EPTthose crazy Reddit users, at it again! - Page 9
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
| ||
|
redviper
Pakistan2333 Posts
On September 18 2012 05:18 Manit0u wrote: Let me ask again. What is this Reddit you speak of? Somehow Reddit and Facebook have never captured my interest and I never visited those sites (I believe I even have facebook banned in my hosts file so no one using my computer can connect to it). Edit: Indeed, facebook.com is returned as 127.0.0.1 That doesn't make you cool, it makes you ignorant. This is akin to closing your eyes, covering your ears and screaming "I can't hear you, I can't hear you" at the top of your voice. I'll never understand this desire people have to embrace ignorance and act as if its a virtue. It isn't. | ||
|
N3rV[Green]
United States1935 Posts
On September 18 2012 09:40 redviper wrote: That doesn't make you cool, it makes you ignorant. This is akin to closing your eyes, covering your ears and screaming "I can't hear you, I can't hear you" at the top of your voice. I'll never understand this desire people have to embrace ignorance and act as if its a virtue. It isn't. No, facebook is a massive waste of time and energy and I stand by this man 100%. Only reason I use reddit is /r/dota2 for funny pictures, otherwise it is also a massive waste of time and energy. That isn't even close to ignorance lol. | ||
|
PanN
United States2828 Posts
On September 18 2012 01:57 Xiphos wrote: Isn't Anderson's sexuality belongs in the homo section? I think that Reddit is a very nice form of technocracy. As matter of fact, it is a very simple medium of expressing one's opinionated thought(s). I have been trying to figure out what this means for awhile... what does this have to do with andersons sexuality? | ||
|
T.O.P.
Hong Kong4685 Posts
| ||
|
zdfgucker
China594 Posts
I don't see the big problem. | ||
|
Kneeb4r
Canada21 Posts
Because we should protect "innocent kids" who are working in a industry to achieve fame and fortune? Uhm, yes? How is that even a question? If you had a child would you like him/her to be exploited? There's a lot of children in the fashion and music industry who get molested, sexually assualted and taken advantage of. Should you not care because they're getting fame and fortune? Even if whatever subreddit you're speaking of isn't used for Child Pornography your post is just sad. You sicken me. | ||
|
Deleted User 173346
16169 Posts
| ||
|
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
| ||
|
cari-kira
Germany655 Posts
| ||
|
I_Love_Bacon
United States5765 Posts
| ||
|
IshinShishi
Japan6156 Posts
| ||
|
Bigtony
United States1606 Posts
On September 18 2012 10:24 jdseemoreglass wrote: I quit reading the article completely after about the third time it called jailbait "child pornography." Nice hit piece though. People need to grow up and live their own lives, quit placating your own meaningless and insecurity with misplaced judgment and self-righteousness. Using pictures of children (even clothed) for erotic stimulation is morally questionable behavior, even if it's not 'child pornography.' Also, 'hacking' photobucket/facebook for suggestive photos of people is also bad. | ||
|
yeastiality
Canada374 Posts
On September 18 2012 10:24 jdseemoreglass wrote: I quit reading the article completely after about the third time it called jailbait "child pornography." Nice hit piece though. People need to grow up and live their own lives, quit placating your own meaningless and insecurity with misplaced judgment and self-righteousness. back any of that up with facts? On September 18 2012 10:42 IshinShishi wrote: Everything and anything is paedophilia these days, I checked the majority of those subreddits, not a single child was seen, not a single fuck was given, moving along. I too speak in internet memes and sweeping generalizations rock on bros | ||
|
jdseemoreglass
United States3773 Posts
On September 18 2012 10:44 Bigtony wrote: Using pictures of children (even clothed) for erotic stimulation is morally questionable behavior, even if it's not 'child pornography.' Also, 'hacking' photobucket/facebook for suggestive photos of people is also bad. People used to think that sodomy, or homosexuality, was "morally questionable behavior." And that involved another person! What you are talking about is someone masturbating in the privacy of their own home, sorry, I don't agree that it's such a horrible thing. I honestly don't care what they get off to if they aren't harming anybody. Society says it's no longer ok to hate gays. We say it's no longer ok to hate blacks. We say it's no longer ok to burn people at the stake because they were "witches." The people in our society who still harbor great hatred and anger and resentment in their hearts only have a couple socially sanctioned outlets left for their hatred, the primary being pedophiles. Their hatred is so great and irrational that it even spreads to people who are NOT pedophiles, such as those who look at jailbait. "Disgusting, you make me sick, these people should eliminated," those are the types of comments you hear even on a board as typically tolerant as teamliquid. I can't tell how much of it is just blind anger and hatred and how much is a need for people to prop up their own egos by judging others so harshly. Either way, it just comes across to me as sad and backwards. | ||
|
Bigtony
United States1606 Posts
On September 18 2012 10:59 jdseemoreglass wrote: People used to think that sodomy, or homosexuality, was "morally questionable behavior." And that involved another person! What you are talking about is someone masturbating in the privacy of their own home, sorry, I don't agree that it's such a horrible thing. I honestly don't care what they get off to if they aren't harming anybody. Society says it's no longer ok to hate gays. We say it's no longer ok to hate blacks. We say it's no longer ok to burn people at the stake because they were "witches." The people in our society who still harbor great hatred and anger and resentment in their hearts only have a couple socially sanctioned outlets left for their hatred, the primary being pedophiles. Their hatred is so great and irrational that it even spreads to people who are NOT pedophiles, such as those who look at jailbait. "Disgusting, you make me sick, these people should eliminated," those are the types of comments you hear even on a board as typically tolerant as teamliquid. I can't tell how much of it is just blind anger and hatred and how much is a need for people to prop up their own egos by judging others so harshly. Either way, it just comes across to me as sad and backwards. 1. What you do in the privacy of your home matters. 2. My dislike for pedophilic behavior is irrational? What? You're seriously comparing disliking pedophilia to hating blacks? 3. You misunderstand me I think. I'm saying that using pictures of children is pedophilia, even if it isn't explicitly illegal. | ||
|
divito
Canada1213 Posts
That said, I only go to Reddit if I absolutely have to; the site is ugly, unintuitive and annoying. That and I'll maybe be interested in one link out of an entire subreddit. Just not worth the time. Really never understood people's fascination with it. | ||
|
yeastiality
Canada374 Posts
On September 18 2012 11:09 divito wrote: The statement by the manager is a good one, and white knights here and in the media probably will still attack it regardless. The one where he acknowledges that illegal things should be punished, while running a website that gives rapists the same free speech rights with their story as people who steal little kids' photobucket pictures? One of those things is DEFINITELY illegal, and the other you can defend with a mile-long list of corner cases and legalese written by internet libertarians who have never been outside. | ||
|
divito
Canada1213 Posts
On September 18 2012 11:12 yeastiality wrote: The one where he acknowledges that illegal things should be punished, while running a website that gives rapists the same free speech rights with their story as people who steal little kids' photobucket pictures? One of those things is DEFINITELY illegal, and the other you can defend with a mile-long list of corner cases and legalese written by internet libertarians who have never been outside. Free speech is free speech, is free speech. Once you start bringing your perspective and bias into it, it ceases to be free. | ||
|
NeMeSiS3
Canada2972 Posts
On September 18 2012 10:54 yeastiality wrote: back any of that up with facts? I too speak in internet memes and sweeping generalizations rock on bros Back any of that up with facts? Jailbait is not CP ... There is a big difference between the two and it would seem obvious that is the case because although the news might use them like synonyms they're not at all. It's not about facts, it's about definition. A young woman, or young women collectively, considered in sexual terms but under the age of consent. Young woman does not equal young child. | ||
| ||
