[TV] South Park - Page 101
Forum Index > Media & Entertainment |
Cubu
1171 Posts
| ||
DemonDeacon
United States158 Posts
On April 19 2012 13:37 Cubu wrote: they really should do one of those episodes focused only mainly butters. haha i love butters episodes... i thought the one tonight was pretty funny tho... i wonder why they decided to do real-life actors on this one | ||
SenorChang
Australia4729 Posts
lol thought it sucked | ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
The beaver part made me laugh pretty hard though but that's about it. But it REALLY made me laugh lol | ||
Chocobo
United States1108 Posts
The concept just doesn't lead to an entertaining show- we're watching people have to suffer through a boring situation, which means we're sitting through the boring situation too. This can work if the comedy is good enough, but all they had was some toilet humor. I give them credit for trying something new, but it just didn't work out. | ||
Pufftrees
2449 Posts
![]() | ||
OperationIvy
United States13 Posts
| ||
phyren
United States1067 Posts
| ||
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
ah i see now, said that when i didnt see they did the whole science thing. but its like one of those type of shows | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
| ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On April 19 2012 14:56 OperationIvy wrote: Have neither of you been dragged on some boring ass tour with a bunch of yuppies for an activity that would barely be fun with just your friends? The live action was to make fun of those shows where they hire actors to do really crappy over-dramatized reenactments. I guess I can see how someone could miss the point on those two things, but if you didn't laugh at "helicraptor" or "seven turdy seven" then I have to ask if you even like comedy? Just because someone doesn't find the joke particularly funny doesn't mean they didn't get it. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On April 19 2012 15:17 Silidons wrote: i think their making fun of shows like when vacations attack? could be wrong lol ah i see now, said that when i didnt see they did the whole science thing. but its like one of those type of shows They are making fun of a show called I shouldn't be alive lmao :D (I used to watch that show and it is like exactly like what they are making fun of ^^). Also I agree the live action was retarded. | ||
Razakel
Ireland466 Posts
| ||
StyLeD
United States2965 Posts
| ||
liberal
1116 Posts
On April 19 2012 14:56 OperationIvy wrote: Have neither of you been dragged on some boring ass tour with a bunch of yuppies for an activity that would barely be fun with just your friends? The live action was to make fun of those shows where they hire actors to do really crappy over-dramatized reenactments. I guess I can see how someone could miss the point on those two things, but if you didn't laugh at "helicraptor" or "seven turdy seven" then I have to ask if you even like comedy? Exactly this. Also as blade pointed out this is a parody of the "I shouldn't be alive" show, which I'm sure most people haven't seen. It's kind of odd to me that they keep doing inside jokes which will appeal to fewer and fewer people... Anyway I loved the episode. I laughed throughout. The beavers, the "dew the math," the "long story short," the "I want to hear about tree biology," the dying of boredom on a tour, all had me laughing. It was a pretty original and clever episode. | ||
Ramong
Denmark1706 Posts
| ||
OrchidThief
Denmark2298 Posts
On April 19 2012 14:41 Chocobo wrote: This can work if the comedy is good enough, but all they had was some toilet humor. . Toilet humor on South Park?! Nah, surely that can't be right, they're far too sophisticated for that. I liked it, I think they should've made the live action characters resemble the kids more though. | ||
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On April 19 2012 19:57 OrchidThief wrote: Toilet humor on South Park?! Nah, surely that can't be right, they're far too sophisticated for that. I liked it, I think they should've made the live action characters resemble the kids more though. That was the joke though, that it was so badly done and they didn't even try to do the voices. they're parodying how poor the reenactions on these types of shows are and how they get actors that don't look anything like the people being interviewed. if they did a good job, it would have ruined the joke | ||
OrchidThief
Denmark2298 Posts
On April 19 2012 19:59 DoctorHelvetica wrote: That was the joke though, that it was so badly done and they didn't even try to do the voices. they're parodying how poor the reenactions on these types of shows are and how they get actors that don't look anything like the people being interviewed. if they did a good job, it would have ruined the joke Aha, I completely missed that. I don't watch enough junk tv to pick up on that sort I guess. | ||
Makenshi
Sweden2105 Posts
| ||
| ||