In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up!
NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action.
well I guess this debunks that clickbait gossip crap someone posted earlier from an "insider source" about Pence dropping off the ticket
oh internet never change
LMFAO "big debate win." It's almost as if the republican party and reality are complete and total strangers to one another.
it's the Trump strategy to claim you won everything no matter what actually happened and everyone has to follow his lead on that. You had every possible rightwing newssite claiming that Clinton completly crashed, burned and Trump won debate1 and we all know how that went.
On October 10 2016 13:56 Netscape9 wrote: What is with this awful poll? What if you don't support EITHER of them? Johnson and Stein fans?
Yeah the poll options are kind of whack but that doesn't matter at all if there's bots screwing it up anyway dude lol.
You think it's being manipulated?
a moderator already said that a site admin told him it was
Hahaha, who would do that? It's hillarious and very sad at the same time..
It could be Russia, but it could also be China. It could also be lots of other people. It also could be somebody sitting on their bed that weighs 400 pounds.
On October 10 2016 15:42 MasterCynical wrote: I really hope he wins and keeps his word... Hillary needs to be given a fair trial...
which word? Usually when you want someone to keep their word, it's when they say they'll do one thing, trump has many different stances on every issue, so which word do you want him to keep?
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote: Better luck next primary.
what does this even mean
You'd better look at the quote chain and not splice out that last little bit. Blisse was remarking on how stunning Trump's candidacy has been, and myself on Clinton. Can you believe this election is even close? Why isn't Hillary winning by 50 points???
On October 10 2016 15:16 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:48 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:42 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:15 Blisse wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:06 L_Master wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:04 Blisse wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:00 OuchyDathurts wrote: [quote]
His core base doesn't care about policy but his core base is inconsequential. He's got their vote wrapped up already. He's gotta get independents in his camp and they're going to want some actual adult thoughts put together.
I agree, I was just talking about how off-topic he can be and how his rhetoric can still support so many voters.
Because the vast majority of people don't vote based on policy, rationality or rhetoric. They vote based on emotions. We can even see this in debates where people routinely have different opinions on who "won" a debate is they listened to audio only or where able to watch it live.
Yes but I'm sure this is the first time a candidate can openly discriminate against multiple races, likely sexually assault numerous women while crudely and inappropriately commenting on them, fuel a hate-based campaign, allude to assassinations, encourage assault, encourage foreign hacking, and be completely ignorant of any kind of policy discussion, yet still have a significant chance of winning the presidency.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Trump somehow managed to bypass all of that.
It's the first time the left has thrown a hissy fit of this size. Fuck, if Hillary wasn't guilty of half this or Romney wasn't accused of half of this, the election wouldn't be close and for good reason.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Hillary somehow managed to bypass all of that.
Better luck next primary.
Please show some actual sources of hilary being guilty of any of this And no, breitbart and infowars don't count.
Now don't be so droll, everybody's long since made up their minds by now. I think the only win here is to keep asking until people get tired of repeating themselves. The man wants to offer up his laundry list of accusations and it's terribly funny the conclusion of "yet have a significant chance of winning the presidency." When you diagnose the problem, then find all the evidence that your diagnosis is wrong, the answer isn't to appear shocked that the evidence exists ... it's to question your diagnosis first.
Better luck next primary.
Funny, because for all this talk and probing, there has been absolutely 0 (zero) proof of corruption from Hillary, yet people like you still assume it's there while being unable to provide a single source. At the same time, you defend trump who there is actual proof of him being corrupt and breaking laws.
You're making my night. They both have proof, and it might require you opening your eyes. The starting point has been both their damaging scandals, the baby step is whether or not one rates higher on your subjective severity level, or are they rather close, or maybe even tied. Another martian lands every day from another planet and wonders why ever are Clinton's favorability ratings only ten points behind this monster-of-a-Trump and why her trustworthiness, with these zero scandals and corruption, lies below Trump.
Again, all of Hillary's scandals have 1: been created and perpetuated by the right, and 2: been thoroughly investigated and shown to actually just not be scandals but made up bullshit. As for trump, his scandals have actually uncovered actual violations. If you are unable to see this, well, I guess I can see why you are a partisan republican.
I tried several time, you are losing your time mate. Hillary definitly killed Ben Gazi, her foundation is totally corrupt (that's why it has that horrible A from charity watch) and the email server deserves death penalty and is a horrible offense because ???????
It's not about what she did, just irrational hatred and a certainty she's dishonest based on gender bias and recycled propaganda.
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote: Better luck next primary.
what does this even mean
You'd better look at the quote chain and not splice out that last little bit. Blisse was remarking on how stunning Trump's candidacy has been, and myself on Clinton. Can you believe this election is even close? Why isn't Hillary winning by 50 points???
On October 10 2016 15:16 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:48 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:42 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:15 Blisse wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:06 L_Master wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:04 Blisse wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:00 OuchyDathurts wrote: [quote]
His core base doesn't care about policy but his core base is inconsequential. He's got their vote wrapped up already. He's gotta get independents in his camp and they're going to want some actual adult thoughts put together.
I agree, I was just talking about how off-topic he can be and how his rhetoric can still support so many voters.
Because the vast majority of people don't vote based on policy, rationality or rhetoric. They vote based on emotions. We can even see this in debates where people routinely have different opinions on who "won" a debate is they listened to audio only or where able to watch it live.
Yes but I'm sure this is the first time a candidate can openly discriminate against multiple races, likely sexually assault numerous women while crudely and inappropriately commenting on them, fuel a hate-based campaign, allude to assassinations, encourage assault, encourage foreign hacking, and be completely ignorant of any kind of policy discussion, yet still have a significant chance of winning the presidency.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Trump somehow managed to bypass all of that.
It's the first time the left has thrown a hissy fit of this size. Fuck, if Hillary wasn't guilty of half this or Romney wasn't accused of half of this, the election wouldn't be close and for good reason.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Hillary somehow managed to bypass all of that.
Better luck next primary.
Please show some actual sources of hilary being guilty of any of this And no, breitbart and infowars don't count.
Now don't be so droll, everybody's long since made up their minds by now. I think the only win here is to keep asking until people get tired of repeating themselves. The man wants to offer up his laundry list of accusations and it's terribly funny the conclusion of "yet have a significant chance of winning the presidency." When you diagnose the problem, then find all the evidence that your diagnosis is wrong, the answer isn't to appear shocked that the evidence exists ... it's to question your diagnosis first.
Better luck next primary.
Funny, because for all this talk and probing, there has been absolutely 0 (zero) proof of corruption from Hillary, yet people like you still assume it's there while being unable to provide a single source. At the same time, you defend trump who there is actual proof of him being corrupt and breaking laws.
You're making my night. They both have proof, and it might require you opening your eyes. The starting point has been both their damaging scandals, the baby step is whether or not one rates higher on your subjective severity level, or are they rather close, or maybe even tied. Another martian lands every day from another planet and wonders why ever are Clinton's favorability ratings only ten points behind this monster-of-a-Trump and why her trustworthiness, with these zero scandals and corruption, lies below Trump.
Again, all of Hillary's scandals have 1: been created and perpetuated by the right, and 2: been thoroughly investigated and shown to actually just not be scandals but made up bullshit. As for trump, his scandals have actually uncovered actual violations. If you are unable to see this, well, I guess I can see why you are a partisan republican.
I did need this bit of humor tonight, thanks for playing.
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote: Better luck next primary.
what does this even mean
You'd better look at the quote chain and not splice out that last little bit. Blisse was remarking on how stunning Trump's candidacy has been, and myself on Clinton. Can you believe this election is even close? Why isn't Hillary winning by 50 points???
On October 10 2016 15:16 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:48 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:42 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:15 Blisse wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:06 L_Master wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:04 Blisse wrote: [quote]
I agree, I was just talking about how off-topic he can be and how his rhetoric can still support so many voters.
Because the vast majority of people don't vote based on policy, rationality or rhetoric. They vote based on emotions. We can even see this in debates where people routinely have different opinions on who "won" a debate is they listened to audio only or where able to watch it live.
Yes but I'm sure this is the first time a candidate can openly discriminate against multiple races, likely sexually assault numerous women while crudely and inappropriately commenting on them, fuel a hate-based campaign, allude to assassinations, encourage assault, encourage foreign hacking, and be completely ignorant of any kind of policy discussion, yet still have a significant chance of winning the presidency.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Trump somehow managed to bypass all of that.
It's the first time the left has thrown a hissy fit of this size. Fuck, if Hillary wasn't guilty of half this or Romney wasn't accused of half of this, the election wouldn't be close and for good reason.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Hillary somehow managed to bypass all of that.
Better luck next primary.
Please show some actual sources of hilary being guilty of any of this And no, breitbart and infowars don't count.
Now don't be so droll, everybody's long since made up their minds by now. I think the only win here is to keep asking until people get tired of repeating themselves. The man wants to offer up his laundry list of accusations and it's terribly funny the conclusion of "yet have a significant chance of winning the presidency." When you diagnose the problem, then find all the evidence that your diagnosis is wrong, the answer isn't to appear shocked that the evidence exists ... it's to question your diagnosis first.
Better luck next primary.
Funny, because for all this talk and probing, there has been absolutely 0 (zero) proof of corruption from Hillary, yet people like you still assume it's there while being unable to provide a single source. At the same time, you defend trump who there is actual proof of him being corrupt and breaking laws.
You're making my night. They both have proof, and it might require you opening your eyes. The starting point has been both their damaging scandals, the baby step is whether or not one rates higher on your subjective severity level, or are they rather close, or maybe even tied. Another martian lands every day from another planet and wonders why ever are Clinton's favorability ratings only ten points behind this monster-of-a-Trump and why her trustworthiness, with these zero scandals and corruption, lies below Trump.
Again, all of Hillary's scandals have 1: been created and perpetuated by the right, and 2: been thoroughly investigated and shown to actually just not be scandals but made up bullshit. As for trump, his scandals have actually uncovered actual violations. If you are unable to see this, well, I guess I can see why you are a partisan republican.
I did need this bit of humor tonight, thanks for playing.
If you'd like to actually answer anything that was said, you have the floor.
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote: Better luck next primary.
what does this even mean
You'd better look at the quote chain and not splice out that last little bit. Blisse was remarking on how stunning Trump's candidacy has been, and myself on Clinton. Can you believe this election is even close? Why isn't Hillary winning by 50 points???
On October 10 2016 15:16 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:48 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:42 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:15 Blisse wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:06 L_Master wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:04 Blisse wrote: [quote]
I agree, I was just talking about how off-topic he can be and how his rhetoric can still support so many voters.
Because the vast majority of people don't vote based on policy, rationality or rhetoric. They vote based on emotions. We can even see this in debates where people routinely have different opinions on who "won" a debate is they listened to audio only or where able to watch it live.
Yes but I'm sure this is the first time a candidate can openly discriminate against multiple races, likely sexually assault numerous women while crudely and inappropriately commenting on them, fuel a hate-based campaign, allude to assassinations, encourage assault, encourage foreign hacking, and be completely ignorant of any kind of policy discussion, yet still have a significant chance of winning the presidency.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Trump somehow managed to bypass all of that.
It's the first time the left has thrown a hissy fit of this size. Fuck, if Hillary wasn't guilty of half this or Romney wasn't accused of half of this, the election wouldn't be close and for good reason.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Hillary somehow managed to bypass all of that.
Better luck next primary.
Please show some actual sources of hilary being guilty of any of this And no, breitbart and infowars don't count.
Now don't be so droll, everybody's long since made up their minds by now. I think the only win here is to keep asking until people get tired of repeating themselves. The man wants to offer up his laundry list of accusations and it's terribly funny the conclusion of "yet have a significant chance of winning the presidency." When you diagnose the problem, then find all the evidence that your diagnosis is wrong, the answer isn't to appear shocked that the evidence exists ... it's to question your diagnosis first.
Better luck next primary.
Funny, because for all this talk and probing, there has been absolutely 0 (zero) proof of corruption from Hillary, yet people like you still assume it's there while being unable to provide a single source. At the same time, you defend trump who there is actual proof of him being corrupt and breaking laws.
You're making my night. They both have proof, and it might require you opening your eyes. The starting point has been both their damaging scandals, the baby step is whether or not one rates higher on your subjective severity level, or are they rather close, or maybe even tied. Another martian lands every day from another planet and wonders why ever are Clinton's favorability ratings only ten points behind this monster-of-a-Trump and why her trustworthiness, with these zero scandals and corruption, lies below Trump.
Again, all of Hillary's scandals have 1: been created and perpetuated by the right, and 2: been thoroughly investigated and shown to actually just not be scandals but made up bullshit. As for trump, his scandals have actually uncovered actual violations. If you are unable to see this, well, I guess I can see why you are a partisan republican.
I did need this bit of humor tonight, thanks for playing.
You're welcome, I guess it's only fair given how much laughter I've gotten from your posts over the last few years.
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote: Better luck next primary.
what does this even mean
You'd better look at the quote chain and not splice out that last little bit. Blisse was remarking on how stunning Trump's candidacy has been, and myself on Clinton. Can you believe this election is even close? Why isn't Hillary winning by 50 points???
On October 10 2016 15:16 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 15:15 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:48 hunts wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:42 Danglars wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:15 Blisse wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:06 L_Master wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:04 Blisse wrote: [quote]
I agree, I was just talking about how off-topic he can be and how his rhetoric can still support so many voters.
Because the vast majority of people don't vote based on policy, rationality or rhetoric. They vote based on emotions. We can even see this in debates where people routinely have different opinions on who "won" a debate is they listened to audio only or where able to watch it live.
Yes but I'm sure this is the first time a candidate can openly discriminate against multiple races, likely sexually assault numerous women while crudely and inappropriately commenting on them, fuel a hate-based campaign, allude to assassinations, encourage assault, encourage foreign hacking, and be completely ignorant of any kind of policy discussion, yet still have a significant chance of winning the presidency.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Trump somehow managed to bypass all of that.
It's the first time the left has thrown a hissy fit of this size. Fuck, if Hillary wasn't guilty of half this or Romney wasn't accused of half of this, the election wouldn't be close and for good reason.
We will vote based on emotions, but generally we all still have bloody standards for people in charge. Hillary somehow managed to bypass all of that.
Better luck next primary.
Please show some actual sources of hilary being guilty of any of this And no, breitbart and infowars don't count.
Now don't be so droll, everybody's long since made up their minds by now. I think the only win here is to keep asking until people get tired of repeating themselves. The man wants to offer up his laundry list of accusations and it's terribly funny the conclusion of "yet have a significant chance of winning the presidency." When you diagnose the problem, then find all the evidence that your diagnosis is wrong, the answer isn't to appear shocked that the evidence exists ... it's to question your diagnosis first.
Better luck next primary.
Funny, because for all this talk and probing, there has been absolutely 0 (zero) proof of corruption from Hillary, yet people like you still assume it's there while being unable to provide a single source. At the same time, you defend trump who there is actual proof of him being corrupt and breaking laws.
You're making my night. They both have proof, and it might require you opening your eyes. The starting point has been both their damaging scandals, the baby step is whether or not one rates higher on your subjective severity level, or are they rather close, or maybe even tied. Another martian lands every day from another planet and wonders why ever are Clinton's favorability ratings only ten points behind this monster-of-a-Trump and why her trustworthiness, with these zero scandals and corruption, lies below Trump.
Again, all of Hillary's scandals have 1: been created and perpetuated by the right, and 2: been thoroughly investigated and shown to actually just not be scandals but made up bullshit. As for trump, his scandals have actually uncovered actual violations. If you are unable to see this, well, I guess I can see why you are a partisan republican.
I did need this bit of humor tonight, thanks for playing.
The problem and what's actually quite funny mate, is that you can't answer.
You guys have been gesticulating for months about corrupt Hillary and when someone tells you "wait a sec, can you develop?" you just have absolutely nothing to say.
Ye, ok. The email thing. That was a big mistake very uncautious. She shouldn't have used the wrong server. Ok. She answered terribly, minimized it. True too. Nobody has ever managed to explain to me what was the criminal intention in using a wrong server (it's just s bit stupid) but nevermind.
That's it? I mean really, you guys have been breaking our balls for like 3000 pages over that?
I watched full frontal with Samantha Bee. Her segment on Trump Supporters was spot on. For fucks sake there was one guy stating he was going to prevent Democrats from rigging polls by rigging polls himself.
EPT
And no, breitbart and infowars don't count.
