• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:56
CEST 22:56
KST 05:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver4[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down0StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon98Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Why Protoss Struggles on ASL (Ft. Shuttle, Tulbo) Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? Remastered crash fix suggestions [D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4719 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6910

Forum Index > Closed
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6908 6909 6910 6911 6912 10093 Next
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.

In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!

NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 18:30 GMT
#138181
On February 18 2017 03:22 Logo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
In mildly related science news: New Zealand is apparently its own continent now.



So we finally have the 7 continents we were always told we had? (Well at least 6).

It's being advertised as #8. Depends how you count the Americas, Eurasia, and India I guess.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
February 17 2017 18:31 GMT
#138182
On February 18 2017 03:26 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 03:20 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:17 GreenHorizons wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:15 Plansix wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
I feel like we're back to how stupid of a fight this is, let's just give Ellison the job and figure out wtf we're going to do with Democrats like Manchin.

EDIT: I sense I know where this conversation is heading, so I'd like to just get the argument of "well we'd rather him than a Republican" out of the way first.

What are some examples of something in the past 6 years where having Manchin, instead of a Republican, has made a substantive difference (actually changed an outcome)? Because if there aren't any of those, I feel that argument falls apart on it's face.

This is not a compelling argument that there is a progressive candidate that can win that state. That man isn’t going away and neither are the voters who vote for him.

But I support your plan of trying to primary him and any other democrat in the senate you disapprove of. Replace them all with Republicans if we can’t have progressives in there. I am excited to see the results.


What's the point in having someone with a D next to their name if they aren't going to make a difference in winning anything for the D they claim? It's stupid moral victories like that, that's left the Democratic party unable to even fight Trump.

No, the moral victory is running someone who will never win so you get to claim the moral high ground despite having no results to show for it.

Better to have someone that will ally with your goals some of the time, than someone who will always oppose you.


Not if you can't show me any evidence having that ally helped change any outcomes. Then at least the blame would go to the right party for their senator's failure to meet their expectations.

Particularly when I can point to him cheering on Trump in "finalizing" a rule that will allow coal mining companies to further pollute the water, approving Sessions, and more in the past, as well as more to come I'm sure. Giving both Trump and that legislation a "bipartisan" stamp of approval it wouldn't have if he or the sitting senator was a Republican.

Well it doesn't make much difference when the Democrats don't hold power in any of the branches of your government, so that's a rather moot point right now.

If they win the Senate by 10 or 20 seats, I'm sure we could go down the list then and find how many of those seats you feel are Democrats in name only.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24353 Posts
February 17 2017 18:33 GMT
#138183
On February 18 2017 03:29 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 03:22 Logo wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:15 Plansix wrote:
On February 18 2017 03:03 GreenHorizons wrote:
I feel like we're back to how stupid of a fight this is, let's just give Ellison the job and figure out wtf we're going to do with Democrats like Manchin.

EDIT: I sense I know where this conversation is heading, so I'd like to just get the argument of "well we'd rather him than a Republican" out of the way first.

What are some examples of something in the past 6 years where having Manchin, instead of a Republican, has made a substantive difference (actually changed an outcome)? Because if there aren't any of those, I feel that argument falls apart on it's face.

This is not a compelling argument that there is a progressive candidate that can win that state. That man isn’t going away and neither are the voters who vote for him.

But I support your plan of trying to primary him and any other democrat in the senate you disapprove of. Replace them all with Republicans if we can’t have progressives in there. I am excited to see the results.


This is a terrible attitude. You're taking a snarky dismissive attitude (dare I say elitist?) because someone has differing political ideologies and wants to try to make things better? But rather than address the shortcomings of those ideologies you just dismiss them as not being tactical. It comes off as a cheap way to dismiss any thoughts of change because we always have to focus on 'defeating the enemy'.

On February 18 2017 03:21 LegalLord wrote:
In mildly related science news: New Zealand is apparently its own continent now.



So we finally have the 7 continents we were always told we had?

I was completely wrong last time around, so I am willing to put my support behind ideas that I think are bad. If people think they can get a progressive senator in WV, I’m all about it. I don’t think it will work, but I was so very wrong last time around that I clearly shouldn’t make the final call. So lets give it a shot.

But I’m not giving up my ability to say “I had a feeling that wasn’t going to work out,” next time around. And GH earns his snarky responses all on his own.


I'd take plenty of told ya so's and snark if it meant people would make that admission and legitimately give this a shot. I'd like if they sold it as hard as they sold Hillary (particularly the ones that made the "I don't think she's that great, but it CAN'T be TRUMP?!?" case), but I'd settle for not trying to rally behind people like Manchin.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 18:37 GMT
#138184
I’ll take the devil I know most of the time, to be honest. Especially when on the ropes. But if it can be done, get it done.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24353 Posts
February 17 2017 18:45 GMT
#138185
On February 18 2017 03:37 Plansix wrote:
I’ll take the devil I know most of the time, to be honest. Especially when on the ropes. But if it can be done, get it done.


Given my little knowledge about WV, my understanding of how Manchin wins that seat is basically that the D next to his name give him all of the non-R votes, and he cleaves off enough R's from the ones that actually listen to what he says (basically what the Republicans of the state want).

A progressive candidate trades R's that will vote D if he says the right things (supports Trump), for people who don't vote R or D reliably but want real change to some specifics like healthcare, a safe and equitable work place, safe water, etc... I don't expect a senator from WV to be leading the charge on racial inequality, but I do expect them to at least be able to sell the stuff that will actually improve their constituents quality of life in a sustainable way.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 18:55 GMT
#138186
From my brief review, it looks like he has been involved in WV politics since 1984. He been a local rep., state senator, governor and finally senator. I think your reasoning might be a little reductive, because he has been challenged in a number of primaries and won.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
TheTenthDoc
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States9561 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 19:22:26
February 17 2017 19:17 GMT
#138187
If the West Virginia Democratic party supports Manchin, then he deserves to be a WV Senator with a (D) next to his name. If he's orchestrating sinister machinations to shut down all other Democrats that run for his seat, that's another thing, but as far as I know he just wins the primaries because WV people, even Democrats, like guns and don't like abortion and see environmental regulation destroying their way of life.

(if he's only winning the primary because of Republicans crossing over, they should probably close the primary...wait...do we want open or closed primaries now? I'm so confused these days)

If people think more WV Democrats would like them than Manchin, it's perfectly reasonable for them to try to run of course.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
February 17 2017 19:42 GMT
#138188
fwiw manchin and toomey had a pretty good gun bill after sandy hook. it loosened regulations but did strengthen background checks. too bad.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
zlefin
Profile Blog Joined October 2012
United States7689 Posts
February 17 2017 20:17 GMT
#138189
re: manchin, a bit hard finding the exact data i'm looking for; but looking at
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2015/06/11/here-are-the-members-of-congress-who-vote-against-their-party-the-most/?utm_term=.853940644d24
it seems like while he does vote against the party a fair deal on close issues, he does vote with the party more than half the time still on them.
not sure what the exact actual effects amount to.
Great read: http://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/ great book on democracy: http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10671.html zlefin is grumpier due to long term illness. Ignoring some users.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 20:21 GMT
#138190
There is no doubt that he could have a better voting record. Almost any other democrat would be better for the party in that seat. But that isn’t the issue. The issue is can you get another democrat in that seat over him? Is that possible and what would it take? And if the party as a whole pushes for that, what do you do if its backfires?
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Nevuk
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States16280 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 20:23:39
February 17 2017 20:22 GMT
#138191
In mildly related news, McCaskill is apparently worried about being primaried due to the tea party-like enthusiasm of the left.
"I am for sure gonna run," McCaskill said on "The Mark Reardon Show" on KMOX Newsradio 1120. "And I may have a primary because there is, in our party now, some of the same kind of enthusiasm at the base that the Republican party had with the Tea Party. We are seeing that same--and many of those people are very impatient with me because they don't think I'm pure. For example, they think I should be voting against all of Trump's nominees and of course I'm judging each nominee on its own merit."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/kfile-mccaskill-on-2018/
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 20:25 GMT
#138192
Everything I've heard about her suggests to me that she is a vulnerable candidate who won on the back of her opponent making the stupid "legitimate rape" comment. A primary challenge would not surprise me.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12533 Posts
February 17 2017 20:35 GMT
#138193
On February 18 2017 05:22 Nevuk wrote:
In mildly related news, McCaskill is apparently worried about being primaried due to the tea party-like enthusiasm of the left.
Show nested quote +
"I am for sure gonna run," McCaskill said on "The Mark Reardon Show" on KMOX Newsradio 1120. "And I may have a primary because there is, in our party now, some of the same kind of enthusiasm at the base that the Republican party had with the Tea Party. We are seeing that same--and many of those people are very impatient with me because they don't think I'm pure. For example, they think I should be voting against all of Trump's nominees and of course I'm judging each nominee on its own merit."

http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/17/politics/kfile-mccaskill-on-2018/


A lot of people confuse integrity with purity. Or perhaps it's not a confusion but a tactic. Either way, it has little to do with which Trump nominees you choose to confirm or not.
No will to live, no wish to die
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 20:38 GMT
#138194
Scott Pruit is le confirmed to lead the EPA. Two Democrats voted for him, one Republican against. 52-46.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
February 17 2017 20:51 GMT
#138195
On February 18 2017 05:38 LegalLord wrote:
Scott Pruit is le confirmed to lead the EPA. Two Democrats voted for him, one Republican against. 52-46.


Pretty bizarre that anyone would oppose Puzder but not Pruitt.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
February 17 2017 20:58 GMT
#138196
Puzder just ran into vetting issues. He had a bunch of problems that had nothing to do with his views of the office or the job.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Doodsmack
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States7224 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 21:07:19
February 17 2017 21:07 GMT
#138197
I would have thought that Pruitt having his pockets stuffed with fossil fuel company money would count as vetting issues.
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-02-17 21:10:17
February 17 2017 21:09 GMT
#138198
Not for the GOP for the couple Democratic senators who are crossing party lines. All of these people are getting approved unless the vetting shows they beat their wife like 30 times and hired illegal immigrants.

Holding up these nominations doesn’t stop Trump or anything. Cabinet positions are going to get filled.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15743 Posts
February 17 2017 21:30 GMT
#138199
On February 18 2017 02:56 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 02:47 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:34 farvacola wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

It'd be a mistake to let anyone carry the standard for 45 or 55 percent of interested Democrats. GH convincing you that millions of people would consider Perez "forced" on them is him doing good politics more than it is an accurate representation of where folks actually fall on the issue. Either will still provide for the realignment that needs to happen imo.


GH convincing me? You might want to spend some time on progressive internet. There are places where even Ellison is viewed as too much of a corporate democrat, but at least he has a decent amount of the support; literally no one is okay with Perez in these circles.

I'm not really interested in hand-wavey attempts at using gesticulating towards particular communities to anchor shorthand characterizations of left, more left, and most left. Yes, there are places where literally everyone thinks like GH, but given my unwillingness to get into the mud of figuring out exactly what proportion of the potentially voting public said places represent, you'll have to forgive me for disagreeing with the idea that obstinacy on the part of an ill-determined sub-constituency should control the outcome of a major party decision.


GH represents a very unique and not common sub-sect of a larger population, though. As an example, there are a lot of people who didn't wanna vote for Clinton, and chose Bernie, but they also would have voted for Biden in the general election. It is important to realize that while the democratic party may never convince GH, there are still people half way between GH and moderate who also decided to tell Clinton to shove it. Clinton was a very, very hard sale.
LegalLord
Profile Blog Joined April 2013
United States13779 Posts
February 17 2017 21:44 GMT
#138200
On February 18 2017 06:30 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 18 2017 02:56 farvacola wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:47 Nebuchad wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:34 farvacola wrote:
On February 18 2017 02:30 Nebuchad wrote:
Okay so we have one side who thinks it's not very important which one goes through, something like 55-45, and one side who thinks it's very important which one goes through. So since we're equal in this partnership, you're going to account for how important it's for the other side and choose the person who they think is important, right?

Right?

It'd be a mistake to let anyone carry the standard for 45 or 55 percent of interested Democrats. GH convincing you that millions of people would consider Perez "forced" on them is him doing good politics more than it is an accurate representation of where folks actually fall on the issue. Either will still provide for the realignment that needs to happen imo.


GH convincing me? You might want to spend some time on progressive internet. There are places where even Ellison is viewed as too much of a corporate democrat, but at least he has a decent amount of the support; literally no one is okay with Perez in these circles.

I'm not really interested in hand-wavey attempts at using gesticulating towards particular communities to anchor shorthand characterizations of left, more left, and most left. Yes, there are places where literally everyone thinks like GH, but given my unwillingness to get into the mud of figuring out exactly what proportion of the potentially voting public said places represent, you'll have to forgive me for disagreeing with the idea that obstinacy on the part of an ill-determined sub-constituency should control the outcome of a major party decision.


GH represents a very unique and not common sub-sect of a larger population, though. As an example, there are a lot of people who didn't wanna vote for Clinton, and chose Bernie, but they also would have voted for Biden in the general election. It is important to realize that while the democratic party may never convince GH, there are still people half way between GH and moderate who also decided to tell Clinton to shove it. Clinton was a very, very hard sale.

GH seems like a garden variety pure blooded American leftist. I know many who speak a lot like he does about issues and that's what I'd describe them as.

Insert another "electable" comment here.
History will sooner or later sweep the European Union away without mercy.
Prev 1 6908 6909 6910 6911 6912 10093 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 4m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 516
ProTech140
SpeCial 60
JuggernautJason42
Nina 18
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 17157
Shine 93
910 39
Trap 31
scan(afreeca) 22
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Noble 8
Dota 2
monkeys_forever104
Counter-Strike
Coldzera 1213
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby4838
Liquid`Hasu609
Other Games
FrodaN3099
summit1g2802
Liquid`RaSZi1839
fl0m866
Beastyqt605
C9.Mang0151
XaKoH 147
ArmadaUGS124
UpATreeSC90
Mew2King57
SteadfastSC22
Railgan8
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1830
BasetradeTV47
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix14
• Pr0nogo 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV702
League of Legends
• TFBlade657
Other Games
• imaqtpie851
• Shiphtur133
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
3h 4m
The PondCast
13h 4m
Kung Fu Cup
14h 4m
Replay Cast
1d 3h
KCM Race Survival
1d 13h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 14h
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-14
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.