• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:15
CEST 03:15
KST 10:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League14Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.162Rollback Netcode in Brood War1165.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202624Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0
StarCraft 2
General
Server Blocker How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners SCII needs to put more weight on strategy and tact Stellar Fest 2 Replay Pack
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
[Recap] Hive ZvZ in MonstarZ vs Dreams [ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory! Rollback Netcode in Brood War [Megathread] Daily Funny Videos Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League ASL 22 Finals 2v2v2v2 Tournament Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread The Chess Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10476 users

Planets that can potentially support life... - Page 14

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
OscarN
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Cape Verde292 Posts
September 16 2011 21:12 GMT
#261
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?
KSMB
Profile Joined April 2011
United States100 Posts
September 16 2011 21:13 GMT
#262
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?

No.
Q2CTF
scFoX
Profile Joined September 2011
France454 Posts
September 16 2011 21:17 GMT
#263
Most of these planets are discovered indirectly (by watching the movement of the star, or if astronomers are really lucky, partial eclipses), so it would be near impossible to determine their composition, let alone see their surface.

One can only speculate.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#264
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?


Won't happen for a very very long time.

But it turns out it's easier to see what sort of elements and molecules there are in the planet's atmosphere than to image the surface. This will almost certainly happen in the next 10-20 years for some Earth-like planets.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
simansh
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
257 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#265
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?
#1 Zenex Line fan!
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:33 GMT
#266
On September 17 2011 06:22 simansh wrote:
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?


There's no way to know for sure if it does have life or not but I don't see why gravity would be a big problem.

There's complex life deep in the oceans under 100s of times the atmospheric pressure.

And smaller animals have less problem with gravity because the strength of their support structure increases decreases slower than the their mass.

Finally, the difference in gravity is probably not that big. It's around 1.5 times the Earth's gravity if it has the same composition as Earth (maybe slightly higher).
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
Sausafeg
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom54 Posts
September 16 2011 21:58 GMT
#267
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.
Microsloth
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada194 Posts
September 16 2011 22:05 GMT
#268
Yikes.. I'd weigh so much on that new super earth, I think I'm good right here =D
Double digit APM. ftw?
xSeraphiel
Profile Joined September 2010
United States7 Posts
September 16 2011 22:16 GMT
#269
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.
Danger_Duck
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Burkina Faso571 Posts
September 16 2011 23:45 GMT
#270
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.


Venus is Char!
TBA
Wrongspeedy
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:10:34
September 17 2011 00:10 GMT
#271
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


It would take a long time to get there, what if you slowly turned the gravity up on yourself and could (if you had the ability to travel there I would assume you could). If it took many generations and you had someway to survive that might work. But I'm no scientist.
It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.- John Stuart Mill
Hypnotic42
Profile Joined August 2011
14 Posts
September 17 2011 00:26 GMT
#272
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


So, while gravity does correlate to the size of the planet, it does so at a very small rate. For instance Jupiter is around 1300 times the size of Earth but it's gravitational field is only ~2.5 times stronger than Earth. In effect, yea there will be more gravity there, but not so much that it would feel abnormal too that large of an extent and human bones could easily support the added gravity. However, if it were a super large planet like Jupiter humans could always use some sort of metal support to move around I guess.
Carson
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada820 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 02:04:09
September 17 2011 01:58 GMT
#273
On September 16 2011 12:56 Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 05:55 ampson wrote:
Now let's get to work on that faster-than light travel? Looks sweet. But why is it called SUPER EARTH?


probably cus it's a lot bigger than actual earth?

It's great. now our parasitic race can take other planets and pollute the hell out of them after we overpopulate this one to the point of death =/

what a depressing thought


Well, technically earth isn't overpopulated at all, just very mis-managed. There is more than enough viable land and food for every person alive on the earth, it's just that because of money, it's not available to people who are poor.

That is one of the main reasons that we'll never go to another planet, we can't manage our own well enough to reap it's potential sustainable resources and be able to form a coordinated plan to go somewhere else. It is sad though, I agree.

edit: thought I should source my statement source
look at "carrying capacity"
"You have to remember something: Everybody pities the weak; jealousy you have to earn." Arnold Schwarzenegger
[Poseidon]
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands58 Posts
September 17 2011 22:18 GMT
#274
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
September 18 2011 03:23 GMT
#275
On September 18 2011 07:18 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up


I'm glad I was helpful.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-05 22:55:18
December 05 2011 22:54 GMT
#276
[image loading]

For the first time, astronomers have found a planet smack in the middle of the habitable zone of its sunlike star, where temperatures are good for life. “If this planet has a surface, it would have a very nice temperature of some 70° Fahrenheit [21°C],” says William Borucki of NASA’s Ames Research Center here, who is the principal investigator of NASA’s Kepler space telescope. “[It's] another milestone on the journey of discovering Earth’s twin,” adds Ames director Simon “Pete” Worden.

Unfortunately, the true nature of the planet, named Kepler-22b, remains unknown. It is 2.4 times the size of Earth, but its mass, and hence its composition, has not yet been determined. “There’s a good chance it could be rocky,” Borucki says, although he adds that the planet would probably contain huge amounts of compressed ice, too. It might even have a global ocean. “We have no planets like this in our own solar system.”

Kepler-22b is 600 light-years away. Every 290 days, it orbits a star that is just a bit smaller and cooler than our own sun. The Kepler telescope, launched in 2009 to scan the skies for Earth-like worlds, found the planet because it sees the orbit edge on. That means that every 290 days, the world transits the surface of the star, blocking out a minute fraction of its light.

Borucki likes to call the new discovery the Christmas planet. “It’s a great gift,” he said at a press conference here this morning. “We were very fortunate to find it.” The first of the three observed transits occurred only days after Kepler started observing. The third one was seen just before Christmas 2010, shortly before the spacecraft was unable to carry out any observations because of a technical glitch. Says Borucki: “We could’ve easily missed it altogether.”


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
December 05 2011 23:02 GMT
#277
Wow that's pretty sweet. Since the star is smaller and cooler, that means it may last quite a bit longer than our own. I sure hope they can find its composition, but wouldn't that be pretty hard considering its distance? It would be cooler if we found one closer to Earth though, 600 light years is a long way away.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
December 05 2011 23:06 GMT
#278
And that, my friends, will be our species refuge and survival.

Really awesome.
Erasme
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Bahamas15899 Posts
December 05 2011 23:07 GMT
#279
That's an amazing bump.
Well 600 light years might be far away for now !
I personnaly hope that, one day, we'll be able to travel that far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7lxwFEB6FI “‘Drain the swamp’? Stupid saying, means nothing, but you guys loved it so I kept saying it.”
Maenander
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany4927 Posts
December 05 2011 23:10 GMT
#280
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.

Cool series of pictures, but the artistic depictions of the large stars are not realistic. No way they have so well defined borders and are almost perfectly spherical, their atmospheres are very thin and their photospheres extended.


off topic:
The most realistic first contact scene ever shown in a Hollywood movie!
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
09:00
FSL draft
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 172
ViBE165
ProTech131
SpeCial 72
JuggernautJason57
StarCraft: Brood War
White-Ra 183
NaDa 60
Dota 2
monkeys_forever579
NeuroSwarm204
PGG 152
febbydoto17
Counter-Strike
Fnx 1301
taco 223
Other Games
summit1g6359
JimRising 525
C9.Mang0305
WinterStarcraft171
Livibee63
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick788
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta26
• Nickrosys3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Korean StarCraft League
1h 45m
Afreeca Starleague
4h 45m
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
8h 45m
WardiTV Invitational
9h 45m
AI Arena Tournament
14h 45m
BSL Open Qualifier
17h 45m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 8h
OSC
1d 11h
IPSL
1d 14h
BSL Open Qualifier
1d 17h
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Weekly
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Acropolis #5 - GSC
HCC Season 3
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
eXTREMESLAND '26: SEA 4th Place
1win Private Club #2
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.