EPTtopic without a name - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Eniram
Sudan3166 Posts
| ||
|
SW)RIF
United States563 Posts
On May 06 2004 11:40 SickofLife wrote: Hmm, animals and humans are different things. We are above animals, that's why there are laws against killing humans. Terrible comparison. Btw egocentrism puts us above animals for the most part. Given the need to survive in the wild, most humans would horribly fail. We rely heavily on things that someone has created for us. To me that sort of dependancy does not merit the award of superiorty. Since im not religious... my poin of view is that we are all living things, and most animals differ very little to humans. Any law that protects humans should apply to the majority of the animal kingdom. Its a fact that they feel pain and have emotions like us why is it so hard for you to appreciate a point of view where i care about them? Boils down to: my appreciation of life, to your apathy and unrational ego. I mentioned this point in the thread about dogs being shot by shotguns. If what really makes you and I superior (our intellect) really that important, than survival of the fittest would be allowed among humans. A mentally handicapped person cannot even provide for themself, making them a large burden on resources. We should cut them loose and have a blast firing rifles into there heads shouldnt we? Its really simple. Either you are heartless, biased and egocentric, or you are appreciative of life like myself. What do you want to be? PS- Since ive had this argument on this forum before i know your response about a family caring for their children even if they are handicapped. The response for anyone that has a pet knows... That an animal feels a sense of loss when family/other pets die. So dont even bother. | ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On May 06 2004 12:53 SW)RIF wrote: Btw egocentrism puts us above animals for the most part. Given the need to survive in the wild, most humans would horribly fail. We rely heavily on things that someone has created for us. To me that sort of dependancy does not merit the award of superiorty. Since im not religious... my poin of view is that we are all living things, and most animals differ very little to humans. Any law that protects humans should apply to the majority of the animal kingdom. Its a fact that they feel pain and have emotions like us why is it so hard for you to appreciate a point of view where i care about them? Boils down to: my appreciation of life, to your apathy and unrational ego. I mentioned this point in the thread about dogs being shot by shotguns. If what really makes you and I superior (our intellect) really that important, than survival of the fittest would be allowed among humans. A mentally handicapped person cannot even provide for themself, making them a large burden on resources. We should cut them loose and have a blast firing rifles into there heads shouldnt we? Its really simple. Either you are heartless, biased and egocentric, or you are appreciative of life like myself. What do you want to be? PS- Since ive had this argument on this forum before i know your response about a family caring for their children even if they are handicapped. The response for anyone that has a pet knows... That an animal feels a sense of loss when family/other pets die. So dont even bother. Gee, you read my mind.. I was going to say whatever about a mentally handicap person's family! No, people are higher than animals, because we are. We are better because of our intellect. Even a retard has more thinking power than a dog. Animals are our food, to think otherwise is idiotic. | ||
|
iD.Surv
Belgium827 Posts
| ||
|
Eniram
Sudan3166 Posts
On May 06 2004 12:53 SW)RIF wrote: ...We rely heavily on things that someone has created for us.... You mean just like every other animal in existence? | ||
|
hasuwar
7365 Posts
| ||
|
rOm
Latvia1208 Posts
 | ||
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
| ||
|
Refrain[FriZ]
Canada4337 Posts
| ||
|
Eniram
Sudan3166 Posts
| ||
|
taeWook
United States1367 Posts
Just send these guys off to prison. After one night of massive ass rapage, they will never shoot a lion, much less shoot a gun, again. | ||
|
Jim
Sweden1965 Posts
 | ||
|
Element)LoGiC
Canada1143 Posts
On May 06 2004 02:14 [pG]Rekrul wrote: i wish the lion tore his face off Agreed... | ||
|
Element)LoGiC
Canada1143 Posts
For food, understandable, for sport, you're fucking disgusting. | ||
|
baal
10708 Posts
On May 06 2004 13:06 hasuwar wrote: that lion biffed it. One of those guys should have just had a pistol ready rather than all with rifles.. real pro hunters Lion hunters.. i mean REAL LION HUNTERS have a .44 when that happens, this fucking amateurs didnt know that ofcourse. BTW im not against real sport "hunting", when you hunt ducks you are suppoused to hit the duck when its flying not aim at it with a scope when its posed over the water... thats not a sport, the animal is sopused to have big chances to escape. And ofcourse never hunt a protected animal like Bengala Tigers, but i think Lions are not near extinction and they are not protected Animals, you get your licence for hunting a # of animals on determinated areas and determinated conditions, not like those 4 fuckers who tried to murder not hunt a lion and even failed, maybe next time they will shoot him with a heat seeking missile -_- | ||
BroOd
Austin10833 Posts
On May 06 2004 14:07 [pG]Rekrul wrote: i think once i have a 50,000 bank account , a good car, and a high powered sniper rifle i will make it my life's task to drive around and murder hunters Feel free to recruit others aswell. | ||
|
RushTHElarvA
449 Posts
| ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
Those guys were just out there for something to put on their mantle. Wish the lion devoured them messily  | ||
|
hk[hanbyul]
Canada149 Posts
| ||
|
SW)RIF
United States563 Posts
You have me mistaken with someone that has unrealistic point of views. I understand why slaughter houses exist. I dont understand why we allow ourselves to murder animals that obviously go through tramendous pain for our enjoyment. Hence.. why i would make an anology about shooting useless humans. | ||
| ||
