And, yeah, they made them look close, but isn't that their job?
NBA Playoffs 2013 - Page 7
Forum Index > General Games |
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
And, yeah, they made them look close, but isn't that their job? | ||
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
| ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On April 20 2013 05:18 Jerubaal wrote: I like Zach Lowe, but he is more of a stats + intelligent but standard analysis. I really liked that guy who made the Xs and Os articles. And, yeah, they made them look close, but isn't that their job? Which is better than the no stats, all feel, maybe not even watched the games shit you get from most other sports reporters. | ||
rabidch
United States20288 Posts
On April 20 2013 11:41 seiferoth10 wrote: There's all these articles on the Heat reacting to Brandon Jennings comments, but I can't find wtf he said anywhere. What? It's pretty funny that it's like Heat media day on ESPN, but I can't find anything about what Brandon said to start this whole charade. he said the bucks will win in 6 games | ||
BoZiffer
United States1841 Posts
On April 20 2013 12:53 DystopiaX wrote: Which is better than the no stats, all feel, maybe not even watched the games shit you get from most other sports reporters. Zach Lowe is a great read. By far my favorite NBA reporter. I mean, outside of the Heat/Bucks and GS/Denver do you see clear-cut blowouts? Games can always be close with the overall series score not reflective of it as well. | ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On April 20 2013 13:02 BoZiffer wrote: Zach Lowe is a great read. By far my favorite NBA reporter. I mean, outside of the Heat/Bucks and GS/Denver do you see clear-cut blowouts? Games can always be close with the overall series score not reflective of it as well. He talks about GS/Denver not necessarily being blowouts. Apparently Denver sucks at defending 3pt shooting and that's what GSW is best at. I feel like HOU/OKC is far more likely to be a blowout than GSW/DEN | ||
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
| ||
BoZiffer
United States1841 Posts
On April 20 2013 13:10 DystopiaX wrote: He talks about GS/Denver not necessarily being blowouts. Apparently Denver sucks at defending 3pt shooting and that's what GSW is best at. I feel like HOU/OKC is far more likely to be a blowout than GSW/DEN Yeah, I listened to his BS Report Podcast where he and Simmons disagreed on the GSW/DEN series a bit. I feel that GS is going to be just destroyed in the paint with/without Bogut. That and I'm just really not sold on GS. I think they get a game off DEN and that might be it, at best. | ||
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
Seems pretty reasonable. You can't expect your opponent to go into a series thinking they'll lose. On April 20 2013 13:13 Itsmedudeman wrote: Den/GSW only depends on which Denver shows up and whether they're crippled by injuries or not. Even if steph curry goes off over and over we've seen that it's not enough sometimes to beat a good team. Or the refs | ||
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
MassHysteria
United States3678 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
As to GSW/Den , I had them, and actually still do going to the conference Finals. With Gallo, Faried and Lawson healthy OKC was going to have an enourmously tough task dealing with them in anything less than 7 games. Golden State just isn't good enough to keep up with em. I still think Denver beats them in 5 unless Steph goes super nova. | ||
MassHysteria
United States3678 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
If KG isn't 100% Boston should be getting swept. If that series goes past 5 I'd consider it a major upset. The Celtics have no shot and should struggle mightily every game. If KG is close to 100% 6 games should decide it. Without him its going to be blowout city. | ||
MassHysteria
United States3678 Posts
| ||
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On April 20 2013 14:01 MassHysteria wrote: What you think of BOS-NY and MEM-LAC Ace? The two toughest series to predict imo, as I actually give BOS a fighting chance and don't think Jordan will cut it verse Gasol and Z-Bo. Grizzlies lack floor spacing though, and they can put whoever on Tony Allen on Defense, or simply pack the paint. Memphis is gonna have a hard time getting into the paint and their jumpshooting is perhaps the worst out of all the playoff teams. ZBo has been cold lately as well so there's no guarantees that he'll be able to show up for the series. | ||
Ducci
United States588 Posts
On April 20 2013 13:25 BoZiffer wrote: Yeah, I listened to his BS Report Podcast where he and Simmons disagreed on the GSW/DEN series a bit. I feel that GS is going to be just destroyed in the paint with/without Bogut. That and I'm just really not sold on GS. I think they get a game off DEN and that might be it, at best. I watched all the Denver/GS games during the regular season and they were all pretty close except for 1 I believe. Warriors should have won their first game at home. Klay missed 2 straight FTs, where 1 would have made it a 4 pt game with like 5 seconds left. Denver hit a 3 and won in OT | ||
darkmetal505
United States639 Posts
Teamliquid group here: http://nbabracketology.com/group/view/297 password: star2craft | ||
FreedomMurder
Canada200 Posts
| ||
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On April 20 2013 16:36 FreedomMurder wrote: To be honest I still have faith in Boston. The style of ball that NYK plays doesn't suit the playoffs. They live and die by the 3-pt shot even at times when they could just straight up beat a team with proper offensive execution, it is like they are addicted or something. I think the physicality of the playoffs really suits Boston's style. Jeff Green is the difference maker in this series, along with the health of KG. We all know Melo is going to take 25+ shots and score 40+ points, the question is how difficult can Jeff Green make it for him. At the end of the day if NYK shoots well from 3 this is going to be blowout, if Boston can figure out how to close down shooters without giving Melo too much space this should be a good series. You serious? not only is that an over simplification of their style, but what style is supposed to be "proper" and work? | ||
| ||