| Forum Index > General Games |
|
mjxn
Australia939 Posts
On May 31 2013 12:04 ZenithM wrote: Sorry, is there a way to watch this from Europe? And if so, a + Show Spoiler + free The game is over  A non-free way would be purchasing a League Pass. Highly recommended, works very well even on crappy Australian internet. It should be better in France. | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
On May 31 2013 12:04 ZenithM wrote: Sorry, is there a way to watch this from Europe? And if so, a + Show Spoiler + free nba league pass has great quality, but is fairly expensive. Oh and don't forget about the NBA trivia. Which you will know by heart after 10 games. | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
I hear it's better if you're not in the US, but it's a huge and stupid ripoff if you are. They won't show any nationally televised games nor any that are shown locally (basically meaning you can't watch your hometown team since local games are always televised locally...) | ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
| ||
|
Doraemon
Australia14949 Posts
On May 31 2013 12:09 Jibba wrote: My biggest problem with League pass are the absurd blackout/network rules. I hear it's better if you're not in the US, but it's a huge and stupid ripoff if you are. They won't show any nationally televised games nor any that are shown locally (basically meaning you can't watch your hometown team since local games are always televised locally...) we get every game, no ads and no halftime shows however. just nba cares! | ||
|
DannyJ
United States5110 Posts
| ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
Wonder if they'll suspend him for that since they missed it tonight. | ||
|
kidleaderr
367 Posts
On May 31 2013 12:09 Jibba wrote: My biggest problem with League pass are the absurd blackout/network rules. I hear it's better if you're not in the US, but it's a huge and stupid ripoff if you are. They won't show any nationally televised games nor any that are shown locally (basically meaning you can't watch your hometown team since local games are always televised locally...) proxy works wonders. | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
On May 31 2013 12:19 Jibba wrote: Oh, wow. Didn't see the first bump from Anderson. Yeah, I think he should've been tossed for that. Not the push, but the blindside shoulder. Wonder if they'll suspend him for that since they missed it tonight. They won't, he plays for the Heat. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Jaaaaasper
United States10225 Posts
| ||
|
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On May 31 2013 13:01 Ace wrote: http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1fczaz/just_another_story_of_mj_being_mj/ http://probasketballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/21/steve-kerr-recalls-the-time-jordan-punched-him-at-practice/ | ||
XaI)CyRiC
United States4471 Posts
Disappointing that the refs gave the Heat the ball on the play where Lebron just lost the ball out of bounds and it was very clear no one else touched it, and it ended up resulting in a Ray 3 pointer at a crucial juncture. Ended up resulting in a Heat run much like the shotclock miscall in the last game. Amazing how Lebron took the game over in the second half. Hill's importance shoots up even more because Augustin is a liability on both ends of the court. The Pacers should've made an adjustment to all those Haslem jumpers. I understand that they might want to concede midrange shots from Haslem as opposed to drives or 3 pointers, but you can't just let a guy keep shooting the exact same shot from the same spot in rhythm over and over. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
/sarcasm | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On May 31 2013 13:01 Ace wrote: http://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1fczaz/just_another_story_of_mj_being_mj/ The more I read about MJ, the more I think that he's extremely lucky to have played before the advent of social media. | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
What is that the line of? That is the combined performance of Hill and Stephenson. The Pacers never had a chance. Time to move on to the Spurs with a real and consistent backcourt. | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
| ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
On May 31 2013 15:36 DystopiaX wrote: I, too, like taking the results of 1 game and sensationalizing it. As if the same 2 didn't put up 20 and 19 points. And as if the strength of the Pacers really relies on guard play. Apparently the word consistent went right over your head. G1: 12pts, 10 assist, 16reb, 7TO, 4-5 FTA, -4 when on court = Pacers Lost G2: 28pts, 8 assist, 11reb, 3TO, 4-7 FTA, +27 when on court = Pacers win G3: 26pts, 4assist, 2 reb, 1 TO, 7-9 FTA, -7 when on court = Pacers Lost G4: 39pts, 8 assist, 2 TO, 10-12 FTA, 10 reb, +18 when on court = Pacer win G5: 5pts, 6 assist, 6 TO, 1-1 FTA, 3 reb, -17 when on court = Pacers lose There is a tendancy for people in this thread to act as if everything is mutually exclusive. Just because somebody says guard play or the frontcourt is vital doesn't mean the other parts of the game are suddenly null and void. Also, unless you can sit here and say that the Pacers do in fact have a more consistent backcourt than the Spurs, then I don't see how what I typed was sensational. It is plain as day to anyone watching that all playoffs the Pacers backcourt has been hot and cold. | ||
|
DystopiaX
United States16236 Posts
edit- because apparently you like putting arguments in my mouth the part that's sensational is you implying that the series is over, not your statements about consistent guard play. Nice backtracking there. | ||
| ||
|
|
Patches Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
BSL
Bonyth vs Dewalt
OSC
Monday Night Weeklies
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Replay Cast
Kung Fu Cup
Maestros of the Game
Classic vs Lambo
Clem vs Maru
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
