EPTWhere's Comey when you need him. Keep in mind Comey revealed something very important in his last hearing. His reason for doing the press conference last july was because he thought the DOJ was incapable of doing a fair and unbiased job PRIOR to Lynch meeting with Clinton. The lynch meeting on the tarmac was just the tipping point.
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 7464
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
Where's Comey when you need him. Keep in mind Comey revealed something very important in his last hearing. His reason for doing the press conference last july was because he thought the DOJ was incapable of doing a fair and unbiased job PRIOR to Lynch meeting with Clinton. The lynch meeting on the tarmac was just the tipping point. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
|
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
On May 09 2017 03:46 Plansix wrote: If Sally Yates wanted attention, why wasn’t she news show rounds right after being fired? Cause she still wants to appear like she doesn't want attention. It's next level! | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 09 2017 03:49 biology]major wrote: Cause she still wants to appear like she doesn't want attention. It's next level! Or the Trump administration dumped an unconstitutional dumpster fire on her desk and she decided to do exactly what she promised Jeff Sessions she would do during her confirmation hearing. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46456 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/GyXoUk9.png) | ||
|
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
| ||
|
hunts
United States2113 Posts
On May 09 2017 03:49 biology]major wrote: Cause she still wants to appear like she doesn't want attention. It's next level! I'm not sure if you're trolling or being serious. It's often hard to tell with you and some of the other posters. Care to explain? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 09 2017 04:19 ShoCkeyy wrote: Any thoughts on the hearing so far? These people are so careful with what they say lol... This is what happens when you put attorneys under oath. Unless they are 100% sure about what they are saying, they don’t answer. Edit: Ok, apparently Yates had 2 meetings and a phone call about Flynn and specifically told them Flynn was like compromised by the Russians (able to be blackmailed). And they only did something once it became public. | ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
On May 09 2017 04:22 Plansix wrote: This is what happens when you put attorneys under oath. Unless they are 100% sure about what they are saying, they don’t answer. And then ask them questions that lead to revealing confidential information in a public setting on top of that, requiring further non-answering. | ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 09 2017 04:32 Gahlo wrote: And then ask them questions that lead to revealing confidential information in a public setting on top of that, requiring further non-answering. I am enjoying the constant questions about unmasking like it is some nefarious thing and not part of the job. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On May 09 2017 04:37 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: If anymore evidence was needed for term limits, Senator Grassley. He is being a good Republican and trying to keep the focus on anything but how the Trump White House 100% knew about all the illegal things Flynn did, but gave him security clearance anyways. | ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On May 09 2017 04:37 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: If anymore evidence was needed for term limits, Senator Grassley. Cares more about the leaks, and who made the request than if Flynn had access or not... The sad thing is, it seems like the GOP found a way to see who's been leaking the info. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On May 09 2017 04:37 {CC}StealthBlue wrote: If anymore evidence was needed for term limits, Senator Grassley. I will reach across the aisle to support Democrats that also want term limits. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
| ||
