• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:49
CEST 18:49
KST 01:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver4[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down0StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon98Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?178Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
[D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war Remastered crash fix suggestions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8877 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6914

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6912 6913 6914 6915 6916 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 18 2017 03:32 GMT
#138261
On February 18 2017 12:19 Gahlo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 12:15 LegalLord wrote:
My view of this is simply "Trump attacking the press [by saying they oppose the American people] is not in good taste, but it's far from reasonable to call him a fascist for it."

Let's not jump the gun just because we don't like him.

Nobody called him a facist because of it. They just noted it's a common tactic that facists have used in the past. Let's not jump the gun on jumping the gun.

The point of the comparison is obvious: to insinuate that he is, or that he is close to being, a fascist.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Aquanim
Profile Joined November 2012
Australia2849 Posts
February 18 2017 03:33 GMT
#138262
On February 18 2017 11:42 xDaunt wrote:
If it's not unconstitutional, then there's nothing wrong with it.
...

Can you confirm that you actually meant to say this?
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 18 2017 03:34 GMT
#138263
On February 18 2017 12:32 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 12:19 Gahlo wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:15 LegalLord wrote:
My view of this is simply "Trump attacking the press [by saying they oppose the American people] is not in good taste, but it's far from reasonable to call him a fascist for it."

Let's not jump the gun just because we don't like him.

Nobody called him a facist because of it. They just noted it's a common tactic that facists have used in the past. Let's not jump the gun on jumping the gun.

The point of the comparison is obvious: to insinuate that he is, or that he is close to being, a fascist.

or the somewhat milder, things are uncomfortably trending in that direction.

also, remember people, it's faScist, not facist. please help the OCD among us
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 18 2017 03:36 GMT
#138264
On February 18 2017 12:24 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
John McCain said on Friday that Donald Trump’s administration was in “disarray” and that Nato’s founders would be alarmed by the growing unwillingness to “separate truth from lies”.

The Republican Senator broke with the reassuring message that US officials visiting Germany have sought to convey on their debut trip to Europe, telling a Munich security conference the resignation of the new president’s security adviser, Michael Flynn, over his contacts with Russia reflected deep problems in Washington.

“I think that the Flynn issue obviously is something that shows that in many respects this administration is in disarray and they’ve got a lot of work to do,” said McCain, a known Trump critic, even as he praised Trump’s defence secretary. “The president, I think, makes statements [and] on other occasions contradicts himself. So we’ve learned to watch what the president does as opposed to what he says,” he said.

Without mentioning the president’s name, McCain lamented a shift in the US and Europe away from the “universal values” that forged the Nato alliance seven decades ago. McCain also said the alliance’s founders would be “alarmed by the growing inability, and even unwillingness, to separate truth from lies.”

The chairman of the Armed Services Committee, said “more and more of our fellow citizens seem to be flirting with authoritarianism and romanticising it as our moral equivalent”. The senator also regretted the “hardening resentment we see toward immigrants, and refugees, and minority groups, especially Muslims”.

European governments have been unsettled by the signals sent by Trump on a range of foreign policy issues ranging from Nato and Russia to Iran, Israel and European integration.

The debut trip to Europe of Trump’s defence secretary, Jim Mattis, and his secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, to a meeting of G20 counterparts in Bonn, went some way to assuaging concerns as they both took a more traditional US position.

But Trump is wrestling with a growing controversy at home about potential ties between his aides and Russia, which he dismissed on Thursday as a “ruse” and “scam” perpetrated by a hostile news media.

Mattis made clear to allies, both at Nato in Brussels and in Munich, that the US would not retreat from leadership as the European continent grapples with an assertive Russia, wars in eastern and southern Mediterranean countries and attacks by Islamist militants.

US vice-president Mike Pence will address the Munich conference on Saturday with a similar message of reassurance. Pence will say Europe is an “indispensable partner”, a senior White House foreign policy adviser told reporters.

Mattis told a crowd that included heads of state and more than 70 defence ministers that Trump backed Nato. “President Trump came into office and has thrown now his full support to Nato. He too espouses Nato’s need to adapt to today’s strategic situation for it to remain credible, capable and relevant,” Mattis said.

Mattis said the US and its European allies had a shared understanding of the challenges ahead. Trump has alarmed allies by expressing admiration for Russian president Vladimir Putin.


Source

McCain sounds like he wants a war with Russia and isn't happy that someone opposes it.

Although the reality on the ground suggests that US-Russia relations will toe the status quo so I suppose he will be happy.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
February 18 2017 03:40 GMT
#138265
On February 18 2017 12:33 Aquanim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 11:42 xDaunt wrote:
If it's not unconstitutional, then there's nothing wrong with it.
...

Can you confirm that you actually meant to say this?

Unlawful may be the better word (though issues of lawfulness concerning the press almost inevitably concern constitutionality), but yes.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 18 2017 03:40 GMT
#138266
On February 18 2017 12:32 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 12:19 Gahlo wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:15 LegalLord wrote:
My view of this is simply "Trump attacking the press [by saying they oppose the American people] is not in good taste, but it's far from reasonable to call him a fascist for it."

Let's not jump the gun just because we don't like him.

Nobody called him a facist because of it. They just noted it's a common tactic that facists have used in the past. Let's not jump the gun on jumping the gun.

The point of the comparison is obvious: to insinuate that he is, or that he is close to being, a fascist.

Yes that is the direction you would like the discussion to go.

However, it does not change the fact those are the tools that dictators and fascist used to gain and hold power. And discussion of those tools being employed in the US system, knowingly or unknowingly, is completely reasonable. And shouldn't be derailed by people crying about Trump being called a fascist when no one did that.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 18 2017 03:47 GMT
#138267
On February 18 2017 12:40 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 12:32 LegalLord wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:19 Gahlo wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:15 LegalLord wrote:
My view of this is simply "Trump attacking the press [by saying they oppose the American people] is not in good taste, but it's far from reasonable to call him a fascist for it."

Let's not jump the gun just because we don't like him.

Nobody called him a facist because of it. They just noted it's a common tactic that facists have used in the past. Let's not jump the gun on jumping the gun.

The point of the comparison is obvious: to insinuate that he is, or that he is close to being, a fascist.

Yes that is the direction you would like the discussion to go.

However, it does not change the fact those are the tools that dictators and fascist used to gain and hold power. And discussion of those tools being employed in the US system, knowingly or unknowingly, is completely reasonable. And shouldn't be derailed by people crying about Trump being called a fascist when no one did that.

Dictators and fascist also give speeches and hold rallies and pass executive orders.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 03:50:05
February 18 2017 03:49 GMT
#138268
On February 18 2017 12:47 LegalLord wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 12:40 Plansix wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:32 LegalLord wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:19 Gahlo wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:15 LegalLord wrote:
My view of this is simply "Trump attacking the press [by saying they oppose the American people] is not in good taste, but it's far from reasonable to call him a fascist for it."

Let's not jump the gun just because we don't like him.

Nobody called him a facist because of it. They just noted it's a common tactic that facists have used in the past. Let's not jump the gun on jumping the gun.

The point of the comparison is obvious: to insinuate that he is, or that he is close to being, a fascist.

Yes that is the direction you would like the discussion to go.

However, it does not change the fact those are the tools that dictators and fascist used to gain and hold power. And discussion of those tools being employed in the US system, knowingly or unknowingly, is completely reasonable. And shouldn't be derailed by people crying about Trump being called a fascist when no one did that.

Dictators and fascist also give speeches and hold rallies and pass executive orders.

Those are also well documented tool of democracy. Denial of provable facts like the weather, attacking the press and judiciary are not. Your argument sort of falls flat.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 18 2017 03:55 GMT
#138269
On February 18 2017 12:49 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 12:47 LegalLord wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:40 Plansix wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:32 LegalLord wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:19 Gahlo wrote:
On February 18 2017 12:15 LegalLord wrote:
My view of this is simply "Trump attacking the press [by saying they oppose the American people] is not in good taste, but it's far from reasonable to call him a fascist for it."

Let's not jump the gun just because we don't like him.

Nobody called him a facist because of it. They just noted it's a common tactic that facists have used in the past. Let's not jump the gun on jumping the gun.

The point of the comparison is obvious: to insinuate that he is, or that he is close to being, a fascist.

Yes that is the direction you would like the discussion to go.

However, it does not change the fact those are the tools that dictators and fascist used to gain and hold power. And discussion of those tools being employed in the US system, knowingly or unknowingly, is completely reasonable. And shouldn't be derailed by people crying about Trump being called a fascist when no one did that.

Dictators and fascist also give speeches and hold rallies and pass executive orders.

Those are also well documented tool of democracy. Denial of provable facts like the weather, attacking the press and judiciary are not. Your argument sort of falls flat.

Not really. It's a sloppy correlation meant to draw parallels where they aren't really appropriate. It's understandable when you really don't like the guy (a fully reasonable position) but it's nonetheless wrong. It's sort of like when people tried to prove that Trump rallies had Nazi salutes at them. Just an attempt to draw parallels to paint a disliked fella in a worse light.

Fuck, at least get something better than just standard Fox News fare before crying fascist - or, in your very deflective and roundabout way, "tools that fascists use."
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 04:03:44
February 18 2017 04:01 GMT
#138270
You're free to engaged in whatever discussions you want. But calling people hysterical and saying people are wrong for even broaching the topic is not a compelling argument. You're constant attempts to derail it are not either. The same with people discussions of Russian aggression towards our sovereignty and election. And other elections.

Trump isn't a dictator, but Bannon would love if he was. But Trump is just a really incompetent version of Nixon. He is no Putin.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 04:09:58
February 18 2017 04:04 GMT
#138271
You're not wrong for broaching the topic - you're wrong for a severe overreaction to an admittedly problematic behavior.

Edit: This isn't going anywhere, as usual with you. Might as well just nip this in the bud and end the discussion. Random Russia mention is random by the way (your desire for people to see Russia in a poor light is noted).
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 04:11:52
February 18 2017 04:11 GMT
#138272
Just pointing out your constant attempts to derail rather than engage with a topic. Specifically dictatorships and their trappings, real or highly hypothetical.

And saying someone is overreacting is synonymous with calling them hysterical. Not really convincing me of much.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
February 18 2017 05:08 GMT
#138273
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

Insofar as I know, nobody in this thread is choosing jack shit, but if they were, I'd assume one person, one vote. If you're so passionate about Ellison, then make the case why he's better, because "it's important that we win" doesn't convince anybody.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12533 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 05:24:30
February 18 2017 05:23 GMT
#138274
On February 18 2017 14:08 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

Insofar as I know, nobody in this thread is choosing jack shit, but if they were, I'd assume one person, one vote. If you're so passionate about Ellison, then make the case why he's better, because "it's important that we win" doesn't convince anybody.


Dude I'm not even american and you aren't either, why are you acting as if I believe it's about us choosing anything? Of course we aren't choosing anything. I'm just pointing out that in an equal relationship where both partners are honest, if one is mostly okay with A and B and the other reaaaaally wants A, then you probably should end up with A. That's a really basic thing. So if the DNC ends up going with B when one part of its base wants either A or B and the other part of its base wants A, that says something about the situation.



As per the press discussion, it's kind of ludicrous in the first place because the american press has actually been overall way too fair to republicans for way too long. It took a Trump for people to come out and actually denounce obvious lies, when the republicans have been demonstrably dishonest on a multitude of subjects for a multitude of years. The far right parties of most of Europe dream of a press that lets them get away with as much as yours does.
No will to live, no wish to die
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 05:30:16
February 18 2017 05:29 GMT
#138275
On February 18 2017 14:23 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 14:08 Acrofales wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

Insofar as I know, nobody in this thread is choosing jack shit, but if they were, I'd assume one person, one vote. If you're so passionate about Ellison, then make the case why he's better, because "it's important that we win" doesn't convince anybody.


Dude I'm not even american and you aren't either, why are you acting as if I believe it's about us choosing anything? Of course we aren't choosing anything. I'm just pointing out that in an equal relationship where both partners are honest, if one is mostly okay with A and B and the other reaaaaally wants A, then you probably should end up with A. That's a really basic thing. So if the DNC ends up going with B when one part of its base wants either A or B and the other part of its base wants A, that says something about the situation.



As per the press discussion, it's kind of ludicrous in the first place because the american press has actually been overall way too fair to republicans for way too long. It took a Trump for people to come out and actually denounce obvious lies, when the republicans have been demonstrably dishonest on a multitude of subjects for a multitude of years. The far right parties of most of Europe dream of a press that lets them get away with as much as yours does.

A and B are classifications in this case, not individuals, so the total weight of them is not so clear. in particular it's not equivalent to a two person system.

it's also a question of which standards should apply to the decision process.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12533 Posts
February 18 2017 05:38 GMT
#138276
On February 18 2017 14:29 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 14:23 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 14:08 Acrofales wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

Insofar as I know, nobody in this thread is choosing jack shit, but if they were, I'd assume one person, one vote. If you're so passionate about Ellison, then make the case why he's better, because "it's important that we win" doesn't convince anybody.


Dude I'm not even american and you aren't either, why are you acting as if I believe it's about us choosing anything? Of course we aren't choosing anything. I'm just pointing out that in an equal relationship where both partners are honest, if one is mostly okay with A and B and the other reaaaaally wants A, then you probably should end up with A. That's a really basic thing. So if the DNC ends up going with B when one part of its base wants either A or B and the other part of its base wants A, that says something about the situation.



As per the press discussion, it's kind of ludicrous in the first place because the american press has actually been overall way too fair to republicans for way too long. It took a Trump for people to come out and actually denounce obvious lies, when the republicans have been demonstrably dishonest on a multitude of subjects for a multitude of years. The far right parties of most of Europe dream of a press that lets them get away with as much as yours does.

A and B are classifications in this case, not individuals, so the total weight of them is not so clear. in particular it's not equivalent to a two person system.

it's also a question of which standards should apply to the decision process.


Why are they classifications rather than individuals?
No will to live, no wish to die
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 05:45:27
February 18 2017 05:44 GMT
#138277
On February 18 2017 14:38 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 14:29 zlefin wrote:
On February 18 2017 14:23 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 14:08 Acrofales wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

Insofar as I know, nobody in this thread is choosing jack shit, but if they were, I'd assume one person, one vote. If you're so passionate about Ellison, then make the case why he's better, because "it's important that we win" doesn't convince anybody.


Dude I'm not even american and you aren't either, why are you acting as if I believe it's about us choosing anything? Of course we aren't choosing anything. I'm just pointing out that in an equal relationship where both partners are honest, if one is mostly okay with A and B and the other reaaaaally wants A, then you probably should end up with A. That's a really basic thing. So if the DNC ends up going with B when one part of its base wants either A or B and the other part of its base wants A, that says something about the situation.



As per the press discussion, it's kind of ludicrous in the first place because the american press has actually been overall way too fair to republicans for way too long. It took a Trump for people to come out and actually denounce obvious lies, when the republicans have been demonstrably dishonest on a multitude of subjects for a multitude of years. The far right parties of most of Europe dream of a press that lets them get away with as much as yours does.

A and B are classifications in this case, not individuals, so the total weight of them is not so clear. in particular it's not equivalent to a two person system.

it's also a question of which standards should apply to the decision process.


Why are they classifications rather than individuals?

oops. my bad, I was incorrectly noting which words were used where.
It should instead be that where you said "both partners", that's the parts that should have been referred to for purposes of unclear weighting etc, rather than the A/B set.

so it should be both "partners" are classifications in this case, not individuals, so the total weight of them is not so clear. in particular it's not equivalent to a two person system.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12533 Posts
February 18 2017 05:50 GMT
#138278
On February 18 2017 14:44 zlefin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 14:38 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 14:29 zlefin wrote:
On February 18 2017 14:23 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 14:08 Acrofales wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

Insofar as I know, nobody in this thread is choosing jack shit, but if they were, I'd assume one person, one vote. If you're so passionate about Ellison, then make the case why he's better, because "it's important that we win" doesn't convince anybody.


Dude I'm not even american and you aren't either, why are you acting as if I believe it's about us choosing anything? Of course we aren't choosing anything. I'm just pointing out that in an equal relationship where both partners are honest, if one is mostly okay with A and B and the other reaaaaally wants A, then you probably should end up with A. That's a really basic thing. So if the DNC ends up going with B when one part of its base wants either A or B and the other part of its base wants A, that says something about the situation.



As per the press discussion, it's kind of ludicrous in the first place because the american press has actually been overall way too fair to republicans for way too long. It took a Trump for people to come out and actually denounce obvious lies, when the republicans have been demonstrably dishonest on a multitude of subjects for a multitude of years. The far right parties of most of Europe dream of a press that lets them get away with as much as yours does.

A and B are classifications in this case, not individuals, so the total weight of them is not so clear. in particular it's not equivalent to a two person system.

it's also a question of which standards should apply to the decision process.


Why are they classifications rather than individuals?

oops. my bad, I was incorrectly noting which words were used where.
It should instead be that where you said "both partners", that's the parts that should have been referred to for purposes of unclear weighting etc, rather than the A/B set.

so it should be both "partners" are classifications in this case, not individuals, so the total weight of them is not so clear. in particular it's not equivalent to a two person system.


Okay, then that's true, but it's also pretty obvious, and doesn't stop us from looking at the major trends in priority.
No will to live, no wish to die
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
February 18 2017 06:26 GMT
#138279
On February 18 2017 12:40 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 12:33 Aquanim wrote:
On February 18 2017 11:42 xDaunt wrote:
If it's not unconstitutional, then there's nothing wrong with it.
...

Can you confirm that you actually meant to say this?

Unlawful may be the better word (though issues of lawfulness concerning the press almost inevitably concern constitutionality), but yes.

Morality and legality are not the same. E.g. if you are an evangelical extremist you believe it's morally wrong to allow women to have an abortion or gays to marry. Luckily it is not legally wrong. For you to marry your morality to legality means you have no moral compass of your own and rely on the American courts to decide what is right or wrong. If that's so, then why are you often so outspoken against things that are obviously legal. One of which is Obamacare, which has been deemed legal, and according to you therefore just.

In fact, with a morality defined by law it seems very hard for you to support your congressmen (or Congress at all): their principal purpose is to propose changes to laws, but how could they do that without some further moral compass about what is right? Pragmatism alone?

But in all fairness, I doubt you actually hold that belief, because you have voiced strong opinions on some of the courts' rulings, as well as proposals by Congress and the president for changes in the law. So clearly you do have some opinion about what is right, regardless of what is lawful. So why not answer the question that was asked rather than dodging it with this weird false equivalency?
Acrofales
Profile Joined August 2010
Spain18438 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-18 06:32:06
February 18 2017 06:30 GMT
#138280
On February 18 2017 14:23 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 14:08 Acrofales wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

Insofar as I know, nobody in this thread is choosing jack shit, but if they were, I'd assume one person, one vote. If you're so passionate about Ellison, then make the case why he's better, because "it's important that we win" doesn't convince anybody.


Dude I'm not even american and you aren't either, why are you acting as if I believe it's about us choosing anything? Of course we aren't choosing anything. I'm just pointing out that in an equal relationship where both partners are honest, if one is mostly okay with A and B and the other reaaaaally wants A, then you probably should end up with A. That's a really basic thing. So if the DNC ends up going with B when one part of its base wants either A or B and the other part of its base wants A, that says something about the situation.



As per the press discussion, it's kind of ludicrous in the first place because the american press has actually been overall way too fair to republicans for way too long. It took a Trump for people to come out and actually denounce obvious lies, when the republicans have been demonstrably dishonest on a multitude of subjects for a multitude of years. The far right parties of most of Europe dream of a press that lets them get away with as much as yours does.

Shouldn't the proportions matter? If 99% of the party wants A, but is okay with B too, but 1% really really wants B, which choice is"right"?

In most European systems clearly the B people would have left the party ages ago and started their own political party. In the US the first past the post system prevents that. So should 1% (note: proportions are fictional) be able to hold the party hostage by virtue of their uncompromising stance?
Prev 1 6912 6913 6914 6915 6916 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 11m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech145
SHIN 77
BRAT_OK 68
UpATreeSC 57
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 27007
Bisu 2318
Jaedong 1782
Soulkey 798
BeSt 381
Horang2 368
Mini 350
Soma 262
Rush 259
Stork 225
[ Show more ]
Larva 207
ggaemo 199
HiyA 143
Shine 140
firebathero 136
Dewaltoss 115
910 111
hero 105
Barracks 65
Zeus 61
Killer 43
soO 39
sorry 38
PianO 28
Terrorterran 24
ToSsGirL 23
sSak 20
Trap 20
Sexy 18
Mong 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
scan(afreeca) 13
Noble 10
zelot 9
Sacsri 4
Dota 2
420jenkins452
Counter-Strike
fl0m1007
ceh9358
pashabiceps187
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King97
C9.Mang067
Other Games
Grubby8448
singsing2128
Liquid`RaSZi1342
Beastyqt608
FrodaN469
DeMusliM179
ArmadaUGS121
TKL 96
XaKoH 89
QueenE38
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1475
WardiTV227
BasetradeTV56
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 56
• mYiSmile144
• Hinosc 28
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade904
Other Games
• Shiphtur162
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
7h 11m
The PondCast
17h 11m
Kung Fu Cup
18h 11m
Replay Cast
1d 7h
KCM Race Survival
1d 17h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 18h
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-14
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.