EPTedit: same rules as TI, if alliance loses they advance due to beating LGD who are 1st place while fnc, spirit and navi all lost to LGD.
[Starladder] Season 13 LAN Finals Groupstage - Page 93
| Forum Index > Dota 2 Tournaments |
|
Super_Style
296 Posts
edit: same rules as TI, if alliance loses they advance due to beating LGD who are 1st place while fnc, spirit and navi all lost to LGD. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:21 Kamisamanachi wrote: LGD had nothing to lose that game and they picked some random ass draft and lose game..why would u count that game in as a purpose to solve tiebreaker? and why spirit and navi plays now? why EG and alliance plays now? LGD had the opportunity to knock out Alliance. They chose not to/weren't able to. Too bad. | ||
|
00Visor
4337 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:21 Kamisamanachi wrote: LGD had nothing to lose that game and they picked some random ass draft and lose game..why would u count that game in as a purpose to solve tiebreaker? and why spirit and navi plays now? why EG and alliance plays now? Well if Alliance wins vs EG, they are 2nd. | ||
|
spudde123
4814 Posts
Based on Secret's recent play yes, but this Secret has been a hard opponent for EG the last times they met. But EG hasn't had the easiest time against VP either as far as I recall (though they still have won more than they have lost). It depends on whether you expect Secret to continue being mediocre or whether they may get back to what they showed 1.5 months ago and before that. | ||
|
Kamisamanachi
4665 Posts
| ||
|
Racket
3023 Posts
| ||
|
Zenmx
Sweden163 Posts
| ||
|
Vertical
Indonesia4317 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:21 Kipsate wrote: On the one hand V1lat is V1lat on the other hand he is still one of the main casters and has ties with the org I find it believable. off topic is it v L at or V i LAT | ||
|
Kamisamanachi
4665 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:23 00Visor wrote: Well if Alliance wins vs EG, they are 2nd. yea...then we have no tiebreaker...but if they loses,the system is one of the worst ive ever seen and for the info..TI had tiebreakers..so vilat is bullshitting about international tournament rule. | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
I think that was what it was. | ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:25 Kipsate wrote: if I remember correctly International had tie breakers for the more important things(such as advancing to winners or loser bracket) and no tiebreakers for the lesser ones(seeding). I think that was what it was. International Rules require playing games if the position puts you in a different bracket or eliminates you. | ||
|
Kamisamanachi
4665 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
| ||
|
Taf the Ghost
United States11751 Posts
| ||
|
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:27 Taf the Ghost wrote: I still don't get why this wasn't Bo2s. time | ||
|
spudde123
4814 Posts
| ||
|
Vertical
Indonesia4317 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:27 Kamisamanachi wrote: apparently major had that rule and starladder is also using this rule...sad anyway.. the major was GSL style groups | ||
|
wims80
1892 Posts
On January 14 2016 20:28 Vertical wrote: this saga just making me more salty toward [A] Alliance? Why is that? That doesn't make any sense at all. It's not like Alliance wrote the rules. | ||
| ||
