• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:05
CEST 00:05
KST 07:05
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 627 users

Kerbal Space Program - Page 25

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 48 Next All
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany983 Posts
March 30 2015 14:54 GMT
#481
On March 30 2015 23:48 -Celestial- wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 30 2015 23:07 nimbim wrote:
On March 30 2015 20:35 -Celestial- wrote:
I should really get back to playing that. I still have to re-engineer my interplanetary cruisers so I can actually get it off Kerbin safely. Once its up there its going to be amazingly useful for interplanetary transfers but until I figure out a way its just a large, very expensive, firework.

If you can't launch it without fireworks, try splitting it up into several launches and construct in LKO. That's also more realisitic than launching one giant thing into orbit.


To be honest my SOLE issue right now is that decoupling the launch vehicle from the ship itself tends to result in the engines exploding because of engine covering collisions. I was using quad engine mounts with nuclear engines to pack some more power onto each housing. But that meant when I hit the button to release the engines the side panels would fly off to free them and smack straight into the other engines.

I tried to do it carefully but there were always problems with it. Very frustrating after pulling off what was a fundamentally tricky launch procedure.


Use timewarp immediately after hitting the stage button, makes the panels disappear.
-Celestial-
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom3867 Posts
March 30 2015 15:31 GMT
#482
On March 30 2015 23:54 nimbim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 30 2015 23:48 -Celestial- wrote:
On March 30 2015 23:07 nimbim wrote:
On March 30 2015 20:35 -Celestial- wrote:
I should really get back to playing that. I still have to re-engineer my interplanetary cruisers so I can actually get it off Kerbin safely. Once its up there its going to be amazingly useful for interplanetary transfers but until I figure out a way its just a large, very expensive, firework.

If you can't launch it without fireworks, try splitting it up into several launches and construct in LKO. That's also more realisitic than launching one giant thing into orbit.


To be honest my SOLE issue right now is that decoupling the launch vehicle from the ship itself tends to result in the engines exploding because of engine covering collisions. I was using quad engine mounts with nuclear engines to pack some more power onto each housing. But that meant when I hit the button to release the engines the side panels would fly off to free them and smack straight into the other engines.

I tried to do it carefully but there were always problems with it. Very frustrating after pulling off what was a fundamentally tricky launch procedure.


Use timewarp immediately after hitting the stage button, makes the panels disappear.


Honestly did not know that. I'll try it. Thanks for the tip.
"Protoss simultaneously feels unbeatably strong and unwinnably weak." - kcdc
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-03-30 20:45:08
March 30 2015 20:44 GMT
#483
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Ljas
Profile Joined July 2012
Finland725 Posts
April 02 2015 19:40 GMT
#484
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 02 2015 23:26 GMT
#485
On April 03 2015 04:40 Ljas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/97285-KSP-v0-90-Stock-Bug-Fix-Modules-(Release-v0-1-7d-28-Feb-15)-Misc-Utilities-(18-Jan-15) might help too~~
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
April 03 2015 02:02 GMT
#486
On April 03 2015 08:26 Epoxide wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2015 04:40 Ljas wrote:
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/97285-KSP-v0-90-Stock-Bug-Fix-Modules-(Release-v0-1-7d-28-Feb-15)-Misc-Utilities-(18-Jan-15) might help too~~


You're thinking it's the decoupler issue that Squad hasn't been able to fully fix yet?
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-03 03:03:05
April 03 2015 03:00 GMT
#487
On April 03 2015 04:40 Ljas wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 31 2015 05:44 Cyro wrote:
I'm just having weird detachment issues.. releasing the second set of 2 engines caused the rocket to split in half further up with no evident collision. Maybe i was just throttled up too high?

Unless the stage you're detaching is still firing, throttle shouldn't matter. I guess the stock question is if you're using the 64bit client? That's the most common source of errors.


I'm using 32 bit client. Was detaching engines that were off - but i tried it and it indeed broke several times at 100% and 25-50% throttle, but worked fine when i went into a slight roll and slowed throttle to 0%. I just took the same craft and launched it like 8 times and eventually it didn't randomly disconnect all of the fuel tanks from eachother (not even decouples, but like the glue of the ship between parts suddenly disappearing with no explosion as soon as i decoupled the second set of 3*2 engines)

I got to minmus and back with a kerbal :D

..alive :D

i would rate that harder than mun though. It's much further out and then you have to correct for inclination and time it to dodge mun on your way out, and then the gravity is so weak it was quite confusing for me to actually get into a proper orbit. I didn't have an orbit, just a line that said minmus escape in X time (when i was in the SOI) and i ended up using twice as much fuel as i actually needed for the transfer stage (around 2000m/s of delta v) but i had 4x as much as i needed, so all good

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
^moments before i realized that i forgot to deploy landing gear

[image loading]
^a minute later, landed :D

[image loading]
ladders down!

[image loading]
The weight of my kerbal leaving the pod caused some slight problems for craft stability. Another reason why Minmus is hard!

[image loading]
how the fuck did i manage to mess up the angle so badly by accident

[image loading]
wheeee 3km/s @30km

:D :D
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
April 03 2015 03:55 GMT
#488
I'm really not convinced the decoupler issue is a bug. I think people who are having problems with separated stages torquing in are attaching the booster too high on the decoupler.

If the decoupler is below the center of mass of the booster, it will create a torque that rotates the bottom of the booster away and the top of the booster towards the ship. If the booster is long enough, that could easily overcome the horizontal velocity of the booster.

To fix this, place the booster as low on the decoupler as possible.

It's a design flaw in your rockets, not a bug in the game.
Who called in the fleet?
felisconcolori
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States6168 Posts
April 03 2015 04:10 GMT
#489
On April 03 2015 12:55 Millitron wrote:
I'm really not convinced the decoupler issue is a bug. I think people who are having problems with separated stages torquing in are attaching the booster too high on the decoupler.

If the decoupler is below the center of mass of the booster, it will create a torque that rotates the bottom of the booster away and the top of the booster towards the ship. If the booster is long enough, that could easily overcome the horizontal velocity of the booster.

To fix this, place the booster as low on the decoupler as possible.

It's a design flaw in your rockets, not a bug in the game.


If it's a torquing issue, though, wouldn't placing the booster as low as possible then lead to the opposite problem with the decoupler kicking the upper part of the booster stage out and causing the bottom of the booster to rotate around and colliding with engines?

Actually, I've seen that happen, so decoupler placement might be really finicky. I generally just add sepratrons to push the decoupling booster away and down from the primary stage.
Yes, I email sponsors... to thank them. Don't post drunk, kids. My king, what has become of you?
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 03 2015 12:37 GMT
#490
I'm not sure if his problem is the decoupler issue. The decoupler definitely changed from 0.23.5 to 0.24.2, that fix changes it back to 0.23.5.
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
Millitron
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2611 Posts
April 03 2015 15:37 GMT
#491
On April 03 2015 13:10 felisconcolori wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 03 2015 12:55 Millitron wrote:
I'm really not convinced the decoupler issue is a bug. I think people who are having problems with separated stages torquing in are attaching the booster too high on the decoupler.

If the decoupler is below the center of mass of the booster, it will create a torque that rotates the bottom of the booster away and the top of the booster towards the ship. If the booster is long enough, that could easily overcome the horizontal velocity of the booster.

To fix this, place the booster as low on the decoupler as possible.

It's a design flaw in your rockets, not a bug in the game.


If it's a torquing issue, though, wouldn't placing the booster as low as possible then lead to the opposite problem with the decoupler kicking the upper part of the booster stage out and causing the bottom of the booster to rotate around and colliding with engines?

Actually, I've seen that happen, so decoupler placement might be really finicky. I generally just add sepratrons to push the decoupling booster away and down from the primary stage.

Placing the booster low will indeed torque the bottom of the rocket in, but that's generally not as bad as the top torquing in.
Who called in the fleet?
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany983 Posts
April 03 2015 23:43 GMT
#492
On April 03 2015 12:00 Cyro wrote:
I got to minmus and back with a kerbal :D

..alive :D

i would rate that harder than mun though. It's much further out and then you have to correct for inclination and time it to dodge mun on your way out, and then the gravity is so weak it was quite confusing for me to actually get into a proper orbit. I didn't have an orbit, just a line that said minmus escape in X time (when i was in the SOI) and i ended up using twice as much fuel as i actually needed for the transfer stage (around 2000m/s of delta v) but i had 4x as much as i needed, so all good

+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
^moments before i realized that i forgot to deploy landing gear

[image loading]
^a minute later, landed :D

[image loading]
ladders down!

[image loading]
The weight of my kerbal leaving the pod caused some slight problems for craft stability. Another reason why Minmus is hard!

[image loading]
how the fuck did i manage to mess up the angle so badly by accident

[image loading]
wheeee 3km/s @30km

:D :D

Gratz :D The difficult part of landing on the Mun is not getting into the SOI. Go botch some Mun landings for science :D
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 07:49:45
April 06 2015 04:37 GMT
#493
[image loading]

SOMEBODY GET ME SOME MORE DUCT TAPE

[image loading]

edit: Mission success. I recorded from the first time i pressed button to go to launchpad (missed struts on some part, instant fireworks) and it actually worked right out from the second time going to launchpad. I tested the lander+transfer stage quickly before building that launch monstrosity, but still surprising :D

an hour and a half later, got to the mun with 1 kerbal and came back with four, in one launch. One of them was 40km away from the others, and all of my kerbals were in the middle of the dark side of the mun (i landed them on light side and thought it was tidally locked? :0) so there was some added challenge and derp reloading there. Also i had another bug where my SAS just didn't respond while i was trying to pick up the last kerbal and i had to manually maneuver and land without it >____>

uploading whole thing to youtube if i can anyways in case anyone wants to see the launch and/or skip through it :D

t;t youtube does not accept videos longer than ~10-15 min without talking to them on phone to verify account
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 06 2015 10:30 GMT
#494
oh god the stock rocket designs o_o
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11491 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 11:49:39
April 06 2015 11:48 GMT
#495
Tidally locked means that the same side of the Mun faces Kerbin at any given time, and that is correct. It does not mean that the same side of the Mun is facing the SUN at all times, which is what makes it light up. You can easily watch this phenomenon in real life, too. It is the reason why there is such a thing as half-moon, full-moon, new moon, but the craters are always at the same spots.

If you wait for half a month, the dark side and the light side will have changed places.

As to your SAS not responding, were you out of electricity?

And that thing is MASSIVE overkill to get to the Mun. You should be able to easily get to Duna and back with something that size. Don't get me wrong, it is definitively cool. But with a few tweeks you should be able to do much larger missions with it.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 12:06:44
April 06 2015 12:01 GMT
#496
Can you get more powerful engines w/ any popular mods? Asparagus feels weak on crafts that heavy because you can't do the usual trick of having the main engine 2-3x as powerful as the booster engines when the booster engines are the highest thrust ones available. Doing that allows you to maintain TWR in the ~1.5-2.2 range, while this craft fell gradually to barely over 1.0 TWR as it dropped engines

i'm sure you could design a craft for the same mission that was smaller and worked fine with smaller than max size engines for asparagus stages, but where's the fun in that?

Tidally locked means that the same side of the Mun faces Kerbin at any given time, and that is correct. It does not mean that the same side of the Mun is facing the SUN at all times, which is what makes it light up.


Ah yea. Shit~

As to your SAS not responding, were you out of electricity?


nop i don't think so, i leave the meter open and i could still use the reaction wheels fine. The SAS just stopped adjusting my craft towards the heading i told it to (retrogade) even when clicking on/off of it

And that thing is MASSIVE overkill to get to the Mun.


And back with three extra kerbals, plus 2-3x redundancy for fuel for fun and shit piloting? :D maybe, but more/bigger engines is always cool. It was like my fifth attempt at a return trip and needing a bunch of pods (or in this case 1 small pod and 1 huge pod) to fit them in. It was pretty awesome aside from some control issues in one stage and lack of TWR for the second half of main stage (if there was an engine with 6-10k thrust, that would be fixed with one part swap)
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
Simberto
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany11491 Posts
April 06 2015 12:17 GMT
#497
I think you overestimate how important TWR is. TWR is only important for landing and starting maneuvers. Anything out in space you can easily do with lower TWRs (albeit it being slightly annoying if it is too low due to maneuvers taking longer acceleration times which you can not accelerate time to get through. Which allows you to use effective engines like the nuclear ones.

As soon as you are even on a suborbital course, TWR is usually no longer a big issue.
Cyro
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United Kingdom20285 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 13:37:28
April 06 2015 12:44 GMT
#498
On April 06 2015 21:17 Simberto wrote:
I think you overestimate how important TWR is. TWR is only important for landing and starting maneuvers. Anything out in space you can easily do with lower TWRs (albeit it being slightly annoying if it is too low due to maneuvers taking longer acceleration times which you can not accelerate time to get through. Which allows you to use effective engines like the nuclear ones.

As soon as you are even on a suborbital course, TWR is usually no longer a big issue.



It makes a huge difference if you're dipping that far below and you're nowhere near a stable orbit. A 0.73 TWR on the ground might be higher if you're using that engine at 30-35km, especially after you partially empty fuel tanks - but it's still awful and barely usable for the second half of orbital insertion

i'm sure at 1.8 TWR it would fly like a dream~ "start slow, get slower" is just icky design. Functional TWR of ~1.6 - 1.1 (average ~1.2) is just too low to get out of atmosphere efficiently
"oh my god my overclock... I got a single WHEA error on the 23rd hour, 9 minutes" -Belial88
nimbim
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany983 Posts
Last Edited: 2015-04-06 14:36:42
April 06 2015 14:16 GMT
#499
xD well there is nothing efficient about that design. Just look at all the reaction wheels you needed to compensate for its insane mass (don't use nose cones unless you've installed FAR btw). There's nothing wrong about what you're doing ofc, but it's not efficient^^

It's like Simberto said, you only need a certain TWR for the critical burns, i.e. while fighting gravity and atmosphere. Once you're in LKO you definitely don't need a specific TWR anymore and the Mün has very low gravity obviously (1.63 m/s²). It's perfectly normal IRL that rockets have a TWR barely above 1 after decoupling boosters, they pick up speed while the fuel depletes.

On April 06 2015 23:23 Epoxide wrote:
You should look for engines with high ISP when outside of the atmosphere, typically the nuclear engine is the most efficient for transfers between planets/moons.


Also, using just 1 engine while you don't need the extra thrust is always best in terms of efficiency. Don't attach 8 LV-N to get more thrust, that's actually less efficient than another single engine with lower Isp. I can't find the table right now, but iirc anything above 4 LV-N is less efficient than using 1 LV-T30 (Isp=370s).
There are some cases when a smaller engine will be more efficient than a LV-N, but in general just use them for space. http://imgur.com/a/iNqmQ#0
Epoxide
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Magic Woods9326 Posts
April 06 2015 14:23 GMT
#500
You should look for engines with high ISP when outside of the atmosphere, typically the nuclear engine is the most efficient for transfers between planets/moons.
LiquipediaSouma: EU MM is just Russian Roulette. Literally.
Prev 1 23 24 25 26 27 48 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RotterdaM Event
16:00
Rotti Stream Rumble 4k Edition
RotterdaM754
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 754
ProTech68
Livibee 44
JuggernautJason35
ROOTCatZ 32
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 105
Rock 19
MaD[AoV]19
Stormgate
Nathanias61
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm31
League of Legends
Grubby5010
Counter-Strike
Fnx 2204
taco 706
Stewie2K601
flusha409
sgares154
Super Smash Bros
PPMD165
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu553
Other Games
summit1g8047
tarik_tv2379
fl0m713
mouzStarbuck316
Mew2King86
ZombieGrub68
Maynarde16
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick49954
BasetradeTV28
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 242
• davetesta34
• musti20045 34
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 30
• Eskiya23 19
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21017
League of Legends
• Jankos2339
• TFBlade1044
Other Games
• imaqtpie2007
• Shiphtur578
• WagamamaTV219
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
1h 55m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
11h 55m
WardiTV European League
17h 55m
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 1h
The PondCast
1d 11h
WardiTV European League
1d 13h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.