|
|
|
On December 09 2010 09:55 Nizaris wrote: I think that if he turned himself in that means he is ready to die to prove how fucked up the system really is. why would he die?
|
On December 09 2010 10:03 Roe wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 09:55 Nizaris wrote: I think that if he turned himself in that means he is ready to die to prove how fucked up the system really is. why would he die? For whatever reason people think this guys life is actually being threatened by the united states.
|
On December 09 2010 10:11 Bosu wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 10:03 Roe wrote:On December 09 2010 09:55 Nizaris wrote: I think that if he turned himself in that means he is ready to die to prove how fucked up the system really is. why would he die? For whatever reason people think this guys life is actually being threatened by the united states.
Perhaps it could have something to do with the calls for execution and assassination by state officials of the U.S. Government
Perhaps...
|
:p well in America ppl bring loaded semi-autos to a political rally and several high profile politicians have spoke out to have Assange treated as a terrorist. not surprised if there is already a price on his head.
in another thought, i wonder how USA will react if Assange get nominated for Nobel peace prize for his anti-war activism. i like to see Obama, also a Nobel prize winner, offer his opinions on the matter.
|
On December 09 2010 10:24 nebffa wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 10:11 Bosu wrote:On December 09 2010 10:03 Roe wrote:On December 09 2010 09:55 Nizaris wrote: I think that if he turned himself in that means he is ready to die to prove how fucked up the system really is. why would he die? For whatever reason people think this guys life is actually being threatened by the united states. Perhaps it could have something to do with the calls for execution and assassination by state officials of the U.S. Government Perhaps...
Oh whatever. Those people are obviously just blabbing retarded shit and I am sure they do believe it,but Sarah Palin and Fox news are not spokesmen for the American government. That doesn't mean it would actually happen. This guy being assassinated wouldn't help the situation at all for the US with or without the "insurance".
|
the ideal situation for the US is if he gets locked away somewhere and never heard of again, they'd be moronic to put a price on his head, the world would go into complete uproar if he was killed.
|
On December 09 2010 09:42 Hizzo wrote:
Quantum computing will break the fuck out of encryption though but we're not close enough to it yet.
From what I understand AES-256 should be okay even against quantum computers.
|
On December 09 2010 10:11 Bosu wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 10:03 Roe wrote:On December 09 2010 09:55 Nizaris wrote: I think that if he turned himself in that means he is ready to die to prove how fucked up the system really is. why would he die? For whatever reason people think this guys life is actually being threatened by the united states.
They called Wikileaks a terrorist organization and toyed with the idea that they should assassinate its founders and stuff...
It really doesn't get more obvious than that.That's like when 'psychics' call people who expose them "evil/Satanistic". The saddest thing is that some people actually buy it..
This might get pretty bad soon..
|
On December 09 2010 10:38 anycolourfloyd wrote: the ideal situation for the us is if he gets locked away somewhere and never heard of again, they'd be moronic to put a price on his head, the world would go into complete uproar if he was killed. just curious, why would the australians want their own countrymen locked up forever without having committed a crime?
wasnt there this thing in western democracies about holding governments accountable to their words and actions?
|
On December 09 2010 10:42 dybydx wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 10:38 anycolourfloyd wrote: the ideal situation for the us is if he gets locked away somewhere and never heard of again, they'd be moronic to put a price on his head, the world would go into complete uproar if he was killed. just curious, why would the australians want their own countrymen locked up forever without having committed a crime? wasnt there this thing in western democracies about holding governments accountable to their words and actions?
yeah i realised that looked spastic after i posted it, i should have capitalised the US as in the United States.
|
On December 09 2010 10:42 dybydx wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 10:38 anycolourfloyd wrote: the ideal situation for the us is if he gets locked away somewhere and never heard of again, they'd be moronic to put a price on his head, the world would go into complete uproar if he was killed. just curious, why would the australians want their own countrymen locked up forever without having committed a crime? wasnt there this thing in western democracies about holding governments accountable to their words and actions?
Where did he say he wanted him locked up? Pretty sure he was stating what he thought of as the "ideal situation for the us". Not his personal beliefs on what should happen with the guy.
|
rofl.. this is what Palin said about WikiLeaks " Governor Palin spoke out about Wikileaks because it has no regard for law or human life," SarahPAC adviser Andy Davis told CNN. "Today we learned their supporters have attacked the Palin family's personal information. Wikileaks remains a threat to every freedom-loving citizen across the globe. The world should not be intimidated. Governor Palin isn't."
The bold part was the funniest
|
Seems like the US is pretty much forcing the issue and trying to get other countries to arrest him for very debatable charges.
|
This reminds me of the scene from the Illusionist.
Crown Prince: "Shut him down." Inspector: "But he's quite popular with the people." Crown Prince: "I'm sure you'll find a way."
|
|
|
He swore an oath to his country and signed official documents stating that he would abide to the military code of justice, then turned around and release classified military documents to the public. Hes in jail for making the conscious decision to break a law he swore to abide by.
|
On December 09 2010 12:19 uSnAmplified wrote: He swore an oath to his country and signed official documents stating that he would abide to the military code of justice, then turned around and release classified military documents to the public. Hes in jail for making the conscious decision to break a law he swore to abide by. And it's a good thing we have people like him willing to go to jail for doing the right thing, even if it involves breaking the law. They remind the rest of us what the whole concept of principles are for.
|
On December 09 2010 12:21 Krigwin wrote:Show nested quote +On December 09 2010 12:19 uSnAmplified wrote: He swore an oath to his country and signed official documents stating that he would abide to the military code of justice, then turned around and release classified military documents to the public. Hes in jail for making the conscious decision to break a law he swore to abide by. And it's a good thing we have people like him willing to go to jail for doing the right thing, even if it involves breaking the law. They remind the rest of us what the whole concept of principles are for. The wikileaks informant who threw the kid under the bus obviously had a great concept of principals, breaking an oath to your country is a real class act to.
|
Please ignore this guy, he is just trolling for arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
|