EPTTillerson had been super anti war. He's replacing Tillerson with a deeply pro war yes man
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 9384
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15479 Posts
Tillerson had been super anti war. He's replacing Tillerson with a deeply pro war yes man | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On December 02 2017 02:40 GreenHorizons wrote: So they are doing what you want by deporting him. That was just a very roundabout way of displaying frustration with Trumps complete inability to make even the slightest hint of progress regarding his inexplicably dumb wall? You’re right. Clinton had a much better chance to get the wall built. | ||
|
GreenHorizons
United States23010 Posts
On December 02 2017 02:46 Danglars wrote: You’re right. Clinton had a much better chance to get the wall built. You know she actually did though right? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
brian
United States9616 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
|
Zambrah
United States7205 Posts
For once Im finding impeachment a possibility, even if I don't really trust the integrity of Congress to follow through with the. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
| ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
| ||
|
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On December 02 2017 03:23 Tachion wrote: If the Republicans weren't on board with the eventual consequences of the Russia investigation (impeachment), wouldn't they have tried to derail it harder? Why did Trump have to go to half a dozen people as reported yesterday to try to squash it, and get jack shit in return? McConnell and Ryan have both been pretty fierce "supporters" of letting the investigation continue unimpeded. You think there just wasn't anything in their power they could have reasonably done to throw it off course and still save face? They clearly have no intention of going down with the ship. They didn't exactly choose Trump, they were stuck with him when he somehow won against the electable Hillary Clinton and the even more electable Jeb Bush & co. | ||
|
Emnjay808
United States10655 Posts
| ||
|
Mohdoo
United States15479 Posts
On December 02 2017 03:38 Emnjay808 wrote: Impeached to have the runner-up take the helm? Am I wrong? I cant wait for this. Pence was the leader of the transition team Flynn says he worked with to setup Russia stuff. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands21555 Posts
On December 02 2017 03:23 Tachion wrote: If the Republicans weren't on board with the eventual consequences of the Russia investigation (impeachment), wouldn't they have tried to derail it harder? Why did Trump have to go to half a dozen people as reported yesterday to try to squash it, and get jack shit in return? McConnell and Ryan have both been pretty fierce "supporters" of letting the investigation continue unimpeded. You think there just wasn't anything in their power they could have reasonably done to throw it off course and still save face? Because stopping the investigation, aside from bad optics, also ties you to any 'obstruction of justice' charges down the line. No one sane wants to touch any possible connection with a 10 foot pole. | ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
| ||
|
brian
United States9616 Posts
i mean hell, trump isn’t good for gop congressmen to begin with. i’m betting all of them with any integrity (so you can see here why Sessions is so pleased) would’ve preferred any of the other candidates. | ||
|
kollin
United Kingdom8380 Posts
| ||
|
zlefin
United States7689 Posts
On December 02 2017 03:48 kollin wrote: If trump and pence both resign does Paul Ryan take the reigns? yes. | ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On December 02 2017 03:48 kollin wrote: If trump and pence both resign does Paul Ryan take the reigns? only if he's speaker. | ||
| ||
