• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:32
CEST 11:32
KST 18:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview4[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)5Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview5
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League4Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double0Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 527 Hell Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 526 Rubber and Glue Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Pros React To: ASL S21 Finals BW General Discussion Very long shot - StarCraft x A7X video Pros React to: TvT Masterclass in FlaSh vs Light vespene.gg — BW replays in browser
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck? European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development streaming software
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Customization Drives Loyalty…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2434 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6910

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6908 6909 6910 6911 6912 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 18:30 GMT
#138181
On February 18 2017 03:22 Logo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
In mildly related science news: New Zealand is apparently its own continent now.



So we finally have the 7 continents we were always told we had? (Well at least 6).

It's being advertised as #8. Depends how you count the Americas, Eurasia, and India I guess.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
February 17 2017 18:31 GMT
#138182
On February 18 2017 03:26 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 03:20 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:15 Plansix wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
I feel like we're back to how stupid of a fight this is, let's just give Ellison the job and figure out wtf we're going to do with Democrats like Manchin.

EDIT: I sense I know where this conversation is heading, so I'd like to just get the argument of "well we'd rather him than a Republican" out of the way first.

What are some examples of something in the past 6 years where having Manchin, instead of a Republican, has made a substantive difference (actually changed an outcome)? Because if there aren't any of those, I feel that argument falls apart on it's face.

This is not a compelling argument that there is a progressive candidate that can win that state. That man isn’t going away and neither are the voters who vote for him.

But I support your plan of trying to primary him and any other democrat in the senate you disapprove of. Replace them all with Republicans if we can’t have progressives in there. I am excited to see the results.


What's the point in having someone with a D next to their name if they aren't going to make a difference in winning anything for the D they claim? It's stupid moral victories like that, that's left the Democratic party unable to even fight Trump.

No, the moral victory is running someone who will never win so you get to claim the moral high ground despite having no results to show for it.

Better to have someone that will ally with your goals some of the time, than someone who will always oppose you.


Not if you can't show me any evidence having that ally helped change any outcomes. Then at least the blame would go to the right party for their senator's failure to meet their expectations.

Particularly when I can point to him cheering on Trump in "finalizing" a rule that will allow coal mining companies to further pollute the water, approving Sessions, and more in the past, as well as more to come I'm sure. Giving both Trump and that legislation a "bipartisan" stamp of approval it wouldn't have if he or the sitting senator was a Republican.

Well it doesn't make much difference when the Democrats don't hold power in any of the branches of your government, so that's a rather moot point right now.

If they win the Senate by 10 or 20 seats, I'm sure we could go down the list then and find how many of those seats you feel are Democrats in name only.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23984 Posts
February 17 2017 18:33 GMT
#138183
On February 18 2017 03:29 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 03:22 Logo wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:15 Plansix wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
I feel like we're back to how stupid of a fight this is, let's just give Ellison the job and figure out wtf we're going to do with Democrats like Manchin.

EDIT: I sense I know where this conversation is heading, so I'd like to just get the argument of "well we'd rather him than a Republican" out of the way first.

What are some examples of something in the past 6 years where having Manchin, instead of a Republican, has made a substantive difference (actually changed an outcome)? Because if there aren't any of those, I feel that argument falls apart on it's face.

This is not a compelling argument that there is a progressive candidate that can win that state. That man isn’t going away and neither are the voters who vote for him.

But I support your plan of trying to primary him and any other democrat in the senate you disapprove of. Replace them all with Republicans if we can’t have progressives in there. I am excited to see the results.


This is a terrible attitude. You're taking a snarky dismissive attitude (dare I say elitist?) because someone has differing political ideologies and wants to try to make things better? But rather than address the shortcomings of those ideologies you just dismiss them as not being tactical. It comes off as a cheap way to dismiss any thoughts of change because we always have to focus on 'defeating the enemy'.

On February 18 2017 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
In mildly related science news: New Zealand is apparently its own continent now.



So we finally have the 7 continents we were always told we had?

I was completely wrong last time around, so I am willing to put my support behind ideas that I think are bad. If people think they can get a progressive senator in WV, I’m all about it. I don’t think it will work, but I was so very wrong last time around that I clearly shouldn’t make the final call. So lets give it a shot.

But I’m not giving up my ability to say “I had a feeling that wasn’t going to work out,” next time around. And GH earns his snarky responses all on his own.


I'd take plenty of told ya so's and snark if it meant people would make that admission and legitimately give this a shot. I'd like if they sold it as hard as they sold Hillary (particularly the ones that made the "I don't think she's that great, but it CAN'T be TRUMP?!?" case), but I'd settle for not trying to rally behind people like Manchin.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 18:37 GMT
#138184
I’ll take the devil I know most of the time, to be honest. Especially when on the ropes. But if it can be done, get it done.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States23984 Posts
February 17 2017 18:45 GMT
#138185
On February 18 2017 03:37 Plansix wrote:
I’ll take the devil I know most of the time, to be honest. Especially when on the ropes. But if it can be done, get it done.


Given my little knowledge about WV, my understanding of how Manchin wins that seat is basically that the D next to his name give him all of the non-R votes, and he cleaves off enough R's from the ones that actually listen to what he says (basically what the Republicans of the state want).

A progressive candidate trades R's that will vote D if he says the right things (supports Trump), for people who don't vote R or D reliably but want real change to some specifics like healthcare, a safe and equitable work place, safe water, etc... I don't expect a senator from WV to be leading the charge on racial inequality, but I do expect them to at least be able to sell the stuff that will actually improve their constituents quality of life in a sustainable way.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 18:55 GMT
#138186
From my brief review, it looks like he has been involved in WV politics since 1984. He been a local rep., state senator, governor and finally senator. I think your reasoning might be a little reductive, because he has been challenged in a number of primaries and won.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 19:22:26
February 17 2017 19:17 GMT
#138187
If the West Virginia Democratic party supports Manchin, then he deserves to be a WV Senator with a (D) next to his name. If he's orchestrating sinister machinations to shut down all other Democrats that run for his seat, that's another thing, but as far as I know he just wins the primaries because WV people, even Democrats, like guns and don't like abortion and see environmental regulation destroying their way of life.

(if he's only winning the primary because of Republicans crossing over, they should probably close the primary...wait...do we want open or closed primaries now? I'm so confused these days)

If people think more WV Democrats would like them than Manchin, it's perfectly reasonable for them to try to run of course.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
February 17 2017 19:42 GMT
#138188
fwiw manchin and toomey had a pretty good gun bill after sandy hook. it loosened regulations but did strengthen background checks. too bad.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 17 2017 20:17 GMT
#138189
re: manchin, a bit hard finding the exact data i'm looking for; but looking at
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/06/11/here-are-the-members-of-congress-who-vote-against-their-party-the-most/?utm_term=.853940644d24
it seems like while he does vote against the party a fair deal on close issues, he does vote with the party more than half the time still on them.
not sure what the exact actual effects amount to.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 20:21 GMT
#138190
There is no doubt that he could have a better voting record. Almost any other democrat would be better for the party in that seat. But that isn’t the issue. The issue is can you get another democrat in that seat over him? Is that possible and what would it take? And if the party as a whole pushes for that, what do you do if its backfires?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 20:23:39
February 17 2017 20:22 GMT
#138191
In mildly related news, McCaskill is apparently worried about being primaried due to the tea party-like enthusiasm of the left.
"I am for sure gonna run," McCaskill said on "The Mark Reardon Show" on KMOX Newsradio 1120. "And I may have a primary because there is, in our party now, some of the same kind of enthusiasm at the base that the Republican party had with the Tea Party. We are seeing that same--and many of those people are very impatient with me because they don't think I'm pure. For example, they think I should be voting against all of Trump's nominees and of course I'm judging each nominee on its own merit."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/kfile-mccaskill-on-2018/
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 20:25 GMT
#138192
Everything I've heard about her suggests to me that she is a vulnerable candidate who won on the back of her opponent making the stupid "legitimate rape" comment. A primary challenge would not surprise me.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12465 Posts
February 17 2017 20:35 GMT
#138193
On February 18 2017 05:22 Nevuk wrote:
In mildly related news, McCaskill is apparently worried about being primaried due to the tea party-like enthusiasm of the left.
Show nested quote +
"I am for sure gonna run," McCaskill said on "The Mark Reardon Show" on KMOX Newsradio 1120. "And I may have a primary because there is, in our party now, some of the same kind of enthusiasm at the base that the Republican party had with the Tea Party. We are seeing that same--and many of those people are very impatient with me because they don't think I'm pure. For example, they think I should be voting against all of Trump's nominees and of course I'm judging each nominee on its own merit."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/kfile-mccaskill-on-2018/


A lot of people confuse integrity with purity. Or perhaps it's not a confusion but a tactic. Either way, it has little to do with which Trump nominees you choose to confirm or not.
No will to live, no wish to die
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 20:38 GMT
#138194
Scott Pruit is le confirmed to lead the EPA. Two Democrats voted for him, one Republican against. 52-46.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
February 17 2017 20:51 GMT
#138195
On February 18 2017 05:38 LegalLord wrote:
Scott Pruit is le confirmed to lead the EPA. Two Democrats voted for him, one Republican against. 52-46.


Pretty bizarre that anyone would oppose Puzder but not Pruitt.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 20:58 GMT
#138196
Puzder just ran into vetting issues. He had a bunch of problems that had nothing to do with his views of the office or the job.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 21:07:19
February 17 2017 21:07 GMT
#138197
I would have thought that Pruitt having his pockets stuffed with fossil fuel company money would count as vetting issues.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 21:10:17
February 17 2017 21:09 GMT
#138198
Not for the GOP for the couple Democratic senators who are crossing party lines. All of these people are getting approved unless the vetting shows they beat their wife like 30 times and hired illegal immigrants.

Holding up these nominations doesn’t stop Trump or anything. Cabinet positions are going to get filled.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
February 17 2017 21:30 GMT
#138199
On February 18 2017 02:56 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 02:47 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:34 farvacola wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

It'd be a mistake to let anyone carry the standard for 45 or 55 percent of interested Democrats. GH convincing you that millions of people would consider Perez "forced" on them is him doing good politics more than it is an accurate representation of where folks actually fall on the issue. Either will still provide for the realignment that needs to happen imo.


GH convincing me? You might want to spend some time on progressive internet. There are places where even Ellison is viewed as too much of a corporate democrat, but at least he has a decent amount of the support; literally no one is okay with Perez in these circles.

I'm not really interested in hand-wavey attempts at using gesticulating towards particular communities to anchor shorthand characterizations of left, more left, and most left. Yes, there are places where literally everyone thinks like GH, but given my unwillingness to get into the mud of figuring out exactly what proportion of the potentially voting public said places represent, you'll have to forgive me for disagreeing with the idea that obstinacy on the part of an ill-determined sub-constituency should control the outcome of a major party decision.


GH represents a very unique and not common sub-sect of a larger population, though. As an example, there are a lot of people who didn't wanna vote for Clinton, and chose Bernie, but they also would have voted for Biden in the general election. It is important to realize that while the democratic party may never convince GH, there are still people half way between GH and moderate who also decided to tell Clinton to shove it. Clinton was a very, very hard sale.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 21:44 GMT
#138200
On February 18 2017 06:30 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 02:56 farvacola wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:47 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:34 farvacola wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

It'd be a mistake to let anyone carry the standard for 45 or 55 percent of interested Democrats. GH convincing you that millions of people would consider Perez "forced" on them is him doing good politics more than it is an accurate representation of where folks actually fall on the issue. Either will still provide for the realignment that needs to happen imo.


GH convincing me? You might want to spend some time on progressive internet. There are places where even Ellison is viewed as too much of a corporate democrat, but at least he has a decent amount of the support; literally no one is okay with Perez in these circles.

I'm not really interested in hand-wavey attempts at using gesticulating towards particular communities to anchor shorthand characterizations of left, more left, and most left. Yes, there are places where literally everyone thinks like GH, but given my unwillingness to get into the mud of figuring out exactly what proportion of the potentially voting public said places represent, you'll have to forgive me for disagreeing with the idea that obstinacy on the part of an ill-determined sub-constituency should control the outcome of a major party decision.


GH represents a very unique and not common sub-sect of a larger population, though. As an example, there are a lot of people who didn't wanna vote for Clinton, and chose Bernie, but they also would have voted for Biden in the general election. It is important to realize that while the democratic party may never convince GH, there are still people half way between GH and moderate who also decided to tell Clinton to shove it. Clinton was a very, very hard sale.

GH seems like a garden variety pure blooded American leftist. I know many who speak a lot like he does about issues and that's what I'd describe them as.

Insert another "electable" comment here.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Prev 1 6908 6909 6910 6911 6912 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
GSL
09:30
2026 Season 2: Ro8 Group A
herO vs Classic
Cure vs Clem
IntoTheiNu 69
CranKy Ducklings SOOP9
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Ryung 60
Rex 11
Classic 1
herO (SOOP) 1
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 461
actioN 148
Hyun 122
EffOrt 89
Pusan 78
ggaemo 43
Hm[arnc] 32
NaDa 29
Liquid`Ret 28
Free 24
[ Show more ]
Bale 23
ZerO 14
NotJumperer 12
Movie 12
Terrorterran 11
Rush 9
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Light 0
Dota 2
Gorgc3247
XaKoH 413
NeuroSwarm104
canceldota31
League of Legends
Reynor72
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1055
shoxiejesuss797
byalli691
m0e_tv474
allub112
Other Games
ceh9560
Pyrionflax152
Mew2King150
RuFF_SC240
ZerO(Twitch)1
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick610
Counter-Strike
PGL391
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 29
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 6
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1365
Upcoming Events
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5h 28m
Replay Cast
14h 28m
GSL
23h 58m
Maru vs SHIN
Zoun vs Rogue
WardiTV Spring Champion…
1d 2h
SKillous vs Strange
Lambo vs Strange
Ryung vs Strange
Lambo vs Ryung
Ryung vs SKillous
Lambo vs SKillous
OSC
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
Maestros of the Game
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Lambo vs SHIN
Solar vs Rogue
herO vs Clem
Maestros of the Game
3 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
3 days
ZZZero vs WorsT
Julia vs eOnzErG
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maestros of the Game
4 days
IPSL
4 days
Dragon vs Artosis
dxtr13 vs Hawk
BSL
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
6 days
Maestros of the Game
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

2026 KK StarCraft Pro League
BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
KK 2v2 League Season 1
YSL S3
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: King of Kings
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
Bounty Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.