EPTChibi Explanation - Page 33
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
| ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
Bey banned a user who was on thin ice. It may have been unjust, but chibi was all ready stepping on toes, he should have tread lightly. It may have been instigated by a moment of anger from bey, but bey's human. Get over it. Baal on the other hand goes out of his way to insult the only important members of tl.net's community - the mods. He does not do this once or twice, but repeatedly throughout the whole thread. He makes no effort to express his feelings in an environment that is all ready under high stress. The amount of people bashing the mods (myself included) when they do this huge and rewardless job must be infuriating. Baal has acting like a jackass and got temp-banned for it. When baal has a chance to cool down and behave appriopriately, he will be back. This will also in turn give the mods a chance to calm down as well. Baal is an arrogant bastard who flames people every chance he gets. How can you not see a temp-ban was warranted in this situation? | ||
Manifesto7
Osaka27148 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:29 Last Romantic wrote: well no the argument kwark and I are taking here is not that "baal should not have been banned", but rather "it was bad form to flame him before banning him, and he should have just been banned straight up" Your right, it was. Im only human though, and sometimes it is going to happen. | ||
KwarK
United States42651 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:28 travis wrote: baal attacked him and the mods, spammed, and acted like a retard. if that's not ban-worthy, I don't know what is. My complaint was that Mani banned him after lowering himself to baals level. Last Romantic put it very succinctly with "he should have just temped him instead of flaming. And if he chose to flame, he shouldn't have temped him. Or at least he should have waited for someone else to do it." Any other mod banning him would be far more respectable. | ||
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
| ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
| ||
|
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
No one owes baal anything, least of all Manifesto, and he wants to throw a "fuck you" before he bans a huge tool then he's certainly entitled to it. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
What is the problem with him replying to baal's attacks before he banned him? | ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:34 BroOd wrote: No one owes baal anything, least of all Manifesto, and he wants to throw a "fuck you" before he bans a huge tool then he's certainly entitled to it. Of course no one owes Baal anything, though that doesn't necessarily mean he had to be banned either. | ||
|
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:36 Servolisk wrote: Of course no one owes Baal anything, though that doesn't necessarily mean he had to be banned either. No, but the fact that he's a jerk-off does. | ||
|
LuMiX
China5757 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:34 travis wrote: I am not understanding something here. What is the problem with him replying to baal's attacks before he banned him? I think because Mani wanted to get baal heated up, and then ban him before he could reply in defense or something...It looks bad kinda | ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:34 travis wrote: I am not understanding something here. What is the problem with him replying to baal's attacks before he banned him? Personally I'd like to see long written flames before any ban, just for reading pleasure. | ||
|
KwarK
United States42651 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:34 travis wrote: I am not understanding something here. What is the problem with him replying to baal's attacks before he banned him? It was hardly replying. It was full on flaming. When Mani posted what he did he lowered himself to baals level and using his mod powers in that context is nothing more than abuse. If he wants to engage in flame wars in the heat of the moment like the rest of us mortals then he should abdicate his divine powers for that time. But whatever, Mani conceded it was bad form, baals ban was pretty justified so as far as I'm concerned this particular issue is closed. | ||
|
Ilvy
Germany2445 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:20 LTT wrote: That's certainly true and I respect Manifesto greatly for all he gives us. Moderation is a thankless job. The problem is that Baal was complaining about Beyonder flaming Chibi and then subsequently banning him so Manifesto attempts to prove baal wrong by flaming him and then subsequently banning him? It just doesn't look right.  Baal´s problem was that he ignored what Mani, Naz and some other wrote why Chibi was banned and never got away from his meaning that the reason was Bey hating Chib. Nearly 10k post make you not a better person on this forum, just less easy to ban, not every spam is productive. It was not right that Eri posted intern Forum secrets, it just heated the discussion in the wrong direction. If things should be public i guess the majority of Mods would have voted for ;(. You guys are guests here, Modorators make the rules, it is not the oposit. 1. THIS IS OUR HOUSE 2. THOU SHALL OBSERVE FORUM ETIQUETTE 3. THOU SHALL THINK BEFORE POSTING 4. THOU SHALL RESPECT YOUR ID 5. THOU SHALL NOT SPAM Just the half of it but some maybe should go and read it again to remind them where and what they are. | ||
Last Romantic
United States20661 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:37 Servolisk wrote: Personally I'd like to see long written flames before any ban, just for reading pleasure. servo has style. Yeah, pretty much what Kwark said. [why we agree on everything here? no clue ;o] | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
Keep that in mind | ||
|
SK.Testie
Canada11084 Posts
It's called being hilariously accurate and to the point while ending the discussion so as to not continue the shit fest. | ||
|
Servolisk
United States5241 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:38 Kwark wrote: It was hardly replying. It was full on flaming. When Mani posted what he did he lowered himself to baals level and using his mod powers in that context is nothing more than abuse. If he wants to engage in flame wars in the heat of the moment like the rest of us mortals then he should abdicate his divine powers for that time. But whatever, Mani conceded it was bad form, baals ban was pretty justified so as far as I'm concerned this particular issue is closed. Man there will be another 30 pages for Baal's banning now. Maybe it's this thread but no one seems capable of changing their minds on anything here... giving up now (only reason I kept at it so long was insomnia). :o | ||
|
LuMiX
China5757 Posts
 | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On March 22 2007 00:37 Metal[x] wrote: I think because Mani wanted to get baal heated up, and then ban him before he could reply in defense or something...It looks bad kinda I could easily tell that was clearly not the case. | ||
| ||
