EPTWhat is TL to you? - Page 7
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Tuke
Finland1666 Posts
| ||
|
DreaM)XeRO
Korea (South)4667 Posts
 legit my every waking fucking moment | ||
|
Shiladie
Canada1631 Posts
My source of a spoilerfree way to view VODs of BW games A place to discuss the latest imbalances and stratagies in SC2, with actual good players, instead of the b-net forums... The forum I browse non-stop at work, reading blogs/general forum news threads The place to read up on the latest Idra drama The source of the amazing subs of Hyung-joon becomes a progamer and Nal'Ra's Oldboy series Fantasy proleague + liquibet! A great community where I can talk to others who like starcraft as much as (or more than) me | ||
|
zergnewb
United States816 Posts
| ||
|
GeMicles
Canada307 Posts
| ||
|
SC2Phoenix
Canada2814 Posts
| ||
|
SC2Phoenix
Canada2814 Posts
sc fun time when im all sc'ed out That also  | ||
|
NuKedUFirst
Canada3139 Posts
and agreed with all other posts.On April 21 2010 16:51 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: a tree fort haha | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
| ||
|
druj
137 Posts
However I recommend taking these arguments and serious threads with a straw. One time I copy-pasted arguments from several veterans out of severe procrastination and really bad drinking, who are highly respected around here, and their arguments got ripped apart and I got a C+ on them. These are university level professors btw. I even double checked afterwards if I read it wrong, if it were the appropriate topic to write, they were being sarcastic, trolling or whatever. They consistently defend their views, contradicted them in months' times, and sometimes forgot them. And one thread had the exact title of the topic I was writing on, and the veteran had a direct response to it. Fuck it. I'm not even gonna bother to mention who, considering their statuses, they'll probably be defended to death. But I'm never going to take them seriously again nor any topic, and just avoid "serious" blog or general threads altogether. *Yes, yes I'm an idiot for being naive enough to use a forum for something academic, but considering their confidence on subject matters, long essays, and snide remarks, I couldn't help but try. | ||
|
InfeSteD
United States4658 Posts
On April 28 2010 08:53 zergnewb wrote: Well I am a bit different on the internet than in real life. I separate what I do on the internet from my real life. To me, TL is like the town in which I live in. The only difference is there is no need for buying stuff and its free, plus the majority of people are much more understanding of my lifestyle. I am trying to understand this post a little more, I think I get it but I aint sure | ||
|
FragKrag
United States11554 Posts
On April 28 2010 09:14 druj wrote: Its a cool site with interesting personalities and really good pro scene shit. However I recommend taking these arguments and serious threads with a straw. One time I copy-pasted arguments from several veterans out of severe procrastination and really bad drinking, who are highly respected around here, and their arguments got ripped apart and I got a C+ on them. These are university level professors btw. I even double checked afterwards if I read it wrong, if it were the appropriate topic to write, they were being sarcastic, trolling or whatever. They consistently defend their views, contradicted them in months' times, and sometimes forgot them. And one thread had the exact title of the topic I was writing on, and the veteran had a direct response to it. Fuck it. I'm not even gonna bother to mention who, considering their statuses, they'll probably be defended to death. But I'm never going to take them seriously again nor any topic, and just avoid "serious" blog or general threads altogether. *Yes, yes I'm an idiot for being naive enough to use a forum for something academic, but considering their confidence on subject matters, long essays, and snide remarks, I couldn't help but try. lol. I don't even know what to say. looooooool edit: was it moltke? edit: if you really think about it, a C+ is pretty good for a guy who just wrote down his ideas on an internet forum | ||
micronesia
United States24751 Posts
On April 28 2010 09:14 druj wrote: Its a cool site with interesting personalities and really good pro scene shit. However I recommend taking these arguments and serious threads with a straw. One time I copy-pasted arguments from several veterans out of severe procrastination and really bad drinking, who are highly respected around here, and their arguments got ripped apart and I got a C+ on them. These are university level professors btw. I even double checked afterwards if I read it wrong, if it were the appropriate topic to write, they were being sarcastic, trolling or whatever. They consistently defend their views, contradicted them in months' times, and sometimes forgot them. And one thread had the exact title of the topic I was writing on, and the veteran had a direct response to it. Fuck it. I'm not even gonna bother to mention who, considering their statuses, they'll probably be defended to death. But I'm never going to take them seriously again nor any topic, and just avoid "serious" blog or general threads altogether. *Yes, yes I'm an idiot for being naive enough to use a forum for something academic, but considering their confidence on subject matters, long essays, and snide remarks, I couldn't help but try. First of all 'lol' and second of all if they had wrote it for the class instead of for tl they probably would have written it differently and gotten a higher grade. | ||
|
Enfold
United States110 Posts
| ||
|
druj
137 Posts
The remarks the professors made was a core point of this particular poster, and the semantic of it, it was literally a handful of words. Yes I know they're recreational individuals, who just post on the fly, but this is at the very core I'm talking about. I spent like 5-7 hours researching on the topic too, and their remarks on certain historical individuals were false or biased, even interpretations One of them were particularly hateful enough to call the other an idiot for not agreeing with him, and that guy got banned for throwing a personal insult back.Its just..ech. Not necessarily, that they're not intelligent, they probably could score higher, but their content, was innaccurate to say the least..on a very consistent basis. The reason why I even scored that high of a c+ was because I regurgitated basic lecture notes and conversations with them. Everything else, from these posters, fundamentally off. | ||
|
micronesia
United States24751 Posts
On April 28 2010 09:30 druj wrote: I copy-pasted the legitimate ones, edited them into appropriate sentences. The remarks the professors made was a core point of this particular poster, and the semantic of it, it was literally a handful of words. Yes I know they're recreational individuals, who just post on the fly, but this is at the very core I'm talking about. I spent like 5-7 hours researching on the topic too, and their remarks on certain historical individuals were false or biased, even interpretations One of them were particularly hateful enough to call the other an idiot for not agreeing with him, and that guy got banned for throwing a personal insult back.Its just..ech. Not necessarily, that they're not intelligent, they probably could score higher, but their content, was innaccurate to say the least..on a very consistent basis. The reason why I even scored that high of a c+ was because I regurgitated basic lecture notes and conversations with them. Everything else, from these posters, fundamentally off. I call bs... you are probably misrepresenting this and or completely wrong... proof or it didn't happen. And if some veteran poster made some claims in some topic that were not correct enough to constitute the meat of a research paper then... so what? BTW tell us which school you attend and what your name is so we can report you. | ||
|
SilverSkyLark
Philippines8437 Posts
| ||
|
FragKrag
United States11554 Posts
anyways if you had the skill to make false arguments sound good enough for a C+ why didn't you do the paper yourself? Clearly if you can make a F look like a C+ you can get at least a B | ||
|
Nitrogen
United States5345 Posts
On April 28 2010 09:33 micronesia wrote: I call bs... you are probably misrepresenting this and or completely wrong... proof or it didn't happen. And if some veteran poster made some claims in some topic that were not correct enough to constitute the meat of a research paper then... so what? BTW tell us which school you attend and what your name is so we can report you. yeah im gonna call bs too. how do you spend 5-7 hours researching a topic and not realize that what you are turning in is completely historically inaccurate? | ||
|
druj
137 Posts
Considering I did something academically immoral,(for which I can get expelled for) I have very little reason to give out this information and considering detailed ip tracking and witchhunting that goes on this forum, especially identity tracking through facebook/e-mail searches and that manifesto7 search thread. I'd rather risk getting penalized on this forum for speaking my mind. Don't consider this an insult, its a very lighthearted remark. I researched after I got the grade as a double check, I felt confident enough of these veterans beforehand. | ||
| ||
