EPTAsk and answer stupid questions here! - Page 665
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Sent.
Poland9201 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44383 Posts
"A smaller moon means less scattered sunlight at night—that's all moonlight is—which would mean darker nighttimes." https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/half-mass-moon/ That article has a lot more info on the topic too  | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11522 Posts
So in this case, a full moon night would be as light as a 2/3 moon night is now. On new moon nights, obviously nothing changes. Any other night would be about as bright as one that has 2/3 of the current moon shining. So half moon would be as bright as 2/6 moon, 3/4 moon as bright as half moon. Definitively a bit darker, but not total darkness all the time. | ||
|
Dark_Chill
Canada3353 Posts
| ||
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
On August 23 2017 09:41 Dark_Chill wrote: Was this question because of Assassination Classroom? I don't know what that is | ||
|
Dark_Chill
Canada3353 Posts
Manga where alien blows up half the moon in the first chapter | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
| ||
|
Oshuy
Netherlands529 Posts
Current hypothesis for the formation of the moon is accretion of matter sent flying from the earth by an impact with an "asteroid" the size of mars. This model predicts that the moon was at first 15 times closer to the earth and that it drifted over time to its current orbit, accelerated through tidal forces (energy coming from earth rotation slowing down). That means the moon appeared to be a lot larger when life first appeared, days were a lot shorter (~4hours to begin with), months (as in moon phases) shorter too, ... Then the question is: how could we verify the hypothesis against historical record ? What consequence could still be detected hunderds of millions of years later ? I've only read about one article on the growth rate of sea shells (comparing the model against the fossil record), but there are probably more to be found. | ||
|
207aicila
1237 Posts
| ||
|
Greywind
2 Posts
| ||
|
Artisreal
Germany9235 Posts
| ||
|
Greywind
2 Posts
| ||
|
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 25 2017 05:40 Greywind wrote: I don't have any blog ~.~ http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/createblog.php | ||
|
207aicila
1237 Posts
On August 25 2017 03:07 207aicila wrote: Here's a stupid question: where are the TL Final Edits? They used to have a subforum of their own, was that changed? | ||
|
Uldridge
Belgium4800 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18007 Posts
On August 31 2017 22:54 Uldridge wrote: Is it best to poop before showering or after showering? Or do you just avoid the issue altogether and separate both things with enough time. What will then be enough time? Who cares? I guess as long as you don't poop under the shower, all is good. | ||
|
Artisreal
Germany9235 Posts
On August 31 2017 22:54 Uldridge wrote: Is it best to poop before showering or after showering? Or do you just avoid the issue altogether and separate both things with enough time. What will then be enough time? Before, so you can scratch your ass trough your pants without remorse. | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11522 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
| ||
