• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:42
CEST 20:42
KST 03:42
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles7[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China10Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL82
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Server Blocker RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Small VOD Thread 2.0 Last Minute Live-Report Thread Resource!
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Accidental Video Game Porn Archive
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 671 users

Kerbal Space Program - Page 25

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 48 Next All
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany983 Posts
March 30 2015 14:54 GMT
#481
On March 30 2015 23:48 -Celestial- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 30 2015 23:07 nimbim wrote:
On March 30 2015 20:35 -Celestial- wrote:
I should really get back to playing that. I still have to re-engineer my interplanetary cruisers so I can actually get it off Kerbin safely. Once its up there its going to be amazingly useful for interplanetary transfers but until I figure out a way its just a large, very expensive, firework.

If you can't launch it without fireworks, try splitting it up into several launches and construct in LKO. That's also more realisitic than launching one giant thing into orbit.


To be honest my SOLE issue right now is that decoupling the launch vehicle from the ship itself tends to result in the engines exploding because of engine covering collisions. I was using quad engine mounts with nuclear engines to pack some more power onto each housing. But that meant when I hit the button to release the engines the side panels would fly off to free them and smack straight into the other engines.

I tried to do it carefully but there were always problems with it. Very frustrating after pulling off what was a fundamentally tricky launch procedure.


Use timewarp immediately after hitting the stage button, makes the panels disappear.
-Celestial-
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom3867 Posts
March 30 2015 15:31 GMT
#482
On March 30 2015 23:54 nimbim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 30 2015 23:48 -Celestial- wrote:
On March 30 2015 23:07 nimbim wrote:
On March 30 2015 20:35 -Celestial- wrote:
I should really get back to playing that. I still have to re-engineer my interplanetary cruisers so I can actually get it off Kerbin safely. Once its up there its going to be amazingly useful for interplanetary transfers but until I figure out a way its just a large, very expensive, firework.

If you can't launch it without fireworks, try splitting it up into several launches and construct in LKO. That's also more realisitic than launching one giant thing into orbit.


To be honest my SOLE issue right now is that decoupling the launch vehicle from the ship itself tends to result in the engines exploding because of engine covering collisions. I was using quad engine mounts with nuclear engines to pack some more power onto each housing. But that meant when I hit the button to release the engines the side panels would fly off to free them and smack straight into the other engines.

I tried to do it carefully but there were always problems with it. Very frustrating after pulling off what was a fundamentally tricky launch procedure.


Use timewarp immediately after hitting the stage button, makes the panels disappear.


Honestly did not know that. I'll try it. Thanks for the tip.
"Protoss simultaneously feels unbeatably strong and unwinnably weak." - kcdc
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-30 20:45:08
March 30 2015 20:44 GMT
#483
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Ljas
Profile Joined July 2012
Finland725 Posts
April 02 2015 19:40 GMT
#484
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 02 2015 23:26 GMT
#485
On April 03 2015 04:40 Ljas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/97285-KSP-v0-90-Stock-Bug-Fix-Modules-(Release-v0-1-7d-28-Feb-15)-Misc-Utilities-(18-Jan-15) might help too~~
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
April 03 2015 02:02 GMT
#486
On April 03 2015 08:26 Epoxide wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2015 04:40 Ljas wrote:
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/97285-KSP-v0-90-Stock-Bug-Fix-Modules-(Release-v0-1-7d-28-Feb-15)-Misc-Utilities-(18-Jan-15) might help too~~


You're thinking it's the decoupler issue that Squad hasn't been able to fully fix yet?
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-03 03:03:05
April 03 2015 03:00 GMT
#487
On April 03 2015 04:40 Ljas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.


I'm using 32 bit client. Was detaching engines that were off - but i tried it and it indeed broke several times at 100% and 25-50% throttle, but worked fine when i went into a slight roll and slowed throttle to 0%. I just took the same craft and launched it like 8 times and eventually it didn't randomly disconnect all of the fuel tanks from eachother (not even decouples, but like the glue of the ship between parts suddenly disappearing with no explosion as soon as i decoupled the second set of 3*2 engines)

I got to minmus and back with a kerbal :D

..alive :D

i would rate that harder than mun though. It's much further out and then you have to correct for inclination and time it to dodge mun on your way out, and then the gravity is so weak it was quite confusing for me to actually get into a proper orbit. I didn't have an orbit, just a line that said minmus escape in X time (when i was in the SOI) and i ended up using twice as much fuel as i actually needed for the transfer stage (around 2000m/s of delta v) but i had 4x as much as i needed, so all good

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
^moments before i realized that i forgot to deploy landing gear

[image loading]
^a minute later, landed :D

[image loading]
ladders down!

[image loading]
The weight of my kerbal leaving the pod caused some slight problems for craft stability. Another reason why Minmus is hard!

[image loading]
how the fuck did i manage to mess up the angle so badly by accident

[image loading]
wheeee 3km/s @30km

:D :D
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
April 03 2015 03:55 GMT
#488
I'm really not convinced the decoupler issue is a bug. I think people who are having problems with separated stages torquing in are attaching the booster too high on the decoupler.

If the decoupler is below the center of mass of the booster, it will create a torque that rotates the bottom of the booster away and the top of the booster towards the ship. If the booster is long enough, that could easily overcome the horizontal velocity of the booster.

To fix this, place the booster as low on the decoupler as possible.

It's a design flaw in your rockets, not a bug in the game.
Who called in the fleet?
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
April 03 2015 04:10 GMT
#489
On April 03 2015 12:55 Millitron wrote:
I'm really not convinced the decoupler issue is a bug. I think people who are having problems with separated stages torquing in are attaching the booster too high on the decoupler.

If the decoupler is below the center of mass of the booster, it will create a torque that rotates the bottom of the booster away and the top of the booster towards the ship. If the booster is long enough, that could easily overcome the horizontal velocity of the booster.

To fix this, place the booster as low on the decoupler as possible.

It's a design flaw in your rockets, not a bug in the game.


If it's a torquing issue, though, wouldn't placing the booster as low as possible then lead to the opposite problem with the decoupler kicking the upper part of the booster stage out and causing the bottom of the booster to rotate around and colliding with engines?

Actually, I've seen that happen, so decoupler placement might be really finicky. I generally just add sepratrons to push the decoupling booster away and down from the primary stage.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 03 2015 12:37 GMT
#490
I'm not sure if his problem is the decoupler issue. The decoupler definitely changed from 0.23.5 to 0.24.2, that fix changes it back to 0.23.5.
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
April 03 2015 15:37 GMT
#491
On April 03 2015 13:10 felisconcolori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2015 12:55 Millitron wrote:
I'm really not convinced the decoupler issue is a bug. I think people who are having problems with separated stages torquing in are attaching the booster too high on the decoupler.

If the decoupler is below the center of mass of the booster, it will create a torque that rotates the bottom of the booster away and the top of the booster towards the ship. If the booster is long enough, that could easily overcome the horizontal velocity of the booster.

To fix this, place the booster as low on the decoupler as possible.

It's a design flaw in your rockets, not a bug in the game.


If it's a torquing issue, though, wouldn't placing the booster as low as possible then lead to the opposite problem with the decoupler kicking the upper part of the booster stage out and causing the bottom of the booster to rotate around and colliding with engines?

Actually, I've seen that happen, so decoupler placement might be really finicky. I generally just add sepratrons to push the decoupling booster away and down from the primary stage.

Placing the booster low will indeed torque the bottom of the rocket in, but that's generally not as bad as the top torquing in.
Who called in the fleet?
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany983 Posts
April 03 2015 23:43 GMT
#492
On April 03 2015 12:00 Cyro wrote:
I got to minmus and back with a kerbal :D

..alive :D

i would rate that harder than mun though. It's much further out and then you have to correct for inclination and time it to dodge mun on your way out, and then the gravity is so weak it was quite confusing for me to actually get into a proper orbit. I didn't have an orbit, just a line that said minmus escape in X time (when i was in the SOI) and i ended up using twice as much fuel as i actually needed for the transfer stage (around 2000m/s of delta v) but i had 4x as much as i needed, so all good

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
^moments before i realized that i forgot to deploy landing gear

[image loading]
^a minute later, landed :D

[image loading]
ladders down!

[image loading]
The weight of my kerbal leaving the pod caused some slight problems for craft stability. Another reason why Minmus is hard!

[image loading]
how the fuck did i manage to mess up the angle so badly by accident

[image loading]
wheeee 3km/s @30km

:D :D

Gratz :D The difficult part of landing on the Mun is not getting into the SOI. Go botch some Mun landings for science :D
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 07:49:45
April 06 2015 04:37 GMT
#493
[image loading]

SOMEBODY GET ME SOME MORE DUCT TAPE

[image loading]

edit: Mission success. I recorded from the first time i pressed button to go to launchpad (missed struts on some part, instant fireworks) and it actually worked right out from the second time going to launchpad. I tested the lander+transfer stage quickly before building that launch monstrosity, but still surprising :D

an hour and a half later, got to the mun with 1 kerbal and came back with four, in one launch. One of them was 40km away from the others, and all of my kerbals were in the middle of the dark side of the mun (i landed them on light side and thought it was tidally locked? :0) so there was some added challenge and derp reloading there. Also i had another bug where my SAS just didn't respond while i was trying to pick up the last kerbal and i had to manually maneuver and land without it >____>

uploading whole thing to youtube if i can anyways in case anyone wants to see the launch and/or skip through it :D

t;t youtube does not accept videos longer than ~10-15 min without talking to them on phone to verify account
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 06 2015 10:30 GMT
#494
oh god the stock rocket designs o_o
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11497 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 11:49:39
April 06 2015 11:48 GMT
#495
Tidally locked means that the same side of the Mun faces Kerbin at any given time, and that is correct. It does not mean that the same side of the Mun is facing the SUN at all times, which is what makes it light up. You can easily watch this phenomenon in real life, too. It is the reason why there is such a thing as half-moon, full-moon, new moon, but the craters are always at the same spots.

If you wait for half a month, the dark side and the light side will have changed places.

As to your SAS not responding, were you out of electricity?

And that thing is MASSIVE overkill to get to the Mun. You should be able to easily get to Duna and back with something that size. Don't get me wrong, it is definitively cool. But with a few tweeks you should be able to do much larger missions with it.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 12:06:44
April 06 2015 12:01 GMT
#496
Can you get more powerful engines w/ any popular mods? Asparagus feels weak on crafts that heavy because you can't do the usual trick of having the main engine 2-3x as powerful as the booster engines when the booster engines are the highest thrust ones available. Doing that allows you to maintain TWR in the ~1.5-2.2 range, while this craft fell gradually to barely over 1.0 TWR as it dropped engines

i'm sure you could design a craft for the same mission that was smaller and worked fine with smaller than max size engines for asparagus stages, but where's the fun in that?

Tidally locked means that the same side of the Mun faces Kerbin at any given time, and that is correct. It does not mean that the same side of the Mun is facing the SUN at all times, which is what makes it light up.


Ah yea. Shit~

As to your SAS not responding, were you out of electricity?


nop i don't think so, i leave the meter open and i could still use the reaction wheels fine. The SAS just stopped adjusting my craft towards the heading i told it to (retrogade) even when clicking on/off of it

And that thing is MASSIVE overkill to get to the Mun.


And back with three extra kerbals, plus 2-3x redundancy for fuel for fun and shit piloting? :D maybe, but more/bigger engines is always cool. It was like my fifth attempt at a return trip and needing a bunch of pods (or in this case 1 small pod and 1 huge pod) to fit them in. It was pretty awesome aside from some control issues in one stage and lack of TWR for the second half of main stage (if there was an engine with 6-10k thrust, that would be fixed with one part swap)
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11497 Posts
April 06 2015 12:17 GMT
#497
I think you overestimate how important TWR is. TWR is only important for landing and starting maneuvers. Anything out in space you can easily do with lower TWRs (albeit it being slightly annoying if it is too low due to maneuvers taking longer acceleration times which you can not accelerate time to get through. Which allows you to use effective engines like the nuclear ones.

As soon as you are even on a suborbital course, TWR is usually no longer a big issue.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 13:37:28
April 06 2015 12:44 GMT
#498
On April 06 2015 21:17 Simberto wrote:
I think you overestimate how important TWR is. TWR is only important for landing and starting maneuvers. Anything out in space you can easily do with lower TWRs (albeit it being slightly annoying if it is too low due to maneuvers taking longer acceleration times which you can not accelerate time to get through. Which allows you to use effective engines like the nuclear ones.

As soon as you are even on a suborbital course, TWR is usually no longer a big issue.



It makes a huge difference if you're dipping that far below and you're nowhere near a stable orbit. A 0.73 TWR on the ground might be higher if you're using that engine at 30-35km, especially after you partially empty fuel tanks - but it's still awful and barely usable for the second half of orbital insertion

i'm sure at 1.8 TWR it would fly like a dream~ "start slow, get slower" is just icky design. Functional TWR of ~1.6 - 1.1 (average ~1.2) is just too low to get out of atmosphere efficiently
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany983 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 14:36:42
April 06 2015 14:16 GMT
#499
xD well there is nothing efficient about that design. Just look at all the reaction wheels you needed to compensate for its insane mass (don't use nose cones unless you've installed FAR btw). There's nothing wrong about what you're doing ofc, but it's not efficient^^

It's like Simberto said, you only need a certain TWR for the critical burns, i.e. while fighting gravity and atmosphere. Once you're in LKO you definitely don't need a specific TWR anymore and the Mün has very low gravity obviously (1.63 m/s²). It's perfectly normal IRL that rockets have a TWR barely above 1 after decoupling boosters, they pick up speed while the fuel depletes.

On April 06 2015 23:23 Epoxide wrote:
You should look for engines with high ISP when outside of the atmosphere, typically the nuclear engine is the most efficient for transfers between planets/moons.


Also, using just 1 engine while you don't need the extra thrust is always best in terms of efficiency. Don't attach 8 LV-N to get more thrust, that's actually less efficient than another single engine with lower Isp. I can't find the table right now, but iirc anything above 4 LV-N is less efficient than using 1 LV-T30 (Isp=370s).
There are some cases when a smaller engine will be more efficient than a LV-N, but in general just use them for space. http://imgur.com/a/iNqmQ#0
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 06 2015 14:23 GMT
#500
You should look for engines with high ISP when outside of the atmosphere, typically the nuclear engine is the most efficient for transfers between planets/moons.
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 48 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
18:00
RO8 Round Robin Group - Day 2
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
LiquipediaDiscussion
FEL
15:00
Polish Championship - Playoffs
Elazer vs MaNaLIVE!
IndyStarCraft 508
CranKy Ducklings346
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 508
BRAT_OK 138
ForJumy 30
StarCraft: Brood War
EffOrt 916
Larva 494
firebathero 359
Dewaltoss 142
ZZZero.O 130
LaStScan 116
Aegong 54
Movie 30
sas.Sziky 23
Terrorterran 14
Stormgate
BeoMulf192
League of Legends
Grubby2353
Dendi1535
Counter-Strike
fl0m1391
pashabiceps561
flusha463
chrisJcsgo104
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox111
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor971
Liquid`Hasu522
Other Games
B2W.Neo1647
KnowMe321
mouzStarbuck208
Hui .114
Pyrionflax65
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick4267
EGCTV3159
StarCraft 2
angryscii 22
Other Games
BasetradeTV8
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• HeavenSC 44
• LUISG 23
• OhrlRock 1
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 16
• Pr0nogo 5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2197
• Ler135
• masondota284
League of Legends
• Nemesis5289
Other Games
• imaqtpie2436
• Shiphtur229
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
16h 19m
Replay Cast
1d 15h
WardiTV European League
1d 21h
PiGosaur Monday
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
Epic.LAN
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
HSC XXVII
NC Random Cup

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.