|
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source
|
lol. this takes "conservative" to a whole new level.
|
Let's get retarded in here
|
On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source
I fucking lol'ed so hard.
Not often I lol in real life like this.
|
Wow.
NANCY KARIBJANIAN: What opinions, of late, that have come from our high court, do you most object to?
O'DONNELL: Oh, gosh. Um, give me a specific one. I'm sorry.
KARIBJANIAN: Actually, I can't, because I need you to tell me which ones you object to.
O'DONNELL: Um, I'm very sorry, right off the top of my head, I know that there are a lot, but I'll put it up on my website, I promise you.
WOLF BLITZER: We know that you disagree with Roe v. Wade.
O'DONNELL: Yeah, but she said a recent one.
|
The Tea Party movement is getting scary as shit now. Is the only reason O'Donnell is being supported is because she's a Protestant and she's a buffoon? Politicians should be the educated elite, not the common idiot.
|
On October 14 2010 11:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Wow. Show nested quote +
NANCY KARIBJANIAN: What opinions, of late, that have come from our high court, do you most object to?
O'DONNELL: Oh, gosh. Um, give me a specific one. I'm sorry.
KARIBJANIAN: Actually, I can't, because I need you to tell me which ones you object to.
O'DONNELL: Um, I'm very sorry, right off the top of my head, I know that there are a lot, but I'll put it up on my website, I promise you.
WOLF BLITZER: We know that you disagree with Roe v. Wade.
O'DONNELL: Yeah, but she said a recent one.
I don't understand how something like this doesn't constitute instant removal from the card.
Also, somewhat relevant, this image always me laugh.
|
On October 14 2010 11:08 Deathstar wrote:
The Tea Party movement is getting scary as shit now. Is the only reason O'Donnell is being supported is because she's a Protestant and she's a buffoon? Politicians should be the educated elite, not the common idiot.
As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron.
-my hero
|
On October 14 2010 11:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Wow. Show nested quote +
NANCY KARIBJANIAN: What opinions, of late, that have come from our high court, do you most object to?
O'DONNELL: Oh, gosh. Um, give me a specific one. I'm sorry.
KARIBJANIAN: Actually, I can't, because I need you to tell me which ones you object to.
O'DONNELL: Um, I'm very sorry, right off the top of my head, I know that there are a lot, but I'll put it up on my website, I promise you.
WOLF BLITZER: We know that you disagree with Roe v. Wade.
O'DONNELL: Yeah, but she said a recent one.
At least she knows that Roe v. Wade isn't a recent decision.
|
On October 14 2010 11:08 Deathstar wrote:
The Tea Party movement is getting scary as shit now. Is the only reason O'Donnell is being supported is because she's a Protestant and she's a buffoon? Politicians should be the educated elite, not the common idiot.
But the educated elite are all evil and want to control our lives and create a new world order!
|
On October 14 2010 11:19 Sadistx wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2010 11:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Wow.
NANCY KARIBJANIAN: What opinions, of late, that have come from our high court, do you most object to?
O'DONNELL: Oh, gosh. Um, give me a specific one. I'm sorry.
KARIBJANIAN: Actually, I can't, because I need you to tell me which ones you object to.
O'DONNELL: Um, I'm very sorry, right off the top of my head, I know that there are a lot, but I'll put it up on my website, I promise you.
WOLF BLITZER: We know that you disagree with Roe v. Wade.
O'DONNELL: Yeah, but she said a recent one.
At least she knows that Roe v. Wade isn't a recent decision.
That's like saying rats don't have human brains...
|
On October 14 2010 11:48 Adila wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2010 11:19 Sadistx wrote:On October 14 2010 11:03 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Wow.
NANCY KARIBJANIAN: What opinions, of late, that have come from our high court, do you most object to?
O'DONNELL: Oh, gosh. Um, give me a specific one. I'm sorry.
KARIBJANIAN: Actually, I can't, because I need you to tell me which ones you object to.
O'DONNELL: Um, I'm very sorry, right off the top of my head, I know that there are a lot, but I'll put it up on my website, I promise you.
WOLF BLITZER: We know that you disagree with Roe v. Wade.
O'DONNELL: Yeah, but she said a recent one.
At least she knows that Roe v. Wade isn't a recent decision. That's like saying rats don't have human brains...
Excuse me, but MICE have fully functioning human brains, not rats. Get it right!!!
|
On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:Show nested quote +
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source
your source is the huffington post.
cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington.
Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
|
On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
|
On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
Shouldn't you cite some "real" information from your good ole pal Fox news? Haven't Glenn and Hannity told you what to say already?
|
On October 14 2010 12:19 Adila wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote:On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him. I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
|
On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
A fuck head with strings attached is what we have and will always get. That's how the damn system works. Sure it may not be cool, but what exactly does putting in a genuine STUPID person do to counter that? What can she "change"? All it does it make the people running our government dumber, and it's at dangerous levels as is.
|
On October 14 2010 12:20 FindingPride wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2010 12:19 Adila wrote:On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote:On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him. I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans. Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
|
On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote:Show nested quote +On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
Okay here's another source, CNN:
The most serious problem for either candidate came when O'Donnell was asked to cite any specific recent Supreme Court rulings that she opposed.
"Oh gosh, give me a specific one," she said, and when told the question required her come up with cases, O'Donnell responded, "I'm sorry," and promised to put the information up later on her website.
Source
|
On October 14 2010 12:25 DannyJ wrote:Show nested quote +On October 14 2010 12:20 FindingPride wrote:On October 14 2010 12:19 Adila wrote:On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote:On October 05 2010 14:55 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
Source your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him. I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans. Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show. The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well?
or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:-ve-_GmfnUWx0M:http://i789.photobucket.com/albums/yy177/smcdu2/wolf-blitzer-fail.jpg&t=1)
