• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:42
CEST 18:42
KST 01:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 20258Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202577RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18
Community News
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced25BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8
StarCraft 2
General
#1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 2025 Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 I offer completely free coaching services What tournaments are world championships?
Tourneys
FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $10,000 live event Esports World Cup 2025 $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Dewalt's Show Matches in China BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 793 users

Planets that can potentially support life... - Page 14

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
OscarN
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Cape Verde292 Posts
September 16 2011 21:12 GMT
#261
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?
KSMB
Profile Joined April 2011
United States100 Posts
September 16 2011 21:13 GMT
#262
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?

No.
Q2CTF
scFoX
Profile Joined September 2011
France454 Posts
September 16 2011 21:17 GMT
#263
Most of these planets are discovered indirectly (by watching the movement of the star, or if astronomers are really lucky, partial eclipses), so it would be near impossible to determine their composition, let alone see their surface.

One can only speculate.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#264
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?


Won't happen for a very very long time.

But it turns out it's easier to see what sort of elements and molecules there are in the planet's atmosphere than to image the surface. This will almost certainly happen in the next 10-20 years for some Earth-like planets.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
simansh
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
257 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#265
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?
#1 Zenex Line fan!
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:33 GMT
#266
On September 17 2011 06:22 simansh wrote:
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?


There's no way to know for sure if it does have life or not but I don't see why gravity would be a big problem.

There's complex life deep in the oceans under 100s of times the atmospheric pressure.

And smaller animals have less problem with gravity because the strength of their support structure increases decreases slower than the their mass.

Finally, the difference in gravity is probably not that big. It's around 1.5 times the Earth's gravity if it has the same composition as Earth (maybe slightly higher).
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
Sausafeg
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom54 Posts
September 16 2011 21:58 GMT
#267
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.
Microsloth
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada194 Posts
September 16 2011 22:05 GMT
#268
Yikes.. I'd weigh so much on that new super earth, I think I'm good right here =D
Double digit APM. ftw?
xSeraphiel
Profile Joined September 2010
United States7 Posts
September 16 2011 22:16 GMT
#269
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.
Danger_Duck
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Burkina Faso571 Posts
September 16 2011 23:45 GMT
#270
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.


Venus is Char!
TBA
Wrongspeedy
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:10:34
September 17 2011 00:10 GMT
#271
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


It would take a long time to get there, what if you slowly turned the gravity up on yourself and could (if you had the ability to travel there I would assume you could). If it took many generations and you had someway to survive that might work. But I'm no scientist.
It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.- John Stuart Mill
Hypnotic42
Profile Joined August 2011
14 Posts
September 17 2011 00:26 GMT
#272
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


So, while gravity does correlate to the size of the planet, it does so at a very small rate. For instance Jupiter is around 1300 times the size of Earth but it's gravitational field is only ~2.5 times stronger than Earth. In effect, yea there will be more gravity there, but not so much that it would feel abnormal too that large of an extent and human bones could easily support the added gravity. However, if it were a super large planet like Jupiter humans could always use some sort of metal support to move around I guess.
Carson
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada820 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 02:04:09
September 17 2011 01:58 GMT
#273
On September 16 2011 12:56 Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 05:55 ampson wrote:
Now let's get to work on that faster-than light travel? Looks sweet. But why is it called SUPER EARTH?


probably cus it's a lot bigger than actual earth?

It's great. now our parasitic race can take other planets and pollute the hell out of them after we overpopulate this one to the point of death =/

what a depressing thought


Well, technically earth isn't overpopulated at all, just very mis-managed. There is more than enough viable land and food for every person alive on the earth, it's just that because of money, it's not available to people who are poor.

That is one of the main reasons that we'll never go to another planet, we can't manage our own well enough to reap it's potential sustainable resources and be able to form a coordinated plan to go somewhere else. It is sad though, I agree.

edit: thought I should source my statement source
look at "carrying capacity"
"You have to remember something: Everybody pities the weak; jealousy you have to earn." Arnold Schwarzenegger
[Poseidon]
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands58 Posts
September 17 2011 22:18 GMT
#274
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
September 18 2011 03:23 GMT
#275
On September 18 2011 07:18 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up


I'm glad I was helpful.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-05 22:55:18
December 05 2011 22:54 GMT
#276
[image loading]

For the first time, astronomers have found a planet smack in the middle of the habitable zone of its sunlike star, where temperatures are good for life. “If this planet has a surface, it would have a very nice temperature of some 70° Fahrenheit [21°C],” says William Borucki of NASA’s Ames Research Center here, who is the principal investigator of NASA’s Kepler space telescope. “[It's] another milestone on the journey of discovering Earth’s twin,” adds Ames director Simon “Pete” Worden.

Unfortunately, the true nature of the planet, named Kepler-22b, remains unknown. It is 2.4 times the size of Earth, but its mass, and hence its composition, has not yet been determined. “There’s a good chance it could be rocky,” Borucki says, although he adds that the planet would probably contain huge amounts of compressed ice, too. It might even have a global ocean. “We have no planets like this in our own solar system.”

Kepler-22b is 600 light-years away. Every 290 days, it orbits a star that is just a bit smaller and cooler than our own sun. The Kepler telescope, launched in 2009 to scan the skies for Earth-like worlds, found the planet because it sees the orbit edge on. That means that every 290 days, the world transits the surface of the star, blocking out a minute fraction of its light.

Borucki likes to call the new discovery the Christmas planet. “It’s a great gift,” he said at a press conference here this morning. “We were very fortunate to find it.” The first of the three observed transits occurred only days after Kepler started observing. The third one was seen just before Christmas 2010, shortly before the spacecraft was unable to carry out any observations because of a technical glitch. Says Borucki: “We could’ve easily missed it altogether.”


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
December 05 2011 23:02 GMT
#277
Wow that's pretty sweet. Since the star is smaller and cooler, that means it may last quite a bit longer than our own. I sure hope they can find its composition, but wouldn't that be pretty hard considering its distance? It would be cooler if we found one closer to Earth though, 600 light years is a long way away.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
December 05 2011 23:06 GMT
#278
And that, my friends, will be our species refuge and survival.

Really awesome.
Erasme
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Bahamas15899 Posts
December 05 2011 23:07 GMT
#279
That's an amazing bump.
Well 600 light years might be far away for now !
I personnaly hope that, one day, we'll be able to travel that far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7lxwFEB6FI “‘Drain the swamp’? Stupid saying, means nothing, but you guys loved it so I kept saying it.”
Maenander
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany4926 Posts
December 05 2011 23:10 GMT
#280
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.

Cool series of pictures, but the artistic depictions of the large stars are not realistic. No way they have so well defined borders and are almost perfectly spherical, their atmospheres are very thin and their photospheres extended.


off topic:
The most realistic first contact scene ever shown in a Hollywood movie!
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
14:00
Bracket Day 2 - Final
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
09:00
Cracow 2025
Reynor vs LamboLIVE!
Clem vs TBD
RotterdaM2736
ComeBackTV 1845
IndyStarCraft 575
WardiTV421
CranKy Ducklings203
Rex141
3DClanTV 110
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 2736
IndyStarCraft 575
Rex 141
BRAT_OK 74
MindelVK 35
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37447
Barracks 1035
EffOrt 992
Larva 923
Nal_rA 673
BeSt 492
Shine 414
firebathero 338
Stork 299
Soulkey 162
[ Show more ]
Dewaltoss 147
Hyun 83
Movie 57
sorry 44
zelot 31
sSak 30
Free 25
yabsab 24
Terrorterran 19
IntoTheRainbow 6
Dota 2
Gorgc6417
qojqva4022
420jenkins394
Counter-Strike
fl0m3332
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor723
Liquid`Hasu322
Other Games
Beastyqt1163
Hui .331
Fuzer 177
KnowMe107
QueenE87
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 44
• StrangeGG 22
• Legendk 11
• iHatsuTV 3
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki16
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV827
League of Legends
• Jankos1670
Counter-Strike
• Nemesis1698
Upcoming Events
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1h 19m
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Wardi Open
18h 19m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 17h
WardiTV European League
1d 23h
Online Event
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Non-Korean Championship
BSL 20 Team Wars
FEL Cracov 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.