|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
United States41991 Posts
On November 29 2017 03:56 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 03:31 Plansix wrote: I just want to remind folks that the Nazi party were generally considered to be buffoons, losers and otherwise a silly fringe party right up until they took power. I could go on for days about why that totally takeover of power would never happen in the US, but that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t be concerned with the prevalence of Nazi ideology in main stream political discourse.
We don’t need to end up in full 1937 Germany for the modern white Nationalist to do a lot of damage. And these folks are shameless. They will lie through their teeth that they don’t believe in violence, are not racist and are totally not Nazis. While at the same time saying that Hitler loved his country and historians over look that. The biggest mistake the US could ever make would be not taking these people seriously. What "prevalence of Nazi ideology in main stream political discourse?" Is Paul Ryan advocating Nazi ideology now? "Very fine people" - The President
He's also retweeted neo-Nazi propaganda a few times.
|
On November 29 2017 03:37 IyMoon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 03:35 On_Slaught wrote:On November 29 2017 03:11 zlefin wrote:On November 29 2017 03:09 hunts wrote:On November 29 2017 03:04 zlefin wrote:On November 29 2017 02:32 hunts wrote:On November 29 2017 01:17 Danglars wrote:On November 29 2017 01:05 GreenHorizons wrote:On November 29 2017 00:28 Danglars wrote:On November 28 2017 17:41 GreenHorizons wrote: [quote]
Well we have mutual combat laws here so I figured it would go something like you say something repugnant, I say you can't say that, you say you can, I challenge you to combat to settle whether you can say it in my presence or not, you don't like those choices and object. I assure you your choices are 1. not say it 2.fight 3. get ostrasized and not be a part of the conversation. You pick fight and get punched in the throat.
I suppose you could just walk away or stop, but you seem far too stubborn to do something like that.
Seems perfectly civilized to me, but you also can't tell the difference between everything being racist and racism being a part of pretty much everything in this country so we clearly have trouble agreeing on the meaning of words. Your evaluation of what’s repugnant lol. You’re way too willing to settle things with violence for me. Go find a police officer or something to get your rocks off. You’ve always seen racism in everything and I don’t expect it to change soon. It's pretty simple really. We both see a Nazi advocating for my genocide I go to punch him, you defend his right to advocate genocide, and get punched too. You act like your positions aren't antithetical to polite discourse on their face. You seem to think you're entitled to the floor to say whatever you want, well, you can't say fire in a crowded theater and you can't advocate for my genocide in my presence. You want to think that makes me the uncivilized one, you go right ahead. I do have to give you points for the clever "Kill yourself" line you slipped in there though. First amendment free speech rights, who needs them? I should frame those first two sentences. But don’t worry, bro, if they shout to start lynching blacks in such and such neighborhood, that’s inciting imminent unlawful activity. I won’t let your base stupidity on the free speech rights of citizens interfere with the historical crossing of the line. You wish everybody thought like you, but they don’t. If you’re perpetually aggrieved, and say that gives you the right to punch someone talking politics, you construct your own law. Just excuse your own mischief. Here’s a thought: If you’re sharing beers and a political topic comes up, and you’re willing to punch him or her over it, just tell them to not discuss politics. It’ll work out better for both, and you get the bonus of not appearing to be a man itching for a fight. Given your tendency to call conservatives here advocates of white supremacy, and topics not unique to the black community expose white fragility, you’re just telling everyone to expect violence for their politics. And anyone not in full agreement with your political theory will have the good sense to stay away from those threats. Come on dangles, of all people, I would assume one of the 2 claiming to be a lawyer would at least know that free speech does not apply to civilian on civilian interaction. xdaunt is the lawyer, not danglars; the difference is quite apparent once you know what to look for (not really sure how to describe the difference in quality of argumentation/rhetoric) also, yawn, another day where 90% of the posts are danglars nonsense, and people countering danglars' nonsense. For some reason I thought it was both xdaunt and danglars, guess I was wrong. np, it happens. there are some other lawyers and/or paralegals around, don't remember who. I don't think there were any other on the "right" of the higher frequency posters. IIRC, xDaunt and farvacola are lawyers, Doodsmack is in law school, and Plansix is a paralegal of sorts who works with attorneys. In some funny but expected news, Dems cancel their meeting with Trump in light of his tweet about them. So does this mean we should expect a gov shutdown? Has the gov ever shutdown when a party is in full control of the government? All government shutdowns that I can think of happen when a different party controls the executive and the legislative We've seen that the Republicans have very different factional views on budget priorities. The threat of a uni-party shutdown is definitely a factor to consider. The other one is passing a budget that has tons of Dem priorities and very few Trump and Republican priorities (aka Wall, Obamacare mandate repeal, shrink the size of government). The voters will have their hides for that in addition to not repealing Obamacare in their first year of united party control.
|
On November 29 2017 03:56 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 03:31 Plansix wrote: I just want to remind folks that the Nazi party were generally considered to be buffoons, losers and otherwise a silly fringe party right up until they took power. I could go on for days about why that totally takeover of power would never happen in the US, but that doesn’t mean people shouldn’t be concerned with the prevalence of Nazi ideology in main stream political discourse.
We don’t need to end up in full 1937 Germany for the modern white Nationalist to do a lot of damage. And these folks are shameless. They will lie through their teeth that they don’t believe in violence, are not racist and are totally not Nazis. While at the same time saying that Hitler loved his country and historians over look that. The biggest mistake the US could ever make would be not taking these people seriously. What "prevalence of Nazi ideology in main stream political discourse?" Is Paul Ryan advocating Nazi ideology now? Breitbart exists and Bannon happily worked with Richard Spencer and other white nationalist. Bannon was in the White House and from all reports Trump still takes his calls. Modern White Nationalists are part of the political discourse.
|
On November 29 2017 03:52 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 03:27 zlefin wrote: re: a bit above on statues because credit isn't due here; THEY didn't all come for the founding father statues; only some extremists did. and there's ALWAYS some extremist who goes further. so he didn't get anything right. he lied, and was wrong; being half-right doesn't mean much when anyone can be half-right. so you're just promulgating lies as usual danglars, and improperly conflating situations that are quite different.
and my post wasn't nonsense, it was correctly pointing out a real problem in the thread that degrades it a lot. so it's in the responses to nonsense trolling category, not nonsense itself; still all part of that 90% though.
I don't see a point making a nonsense post saying "This is all nonsense, again." If it's nonsense, don't participate. It's very hard to separate who were extremists going for statues and who were moderates going for statues when they end up defaced, vandalized, and shrouded. Are you a clairvoyant? I'm not. that you can't see the very obvious point doesn't count for anything. Encouraging people to stop the nonsense is an entirely sensible course of action.
the statue point you're making is so nonsensical that I'm ignoring it, and only putting this sentence to denote that I indeed read it. if it's turned into something resembling a more coherent argument, then there might be something to respond to.
|
|
This CFPB stuff is just weird. I'm all for it staying in the news and getting more attention for its oversight and operation.
|
That agency is too independent for my taste. But modern banks are so deeply stupid and their culture is one that rewards terrible decisions for quarterly gain. I don’t trust Republicans to regulate the finance industry, considering they want to go right back to pre-2007 levels of regulation and zero criminal prosecution for white collar crimes. They should move its funding to being done by a panel of 3 Republicans and 3 Democrats, rather than all of congress.
|
On November 29 2017 04:10 Plansix wrote: That agency is too independent for my taste. But modern banks are so deeply stupid and their culture is one that rewards terrible decisions for quarterly gain. I don’t trust Republicans to regulate the finance industry, considering they want to go right back to pre-2007 levels of regulation and zero criminal prosecution for white collar crimes. They should move its funding to being done by a panel of 3 Republicans and 3 Democrats, rather than all of congress. Too independent for my taste. There's just as much corruption possible with the head naming their own successor, than with ordinary political appointments. Might as well make the title hereditary imo.
|
On November 29 2017 04:04 KwarK wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/11/23/04/2EB78B4000000578-3329934-image-m-46_1448254316150.jpg) Retweeted from this guy ![[image loading]](http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/img/charles/2015/11/22/LGF1827.jpg) Incidentally the source, "Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco", is fictional. This is nothing more than propaganda. The President is publishing neo-Nazi propaganda. That is a factually accurate statement. I think a critical part about these re-tweets is that Trump also believes this stuff. He might be one of the most conformation bias prone politicians I have ever seen. He does not question tweets like the one above and will not listen to anyone who tells him that the information is false.
|
On November 29 2017 04:12 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 04:04 KwarK wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/11/23/04/2EB78B4000000578-3329934-image-m-46_1448254316150.jpg) Retweeted from this guy ![[image loading]](http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/img/charles/2015/11/22/LGF1827.jpg) Incidentally the source, "Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco", is fictional. This is nothing more than propaganda. The President is publishing neo-Nazi propaganda. That is a factually accurate statement. I think a critical part about these re-tweets is that Trump also believes this stuff. He might be one of the most conformation bias prone politicians I have ever seen. He does not question tweets like the one above and will not listen to anyone who tells him that the information is false.
I mean you only have to understand basic level math to figure out that something is off here
|
|
On November 29 2017 04:12 Danglars wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 04:10 Plansix wrote: That agency is too independent for my taste. But modern banks are so deeply stupid and their culture is one that rewards terrible decisions for quarterly gain. I don’t trust Republicans to regulate the finance industry, considering they want to go right back to pre-2007 levels of regulation and zero criminal prosecution for white collar crimes. They should move its funding to being done by a panel of 3 Republicans and 3 Democrats, rather than all of congress. Too independent for my taste. There's just as much corruption possible with the head naming their own successor, than with ordinary political appointments. Might as well make the title hereditary imo. It is temporary. The president still gets to name a new director, which can go through the senate. That is the one part I agree with. The acting director should be appointed by the previous director until the president and congress can do their thing. It keeps regulation and enforcement on track and doesn't derail justice for people who are seeking relief through the agency. I think the FBI and Justice department should work the same way and shield from the politics of the moment.
It’s the budget that mostly bothers me. I think congress should have some input into that, if a bit shielded from the prevailing political winds of that day.
|
On November 29 2017 03:59 Plansix wrote: I have seen little evidence that the alt right is a smaller group that the mythical antifa. Considering both are an unknowable number of people on the fringe of the political spectrum, I don't think anyone can claim one is more relevant that the other.
I will agree that antifa is way better at trolling on twitter. They have that skill on lock. But the Alt right have Reddit down better then sanders ever had reddit down.
I literally was going to post things that Kwark did in the last two pages but I was reading the thread for the past hour. Police departments in towns usually troll the nazies pretty well in the past with almost all minority security for the events.
I mean theres a level of incompetence when you can make perfectly legitimate looking propaganda when you're the literal head of state and when you decide not to and instead just take something from an source you don't bother to have checked and can be instantly found to be false. Not even dictators were this bad.
|
On November 29 2017 04:15 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 04:12 Plansix wrote:On November 29 2017 04:04 KwarK wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/11/23/04/2EB78B4000000578-3329934-image-m-46_1448254316150.jpg) Retweeted from this guy ![[image loading]](http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/img/charles/2015/11/22/LGF1827.jpg) Incidentally the source, "Crime Statistics Bureau in San Francisco", is fictional. This is nothing more than propaganda. The President is publishing neo-Nazi propaganda. That is a factually accurate statement. I think a critical part about these re-tweets is that Trump also believes this stuff. He might be one of the most conformation bias prone politicians I have ever seen. He does not question tweets like the one above and will not listen to anyone who tells him that the information is false. I mean you only have to understand basic level math to figure out that something is off here I have spend the last couple of minutes trying to figure out how it's supposed to be read...
I think it's (supposed to be, we all know it's fake) two or three different sets of data. As in: Blacks killed by Whites - 2% Blacks killed by Blacks - 97% and the remaining 1% makes up for everything else that's neither black nor white as a killer. So you come to 100%
Whites killed by Whites and Whites killed by Blacks comes to a total of 97% so you have another 3% for everything else combined (idk, Asians etc?)
And Killed by Police is supposed to be yet another completly different set of data because there are black and white and asian police officers. So those aren't supposed to overlap...?
Why am I even trying to understand nazi propaganda
|
On November 29 2017 03:41 Plansix wrote: Trump’s master plan of saying you don’t plan on making a deal is a good way to get a meeting about cutting a deal canceled. Trump is going to find out that hard way that the party in power gets blamed for government shut downs.
Idk uh lets not cheer for the shutdown just because of political gain there's a whole lot of scientific progress (and lab animals) that suffer heavily during these things .
|
United States41991 Posts
On November 29 2017 04:24 Toadesstern wrote: Why am I even trying to understand nazi propaganda Because the President of the United States is sending it to his followers.
|
On November 29 2017 04:24 Logo wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 03:41 Plansix wrote: Trump’s master plan of saying you don’t plan on making a deal is a good way to get a meeting about cutting a deal canceled. Trump is going to find out that hard way that the party in power gets blamed for government shut downs. Idk uh lets not cheer for the shutdown just because of political gain there's a whole lot of scientific progress (and lab animals) that suffer heavily during these things  . Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want it. It is bad for everyone. My brother works for the federal government. The last shut down was not fun at all. Mortgage payments were nearly missed before they put him back to work. And the Obama administration was far more capable that the clown show in the oval office this time around.
But Trump embodies the political desire to touch the stove and people voting for that. This is a guy who said that the US should default of its debt if they couldn’t get a better deal. I hate finance and math in general, but I know national default is apocalyptic. I am prepared for the worst.
On November 29 2017 04:18 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 03:59 Plansix wrote: I have seen little evidence that the alt right is a smaller group that the mythical antifa. Considering both are an unknowable number of people on the fringe of the political spectrum, I don't think anyone can claim one is more relevant that the other.
I will agree that antifa is way better at trolling on twitter. They have that skill on lock. But the Alt right have Reddit down better then sanders ever had reddit down. I literally was going to post things that Kwark did in the last two pages but I was reading the thread for the past hour. Police departments in towns usually troll the nazies pretty well in the past with almost all minority security for the events. I mean theres a level of incompetence when you can make perfectly legitimate looking propaganda when you're the literal head of state and when you decide not to and instead just take something from an source you don't bother to have checked and can be instantly found to be false. Not even dictators were this bad. Hitler wrote his own book. And you can tell because its terrible. Trump just retweets racist memes.
|
United States41991 Posts
On November 29 2017 04:30 Plansix wrote:Show nested quote +On November 29 2017 04:24 Logo wrote:On November 29 2017 03:41 Plansix wrote: Trump’s master plan of saying you don’t plan on making a deal is a good way to get a meeting about cutting a deal canceled. Trump is going to find out that hard way that the party in power gets blamed for government shut downs. Idk uh lets not cheer for the shutdown just because of political gain there's a whole lot of scientific progress (and lab animals) that suffer heavily during these things  . Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want it. It is bad for everyone. My brother works for the federal government. The last shut down was not fun at all. Mortgage payments were nearly missed before they put him back to work. And the Obama administration was far more capable that the clown show in the oval office this time around. But Trump embodies the political desire to touch the stove and people voting for that. This is a guy who said that the US should default of its debt if they couldn’t get a better deal. I hate finance and math in general, but I know national default is apocalyptic. I am prepared for the worst. He also said that he'd pay back the full $20t national debt in 8 years. When pressed on how he'd achieve that one of these advisers gave the amazing reply of selling all of the national parks and other Federal land to China in settlement of the debt. I guess we're lucky he didn't think to try to sell Alaska back to Russia.
|
We could sell Alaska to Canada. The Civ/Stellaris player in me is perpetually bothered by how it isn't connected with the rest of the country.
|
On November 29 2017 04:35 Seuss wrote: We could sell Alaska to Canada. The Civ/Stellaris player in me is perpetually bothered by how it isn't connected with the rest of the country. Well, I'm glad that was the option you went for then.
|
|
|
|