EPTToo but that now when we seriously have to invade the country no one will take Bush's word seriously. Its like crying wolf. What if there is a legitamate threat now? Its going to be a lot more difficult to convince people again even if its more serious than Iraq.
They killed the korean hostage? - Page 4
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Chobohobo
United States945 Posts
Too but that now when we seriously have to invade the country no one will take Bush's word seriously. Its like crying wolf. What if there is a legitamate threat now? Its going to be a lot more difficult to convince people again even if its more serious than Iraq. | ||
|
Countdown
1217 Posts
On June 22 2004 14:45 Chobohobo wrote: You are right 0_0 instead we should have marched into Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and whipe them clean, they are more of a threat than Iraq. or none.. | ||
|
StoneR
Spain1252 Posts
| ||
|
Countdown
1217 Posts
| ||
|
StoneR
Spain1252 Posts
| ||
|
Countdown
1217 Posts
| ||
|
StoneR
Spain1252 Posts
would you admit this war was a mistake right from the beginning? | ||
|
StoneR
Spain1252 Posts
| ||
|
Sw1tCh
United States2005 Posts
| ||
|
ZZZnachor
Poland200 Posts
On June 22 2004 14:40 0_0 wrote: I'm really sorry to hear about this Korean guy getting beheaded  . But it seems clearer than ever now that we should have NEVER gone into Iraq, I mean who really cares? Did we really make things better? No. Under Saddam there were people getting killed everyday. Now there are lots of people from other countries getting killed too. Sure, the Iraqies are free, but they live in fear of being killed by bombs, friendly fire, and what not. On the topic of the "War on Terror"/War in Iraq. Has this war dulled the threat of terrorism or escalated it? Have there been more civilian deaths due to terrorism after the war? The answer is this war has actually been counter productive, more people have died, and terrorism is still out there - and Iraq wasn't even an Al Qaeda strong-hold, although there are Al Qaeda there now... Also terrorists now have a place in the Middle East to strike at the United States. Nobady was saing that day after wining the war its gonna be gr8 inIraq. Its hard time now, everybody cnow it is gone be like that, but it is not gonne be that forever, so u cant say yet if that war bring more bad or good. | ||
|
Chobohobo
United States945 Posts
| ||
|
ZZZnachor
Poland200 Posts
| ||
|
StoneR
Spain1252 Posts
| ||
|
mind
129 Posts
| ||
|
GabrielB
Brazil594 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28796 Posts
On June 22 2004 11:24 HnR)Louder wrote: SK will help the USA because the USA has been helping secure their borders against NK since the korean war --; even though NK could walk right over all our troops, and SK's too if they wanted =( It's always unfortunate when a government takes part in something that is against the will of the majority of it's population, but it happens. People need to understand that terrorism will get worse no matter what we do - and that we can't ignore it or negotiate with it =\ I wonder where you get your information. based on the information *I* have, the south korean army is just as strong as the north korea army, if not stronger. and the US army is going to remove a lot of it's forces in south korea, which is good. | ||
|
Ky.Kiske
72 Posts
| ||
|
StoneR
Spain1252 Posts
| ||
|
0wNaG3-
333 Posts
3 fucken words Nuclear-Launch-Detected. | ||
|
Countdown
1217 Posts
On June 22 2004 14:59 StoneR wrote: Just one last thing Countdown would you admit this war was a mistake right from the beginning? duh.. | ||
| ||
