• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:47
CET 15:47
KST 23:47
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!12[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Oct 26 - Nov 1): MaxPax, herO, Solar win0Weekly Cups (October 19-25): Clem triples first in 5.0.175Evil Geniuses - shutting down23ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier7Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon [D] Hacker peak in sc2 ? Liquibets sc2 season 30 Evil Geniuses - shutting down
Tourneys
SC2 iNu's Battles #22 SC4ALL: II Venue Change Announcement! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Starcraft 2 Advance [G] How to playtest arcade maps [D] the control group Simple Questions/Answers
External Content
Mutation # 551 Robotic Revival Mutation # 550 Graveyard Shift The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 549 Endless Sparkles
Brood War
General
List of top players active on ShieldBattery BW General Discussion Cwal.gg not working Rollback Netcode in Brood War Sagi.gg Launcher Released
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
Strategy
50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck? Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
Fan Club Resource Thread Reynor Fan Club The Flash Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The time I organised my…
AssyrianKing
Playlenda
Playlendapro
Why I built Repalyzer (1.1.…
BlueStar
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10831 users

[Manga] One Piece - Page 919

Forum Index > Media & Entertainment
Post a Reply
Prev 1 917 918 919 920 921 1665 Next
This is a thread that is dedicated to discussing One Piece. Do not read this thread if you are not currently caught up as there are spoilers in here.

If an episode or a chapter has already been officially released, then it is not necessary to post using spoilers.

If you have knowledge on a chapter that has not been officially released yet, do NOT post it in this thread. Ignoring this public note will result in a mod action.
ElizarTringov
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Bulgaria317 Posts
September 14 2014 06:13 GMT
#18361
On September 14 2014 15:11 Sentenal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2014 15:11 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:10 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:08 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:06 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:04 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:03 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:02 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 14:58 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 14:56 ElizarTringov wrote:
[quote]
Yes that is what an exception to the rule means in the context I am saying it in.

So this means that if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (an exception), this proves that men are generally stronger than women? Please, explain how that works, and the logic of it. I'm very interested.


Men are stronger than women that is called the "rule" under the Merriam Webster definition I pointed to. The exception to the rule would be women who are Olympic weightlifters. Do you understand now?

Yeah, thats the generalization/rule. Now, if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (for example, an Olympic weightlifter), how does that prove the rule to be true?

No that would prove to be the exception, since the powerlifter is the exception.

But, you said you believe "The exception proves the rule". In fact, you said that two posts ago. So, how come the exception here is not proving the rule to be true? Do you need to go ask Merriam Webster what "to prove" means now?


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prove
"to test the truth, validity, or genuineness of <the exception proves the rule>" second definition

How does showing a female Olympic weightlifter test the truth, validity, or genuineness of men generally being stronger than women?

Because it's the exception.

How does being the exception test the truth, validity, or genuineness of the rule?

I just explained it numerous times, if you don't get it by now then you just won't get it no matter how many more times I explain it.

User was warned for this post
Perfect practice makes perfect.
Sentenal
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States12398 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-14 06:15:44
September 14 2014 06:14 GMT
#18362
On September 14 2014 15:13 ElizarTringov wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2014 15:11 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:11 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:10 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:08 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:06 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:04 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:03 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:02 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 14:58 Sentenal wrote:
[quote]
So this means that if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (an exception), this proves that men are generally stronger than women? Please, explain how that works, and the logic of it. I'm very interested.


Men are stronger than women that is called the "rule" under the Merriam Webster definition I pointed to. The exception to the rule would be women who are Olympic weightlifters. Do you understand now?

Yeah, thats the generalization/rule. Now, if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (for example, an Olympic weightlifter), how does that prove the rule to be true?

No that would prove to be the exception, since the powerlifter is the exception.

But, you said you believe "The exception proves the rule". In fact, you said that two posts ago. So, how come the exception here is not proving the rule to be true? Do you need to go ask Merriam Webster what "to prove" means now?


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prove
"to test the truth, validity, or genuineness of <the exception proves the rule>" second definition

How does showing a female Olympic weightlifter test the truth, validity, or genuineness of men generally being stronger than women?

Because it's the exception.

How does being the exception test the truth, validity, or genuineness of the rule?

I just explained it numerous times, if you don't get it by now then you just won't get it no matter how many more times I explain it.

Actually, you haven't even explained it once. How does an exception existing test the truth of a rule/generalization?

User was warned for this post
"Apparently, Sentenal is a paragon of friendship and tolerance. " - Ech0ne
ElizarTringov
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Bulgaria317 Posts
September 14 2014 06:16 GMT
#18363
On September 14 2014 15:14 Sentenal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2014 15:13 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:11 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:11 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:10 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:08 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:06 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:04 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:03 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:02 ElizarTringov wrote:
[quote]

Men are stronger than women that is called the "rule" under the Merriam Webster definition I pointed to. The exception to the rule would be women who are Olympic weightlifters. Do you understand now?

Yeah, thats the generalization/rule. Now, if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (for example, an Olympic weightlifter), how does that prove the rule to be true?

No that would prove to be the exception, since the powerlifter is the exception.

But, you said you believe "The exception proves the rule". In fact, you said that two posts ago. So, how come the exception here is not proving the rule to be true? Do you need to go ask Merriam Webster what "to prove" means now?


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prove
"to test the truth, validity, or genuineness of <the exception proves the rule>" second definition

How does showing a female Olympic weightlifter test the truth, validity, or genuineness of men generally being stronger than women?

Because it's the exception.

How does being the exception test the truth, validity, or genuineness of the rule?

I just explained it numerous times, if you don't get it by now then you just won't get it no matter how many more times I explain it.

Actually, you haven't even explained it once. How does an exception existing test the truth of a rule/generalization?

Yes I did.
Perfect practice makes perfect.
Sentenal
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States12398 Posts
September 14 2014 06:17 GMT
#18364
On September 14 2014 15:16 ElizarTringov wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2014 15:14 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:13 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:11 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:11 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:10 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:08 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:06 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:04 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:03 Sentenal wrote:
[quote]
Yeah, thats the generalization/rule. Now, if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (for example, an Olympic weightlifter), how does that prove the rule to be true?

No that would prove to be the exception, since the powerlifter is the exception.

But, you said you believe "The exception proves the rule". In fact, you said that two posts ago. So, how come the exception here is not proving the rule to be true? Do you need to go ask Merriam Webster what "to prove" means now?


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prove
"to test the truth, validity, or genuineness of <the exception proves the rule>" second definition

How does showing a female Olympic weightlifter test the truth, validity, or genuineness of men generally being stronger than women?

Because it's the exception.

How does being the exception test the truth, validity, or genuineness of the rule?

I just explained it numerous times, if you don't get it by now then you just won't get it no matter how many more times I explain it.

Actually, you haven't even explained it once. How does an exception existing test the truth of a rule/generalization?

Yes I did.

Copy/paste it for me, since I must have missed you explaining how an exception existing proves a generalization to be true.
"Apparently, Sentenal is a paragon of friendship and tolerance. " - Ech0ne
RenSC2
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States1102 Posts
September 14 2014 06:17 GMT
#18365
The phrase "an exception to prove the rule" is based on the acknowledgement that something is an exception. So if you accept that a woman weightlifter is an exception, then you are also implicitly accepting that there is a general rule that men are stronger than women.

If you don't accept that a woman weightlifter is an exception, then you are rejecting the premise that men are stronger than women and therefore it is not an exception to prove the rule. It works for strict rules as well as rules of thumb. However, it's really in the eye of the beholder. So the argument is moot and can we please move on?

There is a lot of circumstantial evidence that Dragon has Haki. His father has massive Haki, so does his son. He has a massive bounty, which is a good indicator of power (but could potentially only be for political reasons). He is likely the one who taught Sabo the "Dragon Claw" technique, which seems to be haki based (or else something even more powerful). Smoker completely backed down when confronted by Dragon, which would be odd for a logia against someone who didn't have haki.

There is certainly a lot of evidence, but no conclusive proof yet. I think it's a good assumption that Dragon has Haki (and probably Conqueror's haki), but it's still just an assumption. I think it's a strong enough assumption that we can discuss Dragon with that assumption in mind because making that very likely assumption helps understand the characters a little better.

It's not like it's just some wild speculation.
Playing better than standard requires deviation. This divergence usually results in sub-standard play.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-14 06:19:55
September 14 2014 06:18 GMT
#18366
On September 14 2014 15:13 ElizarTringov wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 14 2014 15:11 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:11 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:10 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:08 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:06 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:04 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:03 Sentenal wrote:
On September 14 2014 15:02 ElizarTringov wrote:
On September 14 2014 14:58 Sentenal wrote:
[quote]
So this means that if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (an exception), this proves that men are generally stronger than women? Please, explain how that works, and the logic of it. I'm very interested.


Men are stronger than women that is called the "rule" under the Merriam Webster definition I pointed to. The exception to the rule would be women who are Olympic weightlifters. Do you understand now?

Yeah, thats the generalization/rule. Now, if I produce a woman who is stronger than a man (for example, an Olympic weightlifter), how does that prove the rule to be true?

No that would prove to be the exception, since the powerlifter is the exception.

But, you said you believe "The exception proves the rule". In fact, you said that two posts ago. So, how come the exception here is not proving the rule to be true? Do you need to go ask Merriam Webster what "to prove" means now?


http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prove
"to test the truth, validity, or genuineness of <the exception proves the rule>" second definition

How does showing a female Olympic weightlifter test the truth, validity, or genuineness of men generally being stronger than women?

Because it's the exception.

How does being the exception test the truth, validity, or genuineness of the rule?

I just explained it numerous times, if you don't get it by now then you just won't get it no matter how many more times I explain it.


Its like your argument that it is impossible that Dragon does not have haki. Because you've explained it a lot of times and everyone disagrees with you, you assume everyone fails to see your argument. We all see it and think its bad.

Also WTF is this conversation; its barely tangentially related to One Piece.
Kupon3ss
Profile Joined May 2008
時の回廊10066 Posts
September 14 2014 06:21 GMT
#18367
Take it to PMs if you guys want to continue
When in doubt, just believe in yourself and press buttons
vndestiny
Profile Blog Joined September 2011
Singapore3475 Posts
September 14 2014 07:41 GMT
#18368
Well my subscribed threads page showed 67 unread posts. Little did I know =/
evilfatsh1t
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia8943 Posts
September 14 2014 08:11 GMT
#18369
one piece thread is amazing
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-09-14 11:41:59
September 14 2014 11:36 GMT
#18370
And another one for our anecdotes.

We will say "remember that time when there was an argument about Dragon's haki rule?" and then the next guy will replay "I preferred the rokushiki is haki debate, it was longer and funnier."



edit:
And about rules: Rules come from authority.
In One Piece that means
Oda or a character in the manga has to say it, for it to be a rule.

I could say all strong people have a straw hat and point to Gol D. Roger, Shanks and Luffy. All other people are just exceptions.
(This is obviously nonsense)


I wonder if Luffy will break his rule of never punching the bad guy in the face again. Luffy never punches the bad guy, unless he decides to it anyway.
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24422 Posts
September 14 2014 12:14 GMT
#18371
This is the best thread on all of TL
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
Incognoto
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
France10239 Posts
September 14 2014 13:08 GMT
#18372
Saw 3+ new pages in this thread, thought Oda published a freebie chapter or something. Silly me, if that had happened we'd have had way more than just 3 new pages.
maru lover forever
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
September 14 2014 13:43 GMT
#18373
On September 14 2014 22:08 Incognoto wrote:
Saw 3+ new pages in this thread, thought Oda published a freebie chapter or something. Silly me, if that had happened we'd have had way more than just 3 new pages.

Hahaha.
That's priceless.
If more than 2 days after chapter release there are 50+ new posts, it's some kind of discussion.

One Piece discussions are still more interesting than any other series discussions on TL I know of. :D
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
MoonfireSpam
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United Kingdom1153 Posts
September 14 2014 14:16 GMT
#18374
On September 14 2014 16:41 vndestiny wrote:
Well my subscribed threads page showed 67 unread posts. Little did I know =/


Not even any Enel
flamewheel
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
FREEAGLELAND26782 Posts
September 14 2014 15:34 GMT
#18375
Some dictionary.com stuff up in here
Writerdamn, i was two days from retirement
Chro
Profile Joined May 2010
United States240 Posts
September 14 2014 15:48 GMT
#18376
Not to press the whole dragon haki thing but smoker here looks a little roughed up and even if he didn't try to fight dragon there would be a reason to feel threatened... he can hit logia therefore haki.
goody153
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
44313 Posts
September 14 2014 16:21 GMT
#18377
Dragon should have a Haki. It seems odd if one of the powerful fighters in the world does not have haki.
this is a quote
Incognoto
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
France10239 Posts
September 14 2014 16:23 GMT
#18378
Most wanted man in the world

Can't use Haki.

come off it
maru lover forever
Yhamm
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
France7248 Posts
September 14 2014 18:14 GMT
#18379
let's do it again!
LiquipediaWe will have only each other at the last
Mensol
Profile Joined September 2012
14536 Posts
September 14 2014 19:15 GMT
#18380
Four things TL OP thread taught to you:

1.Rokushiki is Haki.
2.Enel is the strongest OP character.
3.Franky is stronger than Sanji.
4.Dragon can't use haki.
If you don't know what the fuck you are doing, how are your enemies supposed to know what the fuck you are doing. - imaqtpie on NA teams at Worlds.
Prev 1 917 918 919 920 921 1665 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Weekly
21:00
#112
IntoTheiNu 1160
WardiTV855
OGKoka 378
Rex147
Liquipedia
Ultimate Battle
21:00
UBE
Soma vs RoyalLIVE!
UltimateBattle 339
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 378
Rex 147
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2303
Jaedong 1479
EffOrt 703
Shuttle 699
Mini 612
BeSt 487
Light 428
actioN 318
Larva 267
Snow 237
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 214
FanTaSy 189
Rush 185
ZerO 184
Stork 180
hero 178
ProTech170
firebathero 109
Pusan 66
sSak 44
Sharp 44
Barracks 39
Shine 35
ToSsGirL 34
Bale 33
zelot 28
Terrorterran 27
Free 24
Shinee 23
910 16
scan(afreeca) 14
HiyA 13
Trap 12
soO 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 6
Britney 0
Dota 2
Dendi934
BananaSlamJamma228
Counter-Strike
jkaem106
Heroes of the Storm
crisheroes395
Other Games
olofmeister1027
hiko712
Lowko426
B2W.Neo321
Fuzer 216
syndereN211
ToD145
ArmadaUGS105
QueenE89
NeuroSwarm36
Railgan29
ViBE25
amsayoshi21
ZerO(Twitch)20
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL117
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1237
Other Games
• WagamamaTV246
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
2h 13m
Replay Cast
8h 13m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19h 13m
WardiTV Invitational
21h 13m
YoungYakov vs Lambo
SHIN vs TBD
Percival vs Shameless
Solar vs TBD
OSC
1d 8h
ByuN vs MaxPax
herO vs Krystianer
Percival vs Shameless
LetaleX vs YoungYakov
Nicoract vs Gerald
GgMaChine vs ArT
PiGosaur Cup
1d 10h
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Ultimate Battle
3 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
IPSL
5 days
TerrOr vs IJ_Terran
rasowy vs Hazorath
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
IPSL
6 days
Art_Of_Turtle vs KameZerg
Radley vs George
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-11-06
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
International ShieldBattery League
BSL Season 23
IPSL Winter 2026-27
Calamity Cup Div. A Season 8
IEM Beijing 2026
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026

Upcoming

YSL S4
Sector 951
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Underdog Cup 2026 Div 2-3
PGL Bucharest 2027
BLAST Bounty Winter 2027
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.