EPTAnyone else find typing "abbreviations" annyoing - Page 6
| Forum Index > General Forum |
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
| ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
Sawtooth
United States1 Post
Saw | ||
|
andrew-the-anarchist
United States21 Posts
| ||
|
User_
141 Posts
| ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On January 15 2004 20:43 User_ wrote: Well, people are lazy, lazy people tend to accomplish their goal in the shortest amount of time. Therefore, spelling u instead of you would be the optimal choice. Plus, saving those "few" seconds, especially in the middle of a game (considering this is on an sc site) couldn't hurt, now could it? Once you become accustomed to typing "wtf u noob" every game, you'll start typing it more outside the game. And therefore, i just argued about a worthless topic T_T. In game when time is of the essence, it's one thing to short type. When you're on a forum, you probably are not going anywhere for awhile, so it's not that big of a deal to type "you," instead of short typing it. | ||
|
andrew-the-anarchist
United States21 Posts
| ||
|
andrew-the-anarchist
United States21 Posts
| ||
|
SillyCat
United States960 Posts
| ||
|
User_
141 Posts
In game when time is of the essence, it's one thing to short type. When you're on a forum, you probably are not going anywhere for awhile, so it's not that big of a deal to type "you," instead of short typing it. Your point being that somehow the activity changes the laziness of the person? And its not that big of a deal to read "u" either, its not exactly torture. | ||
|
NickDapaulo
United States867 Posts
| ||
|
GoDHovZ
United States1869 Posts
| ||
|
SillyCat
United States960 Posts
| ||
|
Element)LoGiC
Canada1143 Posts
If you want to speak "stupid", go kill yourself. LMAO | ||
|
Element)LoGiC
Canada1143 Posts
| ||
|
NickDapaulo
United States867 Posts
| ||
|
SW)RIF
United States563 Posts
On January 15 2004 15:48 SickofLife322000 wrote: I nominate this for dumbest post ever. First off it's "cannot," not "can not." Secondly, "can't" is not ebonics it's what most people consider English. Did you read my post? or do you always misread posts? Funny, i thought BroOd was an ignorant ass, but now he's flowers compared to you. You might first try reading a post before responding like a second grader. If you hadnt noticed, i was a proponant of "nothing is wrong with abbreviations". So why then would i compare [can't] to ebonics, when obviously i did not. | ||
|
x[ReaPeR]x
United States3447 Posts
On a forum it pisses me off because it's not too hard to type correctly (I do it all the time here), but as long as I can understand the post I don't bitch about abbreviations and what not. Overuse of "lol" pisses me off. | ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
On January 15 2004 05:07 SillyCat wrote: no. | ||
| ||
