On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
honestly dude... you only see one side of it. last game barcelona was denied TWO penalties...
this poor excuse shit is getting fucking old.
edit:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
You can't say anything dude, Chelsea game was pure ROBBERY, no excuse. That referee for that game RETIRED after that game he was so bad. Barcelona get the descions WHEN they need them. The Real game last season was even more proof. Last game might of got given or not, poor referee'n but thats first time ever Barca not got what they want. And did they complain about the referee? No they complained about the pitch LOL. Could of played the ref card but they don't cuz they get their fair share of descions.
And looking on sky sports at what Jamie just said, Puyol clearly "basketball checks" Nesta whilst Nesta is fouling Sergio like an idiot.
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
The only penalty was the Pique handball, you fail to mention the red for Abidal in which Anelka tripped himself but okay. Stop the crap already.
You clearly can't remember the other 2 penaltys!! Was 4 penaltys one being a 50-50 where can be given or not (much like that Nesta one) Referee's don't retire for no reason!!!
Lol you are so biased. Clearly Barca deserved to win. Chelsea was inferior. Now can we stop the silly talk and focus on Messi pls?
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
honestly dude... you only see one side of it. last game barcelona was denied TWO penalties...
this poor excuse shit is getting fucking old.
edit:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
You can't say anything dude, Chelsea game was pure ROBBERY, no excuse. That referee for that game RETIRED after that game he was so bad. Barcelona get the descions WHEN they need them. The Real game last season was even more proof. Last game might of got given or not, poor referee'n but thats first time ever Barca not got what they want. And did they complain about the referee? No they complained about the pitch LOL. Could of played the ref card but they don't cuz they get their fair share of descions.
And looking on sky sports at what Jamie just said, Puyol clearly "basketball checks" Nesta whilst Nesta is fouling Sergio like an idiot.
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
The only penalty was the Pique handball, you fail to mention the red for Abidal in which Anelka tripped himself but okay. Stop the crap already.
You clearly can't remember the other 2 penaltys!! Was 4 penaltys one being a 50-50 where can be given or not (much like that Nesta one) Referee's don't retire for no reason!!!
The unintentional handball and the Drogba dives? They aren't penalties.
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
honestly dude... you only see one side of it. last game barcelona was denied TWO penalties...
this poor excuse shit is getting fucking old.
edit:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
You can't say anything dude, Chelsea game was pure ROBBERY, no excuse. That referee for that game RETIRED after that game he was so bad. Barcelona get the descions WHEN they need them. The Real game last season was even more proof. Last game might of got given or not, poor referee'n but thats first time ever Barca not got what they want. And did they complain about the referee? No they complained about the pitch LOL. Could of played the ref card but they don't cuz they get their fair share of descions.
And looking on sky sports at what Jamie just said, Puyol clearly "basketball checks" Nesta whilst Nesta is fouling Sergio like an idiot.
lol did you not watch that game? players from both sides were slipping everywhere... i was watching the game and as a neutral watcher i even had remarked "damn the grass seems really slippery for some reason" jesus christ, stfu already. they didn't "make up excuse" they filed a complaint BASED ON TRUTH. on your bike, get out little one.
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
honestly dude... you only see one side of it. last game barcelona was denied TWO penalties...
this poor excuse shit is getting fucking old.
edit:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
You can't say anything dude, Chelsea game was pure ROBBERY, no excuse. That referee for that game RETIRED after that game he was so bad. Barcelona get the descions WHEN they need them. The Real game last season was even more proof. Last game might of got given or not, poor referee'n but thats first time ever Barca not got what they want. And did they complain about the referee? No they complained about the pitch LOL. Could of played the ref card but they don't cuz they get their fair share of descions.
And looking on sky sports at what Jamie just said, Puyol clearly "basketball checks" Nesta whilst Nesta is fouling Sergio like an idiot.
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
The only penalty was the Pique handball, you fail to mention the red for Abidal in which Anelka tripped himself but okay. Stop the crap already.
You clearly can't remember the other 2 penaltys!! Was 4 penaltys one being a 50-50 where can be given or not (much like that Nesta one) Referee's don't retire for no reason!!!
...sigh, yes, Chelsea definitely deserved to win that one game, but you're waaayyy too biased, just listen to yourself, seriously...
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
You don't see what I see. Puyol is not "set" by any standard, except maybe the NBA's.
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
Yes puyol was the third man, but what stop busquets was the CLEAR shirt-grabbing from Nesta. You gotta stop being ridiculously anti-barca biased in your posts, this happens in every single forum with portugueses on it.
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
Yes, i'm the one making shit up.. "I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender"
One team should not have this much controversy surrounding them :/
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
You don't see what I see. Puyol is not "set" by any standard, except maybe the NBA's.
NBA has very high standards for a set player. Certainly higher than footbal, so I dont see the problem.
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
honestly dude... you only see one side of it. last game barcelona was denied TWO penalties...
this poor excuse shit is getting fucking old.
edit:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
You can't say anything dude, Chelsea game was pure ROBBERY, no excuse. That referee for that game RETIRED after that game he was so bad. Barcelona get the descions WHEN they need them. The Real game last season was even more proof. Last game might of got given or not, poor referee'n but thats first time ever Barca not got what they want. And did they complain about the referee? No they complained about the pitch LOL. Could of played the ref card but they don't cuz they get their fair share of descions.
And looking on sky sports at what Jamie just said, Puyol clearly "basketball checks" Nesta whilst Nesta is fouling Sergio like an idiot.
On April 04 2012 04:42 ilj.psa wrote:
On April 04 2012 04:30 Pandemona wrote:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
The only penalty was the Pique handball, you fail to mention the red for Abidal in which Anelka tripped himself but okay. Stop the crap already.
You clearly can't remember the other 2 penaltys!! Was 4 penaltys one being a 50-50 where can be given or not (much like that Nesta one) Referee's don't retire for no reason!!!
Lol you are so biased. Clearly Barca deserved to win. Chelsea was inferior. Now can we stop the silly talk and focus on Messi pls?
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
honestly dude... you only see one side of it. last game barcelona was denied TWO penalties...
this poor excuse shit is getting fucking old.
edit:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
You can't say anything dude, Chelsea game was pure ROBBERY, no excuse. That referee for that game RETIRED after that game he was so bad. Barcelona get the descions WHEN they need them. The Real game last season was even more proof. Last game might of got given or not, poor referee'n but thats first time ever Barca not got what they want. And did they complain about the referee? No they complained about the pitch LOL. Could of played the ref card but they don't cuz they get their fair share of descions.
And looking on sky sports at what Jamie just said, Puyol clearly "basketball checks" Nesta whilst Nesta is fouling Sergio like an idiot.
On April 04 2012 04:42 ilj.psa wrote:
On April 04 2012 04:30 Pandemona wrote:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
The only penalty was the Pique handball, you fail to mention the red for Abidal in which Anelka tripped himself but okay. Stop the crap already.
You clearly can't remember the other 2 penaltys!! Was 4 penaltys one being a 50-50 where can be given or not (much like that Nesta one) Referee's don't retire for no reason!!!
...sigh, yes, Chelsea definitely deserved to win that one game, but you're waaayyy too biased, just listen to yourself, seriously...
Watch as well the link. No im not "too biast" Barcelona always get preferential treatment. They have world class midfielders and strikers, yes they do. But they can't defend for crap thus they are not unbetable like they have been beaten this season. I would also not mind a repeat of the 2009 semi final so Chelsea can give a better account of themselves. Also i did agree that Nesta penalty was a foul, but Puyol should of been booked too for his blatent body check after/during the foul.
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
honestly dude... you only see one side of it. last game barcelona was denied TWO penalties...
this poor excuse shit is getting fucking old.
edit:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
You can't say anything dude, Chelsea game was pure ROBBERY, no excuse. That referee for that game RETIRED after that game he was so bad. Barcelona get the descions WHEN they need them. The Real game last season was even more proof. Last game might of got given or not, poor referee'n but thats first time ever Barca not got what they want. And did they complain about the referee? No they complained about the pitch LOL. Could of played the ref card but they don't cuz they get their fair share of descions.
And looking on sky sports at what Jamie just said, Puyol clearly "basketball checks" Nesta whilst Nesta is fouling Sergio like an idiot.
On April 04 2012 04:42 ilj.psa wrote:
On April 04 2012 04:30 Pandemona wrote:
On April 04 2012 04:28 ApocAlypsE007 wrote: Chelsea 2009, Inter 2010, Real 2011, Milan 2012??? ......
Here Here!! Totally true my friend, show me a season where Barcelona get "robbed" never, they always get EVERY SINGLE DESCION go there way at the most important times. 3 Penalty's chelsea were robbed in 2009 3!? Its crazy
The only penalty was the Pique handball, you fail to mention the red for Abidal in which Anelka tripped himself but okay. Stop the crap already.
You clearly can't remember the other 2 penaltys!! Was 4 penaltys one being a 50-50 where can be given or not (much like that Nesta one) Referee's don't retire for no reason!!!
The unintentional handball and the Drogba dives? They aren't penalties.
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
You don't see what I see. Puyol is not "set" by any standard, except maybe the NBA's.
NBA has very high standards for a set player. Certainly higher than footbal, so I dont see the problem.
I was being sarcastic. The NBA never ever ever calls illegal picks, and they happen all the time.
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
Yes, i'm the one making shit up.. "I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender"
One team should not have this much controversy surrounding them :/
I reviewed the play on my DVR over and over for this play and i'm not sure what the official rules are but from what it looks like, it seems as though Puyol purposely put himself infront of nesta to try to block him... is this legal? if so, then your argument is moot, if not than you're correct.
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
Yes, i'm the one making shit up.. "I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender"
One team should not have this much controversy surrounding them :/
Its controversial because people make it so. Its pathetic. Aside from the Van Persie incident (the significance of which is debatable considering that was the only shot he made and even that didnt count) and the Chelsea game where Chelsea really were superior I can point out plenty of cases all the way back to when Porto won where shit happened and United got robbed with Mourinho's lieutenant in chief pulled every single united players pants down and then some. People just didnt care enough to make a big deal out of it. People need to stop crying and just enjoy football. Unless its some huge travesty.
On April 04 2012 04:39 Megatronn wrote: The problem I have with the 2nd penalty is that Puyol is the one who pushes Busquets to the ground, now because his shirt was being grabbed. I don't know if they planned it or what, but it's bullshit.
OMG im looking at replays right now. Where does Puyol do this ? Show it to me. He has his hands down and setting a pick. Its a set play. Puyol has an established position. Nesta loses ground when Busquets runs around him. Clearly looking for what you want to see. Its depressing. Its a soft penalty sure, but repeating absolutely baseless and retarded borderline blind opinions is really stupid im sorry.
You don't see Puyol run straight into both of them? Sir I'm no miracle worker, I can't cure you of being blind.
No I dont. I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender to keep it. Nesta makes a complete mess of everything pulls back Busquets while causing a clatter. Your not a miracle worker, but boy can you make shit up.
Yes, i'm the one making shit up.. "I see him establishing himself and competing with his defender"
One team should not have this much controversy surrounding them :/
I think Barcelona have so much controversy surrounding them because they always get into the high-profile matches where things happen (think of all the 'incidents' that ManU have in the Premier League) and because they. No-other team participates in the same number of high-profile matches because they don't go as deep in the tournament as barcelona do (consistently).
EPT
Very interesting. 
