• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
TeamLiquid Liquipedia LiquidDota LiquidLegends
EDT 08:51
CEST 14:51
KST 21:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Shopify TSL 754WTL 2021 Summer - Week 3 Recap and Week 4 Preview12Code S RO16 Preview: Trap, Armani, sOs, Zest5Code S RO16 Preview: Rogue, Zoun, INnoVation, Dark11[ASL11] Ro24 Preview Pt 3:Contenders and Streamers10
Community News
FlaSh going to army in 3 weeks46ESL Open Week #66: Stats, Clem, Solar win6Code S RO16: Rogue and INno advance to the RO89ByuN to begin wrist treatment13New Worlds Map Contest: ALL SUBMISSIONS57
StarCraft 2
General
Shopify TSL 7 Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away WTL 2021 Summer - Week 3 Recap and Week 4 Preview [GSL] Music List ByuN to begin wrist treatment
Tourneys
[WTL 2021] Summer - Week 4 The Siege Perilous - $5,000 in top-end hardware! Genesis Legends Inv #6 Apr 16/18th 7PM CET [GSL 2021] Code S - Group D Team GP Cup
Strategy
How to Defeat Protoss - Part 1: Powering Simple Questions Simple Answers Practice Partner Thread Season 1 - 2018 How to Break the F2 Hotkey Addiction
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Routavaara [M] (2) Tropical Sacrifice [M] (4)Nautilus [UMS] Micro Match
External Content
The StarCraft Observer Podcast Episode #5 The Pylon Show Mutation # 260 Fright night Mutation # 259 Breath Of Destruction
Brood War
General
[ShowMatch] Foreign All-Star vs Korean Gamer Ladder statistics race distribution (2021?) How to make sunkens have infinite range eSport.fund 2020 ShieldBattery: Relaunched
Tourneys
Reps.Ru Victory Day present Small VOD Thread 2.0 New Worlds Map Contest: ALL SUBMISSIONS BSL 2v2 Showmatch - MadiNho/KenZy vs Scan/BishOp
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fog of War Noises Sorry's TvP lategame Ghost strategies? pvz FE, goons opening
Other Games
Heroes of the Storm
HotS: WP and Funny Moments [HotS] CCL Season 2: ONYX [HotS] The Road to Paris QQ/Rage Thread. Simple Questions, Simple Answers
General Games
Path of Exile Sid Meier's Civilization VI Genshin Impact - Coop RPG Cyberpunk 2077 Diablo 2 thread
TL Mafia
[M][N] Mafia Mafia: Mafia Edition Active List of Mafia Games 2.0 TL Mafia Community Thread Active List of Mafia Games [M][T] Poker Mafia
Hearthstone
Is Hearthstone Gambling?
LoL General
LoL Tournaments
LoL Strategy
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Coronavirus and You YouTube Thread NASA and the Private Sector Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The Scarlett Fan Club The One And Only Incredible Acer.Bly Fan Club! The TY Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion [TV] HBO Game of Thrones Hip Hop / Rap Music Discussion Movie Discussion!
Sports
2020 - 2021 Football Thread NBA General Discussion 2020 NFL and College Football Corona Season Formula1 2019 TL Golf Thread
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers Help! i need a low profile keyboard!!!
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts Ask TL Staff Anything
Blogs
The StarCraft O…
TheStarCraftObserver
Magic the Gathering Cu…
TheRealNanMan
Whale Watching at Hervey Bay i…
Tak3r
To Be a Vtuber
Zambrah
Help me win a vacation by watc…
Chosi
Golf Battle Report (Persona…
FlaShFTW
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1016 users

Immortal: Gates of Pyre - F2P RTS from SC community - Page 3

Forum Index > General Games
48 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 All
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland15629 Posts
March 20 2021 22:36 GMT
#41
On March 21 2021 06:46 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
It’s that it’s later hugely negated by the design philosophy of ‘terrible terrible damage’.


What are we talking about here? Colossus? The reason this unit sucks is because it isn't micro-friendly as it is too slow to properly move around and particularly responsive. Anyway if they wanted to increase HP a bit in order to add a bit extra duration to battles - that's reasonable. Reducing movement speed though is much more problematic.

Are you also implying that Sc2 in normal game speed doesn't have a much lower skillcap?



Show nested quote +
Let’s say a hypothetical slower PvT where it was possible/desirable to target Collosus fire, make sure Immortals weren’t wasting shots on marines instead of marauders, and Terran players splitting bio against Collosus fire, plus the usual duels, some warp prism pickup shenanigans.


If they are more practical to do in a much slower paced game then you can still do them today. The more likely reason we are not seeing target fire on Maurauders by Immortals is because its not efficient micro to target fire in a lot of cases due to having to walk in range before you can attack.

Colossus target firing though is often times very practical and hence you see this very frequently.

The idea that slower paced games results in certain type of micro being much more rewarded is simply wrong. It doesn't change the reward. What will happen though is that more bad players can do the same type of micro that only good players could do before. (and top players will do certain types of less important micro that they didn't prioritize beforehand).

If your design philosophy is that everyone should be able to do the type of micro that only the best players in Sc1 and Sc2 today are possible to do, then yes you will succeed in obtaining that by significantly reducing the speed of the game.

As I see it the only way you can somewhat mitigate the reduction in skillcap is to create several new micro-interactions that are heavily rewarded (so even the 10th highest micro-priority you do in a battle has almost the same importance as the most important type of micro). If you succeed in that the reduction in speed will only be equal to a minor reduction in skill-cap.

However, that's quite difficult do design and not something I think is gonna be the case in Gates of Pyre. What's more likely is that after a couple of hundred APMS during a battle, everyone beyond that has significantly less value.

The (ideal) for me is that the crazy micro shenanigans SC2’s finest exponents can pull off in smaller engagements would be something they could vaguely come close to even trying in larger scale.

Yeah I didn’t word earlier posts well, by ‘fast’ and ‘slowing down’ I was more referring to how short big engagements are. Bad choice of words. How one does this is another matter entirely of course!

I’m arguing for that philosophy and the game’s micro scaling with larger armies (ideally) for the opposite reason, it would raise the achievable skill ceiling and give the best players more room to flex.

If I was to make a hypothetical UMS where you get a representative setup and play the same lategame engagement across different games vs top players. WC3 vs Happy say, BW against Flash and SC2 against a top pro, basically nobody on this forum is going above 0% no matter how many repeats you do, SC2 I reckon quite a few could take a set or two without having to play that many.

Being A-move friendly is fine IMO but the more stuff a human can do in an engagement to make additional gains the better to keep a high skill ceiling.

There’s a whole tonne of potential in the genre with different kinds of micro, so hopefully this game can incorporate as much of it as possible.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
TL+ Member
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark8571 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-03-20 22:40:31
March 20 2021 22:36 GMT
#42
On March 21 2021 01:55 Archeon wrote:
at skill floor vs ceiling: the way they are approaching it is that you can automate a lot of stuff, but it'll be better if you do it manually. Which I think gives players more space to specialize in areas, because the area they are bad in is failing less badly. It also means that if you screw up it's not that bad and both sides can screw up a few times before the game ends, so this helps noobs and allows them to play the game without immediately dying.

.


This appears to be more related to making macro-mechanics and interface easier which I think is necessarily as well. Parts of game-design is about prioritizing what you think is important in the game.

And I think it is important to give bad players the required time focus on microing their units during a battle and rewarding them for attempting multipronged attacks even if they only have 60 APM. I think that will lead to a more enjoyable experience for most players. Everything Jakatak says about the new player experience is something I agree 100% with.

However, it is important to ensure that there is a significant difference in the the efficiency of micro between 60 vs 120, 120 cs 180, 180 cs 240 and 240 vs 300, 300 vs 360 etc. APM. If that's not the case the skill-cap is too low.

I would be genuinely interested in hearing from play-testers of this Gates of Pyre who are 4.5K MMR or higher in Sc2 as to what their thoughts is on the skillcap/skillcurve.

Innovation was a better player in 2013 than Byun in 2016.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark8571 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-03-20 23:12:06
March 20 2021 22:54 GMT
#43
it would raise the achievable skill ceiling and give the best players more room to flex.


What I will give you is that you will see different types of micro as players will be doing less important types of micro that isn't prioritized high enough today.

That said, I suggest you reconsider the idea it raises the skill-ceilings. If less important micro tricks is what differentiates players that is by definition equal to a lower skill-cap.

That said it's a fine belief if that's what you prefer (a lot of game-design is subjective preferences afterall). However, I think a high game-speed creates a "guarantee" of a high enough skill-cap always existing in every single battle whereas a lower game-speed requires that you have many different micro-interactions are properly rewarded.

That's much harder from a design perspective to obtain - in that regard Gates of Pyre devs are playing game-design on hard-mode.
Innovation was a better player in 2013 than Byun in 2016.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland15629 Posts
March 20 2021 23:40 GMT
#44
On March 21 2021 07:54 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
it would raise the achievable skill ceiling and give the best players more room to flex.


What I will give you is that you will see different types of micro as players will be doing less important types of micro that isn't prioritized high enough today.

That said, I suggest you reconsider the idea it raises the skill-ceilings. If less important micro tricks is what differentiates players that is by definition equal to a lower skill-cap.

That said it's a fine belief if that's what you prefer (a lot of game-design is subjective preferences afterall). However, I think a high game-speed creates a "guarantee" of a high enough skill-cap always existing in every single battle whereas a lower game-speed requires that you have many different micro-interactions are properly rewarded.

That's much harder from a design perspective to obtain - in that regard Gates of Pyre devs are playing game-design on hard-mode.

Brood War isn’t particularly slower than SC2 in terms of the pace of the game, but battles are considerably elongated given how the game operates in other areas. Likewise WC3 units are plenty responsive and fluid to control, but a much higher HP to damage ratio stretches engagements out a lot.

SC2’s issue isn’t the speed of the game or the fluidity of control (it’s the best I’ve played in that regard), it’s how it deals with scaling.

I’d be interested to see what others think, purely talking about micro and not the rest of the game’s mechanics. When it comes to the intensity of early 4 gate wars, or weird and wonky low eco situations I’m microing my ass off and enjoying the challenge, when I’ve had a solid game all-round and hit that 200/200 engagement and just roll it and it’s over in 10-15 seconds it’s a very ‘meh’ feeling to me.

If that engagement was a minute long duel to the death with more I could realistically do and more my opponent could do in countering and jousting that would be pretty tasty

Taken to extremis if someone made an RTS where the average max v max engagement lasted a second doesn’t really matter if you’re a scrub like me or Maru, you don’t physically have the time to let your skills shine
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
TL+ Member
Wildmoon
Profile Joined December 2011
Thailand4165 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-03-21 04:00:15
March 21 2021 03:47 GMT
#45
I dont the like art and looks in general but will keep an eye on this. Outside of attracting new players to the genre, I would like to see what would make me play this as an alternative to SC2 and BW. I myself have a hard time imagining how would you innovate RTS genre in a meaningful way without turning it into something else like moba.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark8571 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-03-26 10:01:12
March 26 2021 09:49 GMT
#46
On March 21 2021 08:40 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2021 07:54 Hider wrote:
it would raise the achievable skill ceiling and give the best players more room to flex.


What I will give you is that you will see different types of micro as players will be doing less important types of micro that isn't prioritized high enough today.

That said, I suggest you reconsider the idea it raises the skill-ceilings. If less important micro tricks is what differentiates players that is by definition equal to a lower skill-cap.

That said it's a fine belief if that's what you prefer (a lot of game-design is subjective preferences afterall). However, I think a high game-speed creates a "guarantee" of a high enough skill-cap always existing in every single battle whereas a lower game-speed requires that you have many different micro-interactions are properly rewarded.

That's much harder from a design perspective to obtain - in that regard Gates of Pyre devs are playing game-design on hard-mode.


SC2’s issue isn’t the speed of the game or the fluidity of control (it’s the best I’ve played in that regard), it’s how it deals with scaling.

I’d be interested to see what others think, purely talking about micro and not the rest of the game’s mechanics. When it comes to the intensity of early 4 gate wars, or weird and wonky low eco situations I’m microing my ass off and enjoying the challenge, when I’ve had a solid game all-round and hit that 200/200 engagement and just roll it and it’s over in 10-15 seconds it’s a very ‘meh’ feeling to me.



This is more to do with the specific unit-design. E.g. Immortals, Colossus, Archons and Zealots are simply not micro-friendly units. You do not have the same issue at all with terran. For terran the micro-skillcap increases significantly with army size.

Imagine this though:

1. The Colossus/Immortal received faster movement speed + 0 damage point (which means it can move instantly after attacking like a maurauder) and less HP to compensate
2. Strong AOE abilities could be used by the opponents on those units to incentivize the protoss player to micro his units to mitigate the effect of the AOE.

That way you generate some type of micro and there are different types of abilities you can create in order to reward different type of micro from the opponent (it doesn't have to just be damage).

The essential part here is that units react and move fast though. When that's the case you can add skillbased counters that reward players for movement-based micro and punishes them for blindly a-moving in a blob.

Also note that if you incentivize multitask-based gameplay you will always have small skirmishes around the map. Thus, you don't need to specifically design the game to have very slow production-pace or a low max supply limit to generate that type of gameplay.

One of the ways you reward multitask-based gameplay is to have units fast enough to retreat. You know which units are not fast enough to retreat? Immortals/Colossus.
Innovation was a better player in 2013 than Byun in 2016.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland15629 Posts
March 26 2021 11:15 GMT
#47
On March 26 2021 18:49 Hider wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2021 08:40 WombaT wrote:
On March 21 2021 07:54 Hider wrote:
it would raise the achievable skill ceiling and give the best players more room to flex.


What I will give you is that you will see different types of micro as players will be doing less important types of micro that isn't prioritized high enough today.

That said, I suggest you reconsider the idea it raises the skill-ceilings. If less important micro tricks is what differentiates players that is by definition equal to a lower skill-cap.

That said it's a fine belief if that's what you prefer (a lot of game-design is subjective preferences afterall). However, I think a high game-speed creates a "guarantee" of a high enough skill-cap always existing in every single battle whereas a lower game-speed requires that you have many different micro-interactions are properly rewarded.

That's much harder from a design perspective to obtain - in that regard Gates of Pyre devs are playing game-design on hard-mode.


SC2’s issue isn’t the speed of the game or the fluidity of control (it’s the best I’ve played in that regard), it’s how it deals with scaling.

I’d be interested to see what others think, purely talking about micro and not the rest of the game’s mechanics. When it comes to the intensity of early 4 gate wars, or weird and wonky low eco situations I’m microing my ass off and enjoying the challenge, when I’ve had a solid game all-round and hit that 200/200 engagement and just roll it and it’s over in 10-15 seconds it’s a very ‘meh’ feeling to me.



This is more to do with the specific unit-design. E.g. Immortals, Colossus, Archons and Zealots are simply not micro-friendly units. You do not have the same issue at all with terran. For terran the micro-skillcap increases significantly with army size.

Imagine this though:

1. The Colossus/Immortal received faster movement speed + 0 damage point (which means it can move instantly after attacking like a maurauder) and less HP to compensate
2. Strong AOE abilities could be used by the opponents on those units to incentivize the protoss player to micro his units to mitigate the effect of the AOE.

That way you generate some type of micro and there are different types of abilities you can create in order to reward different type of micro from the opponent (it doesn't have to just be damage).

The essential part here is that units react and move fast though. When that's the case you can add skillbased counters that reward players for movement-based micro and punishes them for blindly a-moving in a blob.

Also note that if you incentivize multitask-based gameplay you will always have small skirmishes around the map. Thus, you don't need to specifically design the game to have very slow production-pace or a low max supply limit to generate that type of gameplay.

One of the ways you reward multitask-based gameplay is to have units fast enough to retreat. You know which units are not fast enough to retreat? Immortals/Colossus.

I’d prefer units in general, especially the Collosus to move slower, although if they turn quicker and have a quicker damage point they’d be more fun to use. On the polar opposite of that extreme you could have a more powerful Collosus that had to be manually oriented with its cone of fire and be quite lumbering, kind of like how you use gun emplacements in RTT games.

Not singling the much maligned Collosus out here, far too much stuff in the game moves at basically the same speed, makes deathballs almost inevitable. You’d create some potential avenues for exploitation as an A-moved blob would naturally spread out more, but a diligent player could reposition to plug gaps, just adds

Some of the tweaks to Immortals and siege tanks in this regard are nice, easy to forget now but try playing the WoL campaign and they’re far nicer to use.

I’m not bashing SC2 here, still love the game but hey we’re spitballing general RTS things for future titles!

My unpopular opinion, having zero idea of the chronology of development is that a ton of the game’s flaws are due to Terran design decisions.

Asymmetric design is what made Starcraft the series it is, methinks giving one race tons of unforgiving but insanely microable glass cannons kind of hamstrings you in giving the other races reliable ways to deal with them that are equally as fun and challenging.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
TL+ Member
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark8571 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-03-26 11:44:29
March 26 2021 11:31 GMT
#48
I’d prefer units in general, especially the Collosus to move slower, although if they turn quicker and have a quicker damage point they’d be more fun to use. On the polar opposite of that extreme you could have a more powerful Collosus that had to be manually oriented with its cone of fire and be quite lumbering, kind of like how you use gun emplacements in RTT games.


From having spent hundreds of hours in the unit-tester experimenting with different tweaks of unit-tests these are my findings:

A) Either you make units fast and responsive (the movement speed that is between speed-hydras and stimmed bio) or
B) You have units that are strong in a zone control, e.g. siege tanks, lurkers, liberators.

Sc2's biggest mistake imo was to have units that are in between these 2 for "lore"-purposes. E.g. a Thor is so big so for lore-puposes it should move slowly, turn and attack and slowly.

Inbetween units end up becoming unmicroable and being impossible to do split up as they are not cost effective when not in a ball.

Protoss especially got several of these inbetween units which is the biggest reason for why it has a lower skillcap than terran/protoss. Protoss also suffers a bit from not having any real zone-control units (although too some extent HT and Disruptors function that way) but that's a different topic.

far too much stuff in the game moves at basically the same speed, makes deathballs almost inevitable.


It's completely the other way around. It's exactly the fact that we have certain units that are somewhat slower and can't escape from the opponent that causes deathballs.

The only type of units that can be significantly faster than other units are units like hellions that are very cost-ineffective against every other unit that it is faster than. However, when 20 roaches beats 3 colossus in a straight up fight in the middle of the map you have a design problem.

When mobility is more similar you can move around more freely. Note ofc that the mobility doesn't need to just come through movement speed. E.g. muta/bling has higher movement speed than bio but this is offset somewhat by speed-medivacs and the general cost-efficiency of marine/medivacs.

Also be careful about just saying "deathball" = bad. Deathball is not per se bad, big battles can be fun, it's about the micro-interactions within each. Colossus and Immortals are both unmicroable deathball unitsbut you can have other unit design that thrive together with other units and generally are fun and skillful to use. So we should make a careful distinction here.

The reason you tend see the correlation between deathball and a-move is due to the the fact that low-movement speed causes both deathballyness + disincentives micro. But there isn't always a causation here.

I think a lot of your opinions come from playing protoss here and making some correlation/causation errors which you would easily be able to dismiss if you observed how terran and zerg functioned.
Innovation was a better player in 2013 than Byun in 2016.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland15629 Posts
March 26 2021 14:09 GMT
#49
There’s nothing more intimidating to go into than a properly sieged up position against Flash probably in all of competitive gaming, although that’s more a wall of death than a ball of death, and the siege tank is rightly regarded as one of the GOAT units in RTS, not just for a spine chilling sound effect occurring through the fog of war, but all the cool counter measures available plus the clear drawbacks of having to deploy and redeploy.

So yeah you’re right a ball of death isn’t necessarily a bad thing. I suppose my own personal utilisation of the term is a comp you can saunter about with in one clump, and in a-moving so much of the damage is output so quickly that there’s little room to do much.

The nadir of PvP Collosus wars being a good example.

You make a good point with the ‘in between’ units, kind of articulated my feelings on many Protoss units. Marine/tank is a composition of pretty extreme contrast, or muta/ling/bling is pretty much min/maxing durability for speed and manoeuvrability.

Protoss rolled the ‘tanky’ card, which compares pretty favourably with the other two races early doors but falls off a lot and necessitates power units and ‘balling. Their most beloved/despised all-ins are all about unit retention and wearing the opponent down over damage output and killing things quickly (thinking blink all-ins, or soul train immortal/prism shenanigans). Which I don’t mind as a bit of contrast, but it does illustrate this aspect of Protoss.

I’m biased rather as a person locked into playing Protoss after I fell in love with the mouthless scamps in BW but on a rather masochistic way given I dislike how they play in SC2, but have played about 40% as much as T.

I think you’re pretty on the money as pertains SC2, I’m more spitballing on what I think works/isn’t ideal that other RTS games could learn from.


'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
TL+ Member
Prev 1 2 3 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
World Team League
11:00
Week 4 Day 2
Dragon Phoenix Gaming vs Alpha XLIVE!
WardiTV1654
IntoTheiNu 219
CreightonOlsen190
Alpha X_
aXEnki
LiquipediaDiscussion
maraleague
09:00
Replay Liga
maralekos19
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Liquid`Crank 1047
ProTech268
Harstem 262
SKillous 128
EnDerr 0
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3422
Rain 1172
Sea 1048
Calm 901
firebathero (twitch) 898
Shuttle 851
Larva 817
Soma 616
EffOrt 311
Mini 243
[ Show more ]
BeSt 233
firebathero 112
Noble 78
actioN 70
BeSt(Twitch) 62
Sharp 62
hero 48
Soulkey 41
Hyuk 35
sorry 34
NaDa 25
Sexy 17
PianO 11
Hm[arnc] 11
hero(twitch) 11
Shine 10
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
byalli3031
bouly183
Other Games
MaximusBlack1534
ToD846
Chillindude671
WinterStarcraft664
Lowko300
Wolf252
crisheroes150
Organizations
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO3229
StarCraft 2
ESL.tv210
OGamingTV SC2 130
Blizzard YouTube
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• ALGaming 380
• Adnapsc2 15
• EnkiAlexander 13
• RayReign 2
• PlayArcher 2
• YuMi 2
• hirohiro 1
• intothetv
• Genesis Gaming
• AlphaB_SC2
• AweesomeSauce
• Migwel
• Matiz_pl
• Laughngamez YouTube
• gravity620
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• Kozan
• Gussbus
• IndyKCrew
SC2: Legacy of the Void
• KarlJayG
StarCraft: Brood War
• sscaitournament6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
Upcoming Events
CreightonOlsen Tournament
3h 9m
HellRaiser vs MaxPax
Cure vs Bly
Solar vs SpeCial
NightMare vs SKillous
BSL 2v2 Tournament
3h 9m
BW Jeez Weekly
4h 9m
Alpha X Junior Champion…
4h 9m
Theleo-ua Showmatch Ser…
6h 9m
eOnzErG vs Casper
Best of the Best Tour
8h 9m
Cross vs OyAji
DragOn vs TerrOr
Cross vs trutaCz
OSC
10h 9m
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
13h 9m
Alpha Pro Series
13h 9m
Future vs ArT
TriGGeR vs Erik
EPT Open Cups
14h 9m
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
21h 9m
BeAsT Cup
23h 9m
Alpha X Event
23h 9m
Starkiller vs Mamba
Asuna vs TBD
CreightonOlsen Tournament
1d 3h
WardiTV Spring Champion…
1d 3h
BSL: Ladder Tournament
1d 3h
Genesis Legends Cup
1d 4h
Online Event
1d 13h
SpeCial vs Astrea
GSL Code S
1d 20h
Bunny vs Dream
Rogue vs Zest
IntoTheAlphaX Pro Circuit
2 days
ByuN vs Zest
DongRaeGu vs Zoun
EPT Open Cups
2 days
EPT Open Cups
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
OlimoLeague
2 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
2 days
ByuN vs Solar
ByuN vs Trap
ByuN vs Zest
Zoun vs Cure
Zoun vs DongRaeGu
Trap vs Zest
Solar vs Zest
Solar vs Trap
KCM Race Survival
3 days
Team GP event
3 days
KeeN vs Percival
CreightonOlsen Tournament
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Hurricane vs Maru
INnoVation vs Trap
KCM Ladies Race Survival
4 days
IntoTheAlphaX Pro Circuit
5 days
Bunny vs Armani
Solar vs Creator
WardiTV Spring Champion…
5 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
5 days
OSC
5 days
Online Event
5 days
CreightonOlsen Tournament
6 days
Grand Platypus Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Ultimate Battle: Soma vs JyJ
2021 GSL S1: Code A
JMcGPlays ARAM Tournament
ESL Pro League Season 13

Ongoing

Foreign All-Star vs Korean Gamer
ASL Season 11
Bombastic StarLeague 12
Russian Hasu League 2021
Best of the Best Tour
KCM Race Survival 2021 Season 1
Deathfate Pro League 1
theleo_ua showmatch 2
BW Jeez Weekly 107
WTL 2021 Summer
2021 GSL S1: Code S
WardiTV Spring Championship 2021
Masters Clash Champ. 2021
Nexus Forces Tour.
NGS Storm Division S2
Spring Sweet Spring #1
BLAST Premier Spring Showd.
ESEA S36 - NA Premier
ESEA S36 - EU Premier
ESEA S36 - AU Premier

Upcoming

BW Jeez Weekly 110
BSL12 HasuLeague
BSL12 GosuLeague
theleo_ua showmatch 3
BW Jeez Weekly 109
BW Jeez Weekly 108
CasterMuse Narak StarLeague Season 4
DH Masters Summer: Finals
TSL 7
NeXT 2021 S1–SC2 Masters
2021 AfreecaTV GSL Super Tournament 2
DHM Summer: China
DHM Summer: NA
DHM Summer: Oceania
DHM Summer: Asia
DHM Summer: LatAm
DHM Summer: Europe
Community Clash League S2
CCL Season 2 Icebreaker
ESL One Cologne 2021
BLAST Premier Spring Finals
IEM Summer 2021
cs_summit 8
Flashpoint Season 3
DH Masters Spring 2021
CBCS Elite League S1
Perfect World League S1
Funspark ULTI 2020
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2021 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.