EPThttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-09/several-markets-are-having-their-biggest-moves-since-brexit?cmpid=socialflow-facebook-business&utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 6049
| Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6214 Posts
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-09/several-markets-are-having-their-biggest-moves-since-brexit?cmpid=socialflow-facebook-business&utm_content=business&utm_campaign=socialflow-organic&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:55 TheYango wrote: Can someone who supports Trump give me a positive spin on why I should be okay with Christie and Gingrich being a part of his administration? Trump is a political neophyte. At this point, I'm willing to give it a shot. Some of his surrogates, however, that have a very real shot at being part of his administration already have...less-than-stellar track records in government. Because Christie, Gingrich, and Trump will all work with democrats to get shit done. | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:57 Introvert wrote: I still think CA is going to come in big for Hillary, this could be another electoral college classic. I think she'll win the popular vote. Want to put a 30 day ban on the line for it? Me vs you? | ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:55 Netscape9 wrote: Florida was just called for Trump. Virginia narrowly went to Hillary though. Well Trump seems to win PA, Mich. and Wisc or at least has a better shot then Clinton to do so. She needs all 3 states, he needs one of them. He will get at least 2 of them, maybe even 3. | ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
oh it did? lmfao | ||
|
Leporello
United States2845 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:55 TheYango wrote: Can someone who supports Trump give me a positive spin on why I should be okay with Christie and Gingrich being a part of his administration? Trump is a political neophyte. At this point, I'm willing to give it a shot. Some of his surrogates that have a very real shot at being part of his administration already have...less-than-stellar track records in government. Not to mention Trump's policies are not anti-establishment. The track-record of his policies is tried and disastrous. People talk about corruption and lying. Mostly, these things are baseless, but more importantly, they just don't matter. We just re-elected George W. Bush. But now he's got a really shitty personality that our allies hate, and has a weird thing with Russia. We're fucked. It isn't insta-lose, world ends. It's 4-8 years of terrible economics and abrasive foreign-policy. But at least he'll "tell it like it is". User was warned for this post | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44364 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:57 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Hopefully the FBI can investigate Hillary properly once Obama is out of office. I don't know what that means... the past ten investigations haven't been proper? | ||
|
Mysticesper
United States1183 Posts
Dems are doing what repubs did during obama, diverting all resources for 2020 gov races to secure a house majority now. and hopefully being less corrupt in the process. The RNC at least allowed for the free democratic primary process, but unfortunately that allowed for a donald trump. The DNC might have had Bernie if it wasnt so corrupt. | ||
|
acker
United States2958 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/005/616/qb.jpg){kind=icon} | ||
|
zeo
Serbia6284 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:57 FiWiFaKi wrote: RealityIsKing. Man, I'm happy you're on my side, but man, you give us Trump guys here a really bad rep. I don't' think Trump would ever have a good rep here mate  | ||
|
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:53 Danglars wrote: We had quote chains at hundreds of words, not that she was some close call, but she was clearly a good candidate that just had enough s*** thrown at her by Republicans that tarnished her name somewhat. I'm wondering if there's anybody on the fence that will finally conclude that in THIS close of a race, something was more wrong with their girl than truthless scandals and an uninformed populace. My more nuanced position was that it was stupid to nominate someone who had been the target of a 20 year smear campaign, regardless of the whether or no the the accusations were true. Made the general election needlessly hard. | ||
|
Introvert
United States4769 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:58 FiWiFaKi wrote: Want to put a 30 day ban on the line for it? Me vs you? I'm generally not a bettor, and I'm not rooting for Hillary. Or Trump. But maybe that doesn't matter? If he wins I kinda want to enjoy liberal tears. | ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:54 blade55555 wrote: I know a majority of TL will disagree and hate this result, but this is for the best. Out of the two candidates we are choosing the least corrupt out of the two. Originally I wasn't even going to vote as both candidates were so shitty. Then I did legit research, not doing research on biased sites like fox news/CNN/MSN/etc. Not listening to the Media, this site, reddit and definitely not my Facebook, but actually looking into them. Reading the DNC emails, I will never understand how people can vote for Hillary. If the leaks where Trump cheated his way into the Primary, had CNN paid off to ask specific questions to his opponent, I would vote Hillary 100%. But that's not what happened, instead we got one of, if not the most corrupt candidate the US has ever had, Hillary as his opponent. I hope Trump is good, don't know if he will actually be a good president or not, but I know he's better than Hillary will ever be. So I hope Trump wins tonight, I know it's looking good, but until it's 100% it's not over. It's practically thread heresy to say the race is legitimately a close least-worse choice between two very bad candidates. Most of her defenders say she's objectively better than Trump on a decent margin. We got somebody that made Trump look good. And right now it looks like Michigan and Wisconsin agree. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
| ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:54 blade55555 wrote: I know a majority of TL will disagree and hate this result, but this is for the best. Out of the two candidates we are choosing the least corrupt out of the two. Originally I wasn't even going to vote as both candidates were so shitty. Then I did legit research, not doing research on biased sites like fox news/CNN/MSN/etc. Not listening to the Media, this site, reddit and definitely not my Facebook, but actually looking into them. Reading the DNC emails, I will never understand how people can vote for Hillary. If the leaks where Trump cheated his way into the Primary, had CNN paid off to ask specific questions to his opponent, I would vote Hillary 100%. But that's not what happened, instead we got one of, if not the most corrupt candidate the US has ever had, Hillary as his opponent. I hope Trump is good, don't know if he will actually be a good president or not, but I know he's better than Hillary will ever be. So I hope Trump wins tonight, I know it's looking good, but until it's 100% it's not over. Is it not true that trump is filling his cabinet with idiots? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On November 09 2016 12:58 xDaunt wrote: Because Christie, Gingrich, and Trump will all work with democrats to get shit done. I thought Christie is politically dead no matter if Clinton or Trump wins at this point with bridge scandal confirmed and all? | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Danglars
United States12133 Posts
| ||
| ||
![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/U3jC2UW.png)
