I can't wait to hear Kamala's position on Title VII, particularly as it applies to quid pro quo claims.
As for Schultz, this threatened Democrat boycott of him is oh-so-telling of the current state of the Democrat party. It's yet another example of the tyrannical personal destruction politics that Democrats revel in. It's not enough to let the democratic process play out. Oh no, political opponents must be punished!
On January 30 2019 00:44 xDaunt wrote: I can't wait to hear Kamala's position on Title VII, particularly as it applies to quid pro quo claims.
As for Schultz, this threatened Democrat boycott of him is oh-so-telling of the current state of the Democrat party. It's yet another example of the tyrannical personal destruction politics that Democrats revel in. It's not enough to let the democratic process play out. Oh no, political opponents must be punished!
On January 30 2019 00:44 xDaunt wrote: I can't wait to hear Kamala's position on Title VII, particularly as it applies to quid pro quo claims.
As for Schultz, this threatened Democrat boycott of him is oh-so-telling of the current state of the Democrat party. It's yet another example of the tyrannical personal destruction politics that Democrats revel in. It's not enough to let the democratic process play out. Oh no, political opponents must be punished!
This is more evidence of the incoherent or dishonest worldview I was describing before. It's one or the other but you can't build a coherent world view where you call Schultz's treatment "tyrannical treatment of political opponents" like you lament it and it's a Dem thing, while supporting Trump and other fascists.
On January 30 2019 02:26 xDaunt wrote: Apples and oranges. Hillary committed a crime. Schultz has not.
So you're saying that Trump supporters are so concerned with politicians following the rule of law that they will go out of their way to campaign for one of them to be jailed? It had nothing to do with the fact that she was a political enemy, and if they didn't believe that she had committed a crime they wouldn't have tried to destroy her.
Interesting.
What about lyin' Ted the sniveling coward? Did his dad really help the JFK assassin?
Trump does exactly the same thing, but just in a more ridiculous cartoonish way.
On January 30 2019 02:26 xDaunt wrote: Apples and oranges. Hillary committed a crime. Schultz has not.
So you're saying that Trump supporters are so concerned with politicians following the rule of law that they will go out of their way to campaign for one of them to be jailed? It had nothing to do with the fact that she was a political enemy, and if they didn't believe that she had committed a crime they wouldn't have tried to destroy her.
Interesting.
What about lyin' Ted the sniveling coward? Did his dad really help the JFK assassin?
Trump does exactly the same thing, but just in a more ridiculous cartoonish way.
Don't be ridiculous. When the acting director of the FBI does a public press conference in which he outlines outlines the crime that a candidate commits (regardless of the fact that he then decides not to recommend prosecution for obvious political reasons -- or because the acting AG refuses to do so for obvious political reasons), it is not unreasonable for an opposing political candidate to point out the crime and advocate for prosecution.
On January 30 2019 02:26 xDaunt wrote: Apples and oranges. Hillary committed a crime. Schultz has not.
So you're saying that Trump supporters are so concerned with politicians following the rule of law that they will go out of their way to campaign for one of them to be jailed? It had nothing to do with the fact that she was a political enemy, and if they didn't believe that she had committed a crime they wouldn't have tried to destroy her.
Interesting.
What about lyin' Ted the sniveling coward? Did his dad really help the JFK assassin?
Trump does exactly the same thing, but just in a more ridiculous cartoonish way.
Don't be ridiculous. When the acting director of the FBI does a public press conference in which he outlines outlines the crime that a candidate commits (regardless of the fact that he then decides not to recommend prosecution for obvious political reasons -- or because the acting AG refuses to do so for obvious political reasons), it is not unreasonable for an opposing political candidate to point out the crime and advocate for prosecution.
Fair point,
What about every single other one of Trump's political opponents that him and his fan club have tried to destroy? I guess that was different to when the dems do it because they do it in a kind of dem way that's much worse.
On January 30 2019 02:26 xDaunt wrote: Apples and oranges. Hillary committed a crime. Schultz has not.
So you're saying that Trump supporters are so concerned with politicians following the rule of law that they will go out of their way to campaign for one of them to be jailed? It had nothing to do with the fact that she was a political enemy, and if they didn't believe that she had committed a crime they wouldn't have tried to destroy her.
Interesting.
What about lyin' Ted the sniveling coward? Did his dad really help the JFK assassin?
Trump does exactly the same thing, but just in a more ridiculous cartoonish way.
Don't be ridiculous. When the acting director of the FBI does a public press conference in which he outlines outlines the crime that a candidate commits (regardless of the fact that he then decides not to recommend prosecution for obvious political reasons -- or because the acting AG refuses to do so for obvious political reasons), it is not unreasonable for an opposing political candidate to point out the crime and advocate for prosecution.
Fair point,
What about every single other one of Trump's political opponents that him and his fan club have tried to destroy? I guess that was different to when the dems do it because they do it in a kind of dem way that's much worse.
Destroy with what? Name calling? Lyin' Ted? Low Energy Jeb? That's just rhetoric. Sticks and stones. It's not on the same level as the economic warfare that Democrats and the SJWs wage against political opponents. Deplatforming and boycotting cause major tangible harm independent of the regular and expected reputational damage that a political candidate receives during a campaign.
It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
Yes. The difference is barely noticeable between during the campaign and now
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
Yes. The difference is barely noticeable between during the campaign and now
If anything, it's more fervent now than it was back during the campaign on account of the Russiagate scandal. And the demand now is to investigate far more people than just Hillary.
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
Yes. The difference is barely noticeable between during the campaign and now
If anything, it's more fervent now than it was back during the campaign on account of the Russiagate scandal. And the demand now is to investigate far more people than just Hillary.
Sounds like a mob wants to spin up a witch hunt because of their political bias.
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
Yes. The difference is barely noticeable between during the campaign and now
If anything, it's more fervent now than it was back during the campaign on account of the Russiagate scandal. And the demand now is to investigate far more people than just Hillary.
Sounds like a mob wants to spin up a witch hunt because of their political bias.
Political bias is besides the point. The facts speak for themselves. Looking at the tea leaves, the rest of the country is eventually going to be forced to face the facts, at which point there will be a reckoning.
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
Yes. The difference is barely noticeable between during the campaign and now
If anything, it's more fervent now than it was back during the campaign on account of the Russiagate scandal. And the demand now is to investigate far more people than just Hillary.
Sounds like a mob wants to spin up a witch hunt because of their political bias.
Political bias is besides the point. The facts speak for themselves. Looking at the tea leaves, the rest of the country is eventually going to be forced to face the facts, at which point there will be a reckoning.
You're starting sound like that qanon crap?
No idea who this guy is yet, but he's showing just how totally empty Kamala's campaign is.
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
Yes. The difference is barely noticeable between during the campaign and now
If anything, it's more fervent now than it was back during the campaign on account of the Russiagate scandal. And the demand now is to investigate far more people than just Hillary.
Sounds like a mob wants to spin up a witch hunt because of their political bias.
Political bias is besides the point. The facts speak for themselves. Looking at the tea leaves, the rest of the country is eventually going to be forced to face the facts, at which point there will be a reckoning.
You're starting sound like that qanon crap?
No, I'm just paying attention to the media leaks per my prior posts. Someone in the know on Trump's side is leaking stuff to friendly media outlets. Combine that with what we publicly know about the Mueller investigation and the continued lack of any semblance of proof of Trump/Russia collusion, and it's not hard to see where this is going.
On January 30 2019 03:20 Nebuchad wrote: It's weird that immediately after Hillary stopped being a meaningful political opponent everyone stopped caring about her crimes. Didn't know a lust for justice could be selective like that.
Not sure who you're talking about here. There is a huge number of Trump supporters who still think that she needs to be investigated and prosecuted, and for good reason, too.
Yes. The difference is barely noticeable between during the campaign and now
If anything, it's more fervent now than it was back during the campaign on account of the Russiagate scandal. And the demand now is to investigate far more people than just Hillary.
Sounds like a mob wants to spin up a witch hunt because of their political bias.
Political bias is besides the point. The facts speak for themselves. Looking at the tea leaves, the rest of the country is eventually going to be forced to face the facts, at which point there will be a reckoning.
You're starting sound like that qanon crap?
No, I'm just paying attention to the media leaks per my prior posts. Someone in the know on Trump's side is leaking stuff to friendly media outlets. Combine that with what we publicly know about the Mueller investigation and the continued lack of any semblance of proof of Trump/Russia collusion, and it's not hard to see where this is going.
Exactly where I said it was going when it started. You have to be pretty deep into the qanon conspiracies if you think Hillary or anyone else will be held accountable to any significant degree. The best you got was Podesta (the fat one) stepping down.