On October 03 2010 08:29 Biochemist wrote: It's funny that this stuff is coming from Bill Maher, since he doesn't believe in vaccines because he doesn't believe germs cause disease.
Tons more where that came from. Very ironic for him to poke fun at someone else for holding onto a few beliefs that run contrary to established scientific consensus when he obviously has several of his own.
What in the world?... Did you even watch the clip you linked?
He specifically says at 3:00 "Let me clear up some things that people have been saying and writing about me that are not true. I am not a germ theory denier, I understand that germs and viruses cause disease.."
I hadn't watched this one specifically, but he's lying through his teeth when he says that to save face.
edit: more specifically, there are many shades of germ theory denialism. Just because he isn't totally off the deep end doesn't mean he isn't still a loon.
But I agree that his opinion matters less since he's not actually running for office. I only pointed it out because it struck me as a little funny.
..I think people really should actually watch these clips and get FULL CONTEXT, instead of taking one quote and start accusing him of things that are not true.
What he is saying is you cannot say western medicine is perfectly proven as of yet, and we should discuss the implication and consequences of advance in western medicine instead of dismissing everything else and say "Current Western medicine is the only way we can fight diseases."
He is hardly a germ denialist. He seems to be against vaccine because although he understands the process of inoculation, (bolded for importance!!!!), science cannot claim to understand the long term consequences of injecting these things in the vaccine (mercury and other chemicals) in to your body. Yet people simply dismiss when he raises these points to discuss.
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
She was 36-37 years old when she said that. Hardly "young". I can understand being an apologist but this is really just a hilarious defense that holds no ground. There really isn't any way I can say this without being derisive, but I just can't help but wonder where in your train of logic that went faulty to allow you to even attempt to use such a ridiculous excuse to justify this woman.
edit: oh wow, your last post pretty much just sums up about everything.
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
WASHINGTON — Republican Senate nominee Christine O'Donnell of Delaware said in a 2006 debate that China was plotting to take over America and claimed to have classified information about the country that she couldn't divulge.
O'Donnell's comments came as she and two other Republican candidates debated U.S. policy on China during Delaware's 2006 Senate primary, which O'Donnell ultimately lost.
She said China had a "carefully thought out and strategic plan to take over America" and accused one opponent of appeasement for suggesting that the two countries were economically dependent and should find a way to be allies.
your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
Uh, do you have any idea what we are talking about? Have you seen the video?
your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
And if your sister ran for Senate within three years of eating her own poo for fun I'd hope that people would take that into consideration when voting for her. But hey that's just me.
On October 14 2010 12:13 FindingPride wrote: [quote] your source is the huffington post. cmon. srsly? in all honesty. I hope she wins. I want something different in washington. Not some fuck head with strings attached to him.
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
And if your sister ran for Senate within three years of eating her own poo for fun I'd hope that people would take that into consideration when voting for her. But hey that's just me.
If i told you she was forced to eat her own poo by a burglar that entered our home. Would you feel the same way?
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
And if your sister ran for Senate within three years of eating her own poo for fun I'd hope that people would take that into consideration when voting for her. But hey that's just me.
If i told you she was forced to eat her own poo by a burglar that entered our home. Would you feel the same way?
Are you trying to say Christine O'Donnell was forced to say the stuff she has said?
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
And if your sister ran for Senate within three years of eating her own poo for fun I'd hope that people would take that into consideration when voting for her. But hey that's just me.
If i told you she was forced to eat her own poo by a burglar that entered our home. Would you feel the same way?
Why don't you ever just state your point instead of throwing out hypotheticals?
I want competent people in Washington, not incompetents like her and Palin. I want people with real, concrete ideas and a plan, not empty slogans.
Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
And if your sister ran for Senate within three years of eating her own poo for fun I'd hope that people would take that into consideration when voting for her. But hey that's just me.
If i told you she was forced to eat her own poo by a burglar that entered our home. Would you feel the same way?
Too bad this line of thought is irrelevant seeing as O'Donnell isn't coerced into saying stupid shit.
lol I think I've been trolled. Great job at pretending to be a moron in support of the Tea Party Candidate. You did fairly well.
On October 14 2010 12:20 FindingPride wrote: [quote] Shes not incompetent. She just said shit when she was young and got caught. Honestly, im sure if you met these people and actually had an honest talk with them you would realize they aren't so "retarded" as certain media posts like to show.
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
And if your sister ran for Senate within three years of eating her own poo for fun I'd hope that people would take that into consideration when voting for her. But hey that's just me.
If i told you she was forced to eat her own poo by a burglar that entered our home. Would you feel the same way?
Too bad this line of thought is irrelevant seeing as O'Donnell isn't coerced into saying stupid shit.
lol I think I've been trolled. Great job at pretending to be a moron in support of the Tea Party Candidate. You did fairly well.
Saying you support a conservative/republican Candidate is grounds for being labeled a moron lately
The woman was well into here 30's when she stated scientists were giving mice fully functioning human brains...
Critical thinking is one of the greatest gifts of the human mind to forgo its use kind of makes one retarded. So rather then blindly looking at the statement you should beable to come up with some sort of reasoning or theory on to why she would make such a statement. Surely a person who would believe such a crazy thing would be saying just as equally crazy things as well? or is it just this one thing? I think the reasoning as to why she said it and in what setting is of much more importance.
Not going to lie, i have no idea what you just said right there. I must be dumb.
Almost as dumb as a person who on national TV says Stuart Little exists.
Well if she had 9 beers in her and a few shots of tequila and she makes the statement to a friend. Do you think that statement holds any value despite?
Except she was sober...and it was in 2007...and on fox news...with O'Reilly
It was an example. Ok so we have O'Reilly having an interview with o'donnel and she made a claim Out of jokes on how her friend believes that rats have fully functional human brains. Big whoop. My sister ate her own poo once.
And if your sister ran for Senate within three years of eating her own poo for fun I'd hope that people would take that into consideration when voting for her. But hey that's just me.
If i told you she was forced to eat her own poo by a burglar that entered our home. Would you feel the same way?
Too bad this line of thought is irrelevant seeing as O'Donnell isn't coerced into saying stupid shit.
lol I think I've been trolled. Great job at pretending to be a moron in support of the Tea Party Candidate. You did fairly well.
Saying you support a conservative/republican Candidate is grounds for being labeled a moron lately
Give us a couple of your reasons why you support her over Coons.
And if you're voting on party lines, then don't talk reason to us.
When i read the fact that she opposes abortion and only allows it when the mother could die and even then letting the families decide which life to save i must say. She is certified insane.
On October 14 2010 14:24 FindingPride wrote: When i read the fact that she opposes abortion and only allows it when the mother could die and even then letting the families decide which life to save i must say. She is certified insane.
I'm glad you said this. She completely defies common sense and has no business being in a position of power.
EPT
