US Politics Mega-thread - Page 4467
Forum Index > Closed |
Read the rules in the OP before posting, please. In order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a re-read to refresh your memory! The vast majority of you are contributing in a healthy way, keep it up! NOTE: When providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion if it's not obvious. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments can result in a mod action. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
| ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:47 farvacola wrote: lol, "what about applause break" sums up precisely why conservatives do not understand what LBGT people want out of politics. But the RNC clapped for gays, isn't that enough? But guys, we clapped at a man who said that we didn't think you should be murdered for being gay. Why isn't that enough? Why can't you be happy with us now coming around to the idea that you shouldn't die for being gay? Marriage is between a man and a woman. | ||
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
| ||
GreenHorizons
United States23307 Posts
| ||
Vin{MBL}
5185 Posts
| ||
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:51 bo1b wrote: Hey guys did you all know that Hillary is a woman? I don't get this, it is okay to run a whole campaign against Mexicans and Muslims but when you're talking about how you're empowering a group of people you're doing something wrong? Is identity politics only acceptable if you list the groups you hate? | ||
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
| ||
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:54 Nyxisto wrote: I don't get this, it is okay to run a whole campaign against Mexicans and Muslims but when you're talking about how you're empowering a group of people you're doing something wrong? Is identity politics only acceptable if you list the groups you hate? That isn't the campaign but ok | ||
LegalLord
United Kingdom13775 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:51 bo1b wrote: Hey guys did you all know that Hillary is a woman? Well that conclusively proves she isn't part of the establishment. | ||
![]()
Nakajin
Canada8989 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:53 Vin{MBL} wrote: Why the fuck couldn't they make Bernie VP? You probably don't want to work with someone that spend the last year trying to put you down (from both side). And also clear policy difference. | ||
bo1b
Australia12814 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:54 Nyxisto wrote: I don't get this, it is okay to run a whole campaign against Mexicans and Muslims but when you're talking about how you're empowering a group of people you're doing something wrong? Is identity politics only acceptable if you list the groups you hate? The obvious point is that it's terrible when Trump does it, it's just as terrible when the entire democratic party seems to be tripping over themselves to remind the world of Hillary's genitals. | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
| ||
Lord Tolkien
United States12083 Posts
Unfortunately it won't so meh. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:54 Nyxisto wrote: I don't get this, it is okay to run a whole campaign against Mexicans and Muslims but when you're talking about how you're empowering a group of people you're doing something wrong? Is identity politics only acceptable if you list the groups you hate? They are just mad that they can't play the identity politics game. No one cares if you are a Mr. White Trust fund baby. Guaranteed to be successful unless you fuck up big time or your parents are literal lunatics. | ||
Livelovedie
United States492 Posts
| ||
Nyxisto
Germany6287 Posts
He's running a platform of economic protectionism, wants to build a literal wall, impose law and order, keep people out of the country on all fronts, withdraw from international organisations. etc... That literally is the whole campaign. Every single topic aims to divide. What positive or unifying message is Trump presenting on any topic? | ||
GreenHorizons
United States23307 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:54 ticklishmusic wrote: yeah shame about those 17m votes that outweigh enthusiasm You really just don't get it. No question Bernie would get more of Hillary's votes than Hillary will get of Bernie's. Strictly from a strategic point of view it's the smarter choice. | ||
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:56 Nevuk wrote: Why did I only just now realize that the bernie supporters are like the democratic analogue to the tea party, but young and not going to die out anytime soon? Welcome to the reality we have all be living. And it is a small subset of Bernie supporters, to be fair. From reports teh boos are coming from like 50 people in the back. They pick it up every time it is quite. | ||
biology]major
United States2253 Posts
| ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On July 26 2016 11:58 GreenHorizons wrote: You really just don't get it. No question Bernie would get more of Hillary's votes than Hillary will get of Bernie's. Strictly from a strategic point of view it's the smarter choice. Eh, I don't really think that's true. I'm pretty sure Bernie would get more votes, but it wouldn't be because of that, it would be because all the independents/nevertrumps who refuse to vote Clinton are more willing to vote him. | ||
| ||