• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:01
CEST 15:01
KST 22:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview25Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates7GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN!
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion I made an ASL quiz [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 1
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread What do you want from future RTS games? Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 24854 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7829

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 7827 7828 7829 7830 7831 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-09 23:25:15
June 09 2017 23:20 GMT
#156561
On June 10 2017 08:12 Buckyman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 07:54 Plansix wrote:
So I took to comment to mean Obamas EO on transgender bathroom use in schools was part of this "culture war". While Teump had not engaged in it. I would be happy to be corrected if Bucky didn't mean that.


Mostly there. I think Obama's EO was more significantly a different sort of bad thing (re-interpreting a statute more broadly than could possibly have been intended by Congress in order to score political points).

The state-level transgender bathroom restrictions are a more direct example of a "culture war" mentality. Republicans pass a bill to inconvenience a demographic that mostly supports their opponents. Trump could attempt to EO on the subject, but is restrained enough to stay out of the conversation.

------

More generally, Trump ran on a platform of not abusing executive authority as much as Obama did. So far, he's indeed doing so, with the most significant EOs being retractions of earlier EOs.

Trump really seems like the abuse his authority type of person; so I expect as time goes by he will have done far more abuse of them than Obama has. As time passes and it becomes more clear he can't get what he wants through the legislature.
I'm not sure on a per EO basis he's doing any better by now. negating orders that are good orders isn't really to your credit of course; and some of them are good orders. An interesting question of fact; with some difficult measurement issues; how many EOs get blocked by the courts for unconstitutionality. From what little I can see so far they seem not that different on that metric, as trump has already had some of his blocked by the courts. sadly it's hard to find things in straighit up list form, and there are some issues with how you compare numbers.
also, abusing and damaging the office is kinda worse than abusing executive authority; but it is admittedly a different issue.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42416 Posts
June 09 2017 23:22 GMT
#156562
On June 10 2017 08:12 Buckyman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 07:54 Plansix wrote:
So I took to comment to mean Obamas EO on transgender bathroom use in schools was part of this "culture war". While Teump had not engaged in it. I would be happy to be corrected if Bucky didn't mean that.


Mostly there. I think Obama's EO was more significantly a different sort of bad thing (re-interpreting a statute more broadly than could possibly have been intended by Congress in order to score political points).

The state-level transgender bathroom restrictions are a more direct example of a "culture war" mentality. Republicans pass a bill to inconvenience a demographic that mostly supports their opponents. Trump could attempt to EO on the subject, but is restrained enough to stay out of the conversation.

------

More generally, Trump ran on a platform of not abusing executive authority as much as Obama did. So far, he's indeed doing so, with the most significant EOs being retractions of earlier EOs.

Out of curiousity, are you opposed to the overtime or fiduciary EOs?
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23054 Posts
June 09 2017 23:30 GMT
#156563
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42416 Posts
June 09 2017 23:33 GMT
#156564
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

Do I need to walk you through the game theory of a FPTP system again? Because I will, but I shouldn't have to.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
biology]major
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2253 Posts
June 09 2017 23:33 GMT
#156565
In case you haven't realized gh, politics in the us sucks.
Question.?
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23054 Posts
June 09 2017 23:35 GMT
#156566
On June 10 2017 08:33 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

Do I need to walk you through the game theory of a FPTP system again? Because I will, but I shouldn't have to.


No. I'm aware of how it works and why we can't join a race to the bottom which you essentially say is inevitable.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United Kingdom13775 Posts
June 09 2017 23:36 GMT
#156567
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

For me personally, there is a threshold past which I'd vote for the more despicable person just to tell the other party to go fuck themselves. Hillary here certainly tested those boundaries here. Didn't quite reach that point though.

If she runs in 2020 I'm voting Trump because he would be less trouble than Democrats still not getting a clue.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42416 Posts
June 09 2017 23:39 GMT
#156568
On June 10 2017 08:35 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 08:33 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

Do I need to walk you through the game theory of a FPTP system again? Because I will, but I shouldn't have to.


No. I'm aware of how it works and why we can't join a race to the bottom which you essentially say is inevitable.

Ah yes, and then if enough moral people refuse to participate on moral grounds then the immoral people will just get tired out from all the constant winning they're doing.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8963 Posts
June 09 2017 23:39 GMT
#156569
Why not vote for a viable 3rd party if it presented itself? Depending on how trump performs (if he lasts), why continue that same thing? We already saw Bush. We don't need a repeat of that, do we?
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8963 Posts
June 09 2017 23:41 GMT
#156570
KwarK, is that following the same premise of why the more intelligent are not reproducing as quickly as the less educated?
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
June 09 2017 23:41 GMT
#156571
No third party is viable in the US. Seriously Democrats need to wake up and understand how power works. In a parliamentary democracy you change things by getting elected and drafting law, not by voting for Jill Stein or kicking trash bins over on a campus.
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
June 09 2017 23:41 GMT
#156572
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

yeah; some people are going overboard with supporting despicableness; that said the slaaaave queen point is unjustified.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23054 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-06-09 23:46:06
June 09 2017 23:43 GMT
#156573
On June 10 2017 08:39 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 08:35 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:33 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

Do I need to walk you through the game theory of a FPTP system again? Because I will, but I shouldn't have to.


No. I'm aware of how it works and why we can't join a race to the bottom which you essentially say is inevitable.

Ah yes, and then if enough moral people refuse to participate on moral grounds then the immoral people will just get tired out from all the constant winning they're doing.


No, if people fight for people to see that the party doesn't represent them and that accepting a corporate party that hates you slightly less than the other corporate party is a stupid voting decision and people need to stop trying to make it sound like the only choice because it's actively harming the ability to change it.


Or we could stick with the absurdly stupid plan you and others are offering.

Republicans are running on killing 1000 people this year and Dems 500, gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 1000 people, but the Republicans are running on killing 1500 gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 10,000,000, but Republicans are running on killing 11,000,000 gotta vote Dem.... Can't vote for someone else, that would be dumb
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
8963 Posts
June 09 2017 23:44 GMT
#156574
On June 10 2017 08:41 Nyxisto wrote:
No third party is viable in the US. Seriously Democrats need to wake up and understand how power works. In a parliamentary democracy you change things by getting elected and drafting law, not by voting for Jill Stein or kicking trash bins over on a campus.

The people who voted for anyone not named Bernie Sanders have themselves to blame, but the Dems also screwed themselves by being staunch Clinton cronies.
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42416 Posts
June 09 2017 23:44 GMT
#156575
On June 10 2017 08:41 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
KwarK, is that following the same premise of why the more intelligent are not reproducing as quickly as the less educated?

No. It's referring to game theory. Voting is not done in a vacuum, you cannot simply vote for whichever candidate you would most prefer and ignore any information about how other people will vote. In a winner takes all system you have to vote tactically for your vote to have any value at all. Refusing to vote tactically is essentially signalling that you're not participating in the game, broadcasting that whatever you believe in isn't worth appealing to because you're not going to help the players win.

FPTP is a shitty system because it devolves into tactical voting bullshit. The founders fucked you. But you have to play it because the prize at stake is worth winning.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42416 Posts
June 09 2017 23:46 GMT
#156576
On June 10 2017 08:43 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 08:39 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:35 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:33 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

Do I need to walk you through the game theory of a FPTP system again? Because I will, but I shouldn't have to.


No. I'm aware of how it works and why we can't join a race to the bottom which you essentially say is inevitable.

Ah yes, and then if enough moral people refuse to participate on moral grounds then the immoral people will just get tired out from all the constant winning they're doing.


No, if people fight for people to see that the party doesn't represent them and that accepting a corporate party that hates you slightly less than the other corporate party is a stupid voting decision and people need to stop trying to make it sound like the only choice because it's actively harming the ability to change it.


Or we could stick with the absurdly stupid plan you and others are offering.

Republicans are running on killing 1000 people this year and Dems 500, gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 1000 people, but the Republicans are running on killing 1500 gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 10,000,000, but Republicans are running on killing 11,000,000 gotta vote Dem....

Yeah, and then the Republicans go "wait a second, it looks like people are voting for the Dems because of our plan to kill 11,000,000 people. What if this year we run on killing 9,000,000 and then the Dems will lose". Then the Democrats run on killing 8,000,000 and after a few years we're back to killing nobody. The same system you're inevitably calling a race to the bottom is also a race to the top. Voting for the least bad of the two is also voting for the most good of the two. And if the least bad candidate wins by virtue of being the least bad then the other side is incentivized to run someone even more least bad next time.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23054 Posts
June 09 2017 23:47 GMT
#156577
On June 10 2017 08:46 KwarK wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 08:43 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:39 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:35 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:33 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

Do I need to walk you through the game theory of a FPTP system again? Because I will, but I shouldn't have to.


No. I'm aware of how it works and why we can't join a race to the bottom which you essentially say is inevitable.

Ah yes, and then if enough moral people refuse to participate on moral grounds then the immoral people will just get tired out from all the constant winning they're doing.


No, if people fight for people to see that the party doesn't represent them and that accepting a corporate party that hates you slightly less than the other corporate party is a stupid voting decision and people need to stop trying to make it sound like the only choice because it's actively harming the ability to change it.


Or we could stick with the absurdly stupid plan you and others are offering.

Republicans are running on killing 1000 people this year and Dems 500, gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 1000 people, but the Republicans are running on killing 1500 gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 10,000,000, but Republicans are running on killing 11,000,000 gotta vote Dem....

Yeah, and then the Republicans go "wait a second, it looks like people are voting for the Dems because of our plan to kill 11,000,000 people. What if this year we run on killing 9,000,000 and then the Dems will lose". Then the Democrats run on killing 8,000,000 and after a few years we're back to killing nobody. The same system you're inevitably calling a race to the bottom is also a race to the top. Voting for the least bad of the two is also voting for the most good of the two. And if the least bad candidate wins by virtue of being the least bad then the other side is incentivized to run someone even more least bad next time.


Except that's not what's been happening for at least the last 60 years.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States42416 Posts
June 09 2017 23:50 GMT
#156578
On June 10 2017 08:47 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 08:46 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:43 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:39 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:35 GreenHorizons wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:33 KwarK wrote:
On June 10 2017 08:30 GreenHorizons wrote:
I'm impressed that people managed to convince themselves that they had no choice but to vote for Clinton, and are prepared to vote for the most despicable person they can imagine, so long as someone else can imagine a more despicable one.

That sounds really dumb. But explains why people would vote for the slaaayyyve queen.

Do I need to walk you through the game theory of a FPTP system again? Because I will, but I shouldn't have to.


No. I'm aware of how it works and why we can't join a race to the bottom which you essentially say is inevitable.

Ah yes, and then if enough moral people refuse to participate on moral grounds then the immoral people will just get tired out from all the constant winning they're doing.


No, if people fight for people to see that the party doesn't represent them and that accepting a corporate party that hates you slightly less than the other corporate party is a stupid voting decision and people need to stop trying to make it sound like the only choice because it's actively harming the ability to change it.


Or we could stick with the absurdly stupid plan you and others are offering.

Republicans are running on killing 1000 people this year and Dems 500, gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 1000 people, but the Republicans are running on killing 1500 gotta vote Dem

Dem's are running on killing 10,000,000, but Republicans are running on killing 11,000,000 gotta vote Dem....

Yeah, and then the Republicans go "wait a second, it looks like people are voting for the Dems because of our plan to kill 11,000,000 people. What if this year we run on killing 9,000,000 and then the Dems will lose". Then the Democrats run on killing 8,000,000 and after a few years we're back to killing nobody. The same system you're inevitably calling a race to the bottom is also a race to the top. Voting for the least bad of the two is also voting for the most good of the two. And if the least bad candidate wins by virtue of being the least bad then the other side is incentivized to run someone even more least bad next time.


Except that's not what's been happening for at least the last 60 years.

Did you miss the part where they stopped shouting about the damn niggers? Or when gays got rights? Things have gotten better over the years because both parties know that if they run candidates as unpopular as their old candidates would be today they will instantly lose. Even Trump is better than Woodrow Wilson for example.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Nyxisto
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany6287 Posts
June 09 2017 23:50 GMT
#156579
On June 10 2017 08:44 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 10 2017 08:41 Nyxisto wrote:
No third party is viable in the US. Seriously Democrats need to wake up and understand how power works. In a parliamentary democracy you change things by getting elected and drafting law, not by voting for Jill Stein or kicking trash bins over on a campus.

The people who voted for anyone not named Bernie Sanders have themselves to blame, but the Dems also screwed themselves by being staunch Clinton cronies.


The Dems can start blaming themselves when they stop facing people like Trump. This kind of infighting is deeply misplaced
Buckyman
Profile Joined May 2014
1364 Posts
June 09 2017 23:50 GMT
#156580
IMO the most likely viable third party scenarios for the near future are:
* A Democratic Party split, where the smaller half attracts some typically-Republican voters.
* The emergence of a regional party that does not contest the presidential election so that it can focus entirely on state and local elections.
Prev 1 7827 7828 7829 7830 7831 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
SC Evo League
12:00
#13
BRAT_OK 87
LiquipediaDiscussion
Bellum Gens Elite
10:00
Stara Zagora 2025 Day 4
Clem vs ZounLIVE!
TBD vs Serral
Bellum Gens Elite3904
ComeBackTV 1655
TaKeTV 785
IndyStarCraft 428
3DClanTV 229
Rex163
CosmosSc2 133
LiquipediaDiscussion
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #92
CranKy Ducklings95
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Bellum Gens Elite3904
IndyStarCraft 428
Hui .273
Lowko207
Rex 163
CosmosSc2 133
BRAT_OK 87
ProTech70
MindelVK 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 39062
Calm 26899
Bisu 2571
Jaedong 2081
Hyuk 1049
Mini 315
BeSt 299
Last 248
Zeus 193
Soulkey 150
[ Show more ]
PianO 104
Mind 89
ZerO 84
Hyun 84
sorry 52
Sea.KH 49
GoRush 22
Sacsri 21
Yoon 12
IntoTheRainbow 10
Noble 9
JYJ9
SilentControl 9
ajuk12(nOOB) 6
Dota 2
qojqva2447
Gorgc1806
XcaliburYe649
League of Legends
KnowMe75
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor278
Other Games
singsing2439
B2W.Neo1197
Mlord463
DeMusliM460
Beastyqt411
Mew2King203
Pyrionflax115
XaKoH 114
ArmadaUGS44
ZerO(Twitch)14
rubinoeu13
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream9319
StarCraft 2
angryscii 15
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis6949
• Jankos1727
Upcoming Events
Fire Grow Cup
1h 59m
CSO Contender
3h 59m
BSL: ProLeague
4h 59m
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
10h 59m
SOOP Global
13h 59m
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
SOOP
19h 59m
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 59m
AllThingsProtoss
21h 59m
Fire Grow Cup
1d 1h
BSL: ProLeague
1d 4h
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
1d 10h
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.