• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:36
CEST 17:36
KST 00:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure4Code S RO8 Preview: Classic, Reynor, Maru, GuMiho2Code S RO8 Preview: ByuN, Rogue, herO, Cure4[ASL19] Ro4 Preview: Storied Rivals7Code S RO12 Preview: Maru, Trigger, Rogue, NightMare12
Community News
Code S Season 1 - RO8 Group B Results (2025)2[BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET4herO & Cure GSL RO8 Interviews: "I also think that all the practice I put in when Protoss wasn’t doing as well is paying off"0Code S Season 1 - herO & Cure advance to RO4 (2025)0Dark to begin military service on May 13th (2025)21
StarCraft 2
General
24/7 "QuickBooks-Error-Customer-Service" 8557492321 Fix QuickBooks Issues Call the Official Code S Season 1 - RO8 Group B Results (2025) 2024/25 Off-Season Roster Moves Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, GuMiho, Classic, Cure
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S Season 1 - RO4 and Grand Finals [GSL 2025] Code S:Season 1 - RO8 - Group B SOOP Starcraft Global #20 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SEL Code A [MMR-capped] (SC: Evo)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void Mutation # 472 Dead Heat Mutation # 471 Delivery Guaranteed Mutation # 470 Certain Demise
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion ASL 19 Tickets for foreigners Recent recommended BW games Battlenet Game Lobby Simulator
Tourneys
[ASL19] Ro8 Day 4 [ASL19] Semifinal B [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
[G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player Creating a full chart of Zerg builds [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Beyond All Reason Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Grand Theft Auto VI Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia: Generative Agents Showdown Survivor II: The Amazon
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Elon Musk's lies, propaganda, etc. Ask and answer stupid questions here!
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Books] Wool by Hugh Howey
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL.net Ten Commandments
Blogs
Why 5v5 Games Keep Us Hooked…
TrAiDoS
Info SLEgma_12
SLEgma_12
SECOND COMMING
XenOsky
WombaT’s Old BW Terran Theme …
WombaT
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
BW PvZ Balance hypothetic…
Vasoline73
ASL S19 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 18176 users

Planets that can potentially support life... - Page 14

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
OscarN
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Cape Verde292 Posts
September 16 2011 21:12 GMT
#261
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?
KSMB
Profile Joined April 2011
United States100 Posts
September 16 2011 21:13 GMT
#262
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?

No.
Q2CTF
scFoX
Profile Joined September 2011
France454 Posts
September 16 2011 21:17 GMT
#263
Most of these planets are discovered indirectly (by watching the movement of the star, or if astronomers are really lucky, partial eclipses), so it would be near impossible to determine their composition, let alone see their surface.

One can only speculate.
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#264
On September 17 2011 06:12 OscarN wrote:
could anyone tell me if they could magnified to see the planets surface?


Won't happen for a very very long time.

But it turns out it's easier to see what sort of elements and molecules there are in the planet's atmosphere than to image the surface. This will almost certainly happen in the next 10-20 years for some Earth-like planets.
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
simansh
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
257 Posts
September 16 2011 21:22 GMT
#265
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?
#1 Zenex Line fan!
hypercube
Profile Joined April 2010
Hungary2735 Posts
September 16 2011 21:33 GMT
#266
On September 17 2011 06:22 simansh wrote:
How does something that it so many times as heavy as earth support life? (as we know it) Doesn't the gravity make it impossible?


There's no way to know for sure if it does have life or not but I don't see why gravity would be a big problem.

There's complex life deep in the oceans under 100s of times the atmospheric pressure.

And smaller animals have less problem with gravity because the strength of their support structure increases decreases slower than the their mass.

Finally, the difference in gravity is probably not that big. It's around 1.5 times the Earth's gravity if it has the same composition as Earth (maybe slightly higher).
"Sending people in rockets to other planets is a waste of money better spent on sending rockets into people on this planet."
Sausafeg
Profile Joined October 2010
United Kingdom54 Posts
September 16 2011 21:58 GMT
#267
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.
Microsloth
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada194 Posts
September 16 2011 22:05 GMT
#268
Yikes.. I'd weigh so much on that new super earth, I think I'm good right here =D
Double digit APM. ftw?
xSeraphiel
Profile Joined September 2010
United States7 Posts
September 16 2011 22:16 GMT
#269
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.
Danger_Duck
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Burkina Faso571 Posts
September 16 2011 23:45 GMT
#270
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.


Venus is Char!
TBA
Wrongspeedy
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States1655 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 00:10:34
September 17 2011 00:10 GMT
#271
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


It would take a long time to get there, what if you slowly turned the gravity up on yourself and could (if you had the ability to travel there I would assume you could). If it took many generations and you had someway to survive that might work. But I'm no scientist.
It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied.- John Stuart Mill
Hypnotic42
Profile Joined August 2011
14 Posts
September 17 2011 00:26 GMT
#272
On September 17 2011 07:16 xSeraphiel wrote:
That is awesome! The thing is - can it support human life? 3.6 times the earth size means 3.6 times the gravity.. wouldn't we have to be like super strong just to stand there? (this isn't dbz) where we all train with super gravity on xD.. I'm curious to know how scientists would go about colonizing a planet that is like earth but with more gravity.


So, while gravity does correlate to the size of the planet, it does so at a very small rate. For instance Jupiter is around 1300 times the size of Earth but it's gravitational field is only ~2.5 times stronger than Earth. In effect, yea there will be more gravity there, but not so much that it would feel abnormal too that large of an extent and human bones could easily support the added gravity. However, if it were a super large planet like Jupiter humans could always use some sort of metal support to move around I guess.
Carson
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada820 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-17 02:04:09
September 17 2011 01:58 GMT
#273
On September 16 2011 12:56 Wire wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 05:55 ampson wrote:
Now let's get to work on that faster-than light travel? Looks sweet. But why is it called SUPER EARTH?


probably cus it's a lot bigger than actual earth?

It's great. now our parasitic race can take other planets and pollute the hell out of them after we overpopulate this one to the point of death =/

what a depressing thought


Well, technically earth isn't overpopulated at all, just very mis-managed. There is more than enough viable land and food for every person alive on the earth, it's just that because of money, it's not available to people who are poor.

That is one of the main reasons that we'll never go to another planet, we can't manage our own well enough to reap it's potential sustainable resources and be able to form a coordinated plan to go somewhere else. It is sad though, I agree.

edit: thought I should source my statement source
look at "carrying capacity"
"You have to remember something: Everybody pities the weak; jealousy you have to earn." Arnold Schwarzenegger
[Poseidon]
Profile Joined April 2011
Netherlands58 Posts
September 17 2011 22:18 GMT
#274
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
September 18 2011 03:23 GMT
#275
On September 18 2011 07:18 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 15 2011 07:05 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 06:12 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:13 Whitewing wrote:
On September 15 2011 05:04 Poseidonsc2 wrote:
On September 13 2011 09:19 hotbreakfest wrote:
Currently we can see up to 42 billion light years into space. We are an insignificant speck dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a speck of dust on a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert. I think that says just about enough.



So you explain to me, how a universe that is 13.9 billion years old, can see up to 42 billion light years

it takes light a year to travel a light year(duh) so 42 billion light years it would take 42 billion years.

So if the big bang happened only 13.9 billion years ago, how can we see up to 42 billion light years?

we can't?

I think the last figure was 13.5 billion light years


Imagine how life on another planet 3.6 times as large as earth would look!
The muscles on those animals!


http://everyjoe.com/technology/how-can-we-see-galaxies-47-billion-light-years-away-when-the-universe-is-only-13-billion-years-old-191/

Short answer as to why we can see around 47 billion light years away (the furthest image taken so far):

The speed at which the universe is expanding is not constant. Rather, everything in the universe is expanding away from each other linearly proportional to the distance between the objects.

The rate at which the universe is expanding is increasing.




I can understand the universe itself being 47 billion light years old the problem i'm having is how can we SEE something 47 billion light years away since the light coming from it would have to travel longer than the age of the universe...


Because the distance the light is traveling is also increasing, at an ever increasing rate (second derivative is positive). Let's say a ray of light leaves point A for point B, and point B is exactly one light year away when the ray of light leaves point A. Now, if the distance remains perfectly constant for one year, the light will reach point B after precisely one year. But what if point A and point B are moving away from one another? Then it would take longer than a year for the ray of light to reach point B, this is what is happening in our universe. Because light has a finite speed (it's bloody fast, but it's finite, it doesn't instantly move from one location to another regardless of distance), it is affected by changes in distance just like anything else. We can see this through redshifts.


Thanks for clearing that up


I'm glad I was helpful.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-05 22:55:18
December 05 2011 22:54 GMT
#276
[image loading]

For the first time, astronomers have found a planet smack in the middle of the habitable zone of its sunlike star, where temperatures are good for life. “If this planet has a surface, it would have a very nice temperature of some 70° Fahrenheit [21°C],” says William Borucki of NASA’s Ames Research Center here, who is the principal investigator of NASA’s Kepler space telescope. “[It's] another milestone on the journey of discovering Earth’s twin,” adds Ames director Simon “Pete” Worden.

Unfortunately, the true nature of the planet, named Kepler-22b, remains unknown. It is 2.4 times the size of Earth, but its mass, and hence its composition, has not yet been determined. “There’s a good chance it could be rocky,” Borucki says, although he adds that the planet would probably contain huge amounts of compressed ice, too. It might even have a global ocean. “We have no planets like this in our own solar system.”

Kepler-22b is 600 light-years away. Every 290 days, it orbits a star that is just a bit smaller and cooler than our own sun. The Kepler telescope, launched in 2009 to scan the skies for Earth-like worlds, found the planet because it sees the orbit edge on. That means that every 290 days, the world transits the surface of the star, blocking out a minute fraction of its light.

Borucki likes to call the new discovery the Christmas planet. “It’s a great gift,” he said at a press conference here this morning. “We were very fortunate to find it.” The first of the three observed transits occurred only days after Kepler started observing. The third one was seen just before Christmas 2010, shortly before the spacecraft was unable to carry out any observations because of a technical glitch. Says Borucki: “We could’ve easily missed it altogether.”


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Chocolate
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2350 Posts
December 05 2011 23:02 GMT
#277
Wow that's pretty sweet. Since the star is smaller and cooler, that means it may last quite a bit longer than our own. I sure hope they can find its composition, but wouldn't that be pretty hard considering its distance? It would be cooler if we found one closer to Earth though, 600 light years is a long way away.
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
December 05 2011 23:06 GMT
#278
And that, my friends, will be our species refuge and survival.

Really awesome.
Erasme
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Bahamas15899 Posts
December 05 2011 23:07 GMT
#279
That's an amazing bump.
Well 600 light years might be far away for now !
I personnaly hope that, one day, we'll be able to travel that far.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7lxwFEB6FI “‘Drain the swamp’? Stupid saying, means nothing, but you guys loved it so I kept saying it.”
Maenander
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany4926 Posts
December 05 2011 23:10 GMT
#280
On September 17 2011 06:58 Sausafeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 13 2011 06:37 Enox wrote:
this one is pretty old already but it amazes me each time i see it again. seems fitting for this thread

[image loading]


This is amazing, it puts loads of stuff into persective. I love seeing stuff like this.

Cool series of pictures, but the artistic depictions of the large stars are not realistic. No way they have so well defined borders and are almost perfectly spherical, their atmospheres are very thin and their photospheres extended.


off topic:
The most realistic first contact scene ever shown in a Hollywood movie!
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 43 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 24m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 268
Hui .221
Rex 77
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 5577
Shuttle 3021
Mini 1130
BeSt 769
ZerO 601
Snow 394
Hyuk 255
Soulkey 216
PianO 204
hero 196
[ Show more ]
Barracks 58
sorry 49
sSak 45
JYJ39
soO 29
TY 25
HiyA 24
Sacsri 24
zelot 20
Terrorterran 13
JulyZerg 12
Free 7
Dota 2
Gorgc7286
qojqva2675
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor21
Other Games
tarik_tv17293
singsing2818
B2W.Neo2031
hiko670
XBOCT491
Lowko464
crisheroes429
SortOf222
XaKoH 188
Liquid`VortiX143
KnowMe86
QueenE40
Trikslyr34
ZerO(Twitch)23
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL53050
StarCraft 2
WardiTV868
ESL.tv121
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV545
• Ler52
League of Legends
• Nemesis3217
• Jankos1451
Upcoming Events
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
3h 24m
OSC
8h 24m
Korean StarCraft League
11h 24m
RSL Revival
18h 24m
SOOP Global
23h 24m
Spirit vs SKillous
YoungYakov vs ShowTime
SOOP
1d 1h
HeRoMaRinE vs Astrea
BSL Season 20
1d 2h
UltrA vs Radley
spx vs RaNgeD
Online Event
1d 12h
Clem vs ShoWTimE
herO vs MaxPax
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 18h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 19h
Percival vs TriGGeR
ByuN vs Solar
Clem vs Spirit
MaxPax vs Jumy
[ Show More ]
BSL Season 20
1d 23h
TerrOr vs HBO
Tarson vs Spine
RSL Revival
2 days
BSL Season 20
2 days
MadiNho vs dxtr13
Gypsy vs Dark
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Road to EWC
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Nation Wars Season 2
PiG Sty Festival 6.0
Calamity Stars S2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
ASL Season 19
YSL S1
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
China & Korea Top Challenge
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
Heroes 10 EU
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025
ESL Pro League S21

Upcoming

NPSL S3
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLAN 2025
K-Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2025
2025 GSL S2
DreamHack Dallas 2025
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.