|
On July 14 2017 12:11 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2017 12:03 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 11:50 JimmiC wrote:
I don't feel bad about it, I don't read that he does either. I read that we are poking humor at the cultural norms. Because the thread is themed in such a manor where humor is encouraged. You can call it whatever you want. The more you wish to normalize it the more of yourself you reveal to us. Rolf, nope, that is just you thinking you are super smart, and much smarter then others. Shockingly most comedians (who by your BS "normalize", when in fact with the end of protest rock it's one of the only creative ways to open peoples eyes about the norms, but that is a whole different discussion), even ones playing dumb have high IQ's. And in my experience people like you lack social, life skills and are not nearly as smart as you think. But I'll end it at this because we have gone at basically this in the past and I've seen you do with others. And in the end I always just shake my head and think, wow he is crazy sexist, just the opposite of "traditional" sexism, but completely unaware.
Believing things can't be malicious just because a comedian says it exposes how much you don't know what criticism actually is. But its fitting being you're in the demographic you're in, people like you can't help be who you are. Which is fine, you're a product of your culture so you'll defend it as best you can instead of actually try to better yourself.
|
|
|
On July 14 2017 12:24 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2017 12:14 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:11 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:03 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 11:50 JimmiC wrote:
I don't feel bad about it, I don't read that he does either. I read that we are poking humor at the cultural norms. Because the thread is themed in such a manor where humor is encouraged. You can call it whatever you want. The more you wish to normalize it the more of yourself you reveal to us. Rolf, nope, that is just you thinking you are super smart, and much smarter then others. Shockingly most comedians (who by your BS "normalize", when in fact with the end of protest rock it's one of the only creative ways to open peoples eyes about the norms, but that is a whole different discussion), even ones playing dumb have high IQ's. And in my experience people like you lack social, life skills and are not nearly as smart as you think. But I'll end it at this because we have gone at basically this in the past and I've seen you do with others. And in the end I always just shake my head and think, wow he is crazy sexist, just the opposite of "traditional" sexism, but completely unaware. Believing things can't be malicious just because a comedian says it exposes how much you don't know what criticism actually is. But its fitting being you're in the demographic you're in, people like you can't help be who you are. Which is fine, you're a product of your culture so you'll defend it as best you can instead of actually try to better yourself. Thanks for proving my point. You have 0 clue which demographic I'm in. I think All you know if I'm from Canadian and married. I thought I could be wrong so I have had my wife and a couple of friends read your posts. They all wish you would stop "defending" them because A they don't need it, and B you don't understand them at all. Here is a goal for you, try to post to people without being a condescending douche any time gender comes up. If you ever pull it off I'll be impressed, but lets be serious your posts are not about the content they are about making yourself feel good, so you keep being you.
And like I said last time, its a bit sad that sharing your internet posts is what you do when you hang out with friends. But I'm sure they understand that its important to make sure to appease you, especially if you're the type to do that. I've definitely had those friends that brag about their thread posts, they're usually a bit sad but you understand that they need to feel powerful themselves.
|
|
|
On July 14 2017 12:43 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2017 12:37 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:24 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:14 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:11 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:03 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 11:50 JimmiC wrote:
I don't feel bad about it, I don't read that he does either. I read that we are poking humor at the cultural norms. Because the thread is themed in such a manor where humor is encouraged. You can call it whatever you want. The more you wish to normalize it the more of yourself you reveal to us. Rolf, nope, that is just you thinking you are super smart, and much smarter then others. Shockingly most comedians (who by your BS "normalize", when in fact with the end of protest rock it's one of the only creative ways to open peoples eyes about the norms, but that is a whole different discussion), even ones playing dumb have high IQ's. And in my experience people like you lack social, life skills and are not nearly as smart as you think. But I'll end it at this because we have gone at basically this in the past and I've seen you do with others. And in the end I always just shake my head and think, wow he is crazy sexist, just the opposite of "traditional" sexism, but completely unaware. Believing things can't be malicious just because a comedian says it exposes how much you don't know what criticism actually is. But its fitting being you're in the demographic you're in, people like you can't help be who you are. Which is fine, you're a product of your culture so you'll defend it as best you can instead of actually try to better yourself. Thanks for proving my point. You have 0 clue which demographic I'm in. I think All you know if I'm from Canadian and married. I thought I could be wrong so I have had my wife and a couple of friends read your posts. They all wish you would stop "defending" them because A they don't need it, and B you don't understand them at all. Here is a goal for you, try to post to people without being a condescending douche any time gender comes up. If you ever pull it off I'll be impressed, but lets be serious your posts are not about the content they are about making yourself feel good, so you keep being you. And like I said last time, its a bit sad that sharing your internet posts is what you do when you hang out with friends. But I'm sure they understand that its important to make sure to appease you, especially if you're the type to do that. I've definitely had those friends that brag about their thread posts, they're usually a bit sad but you understand that they need to feel powerful themselves. Just the really embarrassing ones I believe her words were "what an arrogant douche, does he really believe that every man in the world is sexist but him? He must think he is one special snowflake, comes off so bad when he says shit about women not even realizing the sexism but HE does. How can some people think so highly of themselves AND they are such a great person." Then it was a lot of funny guess about what you like in real life, I'm sure you can guess. and you having "friends" is pretty unbelievable on its ow. Maybe acquaintances but some one dealing with you "helping" them all the time. barf.
I know it must be weird to imagine people hanging out with each other where you don't get to belittle them--but it happens JimmieC. And when you start hanging out with people who don't have to comfort you on your thread posts, I'm sure you'll understand why and how that happens. Until then, I hope you learn to have a better argument to accusations of misogyny than the fact that you have women friends and comedians say mean things. Because it sounds just as bad as arguing that you're not racist because you have a black friend and because you think making fun of black people is good for them; as you say, "only creative ways to open peoples eyes."
|
|
|
Guys, personal stuff in PMs, none of these are answers to stupid questions.
If a cop pulled a gun on you and:
1. you're innocent
2. you have a reasonable fear of death
3. you've complied with everything the cop has said
4. the cop is yelling at you and waving the gun around
would you be able to disarm the cop and claim self-defense?
|
On July 14 2017 13:04 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2017 13:01 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:43 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:37 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:24 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:14 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:11 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:03 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 11:50 JimmiC wrote:
I don't feel bad about it, I don't read that he does either. I read that we are poking humor at the cultural norms. Because the thread is themed in such a manor where humor is encouraged. You can call it whatever you want. The more you wish to normalize it the more of yourself you reveal to us. Rolf, nope, that is just you thinking you are super smart, and much smarter then others. Shockingly most comedians (who by your BS "normalize", when in fact with the end of protest rock it's one of the only creative ways to open peoples eyes about the norms, but that is a whole different discussion), even ones playing dumb have high IQ's. And in my experience people like you lack social, life skills and are not nearly as smart as you think. But I'll end it at this because we have gone at basically this in the past and I've seen you do with others. And in the end I always just shake my head and think, wow he is crazy sexist, just the opposite of "traditional" sexism, but completely unaware. Believing things can't be malicious just because a comedian says it exposes how much you don't know what criticism actually is. But its fitting being you're in the demographic you're in, people like you can't help be who you are. Which is fine, you're a product of your culture so you'll defend it as best you can instead of actually try to better yourself. Thanks for proving my point. You have 0 clue which demographic I'm in. I think All you know if I'm from Canadian and married. I thought I could be wrong so I have had my wife and a couple of friends read your posts. They all wish you would stop "defending" them because A they don't need it, and B you don't understand them at all. Here is a goal for you, try to post to people without being a condescending douche any time gender comes up. If you ever pull it off I'll be impressed, but lets be serious your posts are not about the content they are about making yourself feel good, so you keep being you. And like I said last time, its a bit sad that sharing your internet posts is what you do when you hang out with friends. But I'm sure they understand that its important to make sure to appease you, especially if you're the type to do that. I've definitely had those friends that brag about their thread posts, they're usually a bit sad but you understand that they need to feel powerful themselves. Just the really embarrassing ones I believe her words were "what an arrogant douche, does he really believe that every man in the world is sexist but him? He must think he is one special snowflake, comes off so bad when he says shit about women not even realizing the sexism but HE does. How can some people think so highly of themselves AND they are such a great person." Then it was a lot of funny guess about what you like in real life, I'm sure you can guess. and you having "friends" is pretty unbelievable on its ow. Maybe acquaintances but some one dealing with you "helping" them all the time. barf. I know it must be weird to imagine people hanging out with each other where you don't get to belittle them--but it happens JimmieC. And when you start hanging out with people who don't have to comfort you on your thread posts, I'm sure you'll understand why and how that happens. Until then, I hope you learn to have a better argument to accusations of misogyny than the fact that you have women friends and comedians say mean things. Because it sounds just as bad as arguing that you're not racist because you have a black friend and because you think making fun of black people is good for them; as you say, "only creative ways to open peoples eyes." I really don't need better, because with each additional post you do your condensing douchery arrogance and insanely high view of yourself compared to everyone else come out more and more. So thanks for that I enjoy the laughs. I like how you add some new evil thing I've done in each of your posts because even you know the rest of your posts are full shit so why not just make shit up!. Make fun of black people? Are you a closet racist to go with your blatant sexism. You got big issues bro, like go get help for real! I mean don't forget about the time you raped that girl in college.
Chill out dude.
@dark
You can always claim self defense so long as you have proof, and the cop can always claim resisting arrest.
The actual point of contention is if there is evidence the cop used excessive force, if he did then self defense will win out. If he did not use excessive force then resisting arrest wins out.
But, more realistically, it really depends on who the person defending themselves is, who the cop is, and who the jurors are.
A big black guy doing that to a white cop will be shot on sight.
A small white woman doing that to a big black cop will be more likely to be considered self defense.
Etc...
This is because, unlike civilian interactions, there are laws protecting the police in order to give them more power. A random person waving their gun at you is 100% self defense. A police office is more Gray, as you'd need to show that the officer was acting outside of what is expected of an officer.
|
On July 14 2017 14:12 Thieving Magpie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2017 13:04 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 13:01 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:43 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:37 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:24 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:14 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:11 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:03 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 11:50 JimmiC wrote:
I don't feel bad about it, I don't read that he does either. I read that we are poking humor at the cultural norms. Because the thread is themed in such a manor where humor is encouraged. You can call it whatever you want. The more you wish to normalize it the more of yourself you reveal to us. Rolf, nope, that is just you thinking you are super smart, and much smarter then others. Shockingly most comedians (who by your BS "normalize", when in fact with the end of protest rock it's one of the only creative ways to open peoples eyes about the norms, but that is a whole different discussion), even ones playing dumb have high IQ's. And in my experience people like you lack social, life skills and are not nearly as smart as you think. But I'll end it at this because we have gone at basically this in the past and I've seen you do with others. And in the end I always just shake my head and think, wow he is crazy sexist, just the opposite of "traditional" sexism, but completely unaware. Believing things can't be malicious just because a comedian says it exposes how much you don't know what criticism actually is. But its fitting being you're in the demographic you're in, people like you can't help be who you are. Which is fine, you're a product of your culture so you'll defend it as best you can instead of actually try to better yourself. Thanks for proving my point. You have 0 clue which demographic I'm in. I think All you know if I'm from Canadian and married. I thought I could be wrong so I have had my wife and a couple of friends read your posts. They all wish you would stop "defending" them because A they don't need it, and B you don't understand them at all. Here is a goal for you, try to post to people without being a condescending douche any time gender comes up. If you ever pull it off I'll be impressed, but lets be serious your posts are not about the content they are about making yourself feel good, so you keep being you. And like I said last time, its a bit sad that sharing your internet posts is what you do when you hang out with friends. But I'm sure they understand that its important to make sure to appease you, especially if you're the type to do that. I've definitely had those friends that brag about their thread posts, they're usually a bit sad but you understand that they need to feel powerful themselves. Just the really embarrassing ones I believe her words were "what an arrogant douche, does he really believe that every man in the world is sexist but him? He must think he is one special snowflake, comes off so bad when he says shit about women not even realizing the sexism but HE does. How can some people think so highly of themselves AND they are such a great person." Then it was a lot of funny guess about what you like in real life, I'm sure you can guess. and you having "friends" is pretty unbelievable on its ow. Maybe acquaintances but some one dealing with you "helping" them all the time. barf. I know it must be weird to imagine people hanging out with each other where you don't get to belittle them--but it happens JimmieC. And when you start hanging out with people who don't have to comfort you on your thread posts, I'm sure you'll understand why and how that happens. Until then, I hope you learn to have a better argument to accusations of misogyny than the fact that you have women friends and comedians say mean things. Because it sounds just as bad as arguing that you're not racist because you have a black friend and because you think making fun of black people is good for them; as you say, "only creative ways to open peoples eyes." I really don't need better, because with each additional post you do your condensing douchery arrogance and insanely high view of yourself compared to everyone else come out more and more. So thanks for that I enjoy the laughs. I like how you add some new evil thing I've done in each of your posts because even you know the rest of your posts are full shit so why not just make shit up!. Make fun of black people? Are you a closet racist to go with your blatant sexism. You got big issues bro, like go get help for real! I mean don't forget about the time you raped that girl in college. Chill out dude. @dark You can always claim self defense so long as you have proof, and the cop can always claim resisting arrest. The actual point of contention is if there is evidence the cop used excessive force, if he did then self defense will win out. If he did not use excessive force then resisting arrest wins out. But, more realistically, it really depends on who the person defending themselves is, who the cop is, and who the jurors are. A big black guy doing that to a white cop will be shot on sight. A small white woman doing that to a big black cop will be more likely to be considered self defense. Etc... This is because, unlike civilian interactions, there are laws protecting the police in order to give them more power. A random person waving their gun at you is 100% self defense. A police office is more Gray, as you'd need to show that the officer was acting outside of what is expected of an officer.
And in the US "What is expected of them" is to shoot random people if they feel scared. It is hard to act outside of that, except by not shooting people, and no one is going to complain about that.
|
On July 14 2017 17:26 Simberto wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2017 14:12 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 13:04 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 13:01 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:43 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:37 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:24 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:14 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 12:11 JimmiC wrote:On July 14 2017 12:03 Thieving Magpie wrote:
[quote]
You can call it whatever you want. The more you wish to normalize it the more of yourself you reveal to us. Rolf, nope, that is just you thinking you are super smart, and much smarter then others. Shockingly most comedians (who by your BS "normalize", when in fact with the end of protest rock it's one of the only creative ways to open peoples eyes about the norms, but that is a whole different discussion), even ones playing dumb have high IQ's. And in my experience people like you lack social, life skills and are not nearly as smart as you think. But I'll end it at this because we have gone at basically this in the past and I've seen you do with others. And in the end I always just shake my head and think, wow he is crazy sexist, just the opposite of "traditional" sexism, but completely unaware. Believing things can't be malicious just because a comedian says it exposes how much you don't know what criticism actually is. But its fitting being you're in the demographic you're in, people like you can't help be who you are. Which is fine, you're a product of your culture so you'll defend it as best you can instead of actually try to better yourself. Thanks for proving my point. You have 0 clue which demographic I'm in. I think All you know if I'm from Canadian and married. I thought I could be wrong so I have had my wife and a couple of friends read your posts. They all wish you would stop "defending" them because A they don't need it, and B you don't understand them at all. Here is a goal for you, try to post to people without being a condescending douche any time gender comes up. If you ever pull it off I'll be impressed, but lets be serious your posts are not about the content they are about making yourself feel good, so you keep being you. And like I said last time, its a bit sad that sharing your internet posts is what you do when you hang out with friends. But I'm sure they understand that its important to make sure to appease you, especially if you're the type to do that. I've definitely had those friends that brag about their thread posts, they're usually a bit sad but you understand that they need to feel powerful themselves. Just the really embarrassing ones I believe her words were "what an arrogant douche, does he really believe that every man in the world is sexist but him? He must think he is one special snowflake, comes off so bad when he says shit about women not even realizing the sexism but HE does. How can some people think so highly of themselves AND they are such a great person." Then it was a lot of funny guess about what you like in real life, I'm sure you can guess. and you having "friends" is pretty unbelievable on its ow. Maybe acquaintances but some one dealing with you "helping" them all the time. barf. I know it must be weird to imagine people hanging out with each other where you don't get to belittle them--but it happens JimmieC. And when you start hanging out with people who don't have to comfort you on your thread posts, I'm sure you'll understand why and how that happens. Until then, I hope you learn to have a better argument to accusations of misogyny than the fact that you have women friends and comedians say mean things. Because it sounds just as bad as arguing that you're not racist because you have a black friend and because you think making fun of black people is good for them; as you say, "only creative ways to open peoples eyes." I really don't need better, because with each additional post you do your condensing douchery arrogance and insanely high view of yourself compared to everyone else come out more and more. So thanks for that I enjoy the laughs. I like how you add some new evil thing I've done in each of your posts because even you know the rest of your posts are full shit so why not just make shit up!. Make fun of black people? Are you a closet racist to go with your blatant sexism. You got big issues bro, like go get help for real! I mean don't forget about the time you raped that girl in college. Chill out dude. @dark You can always claim self defense so long as you have proof, and the cop can always claim resisting arrest. The actual point of contention is if there is evidence the cop used excessive force, if he did then self defense will win out. If he did not use excessive force then resisting arrest wins out. But, more realistically, it really depends on who the person defending themselves is, who the cop is, and who the jurors are. A big black guy doing that to a white cop will be shot on sight. A small white woman doing that to a big black cop will be more likely to be considered self defense. Etc... This is because, unlike civilian interactions, there are laws protecting the police in order to give them more power. A random person waving their gun at you is 100% self defense. A police office is more Gray, as you'd need to show that the officer was acting outside of what is expected of an officer. And in the US "What is expected of them" is to shoot random people if they feel scared. It is hard to act outside of that, except by not shooting people, and no one is going to complain about that.
They don't seem to shoot random white people though. Especially unarmed ones. Whatever could be the reason for that?
|
I'm sure American cops do. They randomly shoot everything else. Dogs, cars, inanimate objects. Sometimes they even hit what they are aiming at. Judging that American police seem to have special rights combined with lower expected standards than the average person, my guess is that after this hypothetical disarming of the cop you'll immediately get hunted down and shot by other police, so you wouldn't be able to claim anything as you'll be dead.
____
Also at theiving magpie: women are people. They are all individual persons with different preferences. The actual question is actually quite complicated and cultural. Who is it ok for? The looker? The looked? Those who are in a relationship with either? What are the rules of society? How does it change in context to context? From street to workplace to nightclub. Both the question and the way of your answering the question in the way you did, you've lumped women into one homogenous group as if women aren't individual persons in some wierd context devoid of reality. And that deserves to be made fun of. Anyways, that's probably the most I will say on the topic because it's steering dangerously close to something unpalatable.
|
On July 14 2017 21:04 Dangermousecatdog wrote:
I'm sure American cops do. They randomly shoot everything else. Dogs, cars, inanimate objects. Sometimes they even hit what they are aiming at. Judging that American police seem to have special rights combined with lower expected standards than the average person, my guess is that after this hypothetical disarming of the cop you'll immediately get hunted down and shot by other police, so you wouldn't be able to claim anything as you'll be dead.
____
Also at theiving magpie: women are people. They are all individual persons with different preferences. The actual question is actually quite complicated and cultural. Who is it ok for? The looker? The looked? Those who are in a relationship with either? What are the rules of society? How does it change in context to context? From street to workplace to nightclub. Both the question and the way of your answering the question in the way you did, you've lumped women into one homogenous group as if women aren't individual persons in some wierd context devoid of reality. And that deserves to be made fun of. Anyways, that's probably the most I will say on the topic because it's steering dangerously close to something unpalatable.
Is that really what you think cops do? That there cops randomly shooting at cats and dogs and missing most of the time?
American cops are given authority during criminal situations, during emergencies, and during pre-defined circumstances where authority is required (such as altercations, times of danger, etc...)
Defining those circumstances and then determining whether or not a cop has acted out of turn from those circumstances is what is harder to define--and the issue is that jurors often give cops more benefits of a doubt than they do normal citizens. Of course, cops aren't often judged by a pane of purely black jurors.
What lump did I throw women in?
The lump where you can look or not look at them at it doesn't really matter as each of them will react differently depending on the situation lump?
The lump where unless there's a special reason for them to think someone looking at them is important that they don't simply lump up the people who stare at them that say into the people that stare at them lump?
Is the lump I'm putting women in the lump where somehow you. Have special staring powers and how dare I question your prowess at staring at women because you're different and a nice guy and women should see that lump?
Which lump is it mouscat?
It's been several pages now and the topic has been changed. If you want to bring up that somehow you staring at women is special then go ahead, but I think it's better we drop it before you dig yourself a bigger hole.
|
That you somehow think you "won" this exchange makes this so much funnier.
|
On July 14 2017 23:09 Velr wrote:
That you somehow think you "won" this exchange makes this so much funnier.
I already know what the demographics of this site leans towards when it comes to women's rights, so when it comes to this topic impressing video gamers is not really that important to me. What's truth is true despite what folks like you want it to be.
|
On July 11 2017 18:46 Simberto wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2017 11:47 Nebuchad wrote:On July 10 2017 21:32 Ghostcom wrote:On July 10 2017 06:33 Nebuchad wrote:
I'm looking for a software that allows me to do something specific, but I don't really know the terminology for stuff so I can't really even look for the software ><
What I want to do is a diagram or a family tree, but ideally I'd like it if every time you move to the next branch of the diagram, the chosen element becomes the focus.
So you're at the beginning of your tree, you have like 6 choices. You can click on any of the 6 and you have a new "beginning" for your tree, with any number of choices going from there.
Basically it's the same as the pathing of folders for Windows, but I'd like to have a single file instead of a bunch of folders. Needs to have high capacity too because I'm going to have a lot of branches in it.
Anyone knows what I could do that with? I don't think I can do that with SmartDraw cause I don't think you can focus on a specific choice or "folder". I'm unsure what it is you want to use it for, but Prezi does pretty much that if you want it for presentations. Thanks, I played around with it but from what I could tell you only have one set of branches for your tree on this (unless I suck at software comprehension which is definitely possible), and that's not enough for my tree. I've been looking more and I think one solution is to create a bunch of folders on Windows and then use Snap2html to get a single file, not sure that works the way I think it does but I'll try that. So basically, you want to do a choose your own adventure book or something along those lines? Depending on how pretty you want it to look vs how much effort you want to put into it, you could try doing it with multiple HTML pages and links between them. That was a school project for 7th graders in a school i did a teaching practicum in.
This works well, much better than I thought it would. Thanks.
Is there some sort of cap to this? I have about 800 htmls linked so far and I'm not close to half, will it start lagging at some point or some shit like this?
|
|
|
On July 14 2017 23:58 Nebuchad wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2017 18:46 Simberto wrote:On July 11 2017 11:47 Nebuchad wrote:On July 10 2017 21:32 Ghostcom wrote:On July 10 2017 06:33 Nebuchad wrote:
I'm looking for a software that allows me to do something specific, but I don't really know the terminology for stuff so I can't really even look for the software ><
What I want to do is a diagram or a family tree, but ideally I'd like it if every time you move to the next branch of the diagram, the chosen element becomes the focus.
So you're at the beginning of your tree, you have like 6 choices. You can click on any of the 6 and you have a new "beginning" for your tree, with any number of choices going from there.
Basically it's the same as the pathing of folders for Windows, but I'd like to have a single file instead of a bunch of folders. Needs to have high capacity too because I'm going to have a lot of branches in it.
Anyone knows what I could do that with? I don't think I can do that with SmartDraw cause I don't think you can focus on a specific choice or "folder". I'm unsure what it is you want to use it for, but Prezi does pretty much that if you want it for presentations. Thanks, I played around with it but from what I could tell you only have one set of branches for your tree on this (unless I suck at software comprehension which is definitely possible), and that's not enough for my tree. I've been looking more and I think one solution is to create a bunch of folders on Windows and then use Snap2html to get a single file, not sure that works the way I think it does but I'll try that. So basically, you want to do a choose your own adventure book or something along those lines? Depending on how pretty you want it to look vs how much effort you want to put into it, you could try doing it with multiple HTML pages and links between them. That was a school project for 7th graders in a school i did a teaching practicum in. This works well, much better than I thought it would. Thanks. Is there some sort of cap to this? I have about 800 htmls linked so far and I'm not close to half, will it start lagging at some point or some shit like this?
Generally speaking: no. But it depends a lot on how you are doing this. Are they simply local html files that you open in your web browser? Or are you hosting them on a server? If hosting, it's mostly about concurrent accesses. But if it's just you, then you don't have to worry about that either. If you're generating thousands of separate htmls, it's going to be an absolute nightmare to maintain (it would probably be a lot more efficient to maintain in a database and simply generate the htmls from there, but you're already halfway, so nvm). But as long as it's a fire-and-forget project and you never have to change your structure, it'll be fine.
|
On July 15 2017 00:00 JimmiC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2017 23:34 Thieving Magpie wrote:On July 14 2017 23:09 Velr wrote:
That you somehow think you "won" this exchange makes this so much funnier. I already know what the demographics of this site leans towards when it comes to women's rights, so when it comes to this topic impressing video gamers is not really that important to me. What's truth is true despite what folks like you want it to be. ROLF Perfect TM. Thank you, a great example post of your shtick Let me break it down. TM firmly believes he is the only non sexist, non racist in the west. Disagree with any point he makes you are a racist or sexist yourself. This is because of two reasons he can't even fathom himself being wrong and he truly believes he is the only one smart enough to avoid societies pollution. And he lives and dies by that he "knows the demographics" of this site and there by decides all people responding are young white sexist racists. But again he somehow breaks the mold of this demographic. But just him. You really go to ask, if we are all such assholes why are you here? He then backs this up with such "facts" most people would call logical fallacies. His main goto's are. Psychologists fallacy + Show Spoiler + an observer presupposes the objectivity of his own perspective when analyzing a behavioral event. Strawman and the his go to when things start to get real tough Poisoning the well + Show Spoiler + a subtype of ad hominem presenting adverse information about a target person with the intention of discrediting everything that the target person says.
As someone who lives in the west, I greatly disagree with the idea that I am not influenced by western culture. For the most part, those who think themselves innocent of wrongdoing very rarely are innocent of it.
But please, tell me, what fallacy did I perform by saying I don't need posters on a videogame thread to agree with me on civil rights for me to care about said civil rights?
Calm down, call your friends and have them read your TL posts as you say you love doing, have your wife stroke your ego as they do, and just chill out. No need to be caustic.
|
Canada11355 Posts
Why is it that the songs I get stuck in my heard are almost exclusively songs I don't particularly like or even outright dislike?
At what point will(should) coastal cities start to evacuate/move elswhere if and when sea levels rise beyond manageable levels?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
