On October 12 2012 10:55 xDaunt wrote: Ryan is not getting to say anything at all. This debate is a farce.
Ryan, oddly enough, has had about equal speaking time.
Bullshit, Biden has been talking over him for the past 10-15 mins.
Meh, this is the debate. You still keeping score?
I like this. If Ryan's statements can't stand up to Biden and a moderator I don't care if it's biased (it is). If you have faith in your plan to stand up to scrutiny it wouldn't matter if everything you said got fact-checked and called out by your opponent and the moderator.
I have it at 4-2 still. I haven't been able to score the past several rounds due Biden and the moderator not giving Ryan a fair chance to answer.
On October 12 2012 10:58 Zooper31 wrote: Before they started the question about Afghanistan.
Biden: 26:03 Ryan: 24:46
They've had equal speaking time as much as it seems they haven't. Yes they tick up the clock when Biden or Ryan interrupts and both clocks can go at the same time when they talk over each other.
Ok, thats a little relieving to me, but I still dont think Biden should interrupt. Say what he has to say and if he stops short of 2 minutes he shouldnt make it up interrupting Ryan.
Moderator also seems to cut off the topics every time Ryan wants to respond and never when Biden wants to. I fully believe Biden can win the debate without the help of the moderator or interruptions so this is disappointing to me.
NoOOOOOO not that Obama couldn't know her personally.
Standard nonsense attack. Attack the points raised not the credibility of the people giving them. Doing so just makes you look like an ass unwilling to respond to arguments.
He's saying that she is biased towards one of the debaters, which, if you've been watching, she is. What else is there for him to say ?
How about he says oh she's biased, and you can see clear examples of it here. Instead he tries some stupid conspiracy theory nonsense.
I'll say it again. This is what the Republican party needs. Expose the lies and misrepresentations so this weak trash gets thrown out and the party gets back to sanity.
NoOOOOOO not that Obama couldn't know her personally.
Standard nonsense attack. Attack the points raised not the credibility of the people giving them. Doing so just makes you look like an ass unwilling to respond to arguments.
Attacking me personally does not make this fact any less true not arguing against my point makes you look like an ass and unwilling to respond to arguments.
Meh, I prefer arguments over ideas, not people. I think arguing over people is for weak bitches. To each his own.
Congrats on dodging because it is below you just tell me like Obama tells the Moderators tell me I can move on so I can know I'm right just say it tell me to move on hurry while I twist my nipples.
NoOOOOOO not that Obama couldn't know her personally.
Standard nonsense attack. Attack the points raised not the credibility of the people giving them. Doing so just makes you look like an ass unwilling to respond to arguments.
Attacking me personally does not make this fact any less true not arguing against my point makes you look like an ass and unwilling to respond to arguments.
Meh, I prefer arguments over ideas, not people. I think arguing over people is for weak bitches. To each his own.
Congrats on dodging because it is below you just tell me like Obama tells the Moderators tell me I can move on so I can know I'm right just say it tell me to move on hurry while I twist my nipples.
Read what I've been saying. I acknowledge that the moderator is biased, and I don't care. If Ryan and Romney had their shit straight it wouldn't matter if the whole world was against them. As it is, they need to be thrown out like yesterday's trash so the party can get back on track.
NoOOOOOO not that Obama couldn't know her personally.
Standard nonsense attack. Attack the points raised not the credibility of the people giving them. Doing so just makes you look like an ass unwilling to respond to arguments.
He's saying that she is biased towards one of the debaters, which, if you've been watching, she is. What else is there for him to say ?
How about he says oh she's biased, and you can see clear examples of it here. Instead he tries some stupid conspiracy theory nonsense.
I'll say it again. This is what the Republican party needs. Expose the lies and misrepresentations so this weak trash gets thrown out and the party gets back to sanity.
It is no secret that the moderator is a democrat. I don't really care about that. What I do care about is her performance and fairness in moderating. She clearly is not being fair.
On October 12 2012 11:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Is the moderator actually debating for Biden and against Ryan, or just trying to keep Ryan honest? I'm not exactly sure.
well, even if she is calling ryan on his bull more than biden, debatable, the answer should be she gives more questioning to biden, not less to ryan.
On October 12 2012 11:02 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Is the moderator actually debating for Biden and against Ryan, or just trying to keep Ryan honest? I'm not exactly sure.
Both. She's keeping Ryan honest, but this is a debate and the only person keeping Ryan honest should be Biden. Therefor, she's debating for Biden.
On October 12 2012 10:55 xDaunt wrote: Ryan is not getting to say anything at all. This debate is a farce.
Ryan, oddly enough, has had about equal speaking time.
Bullshit, Biden has been talking over him for the past 10-15 mins.
Meh, this is the debate. You still keeping score?
I like this. If Ryan's statements can't stand up to Biden and a moderator I don't care if it's biased (it is). If you have faith in your plan to stand up to scrutiny it wouldn't matter if everything you said got fact-checked and called out by your opponent and the moderator.
I have it at 4-2 still. I haven't been able to score the past several rounds due Biden and the moderator not giving Ryan a fair chance to answer.
NoOOOOOO not that Obama couldn't know her personally.
Standard nonsense attack. Attack the points raised not the credibility of the people giving them. Doing so just makes you look like an ass unwilling to respond to arguments.
He's saying that she is biased towards one of the debaters, which, if you've been watching, she is. What else is there for him to say ?
How about he says oh she's biased, and you can see clear examples of it here. Instead he tries some stupid conspiracy theory nonsense.
I'll say it again. This is what the Republican party needs. Expose the lies and misrepresentations so this weak trash gets thrown out and the party gets back to sanity.
It is no secret that the moderator is a democrat. I don't really care about that. What I do care about is her performance and fairness in moderating. She clearly is not being fair.
that question was a hardball to the VP i think he answered it well
EPT
