|
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please.In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. |
On October 20 2016 11:19 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:18 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 biology]major wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote: You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. It's a pretty direct and condemning video. It's your choice, but just know that it sounds like you would rather insulate yourself because you can't face certain truths. Its a edited hackjob bullshit video, just like the acorn one. Just because you choose to believe in conspiracy theories from the mentally unstable doesn't mean I have to give them any credence. hackjob? Describe how its a hackjob? Please, I'm genuinely curious why you view it as a "hackjob".
Take your BS someplace else.
|
United States42004 Posts
On October 20 2016 11:13 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:12 FlaShFTW wrote: So I'm guessing none of you have watched Project Veritas given the responses here. nope, didn't. I preferred Lord of the Rings. I liked the realism.
|
On October 20 2016 11:19 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:18 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 biology]major wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote: You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. It's a pretty direct and condemning video. It's your choice, but just know that it sounds like you would rather insulate yourself because you can't face certain truths. Its a edited hackjob bullshit video, just like the acorn one. Just because you choose to believe in conspiracy theories from the mentally unstable doesn't mean I have to give them any credence. hackjob? Describe how its a hackjob? Please, I'm genuinely curious why you view it as a "hackjob". Look, if O'Keefe said the sky was blue then I would literally no longer believe my own eyes.
|
Mossul->Aleppo. Johnson is blowing up right now.
|
FlashFTW, you are literally saying that the town not listening to the boy who cried wolf is the town's fault and not the boy's fault for being an idiot and a liar.
|
I honestly think Trump actually has no clue what he's saying and he's just good at parroting words and ideas.
|
On October 20 2016 11:16 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote: You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. Someone could publish the cure for cancer on Infowars and you'd still write it off. Being unable to even look at the opposing side to your beloved candidate shows ignorance.
No one will ever publish the cure for cancer on infowars.
There's a very good reason for that.
|
On October 20 2016 11:18 Nakajin wrote: Iran is taking over Irak guys!!!
And they are,
2 bad Trump is not smart enough to study this things ind depth... but yeah Iran influence is spreading through the middle east.
|
United States10047 Posts
On October 20 2016 11:18 Nevuk wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:16 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote: You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. Someone could publish the cure for cancer on Infowars and you'd still write it off. Being unable to even look at the opposing side to your beloved candidate shows ignorance. It's what happens when you burn through literally ALL possibility credibility. Infowars/Breitbart are both better sources than O'Keefe. You didn't even bother to watch the video. Why are you talking about it if you won't even bother to look?
|
On October 20 2016 11:18 ShloobeR wrote: good job Trump, bringing up Bernie
He missed adding powell's "everything she touches is ruined". That would have been 3 people, much better than 2, believe me.
|
He's actually the same words repeatedly for differing topics...
|
On October 20 2016 11:19 Stancel wrote:reminder ![[image loading]](https://espnfivethirtyeight.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/strimling-3rd-midpoint.png?w=575) trump must've doubled his count by now
I am not pro trump but that seems pretty unfair if no one can make hillary shut up once she starts going
|
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On October 20 2016 11:20 Blisse wrote: I honestly think Trump actually has no clue what he's saying and he's just good at parroting words and ideas. It's very clear he has no idea what he's saying.
|
So basically Trump has even less knowledge about Aleppo than Gary Johnson.
|
CW takes down Trump on Aleppo by himself. Hilary - 15851, Trump - 0, Wallace - 1
|
|
On October 20 2016 11:16 biology]major wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote: You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. It's a pretty direct and condemning video. It's your choice, but just know that it sounds like you would rather insulate yourself because you can't face certain truths.
When the guy has a history of doctoring footage and doctoring videos, i find it hard to accept his "truth" as 100% fact.
|
On October 20 2016 11:21 LegalLord wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:20 Blisse wrote: I honestly think Trump actually has no clue what he's saying and he's just good at parroting words and ideas. It's very clear he has no idea what he's saying. He understands that he is toast.
|
On October 20 2016 11:20 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:18 Nevuk wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote: You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. Someone could publish the cure for cancer on Infowars and you'd still write it off. Being unable to even look at the opposing side to your beloved candidate shows ignorance. It's what happens when you burn through literally ALL possibility credibility. Infowars/Breitbart are both better sources than O'Keefe. You didn't even bother to watch the video. Why are you talking about it if you won't even bother to look?
Nobody needs to talk to flat earthers to know that they're wrong, take that crap back to 4chan.
|
On October 20 2016 11:20 FlaShFTW wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2016 11:18 Nevuk wrote:On October 20 2016 11:16 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:15 OuchyDathurts wrote:On October 20 2016 11:14 FlaShFTW wrote:On October 20 2016 11:13 OuchyDathurts wrote: You guys didn't watch an edited BS video by the same dude that did the edited BS acorn video? So no, you didn't even bother to check it's legitimacy. Ok. Seems legit. Why do I bother with people who can't even at least check and verify. I don't check and verify bullshit from info wars or Glen Beck either. Someone could publish the cure for cancer on Infowars and you'd still write it off. Being unable to even look at the opposing side to your beloved candidate shows ignorance. It's what happens when you burn through literally ALL possibility credibility. Infowars/Breitbart are both better sources than O'Keefe. You didn't even bother to watch the video. Why are you talking about it if you won't even bother to look?
How do I know the earth is round when thousands of youtube videos say otherwise?
|
|
|
|