Come on Blizzard put BR2 up already! >_<
BR#2 Very close to release - Page 4
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
prOxi.swAMi
Australia3091 Posts
Come on Blizzard put BR2 up already! >_< | ||
|
Cpt.Cocaine
Canada299 Posts
| ||
|
sexsexpussyhair
Canada133 Posts
On April 11 2009 11:20 ZeroCartin wrote: ur first post and you havent read the whole thread -_- read the thread and inform yourself. I read ok, there was confusion or troll and don't always make assumptions, your 200+ posts makes no difference here... | ||
|
Nerapalm
United States39 Posts
| ||
|
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
| ||
|
Cpt.Cocaine
Canada299 Posts
| ||
|
nataziel
Australia1455 Posts
![]() The map looks really small though, zerg shoulda just 4 pooled. | ||
|
da_head
Canada3350 Posts
![]() | ||
|
DoX.)
Singapore6164 Posts
On April 11 2009 12:03 nataziel wrote: And I just got capped too, this is going to take forever to buffer ![]() The map looks really small though, zerg shoulda just 4 pooled. 6 pooled* | ||
|
nataziel
Australia1455 Posts
Come to think of it, that would make an early 6 pool a lot more dangerous, as you would have a bit more economy to support it... | ||
|
ZeroCartin
Costa Rica2390 Posts
On April 11 2009 11:53 sexsexpussyhair wrote: I read ok, there was confusion or troll and don't always make assumptions, your 200+ posts makes no difference here... lmao, the post amount response hahaha. Im just not up for fighting now, so Ill just say that Its not troll or confusion, its they took the video down cuz it wasnt fully uploaded, and prolly will put website again soon. | ||
|
Elegance
Canada917 Posts
| ||
|
Kleander
United States334 Posts
On April 11 2009 12:34 Elegance wrote: Starting with 6 workers means Terran can risk 14cc better. Toss can 12 Nexus better too you start off with more because you get less minerals per run back so these builds will not certainly be "easier" | ||
|
aers
United States1210 Posts
http://starcraft2.com/strings/en_us/battlereport2.xml is still up and shows the commentary for BR #2 that was posted earlier in this thread, however the actual FLV for the report isn't up. | ||
|
Bosu
United States3247 Posts
| ||
|
ramen247
United States1256 Posts
i fear that starcraft players will try to play sc2 like sc too much which will kill the potential sc2 has as its own separate game. | ||
|
chobopeon
United States7342 Posts
On April 11 2009 12:55 ramen247 wrote: yea we still dont know what builds are best to use yet. this is an entirely different game that will need much more experimenting and playing around with. i fear that starcraft players will try to play sc2 like sc too much which will kill the potential sc2 has as its own separate game. the sc players that do that simply won't make it very high on the ladder ![]() | ||
|
PobTheCad
Australia893 Posts
marauder and stalker are too similar imo | ||
|
-fj.
Samoa462 Posts
| ||
|
Alizee-
United States845 Posts
I have to say though, I can't really stand reading the transcript, its watch or not...so it really needs to get uploaded although the map looks fun and yes blizzard doesn't make high eco maps purely/if at all so get used to it because they'll be the ladder maps 99.9% of people play for at least the first year. | ||
| ||

