|
|
On October 23 2012 11:07 TotalBalanceSC2 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2012 11:05 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 23 2012 10:54 ZeaL. wrote:On October 23 2012 10:50 Swazi Spring wrote:On October 23 2012 10:43 ZeaL. wrote: Naval power is what we need to fight off al qaeda. Because it's not like other countries exist... Yes. China is saber rattling as a war would be the best thing for their economy and Putin has set his sights on remaking the Soviet Union. These statements are more true than you might like to admit. Really? China is a very rational actor and knows war with America would be disastrous. And the Russia comment is just hillarious..... As for Russia, see earlier in this thread. We proved that Russia was rebuilding the Soviet Union.
|
romney is gonna need some ice for that burn
women loving the obamalama again
|
On October 23 2012 11:20 radiatoren wrote: I do not think the labeling of China as a currency manipulator and IPR-protectionism is a good way to go for Romney.
I know, international property rights is a weird way for him to go. Unless he wants to talk about India and HIV meds.
|
On October 23 2012 11:20 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Could Romney sweat more?
What the hell? I don't even know where to begin..
You and Defacer have to be same accounts.
|
On October 23 2012 11:20 xDaunt wrote: And a really good answer from Romney.
Really? That's your idea of a 'good' answer? Siiiiiiiiiigggggh.
|
Romney: don't be a protectionist obama! Romney: I'm going to be a protectionist!
|
On October 23 2012 11:19 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: Government doesn't make businesses successful just Olympics.
to be fair Olympics are across the board wild economic failures for how much governments spend on them and how much they bring in.
|
does Obama think Toyota is a Chinese company?
tbh, I would rather have let GM go bankrupt and let the Japanese take over the auto-industry (except for Ford, everyone always forgets about Ford).
|
On October 23 2012 11:20 radiatoren wrote: I do not think the labeling of China as a currency manipulator and IPR-protectionism is a good way to go for Romney.
Well people who know things know he wont do it but hes not appealing to high information voters he is appealing to low information voters.
|
On October 23 2012 11:13 Risen wrote:Linking to a page that has the youtube stream embedded seams... wrong.
Didn't realize until after the fact. Didn't watch the last debate through youtube. Don't see what's wrong anyway.
Also, Obama slapping Romney all over the place.
|
On October 23 2012 11:22 Defacer wrote:Really? That's you idea of a 'good' answer? Siiiiiiiiiigggggh.
Wasn't really bad, just not very accurate regarding how trade wars work because it didn't take into account what is exported, which is integral.
|
Obama on China: I have no plan, but Romney exports jobs to China!
|
ahahahahaha you know about shipping jobs to China. Maybe romney can run for office there!
|
Romney's praying these next two minutes win him Michigan.
|
romney trying to say someone else isnt giving the specifics of their plan is humorous
|
Where the hell is Ron Paul when you actually need him?
|
Someone likes american cars? Fascinating...
|
Romney: Now that Obama has saved the auto industry, I promise not to destroy it.
BOLD
|
|
10387 Posts
|
|
|
|