|
On January 31 2016 02:06 Rebs wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2016 02:05 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On January 31 2016 02:02 Rebs wrote:
Yeah if there was warning, then theres not much excuse. Still sweep banning everything seems a bit much. Couldnt they have just put a report system in place or have people submit their modifications to servers for review on whether they fell within People don't stop doing things you don't want them to if you just ask nicely with no consequences. Sure, but I wasnt talking about there not being consequences, I was asking if it was possible to manage it and minimize the collateral. I dont see why it cant be. Edit: Oh fair enough, was to lazy to read it. My bad.
If my girlfriend hits me and i tell her to stop hitting me but she continues anyway.
I leave her, right?
Isnt this kinda the same thing?
|
On January 31 2016 11:37 Foxxan wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2016 02:06 Rebs wrote:On January 31 2016 02:05 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On January 31 2016 02:02 Rebs wrote:
Yeah if there was warning, then theres not much excuse. Still sweep banning everything seems a bit much. Couldnt they have just put a report system in place or have people submit their modifications to servers for review on whether they fell within People don't stop doing things you don't want them to if you just ask nicely with no consequences. Sure, but I wasnt talking about there not being consequences, I was asking if it was possible to manage it and minimize the collateral. I dont see why it cant be. Edit: Oh fair enough, was to lazy to read it. My bad. If my girlfriend hits me and i tell her to stop hitting me but she continues anyway. I leave her, right? Isnt this kinda the same thing?
Nice analogy dude, I'd call that accurate.
|
On January 31 2016 11:37 Foxxan wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2016 02:06 Rebs wrote:On January 31 2016 02:05 Blitzkrieg0 wrote:On January 31 2016 02:02 Rebs wrote:
Yeah if there was warning, then theres not much excuse. Still sweep banning everything seems a bit much. Couldnt they have just put a report system in place or have people submit their modifications to servers for review on whether they fell within People don't stop doing things you don't want them to if you just ask nicely with no consequences. Sure, but I wasnt talking about there not being consequences, I was asking if it was possible to manage it and minimize the collateral. I dont see why it cant be. Edit: Oh fair enough, was to lazy to read it. My bad. If my girlfriend hits me and i tell her to stop hitting me but she continues anyway. I leave her, right? Isnt this kinda the same thing?
ehhhh ? Nottt reallllyyy ?
|
|
|
28090 Posts
Summit owns a Factory New Dragonlore... but he's playing with the default AWP enabled.
PLZ SUMMIT.
|
Magic Woods9326 Posts
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
|
Netherlands45349 Posts
Katowice groups are out
Brutal format with tons of upset potential,
Group 1
Fnatic
Na`Vi
Luminosity
NiP
mousesports
TheMongolz
Group 2
EnvyUS
Astralis
VP
Faze
NA seed
Efrag
On paper LG, Na`Vi and Fnatic should advance from group 1 with Fnatic 1st but honestly I can see them beating each other(definitely in a bo1).
Astralis, Envy and VP from Group 2 with Envy as first since Astralis is struggling.
Mouse/NiP/Faze/maybe the american seed should all be capeable of upsetting in Bo1 round robin though and VP/Astralis and even Envy(Envy slightly) is inconsistent right now.
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
groups are bo1? Ewww, upset city
|
Netherlands45349 Posts
Going to be some very stressfull games to watch thats for sure, I really hope LG keeps their run going.
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
also, im 100% confident that groups are rigged. LG and navi in same group again; it's like the old titan envy grouping that happened at every fucking tournament
|
On February 02 2016 00:55 amazingxkcd wrote:
also, im 100% confident that groups are rigged. LG and navi in same group again; it's like the old titan envy grouping that happened at every fucking tournament
They probably use some randomisation program with some smart code for the randomisation like some mp3-players have for shuffle, lel.
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On February 02 2016 01:39 Miragee wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2016 00:55 amazingxkcd wrote:
also, im 100% confident that groups are rigged. LG and navi in same group again; it's like the old titan envy grouping that happened at every fucking tournament They probably use some randomisation program with some smart code for the randomisation like some mp3-players have for shuffle, lel.
which would explain why cobble is always the 3rd map when it wasnt banned?
|
On February 02 2016 01:58 amazingxkcd wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2016 01:39 Miragee wrote:On February 02 2016 00:55 amazingxkcd wrote:
also, im 100% confident that groups are rigged. LG and navi in same group again; it's like the old titan envy grouping that happened at every fucking tournament They probably use some randomisation program with some smart code for the randomisation like some mp3-players have for shuffle, lel. which would explain why cobble is always the 3rd map when it wasnt banned?
Yes, obviously.
|
France9034 Posts
Depends how good VP shows... If that's like Leipzig, I could see FaZe over them...
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On February 02 2016 01:59 Miragee wrote:Show nested quote +On February 02 2016 01:58 amazingxkcd wrote:On February 02 2016 01:39 Miragee wrote:On February 02 2016 00:55 amazingxkcd wrote:
also, im 100% confident that groups are rigged. LG and navi in same group again; it's like the old titan envy grouping that happened at every fucking tournament They probably use some randomisation program with some smart code for the randomisation like some mp3-players have for shuffle, lel. which would explain why cobble is always the 3rd map when it wasnt banned? Yes, obviously.
this pseudo randomness of valve triggers me alot
|
|
|
What a slaughterfest lol :p why is it always these certain opposite polars in groups o.o
|
I mean it is Valve we're talking about here. I'd be very surprised if the programmers were capable of implementing a proper random number generating or using one correctly. They probably call rand() without seeding lol
|
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On February 02 2016 21:55 NihiLStarcraft wrote:
I mean it is Valve we're talking about here. I'd be very surprised if the programmers were capable of implementing a proper random number generating or using one correctly. They probably call rand() without seeding lol
int rand() {
// guarenteed to always be random
return 4;
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
