[wow] Mists of pandaria - Page 43
Forum Index > General Games |
The NA-based TL WoW guild has been set: it is being formed on Cenarius as alliance. Talk to farvacola if you want more info! Add yourself to the player list! Use this thread http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=434775 for Warlord of Draenor discussion please! | ||
Vagabond
Scotland149 Posts
| ||
neurosx
Luxembourg1096 Posts
On September 24 2012 22:23 Velr wrote: Wasn't the hardest Boss, disregarding VERY early wow where only the severest class stacking helped because half the classes got fisted by the itemisation, the classic 4 Horsemen? Catas first raid tier was cool(as where the 5 man heroics, they just got overgeared/nerfed way too quick). Fun bossfights on normal and nothing was totally faceroll, Heroic mode changed most of the fights in an interesting way... Alltogether really nicely done except that the 10 / 25 man balance in Heroics was totally fucked up on some Bosses.... Firelands... "meh", I never liked it but the Ragnaros fight was cool. Dragon Soul? What the fuck were they thinking... Not even going to comment big on the "raid finder" except that its an abomination and makes sure that I and many others won't ever touch this game again. How is raid finder an abomination ? I never understood the hate for it. Could someone explain ? | ||
NeonFlare
Finland1307 Posts
| ||
Seiniyta
Belgium1815 Posts
On September 25 2012 05:49 NeonFlare wrote: I'm bit on the fence about it, early expansion has most of the time been most fun time to play the game (aside from stuff like Ulduar that came in later patch), but I'm not sure if I want to go through re-setting up my UI and stuff, anyone who played beta here? How were the dungeons, raids, pet battles and stuff? Honestly, having played through a fair amount of the beta content it's really good. I think people will be surprised how good Mists of Pandaria is once you put aside that it's Panda land (for some people seemingly off-putting) The dungeons are good, the scenarios are decent. The questing is great. Pet battles is like pokemon, not as deep but still pretty addicting and the best new profession since WoW's inception. (screw you, archeology) | ||
Artok
Netherlands2219 Posts
| ||
NeonFlare
Finland1307 Posts
On September 25 2012 06:04 Seiniyta wrote: Honestly, having played through a fair amount of the beta content it's really good. I think people will be surprised how good Mists of Pandaria is once you put aside that it's Panda land (for some people seemingly off-putting) The dungeons are good, the scenarios are decent. The questing is great. Pet battles is like pokemon, not as deep but still pretty addicting and the best new profession since WoW's inception. (screw you, archeology) Sounds nice, I guess I'll have to dig up some old addons and update them. Was there a PvP/Daily Zone like Tol Barad? Is it any better in comparison to previous ones or along the same lines? I really enjoyed the server's own PvP stuff since you'd recognize regulars from both factions. | ||
![]()
Pandemona
![]()
Charlie Sheens House51449 Posts
Ending with the CHIEFTEN :D | ||
Paradise`
United States201 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
Grettin
42381 Posts
| ||
rshswe
Sweden40 Posts
| ||
Artok
Netherlands2219 Posts
| ||
Velr
Switzerland10596 Posts
On September 25 2012 05:47 neurosx wrote: How is raid finder an abomination ? I never understood the hate for it. Could someone explain ? It made raids so easy that you could plain ignore half the boss mechanics and therefore gave away all the excitement of meeting this new Boss that is gonna woop your ass several times now. Having the same fight harder in it's "true form" for guilds is not the same thing. Thats why i liked early Cata... The Bosses weren't really hard but they were far from freeloot... Heroics were truely challenging and altered some fights big time (i'm no big fan of heroics either but well.... thats a lost battel :p). People saying these fights were to hard for average joe were just retarded, none of the (non-heroic) fights needed any enourmous feat aside from "move out of the fire and do your simple job". I haven't raided really hardcore ever, i haven't seen all content in classic, tbc or woltk (well, later with Catalevels ![]() | ||
neurosx
Luxembourg1096 Posts
On September 25 2012 06:58 Velr wrote: It made raids so easy that you could plain ignore half the boss mechanics and therefore gave away all the excitement of meeting this new Boss that is gonna woop your ass several times now. Having the same fight harder in it's "true form" for guilds is not the same thing. Thats why i liked early Cata... The Bosses weren't really hard but they were far from freeloot... Heroics were truely challenging and altered some fights big time (i'm no big fan of heroics either but well.... thats a lost battel :p). People saying these fights were to hard for average joe were just retarded, none of the (non-heroic) fights needed any enourmous feat aside from "move out of the fire and do your simple job". I haven't raided really hardcore ever, i haven't seen all content in classic, tbc or woltk (well, later with Catalevels ![]() Well I always did raids with my guild, I don't see how other people playing in LFR is gonna change my game experience and that's why I ask this because everyone hates on it but why would you care if people do LFR | ||
Shinobi1982
1605 Posts
edit** lolol he stuck on dungeon loading screen and ppl in chat are screaming for adds (22k+ ppl). ![]() | ||
Artok
Netherlands2219 Posts
| ||
WArped
United Kingdom4845 Posts
| ||
Swish 41
Germany154 Posts
I bet I get bored after 10mins of this crap, but its free - so what :D | ||
Wedge
Canada580 Posts
| ||
![]()
micronesia
United States24568 Posts
Not spending 40 dollars for an expansion though... never did never will. | ||
Wedge
Canada580 Posts
| ||
| ||