|
On June 11 2013 03:06 PassiveAce wrote: titanfall stole the show. iv already forgotten everything else except the sound dropping out. Yeah, Titanfall did look good. Of course, I'll always have a hard-on for FPS games with interesting movement mechanics.
|
Titanfall looks really decent, if you can upgrade your titan and stuff I would buy it.
|
So that was a 6/10 for me. They did show a lot of games, most of the good ones were multiplatform though, and the price was bad. Still, much better than the last few years conferences.
|
They showed so many great games only to give me a 500 EURO price tag? 500 dollar AND 500 euro, how the fuck is that fair.
|
On June 11 2013 03:06 PassiveAce wrote: titanfall stole the show. iv already forgotten everything else except the sound dropping out. MGSV stopped the show. Opening with a showstopper like that everything after was bound to look bad.
|
More importantly they did not address anything related to DRM, Internet etc.
|
Yeah, still not worth getting a console, but I'm going to enjoy lots of those games on PC
|
Every exclusive they made should just follow this advice: Do it on computer. Also fucking lol at "Play games at a blistering 60fps." Good job consoles, you finally made it to 60fps. Too bad computers are at 120 with monitors that can support it.
|
499€ for something that is clearly designed for the US market does not seem worth it for me at all, the games looked good but nothing that seems like a crazy system seller to me.
|
On June 11 2013 03:03 Go0g3n wrote: A good HTPC or Media Center PC that can also play every modern game will set you back a lot more.
Considering i already have both those things ( like most people that are the demographic for this ) increasing the price for features i don't need is not a good idea. Give me that as bonus i can get for extra money but don't force me to pay for redundent shit.
|
On June 11 2013 03:08 mistermichael wrote: Titanfall looks really decent, if you can upgrade your titan and stuff I would buy it. I would definitely not buy it if they implement an obnoxious experience point scheme to force you to play for 60 hours of multiplayer before you unlock the cool shit.
|
On June 11 2013 03:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: More importantly they did not address anything related to DRM, Internet etc.
That's why they cancelled the post-E3 conference interviews.
|
How did they get $500 for something with 33% less power than the PS4...Kinect?
|
On June 11 2013 03:09 hootsushi wrote: They showed so many great games only to give me a 500 EURO price tag? 500 dollar AND 500 euro, how the fuck is that fair. Isn't that standard? :D The price is high, but the conversion for hardware/software has always been 1 USD = 1 euro.
|
On June 11 2013 03:11 FakeDeath wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 03:09 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: More importantly they did not address anything related to DRM, Internet etc. That's why they cancelled the post-E3 conference interviews.
No questions! Look at the pretty pictures please.
|
If the PS4 has proper price conversion they win Europe just like that.
If the PS4 is $400 USD regardless, they win everything.
|
Russian Federation410 Posts
On June 11 2013 03:10 s3rp wrote:Show nested quote +On June 11 2013 03:03 Go0g3n wrote: A good HTPC or Media Center PC that can also play every modern game will set you back a lot more. Considering i already have both those things ( like most people that are the demographic for this ) increasing the price for features i don't need is not a good idea. Give me that as bonus i can get for extra money but don't force me to pay for redundent shit.
If gaming is one's entertainment of choice, a 50-100$ price difference should not matter at all in a 5-7 year console lifespan.
|
not sure what ur all complainging about with the tag, i spent up to 500 on the 360 when that cam eout and naer 700 for the ps3 when that came out . . .429? for me in uk, seems good to me, i spent near 200 on a fucking 3ds
|
I think the best game shown was MGS5 and it's Multiplatform
Same old MS
|
On June 11 2013 03:14 Go0g3n wrote:If gaming is one's entertainment of choice, a 50-100$ price difference should not matter at all in a 5-7 year console lifespan. When does that $100 more start becoming a barrier?
If $500 is reasonable, is $600, if $600 is reasonable, is $700, and so forth.
A little bit more here and there adds up in the end.
|
|
|
|