Ethics of dog meat? - Page 14
Forum Index > General Forum |
Azzur
Australia6253 Posts
| ||
IronyDK
Denmark142 Posts
| ||
MadNeSs
Denmark1507 Posts
Jules knows why you wont eat dogs. | ||
xM(Z
Romania5276 Posts
it's basic logic, really, but since people nowadays do things just because they can, the world is what it is. | ||
FrodoAndTheSlobStix
United States158 Posts
| ||
acerockolla
United States219 Posts
On April 15 2012 18:45 FrodoAndTheSlobStix wrote: It's so sad that people eat meat so they, out of guilt, say it's ok to eat dog, knowing if they don't it will flaw the philosophy of eating meat. Animals dont need to died so you can eat meat. They just dont! Bend down rip som grass from the floor and shove it in your mouth! You'll survive! No one will even begin to logically debate with thm selves whether it's wrong or not, because they subconsciously know they wouldnt be able to stop or even consider it. Try me. I guarntee I can slam ANY argumetn against not eating meat. It's like trying to prove me guilty of murder , Im not afraid because Im innocent, so theres nothing u can possibly say because your wrong. You think people here are saying it's ok out of guilt? You are projecting your own perspective onto everyone else. I have ZERO guilt in eating meat. I highly ENJOY it. I also have no issue with others eating dog. I can say it's because there's no difference between animals, as the only difference is built into the culture. That doesn't change the fact that I don't care and feel zero guilt about it though. | ||
ItsMeDomLee
Canada2732 Posts
| ||
FrodoAndTheSlobStix
United States158 Posts
| ||
giesecke
Germany361 Posts
would try cats and stuff too | ||
FrodoAndTheSlobStix
United States158 Posts
People have no right to tell other people what to do. A: They do when your involved with taking ANOTHERS life for your self. And if you just simply dont give a shit then I dont know, User was temp banned for this post. | ||
FrodoAndTheSlobStix
United States158 Posts
Get fucked! | ||
besez
Sweden54 Posts
Unless you bred whatever you're eating yourself, you cannot guarantee that the animal was treated humanely, especially not if you bought it at a supermarket. My $0.02 | ||
FrodoAndTheSlobStix
United States158 Posts
![]() ![]() | ||
acerockolla
United States219 Posts
On April 15 2012 18:59 FrodoAndTheSlobStix wrote: @acerockolla I ask just this question though. If you can survive with out eating meat then how do you justify the detah of animals? I have to go so I cant respond so Ill throw in some counter arguments hoping I land on one. People have no right to tell other people what to do. A: They do when your involved with taking ANOTHERS life for your self. And if you just simply dont give a shit then I dont know, You are equating humans with animals. You have the right to feel that way, but you're definitely in the minority (throughout the world). A fellow human being can convey that they do not wish to be eaten, whereas an animal cannot think and prepare for the future (other than instinctually). Whether you're ultra religious or whatever, here's the deal... nature is always right. If you think eating animals is fundamentally wrong because one might be able to subsist otherwise, what do you think about nature? Something that you are guarding so preciously, while you are also saying is completely wrong... What's the deal here? Either you exist on this planet or your don't. You can pretend that the world is peaches and cream, but the reality is we all die and humans > animals. | ||
acerockolla
United States219 Posts
| ||
NonFactor
Sweden698 Posts
But even though I say that, I really don't pick my meat thinking about the conditions from which the meat came from. I guess I choose to be ignorant. | ||
NIIINO
Slovakia1320 Posts
But I love snakes ![]() | ||
GornWood
Germany121 Posts
On April 15 2012 16:29 Velocirapture wrote: I do not claim to be a moral authority but for me there is one distinction that pulls me emotionally. This distinction is between animals that we take things from (cows, chicken, etc) and animals who give us things (cats, dogs, etc). I know it could very well be entirely perception but there you have it. Well this is it for me. Cows, Chicken and Sheeps and so on are mostly animals, which we use to get us a better life with the products of them (milk, eggs, etc.) It's like they almost can´t feel human on an emotional area like dogs can. Dogs are so much more worth I'd say because they can do some much for humans in way Cow and chicken can't. Have you ever seen a Cow helping a disabled person to get through his life better? I don't think so and if you´ve seen something like that I totally want to have a source. Dogs can help disabled persons, while many other animals can't.You don´t even have to speak to them all of the time if you want something, since it is almost like they can read your mind. Moreover, dogs can be real friends. I´ve never ever seen someone saying a cow is his friend. For me I'd say it´s probably a emotional reaction to say no to this, but I think dogs can do so much more in a way farm animal can´t. Imagine you´re a dog owner and you see this post for me the reaction was immediately no because I love my dog and in general almost all dogs I´ve seen so far are nice and friendly it's mostly the people, who make dogs terrifying by hitting them and not treating them properly. | ||
GornWood
Germany121 Posts
On April 15 2012 18:50 VIPIrony wrote: If it's an animal bred for eating, I'm fine with it. If it's an animal grown in an environment like a pet. I am not fine with it. ![]() Love animals, love meat. Well, there are to many dogs you exclude with this post what is with the ones that are left alone? There are so many people, who think it's okay to leave puppies alone and so the time goes on and some of the puppies survive some die and now there are additional dogs who weren't bred for anything what are you going to do with them? | ||
sushiman
Sweden2691 Posts
| ||
| ||