|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On October 20 2016 11:19 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:18 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 biology]major wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote:
You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. It's a pretty direct and condemning video. It's your choice, but just know that it sounds like you would rather insulate yourself because you can't face certain truths. Its a edited hackjob bullshit video, just like the acorn one. Just because you choose to believe in conspiracy theories from the mentally unstable doesn't mean I have to give them any credence. hackjob? Describe how its a hackjob? Please, I'm genuinely curious why you view it as a "hackjob".
The same way the ACORN video was a hackjob, he has 0 credibility because of that. And the closer such footage is to reality, the more idiotic it is to present it with generic truther editing switching back and forth and adding his face and commentary every other minute instead of releasing it unedited. Very few people are willing to take that seriously, as you can see.
|
On October 20 2016 11:22 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:21 Adreme wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 biology]major wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote:
You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. It's a pretty direct and condemning video. It's your choice, but just know that it sounds like you would rather insulate yourself because you can't face certain truths. When the guy has a history of doctoring footage and doctoring videos, i find it hard to accept his "truth" as 100% fact. So literal video evidence with the people who were immediately fired following the videos with direct ties to the DNC is hard to accept as fact?
Have you listened to an interview of O'Keefe being dismantled by real reporters? They expose his motives and his methods.
http://www.wnyc.org/story/133116-james-okeefe/
Even entertaining his flat out propaganda and lies for a second is an injustice to a person's brain and will.
|
Why are both of these candidates pretending they'll defeat ISIS?
|
You seem under the impression that other people have to respect or listen to your beliefs. That all sides need to be equally represented and weighted. You couldn't possibly be more wrong.
Your source is shit, your video is shit, no one cares and no one will take it seriously.
|
The picture of the 4 year old boy, remember the 4 year old boy.
|
On October 20 2016 11:21 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:21 LegalLord wrote:On October 20 2016 11:20 Blisse wrote:
I honestly think Trump actually has no clue what he's saying and he's just good at parroting words and ideas. It's very clear he has no idea what he's saying. He understands that he is toast.
This just looks like how people try to talk through topics when they find that they are out of their depth.
|
On October 20 2016 11:23 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Aleppo has fallen, have you read the news on the ground ? The rebels are losing "bigly".
|
On October 20 2016 11:23 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:22 Blisse wrote:On October 20 2016 11:20 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:18 Nevuk wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote:
You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. Someone could publish the cure for cancer on Infowars and you'd still write it off. Being unable to even look at the opposing side to your beloved candidate shows ignorance. It's what happens when you burn through literally ALL possibility credibility. Infowars/Breitbart are both better sources than O'Keefe. You didn't even bother to watch the video. Why are you talking about it if you won't even bother to look? The news reporter who posted the article has been completely trashed by the community because he heavily edits videos together to say things that were not true. How do you not understand why people would not think he's credible? Did you watch the video either? Probably not right?
I did. Obviously it's bad. But if it's edited then who the fuck cares what its message is.
|
United States10549 Posts
On October 20 2016 11:23 Dan HH wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:19 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:18 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 biology]major wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote:
You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. It's a pretty direct and condemning video. It's your choice, but just know that it sounds like you would rather insulate yourself because you can't face certain truths. Its a edited hackjob bullshit video, just like the acorn one. Just because you choose to believe in conspiracy theories from the mentally unstable doesn't mean I have to give them any credence. hackjob? Describe how its a hackjob? Please, I'm genuinely curious why you view it as a "hackjob". The same way the ACORN video was a hackjob, he has 0 credibility because of that. And the closer such footage is to reality, the more idiotic it is to present it with generic truther editing switching back and forth and adding his face and commentary every other minute instead of releasing it unedited. Very few people are willing to take that seriously, as you can see.
the first 16 minute video literally had 4 interjections. the rest was actual footage.
|
On October 20 2016 11:22 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:21 Adreme wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 biology]major wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote:
You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. It's a pretty direct and condemning video. It's your choice, but just know that it sounds like you would rather insulate yourself because you can't face certain truths. When the guy has a history of doctoring footage and doctoring videos, i find it hard to accept his "truth" as 100% fact. So literal video evidence with the people who were immediately fired following the videos with direct ties to the DNC is hard to accept as fact?
They also shut down ACORN and that video turned out to be doctored. Republicans have a history of digging in when a controversy hits and Democrats have a history of throwing the party under the bus and trying to move on. There is a reason a member of the house had to resign for sending dick pics but a senator can hire prostitutes (a crime) and not have to step down and can even run again.
|
On October 20 2016 11:24 acker wrote:
Why are both of these candidates pretending they'll defeat ISIS?
What? Should they say "yeah we can't do anything about ISIS sorry guys"?
|
United States44257 Posts
On October 20 2016 11:21 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
So basically Trump has even less knowledge about Aleppo than Gary Johnson.
It's pretty obvious that Alastair Leppo was Benjamin Ghazi's friend at the Servergate.
|
wasn't ISIS an organization around like 2004 or something like that, I'm not as well-versed in terrorist groups
|
Matthew should ask himself what he and his cohorts did to the Republican Party.
|
|
|
Oh, now he criticizes his buddy? Vladimir won't like that.
|
Guys you remember those Planned Parenthood videos with hacking up fetuses? Remember how those were total bullshit? Exactly.
|
On October 20 2016 11:25 las91 wrote:
wasn't ISIS an organization around like 2004 or something like that, I'm not as well-versed in terrorist groups
No, some of them were part of Al-Qaeda in Iraq back then.
|
On October 20 2016 11:25 las91 wrote:
wasn't ISIS an organization around like 2004 or something like that, I'm not as well-versed in terrorist groups
In simple terms ISIS is basically a spin off of Al Qaeda in Iraq.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
