EPTNot every game is going to be an outstanding success or a legacy title.
Name one AAA game company that hasn't disapointed its fans......
point set match.
Blizzard's Comments on Activison - Page 11
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
SayGen
United States1209 Posts
Not every game is going to be an outstanding success or a legacy title. Name one AAA game company that hasn't disapointed its fans...... point set match. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
| ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:42 SayGen wrote: People so mad over D3. Not every game is going to be an outstanding success or a legacy title. Name one AAA game company that hasn't disapointed its fans...... point set match. Blizzard used to ONLY make quality games. From 1994 to 2001 they made Warcraft, Warcraft 2, Diablo, Starcraft, Brood War, Diablo 2 and LoD. All great games. | ||
|
Deadlyhazard
United States1177 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:42 SayGen wrote: People so mad over D3. Not every game is going to be an outstanding success or a legacy title. Name one AAA game company that hasn't disapointed its fans...... point set match. Valve, for me. Arena net. CD Projekt Red. | ||
|
Henno
7 Posts
| ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:48 GolemMadness wrote: Blizzard used to ONLY make quality games. From 1994 to 2001 they made Warcraft, Warcraft 2, Diablo, Starcraft, Brood War, Diablo 2 and LoD. All great games. WC3, TFT, and WoW were also quality games as well. That extends the timeline to 2004. | ||
|
Angra
United States2652 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:42 SayGen wrote: People so mad over D3. Not every game is going to be an outstanding success or a legacy title. Name one AAA game company that hasn't disapointed its fans...... point set match. Blizzard, up until recently. Valve. | ||
|
Deadlyhazard
United States1177 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:53 Henno wrote: Would you guys stop spamming your opinions in this thread? They are: Meaningless, bias, pointless, low-high-skillbased, stupid, based on assumption. And always the same. Dont you guys notice that there is always a same one sentence "opinion" of yours? You cant discuss that. There is nothing to discuss. Nobody can check if your opinion is right or wrong. I don't think you understand what a forum is for. It is for debating opinions. Of course people are going to have similar opinions, some people think similarly about certain issues. There are differing opinions, however, if you read the entire thread. There are fans of Blizzard defending them, going against them, and everything in-between. | ||
|
dragonblade369
Canada464 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:49 Deadlyhazard wrote: Valve, for me. Arena net. CD Projekt Red. I was a hardcore GW1 fan. I was massively disappointed by GW2. The game doesn't even seem close to be finished. Plagued with mechanism issue and design issue. | ||
|
Deadlyhazard
United States1177 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:57 dragonblade369 wrote: I was a hardcore GW1 fan. I was massively disappointed by GW2. The game doesn't even seem close to be finished. Plagued with mechanism issue and design issue. Well, the endgame is certainly a huge mess. Everything up til level 80 is fantastic though. Most of it is a lot better than Guild Wars 1, especially the addition of WvWvW to pvp. It's a shame the dungeons suck (compared to WoW 5 mans) in terms of mechanics.  | ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:42 SayGen wrote: People so mad over D3. Not every game is going to be an outstanding success or a legacy title. Name one AAA game company that hasn't disapointed its fans...... point set match. Which is generally true for most game developers, but few to none dedicate as much time as Blizzard does to their three titles. Especially D3. | ||
|
Henno
7 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:55 Deadlyhazard wrote: I don't think you understand what a forum is for. It is for debating opinions. Of course people are going to have similar opinions, some people think similarly about certain issues. There are differing opinions, however, if you read the entire thread. There are fans of Blizzard defending them, going against them, and everything in-between. You cant debate without digging deeper into someones "opinion". You have to know the circumstances of this person. Or if he contradict his own opinion somehow. Its always the same shit: wow bad addons bad activision-blizzard everything else good. Oh btw. Half-Life 2 was a disappointment. physics/graphic were fun. But the rest to short. Does it matter? No, not at all. | ||
|
dragoon
United States695 Posts
| ||
|
SupLilSon
Malaysia4123 Posts
On September 19 2012 10:11 Henno wrote: You cant debate without digging deeper into someones "opinion". You have to know the circumstances of this person. Or if he contradict his own opinion somehow. Its always the same shit: wow bad addons bad activision-blizzard everything else good. Oh btw. Half-Life 2 was a disappointment. physics/graphic were fun. But the rest to short. Does it matter? No, not at all. Half Life 2 may have personally been a dissapointment to you but it released as a playable and whole game. D3 released without PvP (still no PvP) and tons of inherent problems. On September 19 2012 10:16 joon wrote: I bet Activision told them to say that after all the shit they get for blizzard's fuck ups. lol yea so true | ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
On September 19 2012 09:53 Henno wrote: Would you guys stop spamming your opinions in this thread? They are: Meaningless, bias, pointless, low-high-skillbased, stupid, based on assumption. And always the same. Dont you guys notice that there is always a same one sentence "opinion" of yours? You cant discuss that. There is nothing to discuss. Nobody can check if your opinion is right or wrong. Idk why you felt the need to sign up to post something like this. It's moronic saying that everyone's opinions are stupid and always the same. There have already been dissenting opinions in this thread. Generally there are 2 sides to an argument. So should we only let 2 people post each side of the argument and then close the thread to "stop spamming"? Learn how a forum works. How ridiculous. | ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On September 19 2012 10:16 SupLilSon wrote: Half Life 2 may have personally been a dissapointment to you but it released as a playable and whole game. D3 released without PvP (still no PvP) and tons of inherent problems. lol yea so true In defense of D3 despite it's negative qualities, HL2 didn't have an online component at all to develop. Sort of unfair to make such a comparison. D3 was intended to give lifetimes more play value than HL2 ever was. | ||
|
Deadlyhazard
United States1177 Posts
On September 19 2012 10:20 rd wrote: In defense of D3 despite it's negative qualities, HL2 didn't have an online component at all to develop. Sort of unfair to make such a comparison. D3 was intended to give lifetimes more play value than HL2 ever was. ...Didn't HL2 come with HL2 deathmatch? And Counter-Strike Source when it was originally released? | ||
|
rd
United States2586 Posts
On September 19 2012 10:22 Deadlyhazard wrote: ...Didn't HL2 come with HL2 deathmatch? And Counter-Strike Source when it was originally released? Source, yes. But two separate games -- put against a pseudo-mmo. I'm not sure if you actually intend to make this comparison work. | ||
|
Henno
7 Posts
On September 19 2012 10:16 joon wrote: I bet Activision told them to say that after all the shit they get for blizzard's fuck ups. [B]lol yea so true Thats the meaningless opinion im talking about. People will follow up to this. And they will believe it | ||
|
Henno
7 Posts
[B]Source, yes. But two separate games -- put against a pseudo-mmo. I'm not sure if you actually intend to make this comparison work. What the fuck is a pseudo-MMO? Thats also what i mean. People come up with pointless definitions. | ||
| ||
