|
|
On February 01 2013 21:11 Nilrem wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 21:10 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 21:08 Firebolt145 wrote:On February 01 2013 21:04 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 20:45 ZerG~LegenD wrote:On February 01 2013 20:43 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 20:39 ZerG~LegenD wrote:
The new system relates your performance with one hero to your performance with other heroes. The old system compared your performance with one hero to other people's performance with the same hero. This becomes really obvious on some heroes, like Dark Seer who has been top tier material for ages. If there is no objective comparison, does that not mean at least one hero will be 10? Since for there to be a comparison, there needs to be a "top" to know where the others should be. I do not know though, just seems weird to me. Everyone I knows has ten bars on at least one hero and it seems reasonable that it would be that way. Looks to me like it's based on winrate. All heroes with >=75% have 10 bars for me. Edit: Yeah, definitely only winrate, doesn't matter what hero, same winrate same bars. Definitely not winrate. My sniper is 2 wins 3 losses and is 10 bars. Definitely winrate for me o_O. 24-24 Windrunner = 2-2 CK = 3-3 Clinkz etc... Yeah I don't think it is based solely on winrate alone. Emphasis is on "solely" based on. With that said, my 12-12, 2-2, 3-3, 6-6. and 2-2 are all just after 6, exactly the same. So I do not know, this is confusing me lol,
The same for me, hence my theory. 
|
Whats up with this huge update ? Some big changes and no heroes?
|
On February 01 2013 21:00 Nilrem wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 20:45 ZerG~LegenD wrote:On February 01 2013 20:43 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 20:39 ZerG~LegenD wrote:
The new system relates your performance with one hero to your performance with other heroes. The old system compared your performance with one hero to other people's performance with the same hero. This becomes really obvious on some heroes, like Dark Seer who has been top tier material for ages. If there is no objective comparison, does that not mean at least one hero will be 10? Since for there to be a comparison, there needs to be a "top" to know where the others should be. I do not know though, just seems weird to me. Everyone I knows has ten bars on at least one hero and it seems reasonable that it would be that way. On one of my accounts, I played only Meepo and he is 5. Granted, it is only a single hero there so maybe if there is more than one, than it will become 10. But I do not know, it requires a bit of testing.
Well if you have only played meepo, it will obviously be your best but also the worst hero, so they take the middle.
|
On February 01 2013 21:14 ChrisXIV wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 21:11 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 21:10 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 21:08 Firebolt145 wrote:On February 01 2013 21:04 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 20:45 ZerG~LegenD wrote:On February 01 2013 20:43 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 20:39 ZerG~LegenD wrote:
The new system relates your performance with one hero to your performance with other heroes. The old system compared your performance with one hero to other people's performance with the same hero. This becomes really obvious on some heroes, like Dark Seer who has been top tier material for ages. If there is no objective comparison, does that not mean at least one hero will be 10? Since for there to be a comparison, there needs to be a "top" to know where the others should be. I do not know though, just seems weird to me. Everyone I knows has ten bars on at least one hero and it seems reasonable that it would be that way. Looks to me like it's based on winrate. All heroes with >=75% have 10 bars for me. Edit: Yeah, definitely only winrate, doesn't matter what hero, same winrate same bars. Definitely not winrate. My sniper is 2 wins 3 losses and is 10 bars. Definitely winrate for me o_O. 24-24 Windrunner = 2-2 CK = 3-3 Clinkz etc... Yeah I don't think it is based solely on winrate alone. Emphasis is on "solely" based on. With that said, my 12-12, 2-2, 3-3, 6-6. and 2-2 are all just after 6, exactly the same. So I do not know, this is confusing me lol, The same for me, hence my theory.
But than that one guys sniper is 2-3 and 10 bars (unless he is lying which I see no reason to accuse him of). I guess have to see how many more have the same or varying stats. If it was win rate only, that would be in all honesty, extremely boring. It would essentially ruin and make the par being 1-10 borderline useless.
Well if you have only played meepo, it will obviously be your best but also the worst hero, so they take the middle.
Looked at it (I was guessing, well estimating it since did not memorize the number. The meepo be 4-4 and just over 6. Sooo... yeah, not sure what to say lol.
|
On February 01 2013 21:16 SkelA wrote:
Whats up with this huge update ? Some big changes and no heroes?
Big optimization on load times. Also hats. ^^
On February 01 2013 21:17 Nilrem wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 21:14 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 21:11 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 21:10 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 21:08 Firebolt145 wrote:On February 01 2013 21:04 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 20:45 ZerG~LegenD wrote:On February 01 2013 20:43 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 20:39 ZerG~LegenD wrote:
The new system relates your performance with one hero to your performance with other heroes. The old system compared your performance with one hero to other people's performance with the same hero. This becomes really obvious on some heroes, like Dark Seer who has been top tier material for ages. If there is no objective comparison, does that not mean at least one hero will be 10? Since for there to be a comparison, there needs to be a "top" to know where the others should be. I do not know though, just seems weird to me. Everyone I knows has ten bars on at least one hero and it seems reasonable that it would be that way. Looks to me like it's based on winrate. All heroes with >=75% have 10 bars for me. Edit: Yeah, definitely only winrate, doesn't matter what hero, same winrate same bars. Definitely not winrate. My sniper is 2 wins 3 losses and is 10 bars. Definitely winrate for me o_O. 24-24 Windrunner = 2-2 CK = 3-3 Clinkz etc... Yeah I don't think it is based solely on winrate alone. Emphasis is on "solely" based on. With that said, my 12-12, 2-2, 3-3, 6-6. and 2-2 are all just after 6, exactly the same. So I do not know, this is confusing me lol, The same for me, hence my theory. But than that one guys sniper is 2-3 and 10 bars (unless he is lying which I see no reason to accuse him of). I guess have to see how many more have the same or varying stats. If it was win rate only, that would be in all honesty, extremely boring. It would essentially ruin and make the par being 1-10 borderline useless.
I don't understand that either. Maybe it's bugged right now, and should take winrate+something else, but doesn't.
|
On February 01 2013 21:17 ChrisXIV wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 21:16 SkelA wrote:
Whats up with this huge update ? Some big changes and no heroes? Big optimization on load times. Also hats. ^^ Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 21:17 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 21:14 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 21:11 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 21:10 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 21:08 Firebolt145 wrote:On February 01 2013 21:04 ChrisXIV wrote:On February 01 2013 20:45 ZerG~LegenD wrote:On February 01 2013 20:43 Nilrem wrote:On February 01 2013 20:39 ZerG~LegenD wrote:
The new system relates your performance with one hero to your performance with other heroes. The old system compared your performance with one hero to other people's performance with the same hero. This becomes really obvious on some heroes, like Dark Seer who has been top tier material for ages. If there is no objective comparison, does that not mean at least one hero will be 10? Since for there to be a comparison, there needs to be a "top" to know where the others should be. I do not know though, just seems weird to me. Everyone I knows has ten bars on at least one hero and it seems reasonable that it would be that way. Looks to me like it's based on winrate. All heroes with >=75% have 10 bars for me. Edit: Yeah, definitely only winrate, doesn't matter what hero, same winrate same bars. Definitely not winrate. My sniper is 2 wins 3 losses and is 10 bars. Definitely winrate for me o_O. 24-24 Windrunner = 2-2 CK = 3-3 Clinkz etc... Yeah I don't think it is based solely on winrate alone. Emphasis is on "solely" based on. With that said, my 12-12, 2-2, 3-3, 6-6. and 2-2 are all just after 6, exactly the same. So I do not know, this is confusing me lol, The same for me, hence my theory. But than that one guys sniper is 2-3 and 10 bars (unless he is lying which I see no reason to accuse him of). I guess have to see how many more have the same or varying stats. If it was win rate only, that would be in all honesty, extremely boring. It would essentially ruin and make the par being 1-10 borderline useless. I don't understand that either. Maybe it's bugged right now, and should take winrate+something else, but doesn't.
Yeah, something just seems off. Which is funny because for Diabloprogress (Diablo ranking for like unbuffed damage and such), their stat system broke as well. So now, even when people have like 50k unbuffed dps normally, it was changed to 15m. So now top dps'ers have like 344 million unbuffed dps when use to be like 400k.
All stats for every game is breaking!
|
And the list is still sorted like before the update. I bet that's a bug as well.
|
On February 01 2013 21:26 ZerG~LegenD wrote:
And the list is still sorted like before the update. I bet that's a bug as well.
Yeah, apart from heroes that have 4 wins as those were unranked before
|
That bug where you can't hear any skill related sounds is super annoying. I have no clue wtf is even happening in half the teamfights. T_T
Blizzard fix plz.
Edit: Phew, verifying the game cache worked for me, in case anyone else has that issue.
|
Apparently the heroes are just ordered by the win lose ratio for that hero
|
Czech Republic18921 Posts
On February 01 2013 21:46 Yoshi- wrote:
Apparently the heroes are just ordered by the win lose ratio for that hero
Don't think it is. I have 4-0 heroes ranked the same as 4-1, for example.
|
Northern Ireland22213 Posts
On February 01 2013 21:33 r.Evo wrote:
That bug where you can't hear any skill related sounds is super annoying. I have no clue wtf is even happening in half the teamfights. T_T
Blizzard fix plz.
Edit: Phew, verifying the game cache worked for me, in case anyone else has that issue.
Yeah there was a bug with the sound files in the update, so some people had to verify cache to download them
|
On February 01 2013 21:33 r.Evo wrote:
That bug where you can't hear any skill related sounds is super annoying. I have no clue wtf is even happening in half the teamfights. T_T
Blizzard fix plz.
Edit: Phew, verifying the game cache worked for me, in case anyone else has that issue.
Global Silence OP
|
On February 01 2013 21:48 cecek wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 21:46 Yoshi- wrote:
Apparently the heroes are just ordered by the win lose ratio for that hero Don't think it is. I have 4-0 heroes ranked the same as 4-1, for example.
all my heroes with 0 and 1 loses are capped. heroes with like 2/3 are at 5 5/2 at 9. its pretty much winratio based.
|
On February 01 2013 22:32 The Irate Turk wrote:Show nested quote +On February 01 2013 21:33 r.Evo wrote:
That bug where you can't hear any skill related sounds is super annoying. I have no clue wtf is even happening in half the teamfights. T_T
Blizzard fix plz.
Edit: Phew, verifying the game cache worked for me, in case anyone else has that issue. Global Silence OP
Yo when global silence idc what's happening... I just run :D
|
Remembers me back when Silencer ult mute all ingame sounds was added, which kept confusing me and some friends of mine every time it was used. So all of us went "Hello?! You guys still here?" each time it went off, for the first few times we played against it. I am not proud of it, but it took us a while to figure out what was happening.
|
I have 5 bars on lycan now even though I havnt played him since the huge nerf.
|
Is the performance bar bugged? Mine is weird.
|
On February 02 2013 00:14 Fwizzz wrote:
Is the performance bar bugged? Mine is weird.
Weird as in...? Something like the recent posts or different?
|
Meh. I (as others) hate the new performance bars (rather than the LOL HAVE RANDOM BARS HERE YOU GO). For me, it is 100000% related to winrate and to nothing else, so its pretty boring. I already know what heroes I win with - I want to know what hero you think I'm good with based on some random measurement that I won't be able to understand!
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
