• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:57
CEST 00:57
KST 07:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High15
Community News
PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition235.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)96$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 151Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada11Weekly Cups (Sept 22-28): MaxPax double, Zerg wins, PTR12
StarCraft 2
General
PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition 5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version) ZvT - Army Composition - Slow Lings + Fast Banes Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada Had to smile :)
Tourneys
Stellar Fest $2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 15 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025 Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive
Brood War
General
Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site [ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On BarrackS' ASL S20 Ro.8 Review&Power of Friendship BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro8 Day 4 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art Current Meta I am doing this better than progamers do. Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final
Blogs
[AI] From Comfort Women to …
Peanutsc
Mental Health In Esports: Wo…
TrAiDoS
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1495 users

Planets that can potentially support life... - Page 14

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
OscarN
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Cape Verde292 Posts
September 16 2011 21:12 GMT
#261
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?
KSMB
Profile Joined April 2011
United States100 Posts
September 16 2011 21:13 GMT
#262
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?

No.
Q2CTF
scFoX
Profile Joined September 2011
France454 Posts
September 16 2011 21:17 GMT
#263
Most of these planets are discovered indirectly (by watching the movement of the star, or if astronomers are really lucky, partial eclipses), so it would be near impossible to determine their composition, let alone see their surface.

One can only speculate.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#264
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?


Won't happen for a very very long time.

But it turns out it's easier to see what sort of elements and molecules there are in the planet's atmosphere than to image the surface. This will almost certainly happen in the next 10-20 years for some Earth-like planets.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
simansh
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
257 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#265
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?
#1 Zenex Line fan!
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:33 GMT
#266
On September 17 2011 06:22 simansh wrote:
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?


There's no way to know for sure if it does have life or not but I don't see why gravity would be a big problem.

There's complex life deep in the oceans under 100s of times the atmospheric pressure.

And smaller animals have less problem with gravity because the strength of their support structure increases decreases slower than the their mass.

Finally, the difference in gravity is probably not that big. It's around 1.5 times the Earth's gravity if it has the same composition as Earth (maybe slightly higher).
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
Sausafeg
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom54 Posts
September 16 2011 21:58 GMT
#267
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.
Microsloth
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada194 Posts
September 16 2011 22:05 GMT
#268
Yikes.. I'd weigh so much on that new super earth, I think I'm good right here =D
Double digit APM. ftw?
xSeraphiel
Profile Joined September 2010
United States7 Posts
September 16 2011 22:16 GMT
#269
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.
Danger_Duck
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Burkina Faso571 Posts
September 16 2011 23:45 GMT
#270
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.


Venus is Char!
TBA
Wrongspeedy
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:10:34
September 17 2011 00:10 GMT
#271
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


It would take a long time to get there, what if you slowly turned the gravity up on yourself and could (if you had the ability to travel there I would assume you could). If it took many generations and you had someway to survive that might work. But I'm no scientist.
It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.- John Stuart Mill
Hypnotic42
Profile Joined August 2011
14 Posts
September 17 2011 00:26 GMT
#272
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


So, while gravity does correlate to the size of the planet, it does so at a very small rate. For instance Jupiter is around 1300 times the size of Earth but it's gravitational field is only ~2.5 times stronger than Earth. In effect, yea there will be more gravity there, but not so much that it would feel abnormal too that large of an extent and human bones could easily support the added gravity. However, if it were a super large planet like Jupiter humans could always use some sort of metal support to move around I guess.
Carson
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada820 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 02:04:09
September 17 2011 01:58 GMT
#273
On September 16 2011 12:56 Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 05:55 ampson wrote:
Now let's get to work on that faster-than light travel? Looks sweet. But why is it called SUPER EARTH?


probably cus it's a lot bigger than actual earth?

It's great. now our parasitic race can take other planets and pollute the hell out of them after we overpopulate this one to the point of death =/

what a depressing thought


Well, technically earth isn't overpopulated at all, just very mis-managed. There is more than enough viable land and food for every person alive on the earth, it's just that because of money, it's not available to people who are poor.

That is one of the main reasons that we'll never go to another planet, we can't manage our own well enough to reap it's potential sustainable resources and be able to form a coordinated plan to go somewhere else. It is sad though, I agree.

edit: thought I should source my statement source
look at "carrying capacity"
"You have to remember something: Everybody pities the weak; jealousy you have to earn." Arnold Schwarzenegger
[Poseidon]
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands58 Posts
September 17 2011 22:18 GMT
#274
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
September 18 2011 03:23 GMT
#275
On September 18 2011 07:18 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up


I'm glad I was helpful.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-05 22:55:18
December 05 2011 22:54 GMT
#276
[image loading]

For the first time, astronomers have found a planet smack in the middle of the habitable zone of its sunlike star, where temperatures are good for life. “If this planet has a surface, it would have a very nice temperature of some 70° Fahrenheit [21°C],” says William Borucki of NASA’s Ames Research Center here, who is the principal investigator of NASA’s Kepler space telescope. “[It's] another milestone on the journey of discovering Earth’s twin,” adds Ames director Simon “Pete” Worden.

Unfortunately, the true nature of the planet, named Kepler-22b, remains unknown. It is 2.4 times the size of Earth, but its mass, and hence its composition, has not yet been determined. “There’s a good chance it could be rocky,” Borucki says, although he adds that the planet would probably contain huge amounts of compressed ice, too. It might even have a global ocean. “We have no planets like this in our own solar system.”

Kepler-22b is 600 light-years away. Every 290 days, it orbits a star that is just a bit smaller and cooler than our own sun. The Kepler telescope, launched in 2009 to scan the skies for Earth-like worlds, found the planet because it sees the orbit edge on. That means that every 290 days, the world transits the surface of the star, blocking out a minute fraction of its light.

Borucki likes to call the new discovery the Christmas planet. “It’s a great gift,” he said at a press conference here this morning. “We were very fortunate to find it.” The first of the three observed transits occurred only days after Kepler started observing. The third one was seen just before Christmas 2010, shortly before the spacecraft was unable to carry out any observations because of a technical glitch. Says Borucki: “We could’ve easily missed it altogether.”


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
December 05 2011 23:02 GMT
#277
Wow that's pretty sweet. Since the star is smaller and cooler, that means it may last quite a bit longer than our own. I sure hope they can find its composition, but wouldn't that be pretty hard considering its distance? It would be cooler if we found one closer to Earth though, 600 light years is a long way away.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
December 05 2011 23:06 GMT
#278
And that, my friends, will be our species refuge and survival.

Really awesome.
Erasme
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Bahamas15899 Posts
December 05 2011 23:07 GMT
#279
That's an amazing bump.
Well 600 light years might be far away for now !
I personnaly hope that, one day, we'll be able to travel that far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7lxwFEB6FI “‘Drain the swamp’? Stupid saying, means nothing, but you guys loved it so I kept saying it.”
Maenander
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany4926 Posts
December 05 2011 23:10 GMT
#280
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.

Cool series of pictures, but the artistic depictions of the large stars are not realistic. No way they have so well defined borders and are almost perfectly spherical, their atmospheres are very thin and their photospheres extended.


off topic:
The most realistic first contact scene ever shown in a Hollywood movie!
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
IPSL
19:00
Ro24 Group A
DragOn vs Fear
Radley vs eOnzErG
Liquipedia
BSL Team Wars
19:00
Grand Finals
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
Dewalt vs kogeT
JDConan vs Tarson
RaNgeD vs DragOn
StRyKeR vs Bonyth
Aeternum vs Hejek
ZZZero.O126
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft420
SpeCial 100
StarCraft: Brood War
ZZZero.O 126
Dota 2
capcasts261
PGG 210
monkeys_forever96
Counter-Strike
fl0m279
allub160
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor277
Other Games
FrodaN5046
summit1g4514
Grubby2981
KnowMe215
C9.Mang069
Mew2King68
UpATreeSC60
JuggernautJason16
Organizations
Other Games
EGCTV1247
gamesdonequick1221
BasetradeTV55
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 75
• musti20045 36
• davetesta30
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21910
• Ler72
League of Legends
• Doublelift4225
Other Games
• imaqtpie1318
• Scarra453
• WagamamaTV384
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
11h 3m
Map Test Tournament
1d 12h
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
Map Test Tournament
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Map Test Tournament
3 days
Map Test Tournament
4 days
OSC
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Map Test Tournament
5 days
OSC
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
Safe House 2
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Map Test Tournament
6 days
OSC
6 days
IPSL
6 days
dxtr13 vs Napoleon
Doodle vs OldBoy
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
Maestros of the Game
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Acropolis #4 - TS2
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
Frag Blocktober 2025
Urban Riga Open #1
FERJEE Rush 2025
Birch Cup 2025
DraculaN #2
LanDaLan #3
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
WardiTV TLMC #15
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.