They killed the korean hostage?
Forum Index > General Forum |
dronebabo
10866 Posts
| ||
Piece_Of_Pie
Australia169 Posts
| ||
dronebabo
10866 Posts
| ||
[pG]RaGe
United States346 Posts
Really feel bad for that South Korean killed, this is starting to get rediculous:\ | ||
dronebabo
10866 Posts
| ||
FreeZEternal
Korea (South)3396 Posts
| ||
LostDesire
Canada112 Posts
Or else they'll just keep kidnapping | ||
GundamVX
United States1025 Posts
On June 22 2004 10:11 [pG]RaGe wrote: It's nice that South Korea is willing to help out in the effort but if their people are against it they shouldn't send the troops, regardless of how many people the USA currently has there. It's never good for a government to go against the people. This will also give South Koreans more bitter attitudes towards American since they will think their government is just a drone to the USA. Really feel bad for that South Korean killed, this is starting to get rediculous:\ I agree wholeheartedly. Government going against the people will always have negative effects, even if they are not apparent immediately. | ||
FreeZEternal
Korea (South)3396 Posts
| ||
![]()
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
| ||
footballfanatic
Sweden72 Posts
On June 22 2004 10:11 [pG]RaGe wrote: It's nice that South Korea is willing to help out in the effort but if their people are against it they shouldn't send the troops, regardless of how many people the USA currently has there. It's never good for a government to go against the people. This will also give South Koreans more bitter attitudes towards American since they will think their government is just a drone to the USA. Really feel bad for that South Korean killed, this is starting to get rediculous:\ they are a drone to the american government sad but true | ||
Vharox
United States1037 Posts
| ||
pheered.user
United States2603 Posts
![]() | ||
FreeZEternal
Korea (South)3396 Posts
| ||
LostDesire
Canada112 Posts
On June 22 2004 10:49 PheeRed.User wrote: life is important but you just cant do that for one person ![]() Exactly As soon as the terrorists get what they want, what will stop them from kidnapping even more people | ||
pfff
Belgium1352 Posts
this man died for keeping us safe from this enormous threat terrorists form. umm not i dont really get where everyone gets the idea that terrorists are still capable of a major strike. the war in afghanistan destroyed the whole structure of al-qaeda, all terrorists that still claim to work under alqaedas flag, just do this because one very large and powerful organisation has more effect then a lot very few cells, who have no centralised leadership. hyping alqaeda this much also helps A LOT with recruiting terrorists. but off course, the idea of one very big organized terrorist group, also helps to accomplish the ideas of warmongering neoconservatives. just the thought of bin laden sitting in a cave in afghanistan planning out alqaedas next move is ridiculous. really, terrorists have no where near the capabilities they had before 9/11, you really dont have to be afraid of them, and please, stop thinking the war in iraq is a war against terrorism, cuz iraq is NOT a terrorist state, if you can name a few terrorist strikes iraq did in the past few years? | ||
ejai63
![]()
United States2101 Posts
On June 22 2004 10:11 [pG]RaGe wrote: It's nice that South Korea is willing to help out in the effort but if their people are against it they shouldn't send the troops, regardless of how many people the USA currently has there. It's never good for a government to go against the people. This will also give South Koreans more bitter attitudes towards American since they will think their government is just a drone to the USA. Really feel bad for that South Korean killed, this is starting to get rediculous:\ many times, the people are stupid and wrong about things. maybe not in this case (nobody knows) but often the people are misguided or uninformed about things | ||
LostDesire
Canada112 Posts
On June 22 2004 11:05 pfff wrote: yeah, its obvious that if south korea wouldnt have gone into iraq, the terrorists wouldve already conquered the world. this man died for keeping us safe from this enormous threat terrorists form. umm not Well so far the terrorists havn't gotten what they want from just kidnapping people.. The sooner the terrorists get it through their head that countries will not negotiate with them, the sooner they will stop kidnapping people. So say, Korea did pull out becasue of this kidnapping. Well then, now the terrorists know that kidnapping WILL work. So the terrorists keep kiddnapping more, hoping it will work again. Or, other terrorists may try to kidnap korean citizens overseas and make demands to their government. Its not a matter of how much korea can actaully contribute, its the fact that countries should never negotiate with terrorists. As soon as they do, they put their people in jeoperdy But aside from that, I agree with what you say here: On June 22 2004 11:05 pfff wrote: i dont really get where everyone gets the idea that terrorists are still capable of a major strike. the war in afghanistan destroyed the whole structure of al-qaeda, all terrorists that still claim to work under alqaedas flag, just do this because one very large and powerful organisation has more effect then a lot very few cells, who have no centralised leadership. hyping alqaeda this much also helps A LOT with recruiting terrorists. but off course, the idea of one very big organized terrorist group, also helps to accomplish the ideas of warmongering neoconservatives. just the thought of bin laden sitting in a cave in afghanistan planning out alqaedas next move is ridiculous. really, terrorists have no where near the capabilities they had before 9/11, you really dont have to be afraid of them, and please, stop thinking the war in iraq is a war against terrorism, cuz iraq is NOT a terrorist state, if you can name a few terrorist strikes iraq did in the past few years? | ||
chicken`
Germany3478 Posts
![]() poor kim =(( | ||
Ub3rNoOb3r
Canada209 Posts
| ||
| ||