|
On January 24 2019 07:03 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 06:57 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 06:30 Sermokala wrote:On January 24 2019 06:25 Nebuchad wrote: Congratulations to the US for bringing neolibeFREEDOM to Venezuela Democracy is non negotiable. Venezuela is the perfect example of the limitations of democracy. In that case, a bunch of poorly educated people voted into office socialist goons who proceeded to run their country right into the ground while looting it for their own personal aggrandizement. Without the rule of law as a backstop, democracy is little more than another form of tyranny. Supporting coups and totalitarian monarchs is tyranny, being tyrannical is one of the few things the US still may lead in. Foreign policy is a very different animal from domestic governance. I fully support the US fucking with other countries to the extent that it benefits Americans.
|
Maduro is the worse dictator the continent has had in a long time. Aside from imprisoning, torturing and killing political opponents which is standard communist thing while suspending and/or holding fake elections, starving your own people and having over 3 million exiles is a new low, even for the latin american left.
GH's leftist indoctrination that makes him support him is really something.
|
Yeah, Maduro is irredeemable. There is no good reason to support him whatsoever. He has been an absolute catastrophe for Venezuela and should be executed for crimes against the people.
|
The capitalists aren't sending their best 
|
How much the opposition to using soft power to put pressure on Maduro really based in Venezuela’s socialist connection? (I know the common defense is that it wasn’t real socialism yadda yadda.) Is it really just noninterventionism of the kind that would also want us to withdraw from Syria.
It doesn’t make a lot of sense when he’s starving the country and fixing elections. Just the stories about the state of hospitals (and reported on from left-wing press outlets) is heartbreaking.
|
Yeah, and in the same breath that economist admitted that he doesn't really know and that he needs to study the proposal (also noting that the "devil is in the details."). Clearly he knows that the effective tax rate in the US was never that high and that economic conditions during that time period were materially different than they are now.
|
On January 24 2019 08:57 xDaunt wrote:Yeah, and in the same breath that economist admitted that he doesn't really know and that he needs to study the proposal (also noting that the "devil is in the details."). Clearly he knows that the effective tax rate in the US was never that high and that economic conditions during that time period were materially different than they are now.
There is nothing you could say that would convince me that you truly believe the conditions today are so different from earlier that things would collapse if people who make over 10 million dollars paid more taxes on what they win above these 10 millions.
|
On January 24 2019 09:29 Nebuchad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 08:57 xDaunt wrote:Yeah, and in the same breath that economist admitted that he doesn't really know and that he needs to study the proposal (also noting that the "devil is in the details."). Clearly he knows that the effective tax rate in the US was never that high and that economic conditions during that time period were materially different than they are now. There is nothing you could say that would convince me that you truly believe the conditions today are so different from earlier that things would collapse if people who make over 10 million dollars paid more taxes on what they win above these 10 millions. I can think of two huge, relevant differences right off the top of my head:
1) The US is no longer the economic super power to the extent that it was in the first couple decades following WW2. The global economy is far more multipolar.
2) Globalization has created a level of capital and labor mobility that did not previously exist.
|
On January 24 2019 08:05 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 07:03 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 06:57 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 06:30 Sermokala wrote:On January 24 2019 06:25 Nebuchad wrote: Congratulations to the US for bringing neolibeFREEDOM to Venezuela Democracy is non negotiable. Venezuela is the perfect example of the limitations of democracy. In that case, a bunch of poorly educated people voted into office socialist goons who proceeded to run their country right into the ground while looting it for their own personal aggrandizement. Without the rule of law as a backstop, democracy is little more than another form of tyranny. Supporting coups and totalitarian monarchs is tyranny, being tyrannical is one of the few things the US still may lead in. Foreign policy is a very different animal from domestic governance. I fully support the US fucking with other countries to the extent that it benefits Americans.
While I find this position completely and absolutely morally bankrupt as well as deplorable I do appreciate it's honesty.
This however:
On January 24 2019 08:36 xDaunt wrote: Yeah, Maduro is irredeemable. There is no good reason to support him whatsoever. He has been an absolute catastrophe for Venezuela and should be executed for crimes against the people.
only makes me question why you bothered being honest.
|
On January 24 2019 10:21 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 08:05 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 07:03 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 06:57 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 06:30 Sermokala wrote:On January 24 2019 06:25 Nebuchad wrote: Congratulations to the US for bringing neolibeFREEDOM to Venezuela Democracy is non negotiable. Venezuela is the perfect example of the limitations of democracy. In that case, a bunch of poorly educated people voted into office socialist goons who proceeded to run their country right into the ground while looting it for their own personal aggrandizement. Without the rule of law as a backstop, democracy is little more than another form of tyranny. Supporting coups and totalitarian monarchs is tyranny, being tyrannical is one of the few things the US still may lead in. Foreign policy is a very different animal from domestic governance. I fully support the US fucking with other countries to the extent that it benefits Americans. While I find this position completely and absolutely morally bankrupt as well as deplorable I do appreciate it's honesty. This however: Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 08:36 xDaunt wrote: Yeah, Maduro is irredeemable. There is no good reason to support him whatsoever. He has been an absolute catastrophe for Venezuela and should be executed for crimes against the people. only makes me question why you bothered being honest. What, are you really going to dispute that Maduro has done horrible things to his country? Sure, give him due process and try him, but there's no mistaking his abominable record. King Louis XVI was sent to the guillotine for less.
|
On January 24 2019 08:43 Danglars wrote: How much the opposition to using soft power to put pressure on Maduro really based in Venezuela’s socialist connection? (I know the common defense is that it wasn’t real socialism yadda yadda.) Is it really just noninterventionism of the kind that would also want us to withdraw from Syria.
It doesn’t make a lot of sense when he’s starving the country and fixing elections. Just the stories about the state of hospitals (and reported on from left-wing press outlets) is heartbreaking.
Intentionally starving the Venezuelan people (something you all seem to give the US a pass for) isn't my idea of soft power but that's not as important as not supporting the US overthrowing governments to replace them with someone more friendly to US business interests.
So yes there is certainly a common thread among those that think US interventionism (especially for chasing profits) is problematic af and shouldn't be supported.
On January 24 2019 10:27 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 10:21 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 08:05 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 07:03 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 06:57 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 06:30 Sermokala wrote:On January 24 2019 06:25 Nebuchad wrote: Congratulations to the US for bringing neolibeFREEDOM to Venezuela Democracy is non negotiable. Venezuela is the perfect example of the limitations of democracy. In that case, a bunch of poorly educated people voted into office socialist goons who proceeded to run their country right into the ground while looting it for their own personal aggrandizement. Without the rule of law as a backstop, democracy is little more than another form of tyranny. Supporting coups and totalitarian monarchs is tyranny, being tyrannical is one of the few things the US still may lead in. Foreign policy is a very different animal from domestic governance. I fully support the US fucking with other countries to the extent that it benefits Americans. While I find this position completely and absolutely morally bankrupt as well as deplorable I do appreciate it's honesty. This however: On January 24 2019 08:36 xDaunt wrote: Yeah, Maduro is irredeemable. There is no good reason to support him whatsoever. He has been an absolute catastrophe for Venezuela and should be executed for crimes against the people. only makes me question why you bothered being honest. What, are you really going to dispute that Maduro has done horrible things to his country? Sure, give him due process and try him, but there's no mistaking his abominable record. King Louis XVI was sent to the guillotine for less.
US leadership has done horrible things to his country, can we take them to the guillotine?
|
GH, no one is going to take you seriously if you're going to take the position that Maduro has no responsibility for starving his people. Of course the US is going to sanction the fuck out of Venezuela and refuse to do business with Venezuela when Maduro and his cronies refuse to respect American investments and property rights in their country. Who the fuck are you kidding?
|
On January 24 2019 10:33 xDaunt wrote: GH, no one is going to take you seriously if you're going to take the position that Maduro has no responsibility for starving his people. Of course the US is going to sanction the fuck out of Venezuela and refuse to do business with Venezuela when Maduro and his cronies refuse to respect American investments and property rights in their country. Who the fuck are you kidding?
Did I say Maduro has no responsibility?
You guys are the ones acting like when the US starves Venezuelans for profit that it's cool, even worth supporting an illegal coup to bolster our position of dominance.
You support an open fascist in Brazil and a totalitarian theocratic (Muslim) monarchy for profit and power who the fuck are you kidding with this faux concern for Venezuelans?
The bipartisan support for overthrowing foreign leaders to replace them with ones more profitable for US corporations should be enough for everyone to conclude the parties are trash imo.
|
On January 24 2019 10:40 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 10:33 xDaunt wrote: GH, no one is going to take you seriously if you're going to take the position that Maduro has no responsibility for starving his people. Of course the US is going to sanction the fuck out of Venezuela and refuse to do business with Venezuela when Maduro and his cronies refuse to respect American investments and property rights in their country. Who the fuck are you kidding? Did I say Maduro has no responsibility? You guys are the ones acting like when the US starves Venezuelans for profit that it's cool, even worth supporting an illegal coup to bolster our position of dominance. You support an open fascist in Brazil and a totalitarian theocratic (Muslim) monarchy for profit and power who the fuck are you kidding with this faux concern for Venezuelans? The bipartisan support for overthrowing foreign leaders to replace them with ones more profitable for US corporations should be enough for everyone to conclude the parties are trash imo.
It's not just that Maduro has some responsibility. He bears the vast majority of the responsibility for the collapse of Venezuela. This isn't even a matter of reasonable dispute, unless you want Chavez to share some of the blame.
And no, I do not have any problem with the US sanctioning Venezuela. We don't owe Venezuela anything. If the Venezuelan government is going to rob Americans and American businesses, then the US government has an obligation to retaliate and sanction Venezuela. Yes, the Venezuelan people will suffer, but they're the idiots who elected Maduro in the first place, so my sympathy has its limits. It's ultimately up to the Venezuelans to stop their nation from acting like the banana republic that it has become. For their own good, they need to get rid of Maduro and all of his cronies.
As for Brazil and Saudi Arabia, I've already made it clear why I support Bolsonaro and the Saudis: the realpolitik. At least they aren't outright fucking over their people like Maduro has.
|
On January 24 2019 11:25 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 10:40 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 10:33 xDaunt wrote: GH, no one is going to take you seriously if you're going to take the position that Maduro has no responsibility for starving his people. Of course the US is going to sanction the fuck out of Venezuela and refuse to do business with Venezuela when Maduro and his cronies refuse to respect American investments and property rights in their country. Who the fuck are you kidding? Did I say Maduro has no responsibility? You guys are the ones acting like when the US starves Venezuelans for profit that it's cool, even worth supporting an illegal coup to bolster our position of dominance. You support an open fascist in Brazil and a totalitarian theocratic (Muslim) monarchy for profit and power who the fuck are you kidding with this faux concern for Venezuelans? The bipartisan support for overthrowing foreign leaders to replace them with ones more profitable for US corporations should be enough for everyone to conclude the parties are trash imo. It's not just that Maduro has some responsibility. He bears the vast majority of the responsibility for the collapse of Venezuela. This isn't even a matter of reasonable dispute, unless you want Chavez to share some of the blame. And no, I do not have any problem with the US sanctioning Venezuela. We don't owe Venezuela anything. If the Venezuelan government is going to rob Americans and American businesses, then the US government has an obligation to retaliate and sanction Venezuela. Yes, the Venezuelan people will suffer, but they're the idiots who elected Maduro in the first place, so my sympathy has its limits. It's ultimately up to the Venezuelans to stop their nation from acting like the banana republic that it has become. For their own good, they need to get rid of Maduro and all of his cronies. As for Brazil and Saudi Arabia, I've already made it clear why I support Bolsonaro and the Saudis: the realpolitik. At least they aren't outright fucking over their people like Maduro has.
I can't keep straight whether the Venezuelan people elected Maduro like you just said to cushion the inhumanity you're supporting or he's not an elected leader like your presidents administration just said to justify the coup to take back US corporate interests in Venezuela?
Bolsonaro openly said he would imprison and/or banish his political opposition, as well as a whole ton of draconian bullshit. SA is still fucking decapitating people for non-violent crimes as well as plenty of other horrific shit that typically is used to justify fucking up other Muslim countries. That you describe that as not "outright fucking over their people" at least jives with your previously articulated morally bankrupt and deplorable position on foreign policy.
I certainly still see it plainly as such.
|
On January 24 2019 11:31 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 11:25 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 10:40 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 10:33 xDaunt wrote: GH, no one is going to take you seriously if you're going to take the position that Maduro has no responsibility for starving his people. Of course the US is going to sanction the fuck out of Venezuela and refuse to do business with Venezuela when Maduro and his cronies refuse to respect American investments and property rights in their country. Who the fuck are you kidding? Did I say Maduro has no responsibility? You guys are the ones acting like when the US starves Venezuelans for profit that it's cool, even worth supporting an illegal coup to bolster our position of dominance. You support an open fascist in Brazil and a totalitarian theocratic (Muslim) monarchy for profit and power who the fuck are you kidding with this faux concern for Venezuelans? The bipartisan support for overthrowing foreign leaders to replace them with ones more profitable for US corporations should be enough for everyone to conclude the parties are trash imo. It's not just that Maduro has some responsibility. He bears the vast majority of the responsibility for the collapse of Venezuela. This isn't even a matter of reasonable dispute, unless you want Chavez to share some of the blame. And no, I do not have any problem with the US sanctioning Venezuela. We don't owe Venezuela anything. If the Venezuelan government is going to rob Americans and American businesses, then the US government has an obligation to retaliate and sanction Venezuela. Yes, the Venezuelan people will suffer, but they're the idiots who elected Maduro in the first place, so my sympathy has its limits. It's ultimately up to the Venezuelans to stop their nation from acting like the banana republic that it has become. For their own good, they need to get rid of Maduro and all of his cronies. As for Brazil and Saudi Arabia, I've already made it clear why I support Bolsonaro and the Saudis: the realpolitik. At least they aren't outright fucking over their people like Maduro has. I can't keep straight whether the Venezuelan people elected Maduro like you just said to cushion the inhumanity you're supporting or he's not an elected leader like your presidents administration just said to justify the coup to take back US corporate interests in Venezuela?
Even if we presume that Venezuela had a fair election (huge presumption) in which they chose Maduro, that is not a good enough reason for the Venezuelan people to continue to suffer under his rule. So yes, they absolutely should overthrow his ass.
Bolsonaro openly said he would imprison and/or banish his political opposition, as well as a whole ton of draconian bullshit. SA is still fucking decapitating people for non-violent crimes as well as plenty of other horrific shit that typically is used to justify fucking up other Muslim countries. That you describe that as not "outright fucking over their people" at least jives with your previously articulated morally bankrupt and deplorable position on foreign policy.
I certainly still see it plainly as such.
Wake me up when Brazil and Saudi Arabia are enduring massive famines and economic collapse. Then we can talk about how horrible they are in relation to Maduro-era Venezuela. The fact that you refuse to admit and accept is that Venezuela is in a completely different league of "horrible" than either Saudi Arabia or Brazil.
|
Oh, and as a relevant aside, Venezuela is a perfect example of why the Second Amendment matters. An armed populace would be able to more easily get rid of Maduro.
|
On January 24 2019 11:44 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 11:31 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 11:25 xDaunt wrote:On January 24 2019 10:40 GreenHorizons wrote:On January 24 2019 10:33 xDaunt wrote: GH, no one is going to take you seriously if you're going to take the position that Maduro has no responsibility for starving his people. Of course the US is going to sanction the fuck out of Venezuela and refuse to do business with Venezuela when Maduro and his cronies refuse to respect American investments and property rights in their country. Who the fuck are you kidding? Did I say Maduro has no responsibility? You guys are the ones acting like when the US starves Venezuelans for profit that it's cool, even worth supporting an illegal coup to bolster our position of dominance. You support an open fascist in Brazil and a totalitarian theocratic (Muslim) monarchy for profit and power who the fuck are you kidding with this faux concern for Venezuelans? The bipartisan support for overthrowing foreign leaders to replace them with ones more profitable for US corporations should be enough for everyone to conclude the parties are trash imo. It's not just that Maduro has some responsibility. He bears the vast majority of the responsibility for the collapse of Venezuela. This isn't even a matter of reasonable dispute, unless you want Chavez to share some of the blame. And no, I do not have any problem with the US sanctioning Venezuela. We don't owe Venezuela anything. If the Venezuelan government is going to rob Americans and American businesses, then the US government has an obligation to retaliate and sanction Venezuela. Yes, the Venezuelan people will suffer, but they're the idiots who elected Maduro in the first place, so my sympathy has its limits. It's ultimately up to the Venezuelans to stop their nation from acting like the banana republic that it has become. For their own good, they need to get rid of Maduro and all of his cronies. As for Brazil and Saudi Arabia, I've already made it clear why I support Bolsonaro and the Saudis: the realpolitik. At least they aren't outright fucking over their people like Maduro has. I can't keep straight whether the Venezuelan people elected Maduro like you just said to cushion the inhumanity you're supporting or he's not an elected leader like your presidents administration just said to justify the coup to take back US corporate interests in Venezuela? Even if we presume that Venezuela had a fair election (huge presumption) in which they chose Maduro, that is not a good enough reason for the Venezuelan people to continue to suffer under his rule. So yes, they absolutely should overthrow his ass. Show nested quote +Bolsonaro openly said he would imprison and/or banish his political opposition, as well as a whole ton of draconian bullshit. SA is still fucking decapitating people for non-violent crimes as well as plenty of other horrific shit that typically is used to justify fucking up other Muslim countries. That you describe that as not "outright fucking over their people" at least jives with your previously articulated morally bankrupt and deplorable position on foreign policy.
I certainly still see it plainly as such. Wake me up when Brazil and Saudi Arabia are enduring massive famines and economic collapse. Then we can talk about how horrible they are in relation to Maduro-era Venezuela. The fact that you refuse to admit and accept is that Venezuela is in a completely different league of "horrible" than either Saudi Arabia or Brazil.
You did just presume they had a fair election. (edit:Also bold coming from someone supporting a government making people work for them without paying them.)
Wake me up when the US is intentionally crippling their economy through sanctions, straight up holding their own assets hostage, and supporting unelected replacement leaders and I bet it looks a lot like Iraq afterwords.
Venezuela is in a completely different league, SA and Bolsonaro are WAY more dangerous.
|
On January 24 2019 07:21 Nebuchad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 07:15 Sermokala wrote:On January 24 2019 07:03 Nebuchad wrote:On January 24 2019 06:30 Sermokala wrote:On January 24 2019 06:25 Nebuchad wrote: Congratulations to the US for bringing neolibeFREEDOM to Venezuela Democracy is non negotiable. A pretty comical take considering how often we negotiate with authoritarian countries when they accept their role in global capitalism. Yeah it was a pretty comical take in Fallout 3 when liberty bot said it. Sorry, I didn't know that meme GH: what did AOC say?
Forgot to answer this, nothing. That's the problem. I mean she doesn't have to oppose US imperialism but trying to leave it ambiguous is worse to me.
Here's a political response to Venezuela that AOC could have taken. Not a bold stance against US neocolonialism but at least makes it clear they aren't in favor of Trump's support for a right-wing coup or more US interference.
(VA’s 50th House District candidate)
|
On January 24 2019 09:29 Nebuchad wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2019 08:57 xDaunt wrote:Yeah, and in the same breath that economist admitted that he doesn't really know and that he needs to study the proposal (also noting that the "devil is in the details."). Clearly he knows that the effective tax rate in the US was never that high and that economic conditions during that time period were materially different than they are now. There is nothing you could say that would convince me that you truly believe the conditions today are so different from earlier that things would collapse if people who make over 10 million dollars paid more taxes on what they win above these 10 millions.
The economy wouldn't collapse but capital is more fluid, across a global level, than it was in the postwar decades. I don't oppose a 70% marginal tax rate, but I don't think it will be very effective. It will simply change incentives, change where the money is, how it is, but not whose it is.
|
|
|
|