 25
Sharp 24
Movie 22
Bale 10
IntoTheRainbow 10
Aegong 9
Yoon 7
Dota 2
XcaliburYe789
League of Legends
JimRising 503
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K912
shoxiejesuss660
kennyS388
allub4
Other Games
gofns5563
tarik_tv3324
ceh9631
Liquid`RaSZi452
shahzam346
Tasteless147
Pyrionflax138
Mew2King86
crisheroes38
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick23565
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2294
League of Legends
• Lourlo1595
• HappyZerGling101
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1h 1m
WardiTV European League
7h 1m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
15h 1m
The PondCast
1d 1h
WardiTV European League
1d 3h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 15h
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
[ Show More ]
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
CSO Cup
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.