EPTHere is the one I am currently using + Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://cdn.watchshop.com/profiler/thumb_cache/zoom/99941555_v_1355975894.jpg)
Post your watch! - Page 58
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
GettingIt
1656 Posts
Here is the one I am currently using + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
GettingIt
1656 Posts
On August 11 2014 12:17 IgnE wrote: How do you judge which watch is better? There are many ways such as weight, name/tradition, sweep, accuracy and more. | ||
|
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
| ||
|
Liebig
France738 Posts
On August 11 2014 12:09 GettingIt wrote: If I see one more Seiko post I'm going to cry. There are much better watches out there! Here is the one I am currently using + Show Spoiler + There aren't that many watches better than a Grand Seiko. | ||
|
GettingIt
1656 Posts
On August 11 2014 12:33 IgnE wrote: Aren't most watches pretty accurate? Name can make a watch better? You can tell a watch is better than another by its name. The name itself doesn't make it better. | ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
Look for fake watch buster. Rappers have hilariously bad taste in fake watches | ||
|
Piste
6175 Posts
On August 11 2014 12:23 GettingIt wrote: There are many ways such as weight, name/tradition, sweep, accuracy and more. price ofcourse  | ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
On August 11 2014 12:42 lichter wrote: I was expecting maybe JLC or ALS, instead it was Bulova Look for fake watch buster. Rappers have hilariously bad taste in fake watches Yup was also going to point to #fakewatchbusta + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](https://static-ssl.businessinsider.com/image/538788c3ecad04211a29a015-960/screen%20shot%202014-05-29%20at%203.16.40%20pm.png) ![[image loading]](https://static-ssl.businessinsider.com/image/538788c36bb3f7133129a015-960/screen%20shot%202014-05-29%20at%203.19.51%20pm.png) ![[image loading]](https://s3.amazonaws.com/vice_asset_uploader/files/140000470353_PM.png) | ||
|
solsken
Sweden182 Posts
On August 11 2014 12:09 GettingIt wrote: If I see one more Seiko post I'm going to cry. There are much better watches out there! Here is the one I am currently using + Show Spoiler + Start your own thread where seikos aren't allowed then, have fun on your own. Can't really see how someone wearing that Bulova feels he's entitled to elitism. | ||
|
mdb
Bulgaria4059 Posts
On August 02 2014 14:48 Liebig wrote: I agree. The looks kinda reminds me of a Royal Oak :o ![[image loading]](http://people.timezone.com/msandler/Articles/Clymer/ClymerRO01.jpg) This watch is amazing! I got Seiko, but I wont show it ^^ | ||
|
ShadeR
Australia7535 Posts
On July 22 2014 12:08 IgnE wrote: But without prices you can't even tell the $25 watches from the $2500 watches. Sure you can. If it keeps better time then its the $20 watch =] | ||
|
Ahzz
Finland780 Posts
On August 11 2014 22:09 ShadeR wrote: Sure you can. If it keeps better time then its the $20 watch =] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kgDLdgzq3k&list=UUQ0qP6koCeknuEjb11DjX_Q I'll be honest. I watched the video on mute, and I had a relatively difficult time seeing which watch was superior. I really did. I assume it was the metallic looking watch, but with just outside appearances at least I dont have the eye to see why the other is so much better crafted. | ||
|
StatixEx
United Kingdom779 Posts
![[image loading]](http://cdn.watchshop.com/profiler/thumb_cache/zoom/99937423_v_1355950753.jpg) | ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/4Hfdfql.jpg) | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44257 Posts
On August 12 2014 00:20 Dangermousecatdog wrote: I thought this was meant to be a post your watch thread not post images of watches found on the internet thread. It's pretty much implied that the internet images are the same as the watch you own at home, except looking a lot better and without all the hairy arms  | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
I mean in real life, when you show your watch, you simply show your wrist, you don't head towards a watch showroom and point out the watch you own lol. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44257 Posts
On August 12 2014 00:41 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Yeah, I guess that's what they are trying to imply, but in this age where if you don't simply own a camera outright, nearly every phone has a camera; posting a stock picture is just like saying you don't actually own this watch. I never really viewed this thread as a place to lie about the watches you own (although I'm sure some people do for whatever reason), but instead sharing the watches and opinions of watches we do have and having the rest of us view/ compliment/ critique them. I could totally see how the better pictures online of your watch could be preferable to some shitty cameraphone pic in poor lighting ::shrugs:: | ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
On August 12 2014 00:41 Dangermousecatdog wrote: Yeah, I guess that's what they are trying to imply, but in this age where if you don't simply own a camera outright, nearly every phone has a camera; posting a stock picture is just like saying you don't actually own this watch. I mean in real life, when you show your watch, you simply show your wrist, you don't head towards a watch showroom and point out the watch you own lol. This view is so creatively negative, it´s amazing. I guess there´s always room for being upset. | ||
| ||
